14 found
Sort by:
  1. John W. Bender (2003). Skepticism, Justification and the Trustworthiness Argument. In Olsson Erik (ed.), The Epistemology of Keith Lehrer. Kluwer. 263--280.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. John W. Bender (2001). Sensitivity, Sensibility, and Aesthetic Realism. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 59 (1):73-83.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. John W. Bender (2000). Real Beauty. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (3):714-717.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. John W. Bender (1998). Elizabeth Telfer, Food for Thought Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 18 (1):69-72.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. John W. Bender (1997). On Shiner's "Hume and the Causal Theory of Taste". Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 55 (3):317-320.
  6. John W. Bender (1996). Realism, Supervenience, and Irresolvable Aesthetic Disputes. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 54 (4):371-381.
  7. John W. Bender (1995). General but Defeasible Reasons in Aesthetic Evaluation: The Particularist/Generalist Dispute. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53 (4):379-392.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. John W. Bender (1993). Deane Curtin and Lisa Heldke Eds., Cooking, Eating, Thinking: Transformative Philosophies of Food Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 13 (6):300-302.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. John W. Bender & H. Gene Blocker (1993). Contemporary Philosophy of Art Readings in Analytic Aesthetics.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. John W. Bender (1992). Unreckoned Misleading Truths and Lehrer's Theory of Undefeated Justification. Journal of Philosophical Research 17:465-481.
    According to Keith Lehrer’s coherence theory, knowledge is true acceptance whose justification is undefeated by a falsehood. It has recently become clear that Lehrer’s handling of important Gettier-inspired problems depends upon his position that only falsehoods accepted by the subject can act as defeaters of knowledge. I argue against this and present an example in which an unreckoned truth---one neither believed nor believed to be false by the subject---defeats knowledge. I trace the negative implications of this matter for the coherence (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Wayne A. Davis & John W. Bender (1989). Technical Flaws in the Coherence Theory. Synthese 79 (2):257 - 278.
    We have argued that Lehrer's definitions of coherence and justification have serious technical defects. As a result, the definition of justification is both too weak and too strong. We have suggested solutions for some of the problems, but others seem irremediable. We would also argue more generally that if coherence is anything like what Lehrer's theory says it is, then coherence is neither necessary nor sufficient for justification. While our current objections are directed at the ‘letter’ of Lehrer's theory, other (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. John W. Bender (1988). Knowledge, Justification and Lehrer's Theory of Coherence. Philosophical Studies 54 (3):355 - 381.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. John W. Bender (1988). Knotty, Knotty: Comments on Nelson's The New World Knot. In Perspectives On Mind. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. John W. Bender (1988). Perspectives On Mind. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation