6 found
Sort by:
See also:
Profile: Jonathan Robert Parker (Miyazaki International College)
  1. J. Baird Callicott, Jonathan Parker, Jordan Batson, Nathan Bell & Keith Brown (2011). The Other in A Sand County Almanac. Environmental Ethics 33 (2):115-146.
    Much philosophical attention has been devoted to “The Land Ethic,” especially by Anglo-American philosophers, but little has been paid to A Sand County Almanac as a whole. Read through the lens of continental philosophy, A Sand County Almanac promulgates an evolutionary-ecological world view and effects a personal self- and a species-specific Self-transformation in its audience. It’s author, Aldo Leopold, realizes these aims through descriptive reflection that has something in common with phenomenology-although Leopold was by no stretch of the imagination a (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Robert Frodeman & Jonathan Parker (2011). Intellectual Merit and Broader Impact: The National Science Foundation's Broader Impacts Criterion and the Question of Peer Review. Social Epistemology 23 (3):337-345.
    Over the last 300 years science has been quite successful at revealing the nature of physical reality. In so doing it has provided an epistemological basis for scientific discovery and technological innovation. But science has been decidedly less successful at guiding political debate. How do we conceive of the science-society relation in the 21st century? How does scientific research hook onto the world in a multi-faceted, pluralistic, and global age? This essay seeks to reframe our thinking about the broader impacts (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Jonathan Parker, Bridget Penhale & David Stanley (2011). Research Ethics Review: Social Care and Social Science Research and the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Ethics and Social Welfare 5 (4):380-400.
    This paper considers concerns that social care research may be stifled by health-focused ethical scrutiny under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and the requirement for an ?appropriate body? to determine ethical approval for research involving people who are deemed to lack capacity under the Act to make decisions concerning their participation and consent in research. The current study comprised an online survey of current practice in university research ethics committees (URECs), and explored through semi-structured interviews the views of social researchers (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Jonathan Parker (2010). Comments on William Grove-Fanning's “Biodiversity Loss, the Motivational Gap, and the Failure of Conservation Education”. Southwest Philosophy Review 26 (2):29-32.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Robert Frodeman & Jonathan Parker (2009). Intellectual Merit and Broader Impact: The National Science Foundation's Broader Impacts Criterion and the Question of Peer Review. Social Epistemology 23 (3):337-345.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Jonathan Parker (2009). Onto-Ethologies. Environmental Philosophy 6 (1):113-116.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation