14 found
Sort by:
See also:
Profile: Jose Juan Moreso (Universitat Pompeu Fabra)
  1. José Juan Moreso (2012). Legal Defeasibility and the Connection Between Law and Morality. In Jordi Ferrer Beltrán & Giovanni Battista Ratti (eds.), The Logic of Legal Requirements: Essays on Defeasibility. Oxford University Press.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. José Juan Moreso (2012). Ways of Solving Conflicts of Constitutional Rights: Proportionalism and Specificationism. Ratio Juris 25 (1):31-46.
    This paper deals with the question of the conflict of constitutional rights with regard to basic rights. Two extreme accounts are outlined: the subsumptive approach and the particularistic approach, that embody two main conceptions of practical rationality. Between the two approaches there is room for a range of options, two of which are examined: the proportionalist approach, which conserves the scope of rights restricting their stringency, and the specificationist approach, which preserves the stringency of rights restricting their scope. I will (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. José Juan Moreso (2009). Legal Positivism and Legal Disagreements. Ratio Juris 22 (1):62-73.
    This paper deals with the possibility of faultless disagreement in law. It does this by looking to other spheres in which faultless disagreement appears to be possible, mainly in matters of taste and ethics. Three possible accounts are explored: the realist account, the relativist account, and the expressivist account. The paper tries to show that in the case of legal disagreements, there is a place for an approach that can take into account our intuitions in the sense that legal disagreements (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. José Juan Moreso (2002). Guastini sobre la ponderación. Isonomía. Revista de Teoría y Filosofía Del Derecho 17:227-249.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Jose Juan Moreso, Pablo E. Navarro & Cristina Redondo (2002). Legal Gaps and Conclusive Reasons. Theoria 68 (1):52-66.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. José Juan Moreso (2001). El Encaje de Las Piezas Del Derecho. Isonomía 14:135-157.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. José Juan Moreso, Pablo E. Navarro & María Cristina Redondo (2001). Sobre la Lógica de Las Lagunas En El Derecho (On the Logic of Legal Gaps). Critica 33 (99):47 - 73.
    En "Legal Reasons, Sources and Gaps", Raz señala que las lagunas jurídicas existen sólo cuando el derecho habla con voz incierta o cuando habla con muchas voces, pero que no hay lagunas cuando el derecho guarda silencio. En este último caso habría reglas de clausura, analíticamente verdaderas, que impiden la ocurrencia de esas lagunas. Según Raz, si hay una laguna en un sistema jurídico, entonces no es verdadero ni falso que exista una razón concluyente para ejecutar cierta acción. Así, una (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. José Juan Moreso & Pablo E. Navarro (1998). The Reception of Norms, and Open Legal Systems. In Stanley L. Paulson & Bonnie Litschewski Paulson (eds.), Normativity and Norms: Critical Perspectives on Kelsenian Themes. Oxford University Press.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Pablo E. Navarro & José Juan Moreso (1997). Applicability and Effectiveness of Legal Norms. Law and Philosophy 16 (2):201 - 219.
    We analyse the relationship between applicability and effectiveness of legal norms from a philosophical perspective. In particular, we distinguish between two concepts of applicability. The external applicability of norms refers to institutional duties; a norm N is externally applicable if and only if a judge is legally obliged to apply N to some case c. Internal applicability refers instead to the sphere of validity of legal norms. A norm N is internally applicable to actions regulated by its sphere of validity. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Pablo E. Navarro & Jose Juan Moreso (1997). The Dynamics of Legal Positivism. Some Remarks on Shiner's Norm and Nature. Ratio Juris 10 (3):288-299.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. José Juan Moreso & Pablo E. Navarro (1996). Verdad y eficacia. Theoria 11 (26):105-124.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Pablo Navarro & José Juan Moreso (1996). Aplicabilidad y eficacia de las normas jurídicas. Isonomía 5:119-139.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. José Juan Moreso (1994). Verfassungswidrige Normen. Rechtstheorie 25 (4):417-449.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. José Juan Moreso & Pablo Eugenio Navarro (1993). Some Remarks on the Notions of Legal Order and Legal System. Ratio Juris 6 (1):48-63.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation