37 found
Sort by:
  1. Joseph P. DeMarco & Paul J. Ford (2014). Neuroethics and the Ethical Parity Principle. Neuroethics 7 (3):317-325.
    Neil Levy offers the most prominent moral principles that are specifically and exclusively designed to apply to neuroethics. His two closely related principles, labeled as versions of the ethical parity principle , are intended to resolve moral concerns about neurological modification and enhancement [1]. Though EPP is appealing and potentially illuminating, we reject the first version and substantially modify the second. Since his first principle, called EPP , is dependent on the contention that the mind literally extends into external props (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Joseph P. DeMarco, Paul J. Ford, Dana J. Patton & Douglas O. Stewart (2014). Is There an Ethical Obligation to Disclose Controversial Risk? A Question From the ACCORD Trial. American Journal of Bioethics 14 (4):4-10.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Joseph P. DeMarco, Paul J. Ford, Dana J. Patton & Douglas O. Stewart (2014). Response to the Open Peer Commentaries on “Is There an Ethical Obligation to Disclose Controversial Risk? A Question From the ACCORD Trial”. American Journal of Bioethics 14 (4):W1 - W2.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Samuel LiPuma & Joseph P. DeMarco (2014). A Functionalist View of Brain Death. American Journal of Bioethics 14 (8):19-20.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Samuel H. LiPuma & Joseph P. DeMarco (2013). Reviving Brain Death: A Functionalist View. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10 (3):383-392.
    Recently both whole brain death (WBD) and higher brain death (HBD) have come under attack. These attacks, we argue, are successful, leaving supporters of both views without a firm foundation. This state of affairs has been described as “the death of brain death.” Returning to a cardiopulmonary definition presents problems we also find unacceptable. Instead, we attempt to revive brain death by offering a novel and more coherent standard of death based on the permanent cessation of mental processing. This approach (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Douglas O. Stewart & Joseph P. DeMarco (2010). Rational Noncompliance with Prescribed Medical Treatment. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 20 (3):277-290.
    Patient noncompliance with physician prescriptions, especially in nonsymptomatic chronic diseases, is frequently characterized in the literature as harmful and economically costly (Miller 1997).1 Nancy Houston Miller views patient noncompliance as harmful because noncompliance can result in continued or new health problems leading to hospital admissions. Further, she places the annual monetary cost of noncompliance at $100 billion.Patient noncompliance with prescribed treatment is considered the least understood form of health behavior (Coons 2001). Despite the plethora of attention in journal articles, the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Joseph P. DeMarco (2009). Commentary. Hastings Center Report 39 (4):12-12.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Joseph P. DeMarco & Douglas O. Stewart (2009). Expanding Autonomy; Contracting Informed Consent. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):35 – 36.
  9. Joseph P. Demarco & Paul J. Ford (2006). Balancing in Ethical Deliberation: Superior to Specification and Casuistry. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (5):483 – 497.
    Approaches to clinical ethics dilemmas that rely on basic principles or rules are difficult to apply because of vagueness and conflict among basic values. In response, casuistry rejects the use of basic values, and specification produces a large set of specified rules that are presumably easily applicable. Balancing is a method employed to weigh the relative importance of different and conflicting values in application. We argue against casuistry and specification, claiming that balancing is superior partly because it most clearly exhibits (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Douglas O. Stewart & Joseph P. DeMarco (2006). Rejoinder. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (3):137-138.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Douglas O. Stewart & Joseph P. DeMarco (2005). An Economic Theory of Patient Decision-Making. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 2 (3):153-164.
