18 found
Sort by:
  1. Jose L. Zalabardo (2012). Necessary Existence in the Tractatus'k. In Jl Zalabardo (ed.), Wittgenstein's Early Philosophy. Oxford University Press. 119.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. José L. Zalabardo (2012). Semantic Normativity and Naturalism. In Manuel García-Carpintero & Max Kölbel (eds.), The Continuum Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Continuum International Pub..
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. José L. Zalabardo (2011). Boghossian on Inferential Knowledge1. Analytic Philosophy 52 (2):124-139.
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. José L. Zalabardo (2010). The Tractatus on Logical Consequence. European Journal of Philosophy 18 (3):425-442.
    Abstract: I discuss the account of logical consequence advanced in Wittgenstein's Tractatus. I argue that the role that elementary propositions are meant to play in this account can be used to explain two remarkable features that Wittgenstein ascribes to them: that they are logically independent from one another and that their components refer to simple objects. I end with a proposal as to how to understand Wittgenstein's claim that all propositions can be analysed as truth functions of elementary propositions.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. José L. Zalabardo (2010). Why Believe the Truth? Shah and Velleman on the Aim of Belief. Philosophical Explorations 13 (1):1 – 21.
    The subject matter of this paper is the view that it is correct, in an absolute sense, to believe a proposition just in case the proposition is true. I take issue with arguments in support of this view put forward by Nishi Shah and David Velleman.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. José L. Zalabardo (2009). One Strand in the Rule-Following Considerations. Synthese 171 (3):509 - 519.
    I argue that a target of the rule-following considerations is the thought that there are mental episodes in which a consciously accessible item guides me in my decision to respond in a certain way when I follow a rule. I contend that Wittgenstein’s position on this issue invokes a distinction between a literal and a symbolic reading of the claim that these processes of guidance take place. In the literal sense he rejects the claim, but in the symbolic sense he (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. José L. Zalabardo (2008). Internalist Foundationalism and the Problem of the Epistemic Regress. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (1):34-58.
    I provide a construal of the epistemic regress problem and I take issue with the contention that a foundationalist solution is incompatible with an internalist account of warrant. I sketch a foundationalist solution to the regress problem that respects a plausible version of internalism. I end with the suggestion that the strategy that I have presented is not available only to the traditional versions of foundationalismthat ascribe foundational status to experiential beliefs. It can also be used to generate aversion of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. José L. Zalabardo (2008). Review: Marie McGinn: Elucidating the Tractatus: Wittgenstein's Early Philosophy of Logic and Language. [REVIEW] Mind 117 (468):1105-1108.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. José L. Zalabardo (2006). BonJour, Externalism and the Regress Problem. Synthese 148 (1):135-169.
    In this paper I assess the two central ingredients of Laurence BonJour’s position on empirical knowledge that have survived the transition from his earlier coherentist views to his current endorsement of the doctrine of the given: his construal of the problem of the epistemic regress and his rejection of an internalist solution to the problem. The bulk of the paper is devoted to a critical assessment of BonJour’s arguments against externalism. I argue that they fail to put real pressure on (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Diana Raffman & José L. Zalabardo (2005). Externalism, Skepticism, and the Problem of Easy Knowledge. Philosophical Review 114 (1):33 - 61.
  11. José L. Zalabardo (2005). Externalism, Skepticism, and the Problem of Easy Knowledge. Philosophical Review 114 (1):33-61.
  12. José L. Zalabardo (2003). Wittgenstein on Accord. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 84 (3):311-329.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. José L. Zalabardo (2002). Review: Wittgenstein, Empiricism, and Language. [REVIEW] Mind 111 (441):88-92.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. José L. Zalabardo (2002). Wittgenstein, Empiricism, and Language. Mind 111 (441):88-92.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. José L. Zalabardo (2001). Towards a Nominalist Empiricism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (1):29–52.
    The paper deals with our ability to classify objects as being of a certain kind on the basis of information provided by the senses (empirical classification) and to ascribe empirical predicates to objects on the basis of these classificatory verdicts (empirical predication). I consider, first, the project of construing the episodes in which this ability is exercised as involving universals. I argue that this construal faces epistemological problems concerning our access to the universals that it invokes. I present the empiricist (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. José L. Zalabardo (2000). Realism Detranscendentalized. European Journal of Philosophy 8 (1):63–88.
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. José L. Zalabardo (1998). Putting Reference Beyond Belief. Philosophical Studies 91 (3):221-257.
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Jose L. Zalabardo (1996). Predicates, Properties and the Goal of a Theory of Reference. Grazer Philosophische Studien 51:121-161.
    An account of predicate reference is presented which attempts to steer a middle course between reductionism, which construes the notion in terms of speakers' inclinations, and {transcendent) realism, which construes the notion in terms of properties. It is first introduced in the context of a discussion of the accounts of length (distance) advanced by Hans Reichenbach, Adolf Grünbaum and Hilary Putnam. A general account of predicate reference is then developed that explains the notion in terms of speakers' inclinations, while rejecting (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation