8 found
Sort by:
  1. John T. Blackmore, Ryōichi Itagaki & S. Tanaka (eds.) (2010). Ernst Mach's Graz (1864-1867): Where Much Science and Philosophy Were Developed. Distributed by Enfield Publishing and Distribution Co..
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. John T. Blackmore, Ryōichi Itagaki & S. Tanaka (eds.) (2009). Ernst Mach's Influence Spreads. Distributed by Enfield Pub. And Distribution Co..
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. John T. Blackmore (2006). Three Autobiographical Manuscripts by Ernst Mach. Annals of Science 35 (4):401-418.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. N. C. A. Costdaa, David Harrah, Michael Tye, D. S. Clarke, Jeffrey Olen, Robert Young, Richard Campbell, Michael McKinsey, John Peterson, Alex C. Michalos, John Glucker, John T. Blackmore, Eileen Bagus & Barbara Goodwin (1985). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] Philosophia 15 (1-2):279-281.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. John T. Blackmore (1983). Philosophy as Part of Internal History of Science. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 13:17-46.
    The primary purpose of the paper is to try to prove that it is impossible to write or understand history without making epistemological and ontological assumptions, In particular assumptions about whether physical objects and processes are within or beyond the limits of what can be made empirical or conscious.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. John T. Blackmore (1983). Should We Abolish the Distinction Between Science and Metaphysics? Philosophia 12 (3-4):393-400.
    The distinction between science and metaphysics tends to be invidious and is often used to set up a prejudice against foundation theory in general and indirect realism in particular. It should probably be replaced by distinctions between idealized and non-Idealized science on the one side and direct and indirect foundation theory on the other.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. John T. Blackmore (1978). Discussion Notes: IS planck'S ‘PRINCIPLE’ TRUE? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (4):347-349.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. John T. Blackmore (1978). Is Planck's 'Principle' True? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (4):347-349.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation