67 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Joseph C. Pitt [67]Joseph Charles Pitt [1]
See also:
Profile: Joseph C. Pitt (Virginia Tech)
  1.  27
    Joseph C. Pitt (2001). The Dilemma of Case Studies: Toward a Heraclitian Philosophy of Science. Perspectives on Science 9 (4):373-382.
    : What do appeals to case studies accomplish? Consider the dilemma: On the one hand, if the case is selected because it exemplifies the philosophical point, then it is not clear that the historical data hasn't been manipulated to fit the point. On the other hand, if one starts with a case study, it is not clear where to go from there—for it is unreasonable to generalize from one case or even two or three.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  2. Joseph C. Pitt (ed.) (1988). Theories of Explanation. Oxford University Press.
    Since the publication of Carl Hempel and Paul Oppenheim's ground-breaking work "Studies in the Logic of Explanation," the theory of explanation has remained a major topic in the philosophy of science. This valuable collection provides readers with the opportunity to study some of the classic essays on the theory of explanation along with the best examples of the most recent work being done on the topic. In addition to the original Hempel and Oppenheim paper, the volume includes Scriven's critical reaction (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  3.  1
    Joseph C. Pitt (1984). Galileo and His Sources the Heritage of the Collegio Romano in Galileo s Science. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  4.  52
    Joseph C. Pitt, The Epistemology of the Very Small.
    The question is how do Scanning Electron Microscopes (SEMs) give us access to the nano world? The images these instruments produce, I argue, do not allow us to see atoms in the same way that we see trees. To the extent that SEMs and STMs allow us to see the occupants of the nano world it is by way of metaphorical extension of the concept of “seeing”. The more general claim is that changes in scientific instrumentation effect changes in the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5.  18
    Joseph C. Pitt (2005). Hume and Peirce on Belief, or, Why Belief Should Not Be Considered an Epistemic Category. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 41 (2):343 - 354.
  6.  29
    Joseph C. Pitt (2005). When is an Image Not an Image? Techne 8 (3):24-33.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  7.  18
    Joseph C. Pitt (2010). It’s Not About Technology. Knowledge, Technology and Policy 23 (3-4):445-454.
    It is argued that the question “Can we trust technology?” is unanswerable because it is open-ended. Only questions about specific issues that can have specific answers should be entertained. It is further argued that the reason the question cannot be answered is that there is no such thing as Technology simpliciter. Fundamentally, the question comes down to trusting people and even then, the question has to be specific about trusting a person to do this or that.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  8. Joseph C. Pitt (1987). The Problems of Individuating Revolutions. Behaviorism 15 (1):83-87.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  21
    Joseph C. Pitt (2000). The Author Replies. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 5 (1):35-47.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  18
    Joseph C. Pitt (1998). Explaining Change in Science. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 3 (3):135-140.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  29
    Joseph C. Pitt (2001). What Engineers Know. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 5 (3):116-123.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  12.  16
    Joseph C. Pitt, Pieter E. Vermaas & Peter-Paul Verbeek (2007). Editorial Statement. Techne 11 (1):1-1.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  13.  9
    Joseph C. Pitt (2003). Against the Perennial. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 7 (2):57-65.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  8
    Joseph C. Pitt (2004). Ethical Colonialism. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 7 (3):32-38.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  8
    Joseph C. Pitt, Pieter E. Vermaas & Peter-Paul Verbeek (2007). Editorial Statement. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 11 (1):1-1.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  8
    Joseph C. Pitt (2005). When is an Image Not an Image? Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 8 (3):24-33.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  15
    Joseph C. Pitt (1994). Editorial Preface. Synthese 99 (1):1-1.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  34
    Joseph C. Pitt (1992). Problematics in the History of Philosophy. Synthese 92 (1):117 - 134.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  19.  19
    Joseph C. Pitt (1990). The Myth of Science Education. Studies in Philosophy and Education 10 (1):7-17.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  11
    Joseph C. Pitt (1992). Scientific Explanation. Review of Metaphysics 45 (3):615-616.
  21.  6
    Joseph C. Pitt (2010). The Technological Twist. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 14 (1):69-71.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  20
    Joseph C. Pitt (1981). The Role of Inductive Generalizations in Sellars' Theory of Explanation. Theory and Decision 13 (4):345-356.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  8
    Joseph C. Pitt (1995). On the Philosophy of Technology, Past and Future. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 1 (1/2):18-22.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  8
    Joseph C. Pitt (1996). Philosophical Methodology, Technologies, and the Transformation of Knowledge. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 1 (3/4):146-158.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  38
    Richard M. Burian & Joseph C. Pitt (1992). Editorial Introduction. Synthese 92 (1):3-7.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  3
    Joseph C. Pitt (1990). Change and Progress in Modern Science. Noûs 24 (2):347-349.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  27.  7
    Joseph C. Pitt (2001). Thinking Through Technology. International Studies in Philosophy 33 (2):147-149.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  28
    Joseph C. Pitt (2005). Thing Knowledge: A Philosophy of Scientific Instruments. Philosophy of Science 72 (4):645-647.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  17
    Joseph C. Pitt (2010). The Technological Twist. Techne 14 (1):69-71.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  27
    Joseph C. Pitt (1988). Galileo, Rationality and Explanation. Philosophy of Science 55 (1):87-103.
    It is argued that Galileo's theory of justification was a version of explanationism. Galileo's Dialogue on the Two Chief World Systems is to be read as primarily a defense of his theory of the tides. He shows how, by assuming Copernican motions, he can explain the tides, thereby justifying the endorsement of Copernicus. The crux of the argument rests on Galileo's account of explanation, which is novel in its reliance on the use of geometry. Finally, the consequences of his use (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  17
    Joseph C. Pitt (2003). Against the Perennial. Techne 7 (2):57-65.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Joseph C. Pitt (1981). Pictures, Images, and Conceptual Change an Analysis of Wilfred Sellars' Philosophy of Science.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  33.  11
    Joseph C. Pitt & Morton Tavel (1977). Revolutions in Science and Refinements in the Analysis of Causation. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 8 (1):48-62.
    Summary A sufficient condition for a revolution in physics is a change in the concept of cause. To demonstrate this, we examine three developments in physical theory. After informally characterizing a theory in terms of an heuristic and a set of equations, we show how tensions between these two dimensions lead to the development of alternative theoretical accounts. In each case the crucial move results in a refinement of our account of cause. All these refinements taken together result in the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  34.  4
    Joseph C. Pitt (2001). Philosophy at Virginia Tech. He Recently Published Thinking About Tech-Nology (Seven Bridges Press, 2000) and is Co-Editor of the Forthcoming Pro-Duction and Diffusion of Publish Choice (Blackwells, 2003). He is Currently Working on a New Project Concerning the Role of Innovative Instrumenta. [REVIEW] Perspectives on Science 9 (4).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  12
    Joseph C. Pitt (2001). Reconsidering the Legacy of Thomas Kuhn; Editor's Introduction. Perspectives on Science 9 (4):371-372.
  36.  9
    Joseph C. Pitt (2005). Review of Carla Rita Palmerino (Ed.), J.M.M.H. Thijssen (Ed.), The Reception of the Galilean Science of Motion in Seventeenth-Century Europe. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (7).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  3
    Joseph C. Pitt (2009). Small Talk: Nanotechnology and Metaphor. Spontaneous Generations 2 (1):90.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  7
    Joseph C. Pitt (1987). Book Review:Galileo and His Sources: The Heritage of the Collegio Romano in Galileo's Science William A. Wallace. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 54 (1):138-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  5
    Joseph C. Pitt (1991). Philosophy of Economics, Wolfgang Balzer and Bert Hamminga . Dordrecht: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing, 1989, 270 Pages. [REVIEW] Economics and Philosophy 7 (1):122-128.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  2
    Joseph C. Pitt (2005). Book Review: Davis Baird: "Thing Knowledge: A Philosophy of Scientific Instruments", Berkeley 2004. [REVIEW] Hyle 11 (1):97 - 99.
  41.  1
    Joseph C. Pitt (1998). Doing Philosophy: Rescher's Normative Methodology. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 64:135-145.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  1
    Joseph C. Pitt (1980). Hempel Versus Sellars on Explanation. Dialectica 34 (2):95-120.
    SummaryHempel's Deductive‐Nomological model of explanation is compared to Sellars' brand of essentialism. The source of their differences is shown to lie in their views on the explanatory role of inductively based generalizations. An adequate explanation requires a reasoned account of why an empirical generalization fails. On Sellars' view this entails concentrating on the nature of the things whose behavior is in question. We thereby remove ourselves from the misleading positivist methodology in which one counterinstance renders a generalization uninteresting. It is (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  1
    Joseph C. Pitt (1991). No Title Available: Reviews. Economics and Philosophy 7 (1):122-128.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  2
    Joseph C. Pitt (2000). Note From the Editor. Perspectives on Science 8 (4):327-327.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  1
    Joseph C. Pitt (1986). The Character of Galilean Evidence. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:125 - 134.
    We examine Galileo's theory of evidence as presented in his Dialogue on the Two Chief World Systems. It is argued that for Galileo evidence not only had to be tied to the senses, but, that for purposes of evidential relevance, epistemologically significant experience is only of terrestrial objects and events. This account forms the first part of an argument for understanding Galileo as an instrumentalist. The second part of the argument consists in examining Galileo's views on the limits of knowledge. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Robert Arr1ngton, Gareth Matthews, William Bechtel, Joseph C. Pitt, Jonathan Bennett, Ut Place, Alan Berger, Jond Ringen, Richard Creel & Alexander Rosenberg (1989). Ron Amundson J. Christopher Maloney. Behaviorism 17:85.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Robert E. Butts & Joseph C. Pitt (1978). New Perspectives on Galileo Papers Deriving From and Related to a Workshop on Galileo Held at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1975. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Robert E. Butts & Joseph C. Pitt (1978). New Perspectives on Galileo Papers Deriving From and Related to a Workshop on Galileo Held at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1975; Edited by Robert E. Butts and Joseph C. Pitt. --. [REVIEW] D. Reidel.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Edmund F. Byrne & Joseph C. Pitt (1989). Technological Transformation Contextual and Conceptual Implications. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Susan Haack, Rosa Mayorga, Jaime Nubiola, Cornelis de Waal, Deborah G. Mayo, Robert G. Meyers, Joseph C. Pitt & Nicholas Rescher (2005). 'Peirce-Pectives' on Metaphysics and the Sciences. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 41 (2):237-365.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 67