    Patient autonomy, as exercised in the informed consent process, is a central concern in bioethics. The typical bioethicist's analysis of autonomy centers on decisional capacity—finding the line between autonomy and its absence. This approach leaves unexplored the structure of reasoning behind patient treatment decisions. To counter that approach, we present a microeconomic theory of patient decision-making regarding the acceptable level of medical treatment from the patient's perspective. We show that a rational patient's desired treatment level typically departs from the level (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Joseph P. DeMarco (2004). In Defense of Live Kidney Donation. American Journal of Bioethics 4 (4):33 – 35.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Joseph P. DeMarco (2003). Should Nonresponders Dictate the Use of Placebos? Irb 25 (6):11.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Joseph P. DeMarco (2002). Competence and Paternalism. Bioethics 16 (3):231–245.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Joseph P. DeMarco (2001). Substantive Equality: A Basic Value. Journal of Social Philosophy 32 (2):197–206.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Joseph P. Demarco (1997). Coherence and Applied Ethics. Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (3):289–300.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Richard M. Fox & Joseph P. Demarco (1996). On Making and Keeping Promises. Journal of Applied Philosophy 13 (2):199-208.
  18. Richard M. Fox & Joseph P. Demarco (1993). The Immorality of Promising. Journal of Value Inquiry 27 (1):81-84.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Joseph P. DeMarco & Richard M. Fox (1992). Putting Pressure on Promises. Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 (2):45-58.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Joseph P. DeMarco (1991). The Abuse of Casuistry. Southwest Philosophy Review 7 (2):17-30.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Joseph P. DeMarco (1989). Justice and the Critique of Basic Social Structures. Social Philosophy Today 2:69-76.
  22. Joseph P. DeMarco (1989). The Problems of Preference Based Morality: A Critique of "Morals by Agreement". Journal of Social Philosophy 20 (3):77-91.
  23. Joseph P. DeMarco & Richard M. Fox (1989). “Toward an Adequate Theory of Applied Ethics”. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 4 (4):45-51.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Joseph P. DeMarco (1988). Philosophy and Politics. Review of Metaphysics 41 (3):631-632.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Joseph P. DeMarco & Samuel A. Richmond (1987). Justice: Simple Theories, Complex Applications. Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (1):31-38.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Joseph P. DeMarco, Richard M. Fox & Michael D. Bayles (eds.) (1986). New Directions in Ethics: The Challenge of Applied Ethics. Routledge & K. Paul.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Joseph P. DeMarco & Samuel A. Richmond (1986). The Mutuality of Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity. Journal of Social Philosophy 17 (3):7-12.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Joseph P. DeMarco (1983). The Immorality of Limiting Growth. Teaching Philosophy 6 (4):402-403.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Joseph P. DeMarco (1982). Justice and Reverse Discrimination. Teaching Philosophy 5 (2):145-149.
  30. Joseph P. Demarco (1980). Rawls and Marx. In Gene Blocker & Elizabeth Smith (eds.), John Rawls' Theory of Social Justice. Ohio University Press. 395--430.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Joseph P. DeMarco (1979). Justice and Economic Distribution. Teaching Philosophy 3 (2):243-244.
  32. Joseph P. DeMarco & Samuel A. Richmond (1977). A Note on the Priority of Liberty. Ethics 87 (3):272-275.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Joseph P. DeMarco (1975). The Social Contract or Principles of Political Right. Teaching Philosophy 1 (2):212-213.
  34. Joseph P. DeMarco & Samuel A. Richmond (1975). A Fault in the Utilitarian Theory of Conduct. Southern Journal of Philosophy 13 (3):275-279.
    Utilitarians take an uncritical attitude toward the sort of individual claims they seek to aggregate. In this way they cannot account for an individual's valid claim against a policy which actually maximizes aggregate satisfaction. We thus claim that utilitarianism properly functions only after conflicting claims have been adjudicated; consequently, Utilitarianism properly maximizes the satisfaction of claims judged to be valid. In such a program, Utilitarianism ceases to be considered a part of ethics, But is seen as maintaining a principle of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Joseph P. DeMarco (1973). Peirce's Categories and Normative Inquiry. Journal of Value Inquiry 7 (3):214-216.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Joseph P. DeMarco (1972). God, Religion, and Community in the Philosophy of C. S. Peirce. Modern Schoolman 49 (4):331-347.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Joseph P. DeMarco (1971). Peirce's Concept of Community: Its Development & Change. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 7 (1):24 - 36.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation