30 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Jonathan Gorman [27]Jonathan L. Gorman [3]
See also:
Profile: Jonathan Lamb Gorman (Queen's University, Belfast)
  1.  4
    Jonathan Gorman (2003). Rights and Reason. Acumen/McGill-Queen's University Press.
    In "Rights and Reason", Jonathan Gorman sets discussion of the 'rights debate' within a wide-ranging philosophical and historical framework. Drawing on positions in epistemology, metaphysics and the theory of human nature as well as on the ideas of canonical thinkers, Gorman provides an introduction to the philosophy of rights that is firmly grounded in the history of philosophy as well as the concerns of contemporary political and legal philosophy. The book gives readers a clear sense that, just as there are (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  2.  52
    Jonathan Gorman (2010). The Grammar of Historiography. Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 3:45-53.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  14
    Jonathan L. Gorman (2001). Justice and Toleration. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 11:43-50.
    Are there independent standards of justice by which we are to measure our activities, or is justice itself to be understood in relativistic terms that vary with locality or historical period? I wish to examine briefly how far two inconsistent positions can both be accepted. I suggest that perhaps our ordinary understanding of reality itself—and in particular political reality—is essentially the outcome of a time of contest, and that there are areas of political reality where matters may be best seen (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  52
    Jonathan Gorman (2009). Law as a Moral Idea • by Nigel Simmonds. Analysis 69 (2):395-397.
    This is a pugnacious book, born of ancient controversy and attempting to return the debate to a time before the central jurisprudential questions were set by Hart and other legal positivists. Simmonds addresses those familiar with current analytical philosophy of law: those of us who know our Hart, Fuller, Dworkin, Raz, MacCormick and Kramer, and who perhaps need to have our attention drawn to Plato, Aristotle, Grotius, Hobbes and Kant. Presuming an informed readership, there is no bibliography, and it incorporates (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  7
    Jonathan Gorman (1999). On Hedgehogs and Foxes. Philosophical Inquiry 21 (1):61-86.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  19
    Jonathan Gorman (2009). Allan Megill's Historical Knowledge, Historical Error: A Contemporary Guide to Practice. Journal of the Philosophy of History 3 (1):79-89.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  7
    Jonathan Gorman (2011). The Normativity of Logic in the History of Ideas. Intellectual History Review 21 (1):3-13.
    (2011). The Normativity of Logic in the History of Ideas. Intellectual History Review: Vol. 21, Post-Analytic Hermeneutics: Themes from Mark Bevir's Philosophy of History, pp. 3-13. doi: 10.1080/17496977.2011.546631.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  14
    Jonathan L. Gorman (1991). Some Astonishing Things. Metaphilosophy 22 (1-2):28-40.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  5
    Jonathan Gorman (2004). Historians and Their Duties. History and Theory 43 (4):103-117.
    We need to specify what ethical responsibility historians, as historians, owe, and to whom. We should distinguish between natural duties and (non-natural) obligations, and recognize that historians' ethical responsibility is of the latter kind. We can discover this responsibility by using the concept of “accountability”. Historical knowledge is central. Historians' central ethical responsibility is that they ought to tell the objective truth. This is not a duty shared with everybody, for the right to truth varies with the audience. Being a (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  9
    Jonathan Gorman (1995). For Tolerance. Philosophy Now 12:22-23.
  11.  3
    Jonathan Gorman (2009). Historical Knowledge, Historical Error: A Contemporary Guide to Practice. Journal of the Philosophy of History 3 (1):79-89.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  7
    Jonathan Gorman (2004). Convergence to Agreement. History and Theory 43 (1):107–116.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  8
    Jonathan Gorman (2005). Our Knowledge of the Past: A Philosophy of Historiography by Aviezer Tucker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Pp. VII + 291. £45.00. [REVIEW] Philosophy 80 (2):292-300.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  5
    Jonathan Gorman (2003). Political Philosophy. [REVIEW] Philosophical Books 44 (2):183-187.
  15.  5
    Jonathan Gorman (2007). The Commonplaces of "Revision" and Their Implications for Historiographical Understanding. History and Theory 46 (4):20–44.
    Recognizing the contingent entanglement between historiography's social and political roles and the conception of the discipline as purely factual, this essay provides a detailed analysis of "revision" and its connection to "revisionism." This analysis uses a philosophical approach that begins with the commonplaces of our understanding as expressed in dictionaries, which are compared and contrasted to display relevant confusions. The essay then turns to examining the questions posed by History and Theory's Call for Papers announcing its Theme Issue on Revision (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Jonathan Gorman (2009). George Pavlakos's Our Knowledge of the Law: Objectivity and Practice in Legal Theory. [REVIEW] Social and Legal Studies 18:568-570.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Jonathan Gorman, Historians and Their Duties.
    We need to specify what ethical responsibility historians, as historians, owe, and to whom. We should distinguish between natural duties and obligations, and recognize that historians' ethical responsibility is of the latter kind. We can discover this responsibility by using the concept of “accountability”. Historical knowledge is central. Historians' central ethical responsibility is that they ought to tell the objective truth. This is not a duty shared with everybody, for the right to truth varies with the audience. Being a historian (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Jonathan Gorman (2007). Historical Judgement. Acumen/McGill-Queen's University Press.
    The historical profession is not noted for examining its own methodologies. Indeed, most historians are averse to historical theory. In "Historical Judgement" Jonathan Gorman's response to this state of affairs is to argue that if we want to characterize a discipline, we need to look to persons who successfully occupy the role of being practitioners of that discipline. So to model historiography we must do so from the views of historians. Gorman begins by showing what it is to model a (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Jonathan Gorman (2008). Historical Judgement. Mcgill-Queen's University Press.
    The historical profession is not noted for examining its own methodologies. Indeed, most historians are averse to historical theory. In "Historical Judgement" Jonathan Gorman's response to this state of affairs is to argue that if we want to characterize a discipline, we need to look to persons who successfully occupy the role of being practitioners of that discipline. So to model historiography we must do so from the views of historians. Gorman begins by showing what it is to model a (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Jonathan Gorman (2008). Historical Judgement. Mcgill-Queen's University Press.
    The historical profession is not noted for examining its own methodologies. Indeed, most historians are averse to historical theory. In "Historical Judgement" Jonathan Gorman's response to this state of affairs is to argue that if we want to characterize a discipline, we need to look to persons who successfully occupy the role of being practitioners of that discipline. So to model historiography we must do so from the views of historians. Gorman begins by showing what it is to model a (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Jonathan Gorman (2014). Historical Judgement. Routledge.
    The historical profession is not noted for examining its own methodologies. Indeed, most historians are averse to historical theory. In "Historical Judgement" Jonathan Gorman's response to this state of affairs is to argue that if we want to characterize a discipline, we need to look to persons who successfully occupy the role of being practitioners of that discipline. So to model historiography we must do so from the views of historians. Gorman begins by showing what it is to model a (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Jonathan Gorman (2007). Historical Judgement: The Limits of Historiographical Choice. Routledge.
    The historical profession is not noted for examining its own methodologies. Indeed, most historians are averse to historical theory. In "Historical Judgement" Jonathan Gorman's response to this state of affairs is to argue that if we want to characterize a discipline, we need to look to persons who successfully occupy the role of being practitioners of that discipline. So to model historiography we must do so from the views of historians. Gorman begins by showing what it is to model a (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Jonathan Gorman (2010). Peter Charles Hoffer's The Historians' Paradox: The Study of History in Our Time. [REVIEW] American Historical Review 115:186.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Jonathan Gorman (2014). Rights and Reason: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Rights. Routledge.
    In "Rights and Reason", Jonathan Gorman sets discussion of the 'rights debate' within a wide-ranging philosophical and historical framework. Drawing on positions in epistemology, metaphysics and the theory of human nature as well as on the ideas of canonical thinkers, Gorman provides an introduction to the philosophy of rights that is firmly grounded in the history of philosophy as well as the concerns of contemporary political and legal philosophy. The book gives readers a clear sense that, just as there are (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Jonathan Gorman (2003). Rights and Reason: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Rights. Mcgill-Queen's University Press.
    In "Rights and Reason", Jonathan Gorman sets discussion of the 'rights debate' within a wide-ranging philosophical and historical framework. Drawing on positions in epistemology, metaphysics and the theory of human nature as well as on the ideas of canonical thinkers, Gorman provides an introduction to the philosophy of rights that is firmly grounded in the history of philosophy as well as the concerns of contemporary political and legal philosophy. The book gives readers a clear sense that, just as there are (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Jonathan Gorman (2005). Review: Reviews. [REVIEW] Philosophy 80 (312):292 - 300.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Jonathan L. Gorman (1997). Truth and Toleration. In Sirkku Hellsten, Marjaana Kopperi & Olli Loukola (eds.), Taking the Liberal Challenge Seriously: Essays on Contemporary Liberalism at the Turn of the 21st Century. Ashgate 221.
  28. Jonathan Gorman, The Commonplaces of 'Revision' and Their Implications for Historiographical Understanding.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  4
    Jonathan Gorman (1992). Understanding History. University of Ottawa Press.
    The problem of justifying historical methodologies is first set in the wider context of the philosophical problem of knowledge, then lucidly explained and ...
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Jonathan Gorman (1992). Understanding History an Introduction to Analytical Philosophy of History. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography