37 found
Sort by:
  1. Jose L. Zalabardo (forthcoming). Epistemic Disjunctivism and the Evidential Problem. Analysis.
    I argue that Epistemic Disjunctivism doesn’t sustain a successful anti-sceptical strategy. I contend, in particular, that the treatment of scepticism that Duncan Pritchard puts forward on behalf of Epistemic Disjunctivism is unsatisfactory.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Jose L. Zalabardo (forthcoming). Wittgenstein's Nonsense Objection to Russell's Theory of Judgment. In Michael Campbell & Michael O’Sullivan (eds.), Wittgenstein and Perception. Routledge.
    I offer an interpretation of Wittgenstein's claim that Russell's theory of judgment fails to show that it's not possible to judge nonsense.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Jose L. Zalabardo (2014). Inference and Scepticism. In Elia Zardini & Dylan Dodd (eds.), Scepticism and Perceptual Justification. Oxford University Press.
    I focus on a family of inferences that are intuitively incapable of producing knowledge of their conclusions, although they appear to satisfy sufficient conditions for inferential knowledge postulated by plausible epistemological theories. They include Moorean inferences and inductive-bootstrapping inferences. I provide an account of why these inferences are not capable of producing knowledge. I argue that the reason why these inferences fail to produce knowledge of their conclusions is that inferential knowledge requires that the subject is more likely to believe (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Jose L. Zalabardo (2014). Precis of Scepticism and Reliable Belief. Teorema 33 (3):88-91.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Jose L. Zalabardo (2014). Replies to My Critics. Teorema 33 (3):181-202.
    Replies to contributions to a symposium on the book, Scepticism and Reliable Belief.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Jose L. Zalabardo (2012). Reference, Simplicity and Necessary Existence in the Tractatus. In , Wittgenstein's Early Philosophy. Oxford University Press. 119-150.
    Many interpreters of the Tractatus accept that the book endorses an argument for simples based on the reflection that, since complexes exist only contingently, if names referred to complexes the propositions in which they figure would lack sense if their referents went out of existence. More specifically, most interpreters read 2.0211-2.0212 as putting forward this argument. My main goal in this paper is to attack this reading and to put forward an alternative. I argue that there is no good reason (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Jose L. Zalabardo (2012). Scepticism and Reliable Belief. Oxford University Press.
    Reliabilist accounts of knowledge are widely seen as having the resources for blocking sceptical arguments, since these arguments appear to rely on assumptions about the nature of knowledge that are rendered illegitimate by reliabilist accounts. The goal of this book is to assess the main arguments against the possibility of knowledge, and its conclusions challenge this consensus. The book articulates and defends a theory of knowledge that belongs firmly in the truth-tracking tradition, and argues that although the theory has the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. José L. Zalabardo (2012). Semantic Normativity and Naturalism. In Manuel García-Carpintero & Max Kölbel (eds.), The Continuum Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Continuum International Pub..
    The paper addresses the question whether semantic naturalism is undermined by the thought that semantic concepts are normative.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Jose L. Zalabardo (ed.) (2012). Wittgenstein's Early Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
    This volume comprises nine lively and insightful essays by leading scholars on the philosophy of Ludwig Wittgenstein, focusing mainly on his early work.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. José L. Zalabardo (2012). Wright on Moore. In Annalisa Coliva (ed.), Mind, Meaning, and Knowledge: Themes From the Philosophy of Crispin Wright. Oxford University Press. 304–322.
    To the sceptic's contention that I don't know that I have hands because I don't know that there is an external world, the Moorean replies that I know that there is an external world because I know that I have hands. Crispin Wright has argued that the Moorean move is illegitimate, and has tried to block it by limiting the applicability of the principle of the transmission of knowledge by inference—the principle that recognising the validity of an inference from known (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Jose L. Zalabardo (2011). Boghossian on Inferential Knowledge. Analytic Philosophy 52 (2):124-139.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. José L. Zalabardo (2010). The Tractatus on Logical Consequence. European Journal of Philosophy 18 (3):425-442.
    I discuss the account of logical consequence advanced in Wittgenstein's Tractatus. I argue that the role that elementary propositions are meant to play in this account can be used to explain two remarkable features that Wittgenstein ascribes to them: that they are logically independent from one another and that their components refer to simple objects. I end with a proposal as to how to understand Wittgenstein's claim that all propositions can be analysed as truth functions of elementary propositions.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Jose L. Zalabardo (2010). Why Believe the Truth? Shah and Velleman on the Aim of Belief. Philosophical Explorations 13 (1):1 - 21.
    The subject matter of this paper is the view that it is correct, in an absolute sense, to believe a proposition just in case the proposition is true. I take issue with arguments in support of this view put forward by Nishi Shah and David Velleman.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Jose L. Zalabardo (2009). An Argument for the Likelihood-Ratio Measure of Confirmation. Analysis 69 (4):630-635.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Jose L. Zalabardo (2009). How I Know I'm Not a Brain in a Vat. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 84 (64):65-.
    I use some ideas of Keith DeRose's to develop an (invariantist!) account of why sceptical reasoning doesn't show that I don't know that I'm not a brain in a vat. I argue that knowledge is subject to the risk-of-error constraint: a true belief won’t have the status of knowledge if there is a substantial risk of the belief being in error that hasn’t been brought under control. When a substantial risk of error is present (i.e. beliefs in propositions that are (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. José L. Zalabardo (2009). One Strand in the Rule-Following Considerations. Synthese 171 (3):509 - 519.
    I argue that a target of the rule-following considerations is the thought that there are mental episodes in which a consciously accessible item guides me in my decision to respond in a certain way when I follow a rule. I contend that Wittgenstein’s position on this issue invokes a distinction between a literal and a symbolic reading of the claim that these processes of guidance take place. In the literal sense he rejects the claim, but in the symbolic sense he (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Jose L. Zalabardo (2008). Internalish Foundationalism and the Problem of the Epistemic Regress. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (1):34 - 58.
    I provide a construal of the epistemic regress problem and I take issue with the contention that a foundationalist solution is incompatible with an internalist account of warrant. I sketch a foundationalist solution to the regress problem that respects a plausible version of internalism. I end with the suggestion that the strategy that I have presented is not available only to the traditional versions of foundationalism that ascribe foundational status to experiential beliefs. It can also be used to generate a (...)
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Jose L. Zalabardo (2008). Internalist Foundationalism and the Problem of the Epistemic Regress. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (1):34-58.
    I provide a construal of the epistemic regress problem and I take issue with the contention that a foundationalist solution is incompatible with an internalist account of warrant. I sketch a foundationalist solution to the regress problem that respects a plausible version of internalism. I end with the suggestion that the strategy that I have presented is not available only to the traditional versions of foundationalismthat ascribe foundational status to experiential beliefs. It can also be used to generate aversion of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. José L. Zalabardo (2008). Review: Marie McGinn: Elucidating the Tractatus: Wittgenstein's Early Philosophy of Logic and Language. [REVIEW] Mind 117 (468):1105-1108.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Jose L. Zalabardo (2008). Review: Marie McGinn: Elucidating the Tractatus: Wittgenstein's Early Philosophy of Logic and Language. [REVIEW] Mind 117 (468):1105-1108.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Jose L. Zalabardo (2007). Review: The Possibility of Language: Internal Tensions in Wittgenstein's Tractatus. [REVIEW] Mind 116 (464):1095-1098.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. José L. Zalabardo (2006). BonJour, Externalism and the Regress Problem. Synthese 148 (1):135-169.
    In this paper I assess the two central ingredients of Laurence BonJour’s position on empirical knowledge that have survived the transition from his earlier coherentist views to his current endorsement of the doctrine of the given: his construal of the problem of the epistemic regress and his rejection of an internalist solution to the problem. The bulk of the paper is devoted to a critical assessment of BonJour’s arguments against externalism. I argue that they fail to put real pressure on (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Jose L. Zalabardo (2005). Externalism, Skepticism, and the Problem of Easy Knowledge. Philosophical Review 114 (1):33 - 61.
  24. José L. Zalabardo (2005). Externalism, Skepticism, and the Problem of Easy Knowledge. Philosophical Review 114 (1):33-61.
    The paper deals with a version of the principle that a belief source can be a knowledge source only if the subject knows that it is reliable. I argue that the principle can be saved from the main objections that motivate its widespread rejection: the claim that it leads to skepticism, the claim that it forces us to accept counterintuitive knowledge ascriptions and the claim that it is incompatible with reliabilist accounts of knowledge. I argue that naturalist epistemologists should reject (...)
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. José L. Zalabardo (2003). Wittgenstein on Accord. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 84 (3):311–329.
    The paper deals with the interpretation of Wittgenstein's views on the power of occurrent mental states to sort objects or states of affairs as in accord or in conflict with them, as presented in the rule-following passages of the Philosophical Investigations. I shall argue first that the readings advanced by Saul Kripke and John McDowell fail to provide a satisfactory construal of Wittgenstein's treatment of a platonist account of this phenomenon, according to which the sorting power of occurrent mental states (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Jose L. Zalabardo (2002). Review: Wittgenstein, Empiricism, and Language. [REVIEW] Mind 111 (441):88-92.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Jose L. Zalabardo (2002). Wittgenstein, Empiricism, and Language. Mind 111 (441):88-92.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. José L. Zalabardo (2001). Towards a Nominalist Empiricism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (1):29–52.
    The paper deals with our ability to classify objects as being of a certain kind on the basis of information provided by the senses (empirical classification) and to ascribe empirical predicates to objects on the basis of these classificatory verdicts (empirical predication). I consider, first, the project of construing the episodes in which this ability is exercised as involving universals. I argue that this construal faces epistemological problems concerning our access to the universals that it invokes. I present the empiricist (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. José L. Zalabardo (2000). Realism Detranscendentalized. European Journal of Philosophy 8 (1):63–88.
    The paper develops an account of semantic notions which occupies a middle ground between antirealism and traditional forms of realism, using some ideas from the work of John McDowell. The position is based on a contrast between two points of view from which we might attempt to characterize our linguistic practices from the cosmic exile s point of view and from the midst of language as a going concern. The contrast is drawn in terms of whether our characterization of our (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Jose L. Zalabardo (1998). Putting Reference Beyond Belief. Philosophical Studies 91 (3):221-257.
    The paper deals with Hilary Putnam's model-theoretic argument against metaphysical realism. It considers the objections to the argument raised by David Lewis, Mark Heller, James van Cleve, Anthony Brueckner and others, to the effect that Putnam's reasoning fails to undermine versions of metaphysical realism which construe reference along externalist lines. I argue that the version of Putnam's argument that his critics have attacked is indeed powerless against externalist accounts of reference, but that, on a different construal, the argument puts genuine (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Jose L. Zalabardo (1997). Kripke's Normativity Argument. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 27 (4):467-488.
    In Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language, Saul Kripke rejects some of the most popular accounts of what meaning facts consist in on the grounds that they fail to accommodate the normative character of meaning. I argue that a widespread interpretation of Kripke's argument is incorrect. I contend that the argument does not rest on the contrast between descriptive and normative facts, but on the thought that speakers' uses of linguistic expressions have to be justified. I suggest that the line (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Jose L. Zalabardo (1996). Predicates, Properties and the Goal of a Theory of Reference. Grazer Philosophische Studien 51:121-161.
    An account of predicate reference is presented which attempts to steer a middle course between reductionism, which construes the notion in terms of speakers' inclinations, and {transcendent) realism, which construes the notion in terms of properties. It is first introduced in the context of a discussion of the accounts of length (distance) advanced by Hans Reichenbach, Adolf Grünbaum and Hilary Putnam. A general account of predicate reference is then developed that explains the notion in terms of speakers' inclinations, while rejecting (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Jose L. Zalabardo (1995). A Problem for Information-Theoretic Semantics. Synthese 105 (1):1-29.
    Information theoretic semantics proposes to construe predicate reference in terms of nomological relations between distal properties and properties of representational mental events. Research on the model has largely concentrated on the problem of choosing the nomological relation in terms of which distal properties are to be singled out. I argue that, in addition to this, an information theoretic account has to provide a specification of which properties of representational mental events will play a role in determining reference, qua bearers of (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. José L. Zalabardo (1989). Rules, Communities and Judgements. Critica 21 (63):33-58.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Jose L. Zalabardo (1989). Rules, Communities and Judgement. Critica 21 (63):33-58.
    I endorse Kripke's (Wittgenstein's) conclusion that the standard of correct application required by the notion of rule-following can only be made sense of in terms of intersubjective agreement. This is not to be taken, as Kripke does, merely as providing assertibility conditions, but rather as a genuine account of what normativity consists in. As Blackburn has pointed out, this result entails that the notion of objective judgment is dependent, in a sense, on the shared inclinations of the members of the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Jose L. Zalabardo (1989). Rules, Communities, Judgements. Critica 63:33-58.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation