Search results for 'Joroen Groenendijk' (try it on Scholar)

49 found
Sort by:
  1. Joroen Groenendijk & Martin Stokhof (1982). Semantic Analysis of Wh-Complements. Linguistics and Philosophy 5 (2):175 - 233.score: 240.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Jeroen Groenendijk & Martin Stokhof (1991). Dynamic Predicate Logic. Linguistics and Philosophy 14 (1):39-100.score: 30.0
    This paper is devoted to the formulation and investigation of a dynamic semantic interpretation of the language of first-order predicate logic. The resulting system, which will be referred to as ‘dynamic predicate logic’, is intended as a first step towards a compositional, non-representational theory of discourse semantics. In the last decade, various theories of discourse semantics have emerged within the paradigm of model-theoretic semantics. A common feature of these theories is a tendency to do away with the principle of compositionality, (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Jeroen Groenendijk & Martin Stokhof, Interrogatives and Adverbs of Quantification.score: 30.0
    This paper is about a topic in the semantics of interrogatives.1 In what follows a number of assumptions figure at the background which, though intuitively appealing, have not gone unchallenged, and it seems therefore only fair to draw the reader’s attention to them at the outset. The first assumption concerns a very global intuition about the kind of semantic objects that we associate with interrogatives. The intuition is that there is an intimate relationship between interrogatives and their answers: an interrogative (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Doret J. de Ruyter & Leendert F. Groenendijk (2010). Learning From Seneca: A Stoic Perspective on the Art of Living and Education. Ethics and Education 4 (1):81-92.score: 30.0
    There is an increasing interest in publications about the sources of meaning in life; books about the art of living are immensely popular. This article discusses whether one of the ancient predecessors of current 'art of living' theories, the Stoa and more particularly Seneca, can be of interest to educators today. Seneca's explicit writings on education are relatively few, but in his letters to his friend Lucilius we find several ideas as to how educators can assist students to become wise (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Jeroen Groenendijk & Martin Stokhof, Partitioning Logical Space.score: 30.0
    In the present version of these lecture notes only a number of typos and a few glaring mistakes have been corrected. Thanks to Paul Dekker for his help in this respect. No attempt has been been made to update the original text or to incorporate new insights and approaches. For a more recent overview, see our ‘Questions’ in the Handbook of Logic and Language (edited by Johan van Benthem and Alice ter Meulen, Elsevier, 1997).
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Jeroen Groenendijk & Martin Stokhof (2005). Why Compositionality? In Greg N. Carlson & Francis Jeffry Pelletier (eds.), Reference and Quantification: The Partee Effect. Csli. 83--106.score: 30.0
    The paper identifies some background assumptions of compositionality in formal semantics and investigates how they shape formal semantics as a scientific discipline.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. J. A. G. Groenendijk, T. M. V. Janssen & M. J. B. Stokhof (eds.) (1984). Truth, Interpretation, and Information: Selected Papers From the Third Amsterdam Colloquium. Foris Publications.score: 30.0
    A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation Hans Kamp. INTRODUCTION Two conceptions of meaning have dominated formal semantics of natural language. ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. J. A. G. Groenendijk, Dick de Jongh & M. J. B. Stokhof (eds.) (1986/1987). Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers. Foris Publications.score: 30.0
    Semantic Automata Johan van Ben them. INTRODUCTION An attractive, but never very central idea in modern semantics has been to regard linguistic expressions ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Frank Veltman, Jeroen Groenendijk & Martin Stokhof (1996). This Might Be It. In Dag Westerstahl & Jeremy Seligman (eds.), Language, Logic, and Computation: the 1994 Moraga Proceedings. CSLI. 255--70.score: 30.0
    Discussions often end before the issues that started them have been resolved. For example, in the late sixties and early seventies, a hot topic in philosophical logic was the development of an adequate semantics for the language of modal predicate logic. However, the result of this discussion was not one single system that met with general agreement, but a collection of alternative systems, each defended most ably by its proponents.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Jeroen Groenendijk & Martin Stokhof (2000). Meaning in Motion. In Klaus von Heusinger & Urs Egli (eds.), Reference and Anaphoric Relations. Kluwer. 47--78.score: 30.0
    The paper sketches the place of dynamic semantics within a broader picture of developments in philosophical and linguistic theories of meaning. Some basic concepts of dynamic semantics are illustrated by means of a detailed analysis of anaphoric definite and indefinite descriptions, which are treated as contextually dependent quantificational expressions. It is shown how a dynamic view sheds new light on the contextual nature of interpretation, on the difference between monologue and dialogue, and on the interplay between direct and indirect information.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Ivano Ciardelli, Jeroen Groenendijk & Floris Roelofsen (2013). On the Semantics and Logic of Declaratives and Interrogatives. Synthese:1-40.score: 30.0
    In many natural languages, there are clear syntactic and/or intonational differences between declarative sentences, which are primarily used to provide information, and interrogative sentences, which are primarily used to request information. Most logical frameworks restrict their attention to the former. Those that are concerned with both usually assume a logical language that makes a clear syntactic distinction between declaratives and interrogatives, and usually assign different types of semantic values to these two types of sentences. A different approach has been taken (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. B. Spiecker & L. F. Groenendijk (1985). Fantasies in Recent Historiography of Childhood. British Journal of Educational Studies 33 (1):5 - 19.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Jeroen Groenendijk & Marting Stokhof (1998). Betekenis in Beweging. Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 90:26-53.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Jeroen Groenendijk, Martin Stokhof & Frank Veltman (1997). Coreference and Modality in Multi-Speaker Discourse. In Hans Kamp & Barbara Partee (eds.), Context-Dependence in the Analysis of Linguistic Meaning. Ims. 195--217.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Jeroen Groenendijk (ed.) (1981). Formal Methods in the Study of Language. U of Amsterdam.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. J. A. G. Groenendijk, Dick de Jongh & M. J. B. Stokhof (eds.) (1986/1987). Foundations of Pragmatics and Lexical Semantics. Providence, Ri, Usa,Foris Publications ;.score: 30.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. J. Groenendijk, F. Veltman & M. Stokhof (eds.) (1987). Sixth Amsterdam Colloquium Proceedings. Univ of Amserdam.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. J. A. G. Groenendijk & M. J. B. Stokhof (1981). Semantics of Wh-Complements. In Jeroen Groenendijk (ed.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language. U of Amsterdam. 153-181.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Jfak van Benthem, J. A. G. Groenendijk, M. J. B. Stokhof & Fjmm Veltman (1998). Logische Dynamiek: Een Inleiding. Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 90 (1):3-25.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Thomas Ede Zimmermann (1985). Remarks on Groenendijk and Stokhof's Theory of Indirect Questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 8 (4):431 - 448.score: 15.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. John Griffiths (1977). De Weg Naar Het Recht (The Road to Justice) By K. Schuyt, K. Groenendijk and B. Sloot (Deventer: Kluwer 1976, 387+ X Pp. Hfl. 32.50). The Distribution of Legal Services in the Netherlands. Book Reviews. [REVIEW] In Vincent Stuart (ed.), Order. Distributed by Random House. 501--5415.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. H. Kamp (1981). A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation, 277-322, JAG Groenendijk, TMV Janssen and MBJ Stokhof, Eds. In Jeroen Groenendijk (ed.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language. U of Amsterdam.score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Adrian Brasoveanu & Anna Szabolcsi, Presuppositional TOO, Postsuppositional TOO. The Dynamic, Inquisitive, and Visionary Life of Φ, ?Φ, and ◊Φ Subtitle: A Festschrift for Jeroen Groenendijk, Martin Stokhof, and Frank Veltman.score: 6.0
    One of the insights of dynamic semantics in its various guises (Kamp 1981, Heim 1982, Groenendijk & Stokhof 1991, Kamp & Reyle 1993 among many others) is that interpretation is sensitive to left-to-right order. Is order sensitivity, particularly the default left-to-right order of evaluation, a property of particular meanings of certain lexical items (e.g., dynamically interpreted conjunction) or is it a more general feature of meaning composition? If it is a more general feature of meaning composition, is it a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Christopher Gauker, Comments on Dynamic Semantics.score: 3.0
    This is the text of my comments on the project of dynamic semantics for the session on that topic at the Central Division APA meeting on April 21, 2007. The other speakers were Jeroen Groenendijk, Frank Veltman and Thony Gillies. I question the philosophical basis for dynamic semantics. My doubts have to do with the nature of information states and the norms of semantics. I also question the data that inspire the project. In particular, I question the data concerning (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Jan van Eijck, A Conversation with Wittgenstein.score: 3.0
    Thinking about Martin Stokhof as a philosopher and colleague, his formal analysis (together with Jeroen Groenendijk) of questions and question answering is the first thing that comes to mind. This work is part of a fruitful tradition that has recently spawned inquisitive semantics, and the focus on question answering in dynamic epistemic logic. The theme is still very much alive at ILLC today. Next, I am reminded of the dynamic turn in natural language semantics, of the way he and (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Martin Stokhof, Changing the Context. Dynamic Semantics and Discourse.score: 3.0
    This paper is an informal introduction to some aspects of dynamic semantics. It is a compilation of earlier reports on joint work with Frank Veltman. The opening section can also be found in Groenendijk et al. 1996a. Section 3 is drawn from Groenendijk et al. 1995a. Some of the discussion in section 4 derives from Groenendijk et al. 1996c.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Reinhard Muskens (2011). A Squib on Anaphora and Coindexing. Linguistics and Philosophy 34 (1):85-89.score: 3.0
    There are two kinds of semantic theories of anaphora. Some, such as Heim’s File Change Semantics, Groenendijk and Stokhof’s Dynamic Predicate Logic, or Muskens’ Compositional DRT (CDRT), seem to require full coindexing of anaphora and their antecedents prior to interpretation. Others, such as Kamp’s Discourse Representation Theory (DRT), do not require this coindexing and seem to have an important advantage here. In this squib I will sketch a procedure that the first group of theories may help themselves to so (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Martin Stokhof, Dynamic Montague Grammar.score: 3.0
    In Groenendijk & Stokhof [1989] a system of dynamic predicate logic (DPL) was developed, as a compositional alternative for classical discourse representation theory (DRT ). DPL shares with DRT the restriction of being a first-order system. In the present paper, we are mainly concerned with overcoming this limitation. We shall define a dynamic semantics for a typed language with λ-abstraction which is compatible with the semantics DPL specifies for the language of first-order predicate logic. We shall propose to use (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Manfred Krifka, For a Structured Meaning Account of Questions and Answers.score: 3.0
    In the logical, philosophical and linguistic literature, a number of theoretical frameworks have been proposed for the meaning of questions (see Ginzburg (1995), Groenendijk & Stokhof (1997) for recent overviews). I will concentrate on two general approaches that figured prominently in linguistic semantics, which I will call the proposition set approach and the structured meaning approach (sometimes called the “propositional” and the “categorial” or “functional” approach). I will show that the proposition set approach runs into three problems: It does (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Katrin Schulz & Robert Van Rooij (2006). Pragmatic Meaning and Non-Monotonic Reasoning: The Case of Exhaustive Interpretation. [REVIEW] Linguistics and Philosophy 29 (2):205 - 250.score: 3.0
    In this paper an approach to the exhaustive interpretation of answers is developed. It builds on a proposal brought forward by Groenendijk and Stokhof (1984). We will use the close connection between their approach and McCarthy’s (1980, 1986) predicate circumscription and describe exhaustive interpretation as an instance of interpretation in minimal models, well-known from work on counterfactuals (see for instance Lewis (1973)). It is shown that by combining this approach with independent developments in semantics/pragmatics one can overcome certain (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Maria Bittner, Mood as Illocutionary Centering.score: 3.0
    By this point, we have developed some articulated analyses of top-level temporal anaphora, including temporal quantification, in languages with grammatical tense and/or aspect systems, represented by English, Polish, and Mandarin. But it is still not clear how this approach might extend to temporal anaphora in a language such as Kalaallisut, which has neither grammatical tense nor grammatical aspect, but instead marks only grammatical mood and person. Most theories of mood and modal reference either ignore temporal reference (e.g. Hamblin 1973, Stalnaker (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Rani Nelken & Chung-Chieh Shan (2006). A Modal Interpretation of the Logic of Interrogation. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 15 (3):251-271.score: 3.0
    We propose a novel interpretation of natural-language questions using a modal predicate logic of knowledge. Our approach brings standard model-theoretic and proof-theoretic techniques from modal logic to bear on questions. Using the former, we show that our interpretation preserves Groenendijk and Stokhof's answerhood relation, yet allows an extensional interpretation. Using the latter, we get a sound and complete proof procedure for the logic for free. Our approach is more expressive; for example, it easily treats complex questions with operators that (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Jaroslav Peregrin, Johan van Benthem and Alice ter Meulen, Eds.score: 3.0
    The relationships between logic and natural language are multiverse. On the one hand, logic is a theory of argumentation, proving and giving reasons, and such activities are primarily carried out in natural language. This means that logic is, in a certain loose sense, about natural language. On the other hand, logic has found it useful to develop its own linguistic means which sometimes in a sense compete with those of natural language. This has led to the situation where the systems (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. R. Nelken & N. Francez (2002). Bilattices and the Semantics of Natural Language Questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (1):37-64.score: 3.0
    In this paper we reexamine the question of whether questions areinherently intensional entities. We do so by proposing a novelextensional theory of questions, based on a re-interpretation of thedomain of t as a bilattice rather than the usual booleaninterpretation. We discuss the adequacy of our theory with respect tothe adequacy criteria imposed on the semantics of questionsby (Groenendijk and Stokhof 1997). We show that the theory is able to account in astraightforward manner for some complex issues in the semantics (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Marco Hollenberg (1997). An Equational Axiomatization of Dynamic Negation and Relational Composition. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 6 (4):381-401.score: 3.0
    We consider algebras on binary relations with two main operators: relational composition and dynamic negation. Relational composition has its standard interpretation, while dynamic negation is an operator familiar to students of Dynamic Predicate Logic (DPL) (Groenendijk and Stokhof, 1991): given a relation R its dynamic negation R is a test that contains precisely those pairs (s,s) for which s is not in the domain of R. These two operators comprise precisely the propositional part of DPL.This paper contains a finite (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Elena Guerzoni & Yael Sharvit (2007). A Question of Strength: On NPIs in Interrogative Clauses. [REVIEW] Linguistics and Philosophy 30 (3):361 - 391.score: 3.0
    We observe that the facts pertaining to the acceptability of negative polarity items (henceforth, NPIs) in interrogative environments complex than previously noted. Since Klima [Klima, E. (1964). In J. Fodor & J. Katz (Eds.), The structure of language. Prentice-Hall], it has been typically assumed that NPIs are grammatical in both matrix and embedded questions, however, on closer scrutiny it turns out that there are differences between root and embedded environments, and between question nucleus and wh-restrictor. While NPIs are always licensed (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Floris Roelofsen (2011). Inquisitive Logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 40 (1):55 - 94.score: 3.0
    This paper investigates a generalized version of inquisitive semantics. A complete axiomatization of the associated logic is established, the connection with intuitionistic logic and several intermediate logics is explored, and the generalized version of inquisitive semantics is argued to have certain advantages over the system that was originally proposed by Groenendijk (2009) and Mascarenhas (2009).
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Robert van Rooij & Katrin Schulz (2004). Exhaustive Interpretation of Complex Sentences. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 13 (4):491-519.score: 3.0
    In terms of Groenendijk and Stokhofs (1984) formalization of exhaustive interpretation, many conversational implicatures can be accounted for. In this paper we justify and generalize this approach. Our justification proceeds by relating their account via Halpern and Moses (1984) non-monotonic theory of only knowing to the Gricean maxims of Quality and the first sub-maxim of Quantity. The approach of Groenendijk and Stokhof (1984) is generalized such that it can also account for implicatures that are triggered in subclauses not (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Albert Visser (2002). The Donkey and the Monoid. Dynamic Semantics with Control Elements. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 11 (1):107-131.score: 3.0
    Dynamic Predicate Logic (DPL) is a variant of Predicate Logic introduced by Groenendijk and Stokhof. One rationale behind the introduction of DPL is that it is closer to Natural Language than ordinary Predicate Logic in the way it treats scope. In this paper I develop some variants of DPL that can more easily approximate Natural Language in some further aspects. Specifically I add flexibility in the treatment of polarity and and some further flexibility in the treatment of scope.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Jan Eijck & Fer-Jan Vries (1992). Dynamic Interpretation and HOARE Deduction. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 1 (1):1-44.score: 3.0
    In this paper we present a dynamic assignment language which extends the dynamic predicate logic of Groenendijk and Stokhof [1991: 39–100] with assignment and with generalized quantifiers. The use of this dynamic assignment language for natural language analysis, along the lines of o.c. and [Barwise, 1987: 1–29], is demonstrated by examples. We show that our representation language permits us to treat a wide variety of donkey sentences: conditionals with a donkey pronoun in their consequent and quantified sentences with donkey (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Albert Visser (1998). Contexts in Dynamic Predicate Logic. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7 (1):21-52.score: 3.0
    In this paper we introduce a notion of context for Groenendijk & Stokhof's Dynamic Predicate Logic DPL. We use these contexts to give a characterization of the relations on assignments that can be generated by composition from tests and random resettings in the case that we are working over an infinite domain. These relations are precisely the ones expressible in DPL if we allow ourselves arbitrary tests as a starting point. We discuss some possible extensions of DPL and the (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Yoad Winter, Abstract of "Type Shifting with Semantic Features: A Unified Perspective".score: 3.0
    Since their introduction by Partee and Rooth (1983) into linguistic theory, type shifting principles have been extensively employed in various linguistic domains, including nominal predicates (Partee 1987), kind denoting NPs (Chierchia 1998), interrogatives (Groenendijk and Stokhof 1989), scrambled definites (De Hoop and Van der Does 1998) and plurals (Winter 2001,2002). Most of the accounts that use type shifting principles employ them as ``last resort'' mechanisms, which apply only when other compositional mechanisms fail. This failure is often sloppily referred to (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Reinhard Blutner (1993). Dynamic Generalized Quantifiers and Existential Sentences in Natural Languages. Journal of Semantics 10 (1):33-64.score: 3.0
    The central topic to be discussed in this paper is the definiteness restriction in there-insertion contexts. Various attempts to explain this definiteness restriction using the standard algebraic framework are discussed (Barwise & Cooper 1981; Keenan 1978; Milsark 1974; Higginbortham 1987; Lappin 1988) and the shortcomings of these attempts are demonstrated. Finally, a new approach to the interpretation of existential there be-sentences is developed within the framework of Groenendijk & Stokhof's (1990) Dynamic Montague Grammar. This approach makes use of a (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Matthew D. Stone, Or and Anaphora.score: 3.0
    The meanings of donkey sentences cannot be captured using a procedure which, like Montague’s, uses the existential quantifiers of classical logic to translate indefinites and the variables to translate pronouns. The treatment of these examples requires meanings which depend on the context in which sentences appear, and thus necessitates a logic which models this context to some extent. If context is represented as the information conveyed in discourse, and the meanings of pronouns are enriched to depend on this information, the (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Yael Sharvit (2007). A Question of Strength: On NPIs in Interrogative Clauses. [REVIEW] Linguistics and Philosophy 30 (3):361 - 391.score: 3.0
    We observe that the facts pertaining to the acceptability of negative polarity items (henceforth, NPIs) in interrogative environments are more complex than previously noted. Since Klima [Klima, E. (1964). In J. Fodor & J. Katz (Eds.), The structure of language. Prentice-Hall], it has been typically assumed that NPIs are grammatical in both matrix and embedded questions, however, on closer scrutiny it turns out that there are differences between root and embedded environments, and between question nucleus and wh-restrictor. While NPIs are (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Sigrid Beck & Hotze Rullmann (1999). A Flexible Approach to Exhaustivity in Questions. Natural Language Semantics 7 (3):249-298.score: 3.0
    A semantics for interrogatives is presented which is based on Karttunen's theory, but in a flexible manner incorporates both weak and strong exhaustivity. The paper starts out by considering degree questions, which often require an answer picking out the maximal degree from a certain set. However, in some cases, depending on the semantic properties of the question predicate, reference to the minimal degree is required, or neither specifying the maximum nor the minimum is sufficient. What is needed is an operation (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Jan Eijcvank (1993). The Dynamics of Description. Journal of Semantics 10 (3):239-267.score: 3.0
    In a static approach to the semantics of natural language, the use of definite and indefinite descriptions encounters certain difficulties. This paper shows that these problems can to a large extent be overcome by switching to a dynamic perspective, and demonstrates how description operators acquire a new lustre and attractiveness in a dynamic set-up. The starting point of this paper is dynamic predicate logic. The paper first extends the semantics of dynamic predicate logic (Groenendijk & Stokhof 1991) with a (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Katrin Schulz & Robert van Rooij (2006). Pragmatic Meaning and Non-Monotonic Reasoning: The Case of Exhaustive Interpretation. Linguistics and Philosophy 29 (2):205 - 250.score: 3.0
    In this paper an approach to the exhaustive interpretation of answers is developed. It builds on a proposal brought forward by Groenendijk and Stokhof (1984). We will use the close connection between their approach and McCarthy's (1980, 1986) predicate circumscription and describe exhaustive interpretation as an instance of interpretation in minimal models, well-known from work on counterfactuals (see for instance Lewis (1973)). It is shown that by combining this approach with independent developments in semantics/pragmatics one can overcome certain limitations (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation