11 found
Order:
  1.  3
    John T. Blackmore (2006). Three Autobiographical Manuscripts by Ernst Mach. Annals of Science 35 (4):401-418.
    This paper is a collection of original source material for the use of all scholars interested in understanding Ernst Mach's life as an aid to comprehending his unique and controversial impact on the development of modern physics and both the history and philosophy of science. The documents are complete; and to encourage points of view other than my own, I have listed a number of very recent articles in my footnotes which reflect a wide spectrum of opinion on Ernst Mach (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2.  1
    John T. Blackmore (1983). Philosophy as Part of Internal History of Science. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 13 (1):17-46.
    The primary purpose of the paper is to try to prove that it is impossible to write or understand history without making epistemological and ontological assumptions, In particular assumptions about whether physical objects and processes are within or beyond the limits of what can be made empirical or conscious.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3.  16
    John T. Blackmore (1983). Should We Abolish the Distinction Between Science and Metaphysics? Philosophia 12 (3-4):393-400.
    The distinction between science and metaphysics tends to be invidious and is often used to set up a prejudice against foundation theory in general and indirect realism in particular. It should probably be replaced by distinctions between idealized and non-Idealized science on the one side and direct and indirect foundation theory on the other.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  15
    N. C. A. Costa, David Harrah, Michael Tye, D. S. Clarke, Jeffrey Olen, Robert Young, Richard Campbell, Michael McKinsey, John Peterson, Alex C. Michalos, John Glucker, John T. Blackmore, Eileen Bagus & Barbara Goodwin (1985). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] Philosophia 15 (1-2):279-281.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  11
    John T. Blackmore (1978). Is Planck's 'Principle' True? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (4):347-349.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  5
    John T. Blackmore (1978). Discussion Notes: IS planck'S ‘PRINCIPLE’ TRUE? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (4):347-349.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. John T. Blackmore (1992). Ernst Mach-a Deeper Look Documents and New Perspectives.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. John T. Blackmore, Ryōichi Itagaki & S. Tanaka (eds.) (2010). Ernst Mach's Graz (1864-1867): Where Much Science and Philosophy Were Developed. Distributed by Enfield Publishing and Distribution Co..
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. John T. Blackmore, Ryōichi Itagaki & S. Tanaka (eds.) (2009). Ernst Mach's Influence Spreads. Distributed by Enfield Pub. And Distribution Co..
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. John T. Blackmore, R. Itagaki & S. Tanaka (2001). Ernst Mach's Vienna, 1895-1930, or, Phenomenalism as Philosophy of Science.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Ernst Mach, John T. Blackmore & Klaus Hentschel (1985). Ernst Mach Als Aussenseiter Machs Briefwechsel Über Philosophie Und Relativitätstheorie Mit Persönlichkeiten Seiner Zeit.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography