Search results for 'Joshua Seigal' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
See also:
Profile: Joshua Seigal (Oxford University)
  1. Joshua Seigal (2012). 'God Told Me to Do It': Sceptical Theism and Perceiving God. Religious Studies 48 (1):95 - 100.score: 160.0
    In this article I highlight a tension between Alston's core thesis in his seminal book Perceiving God -that beliefs about God formed on the basis of mystical perception are prima facie justified - and a currently popular method for disarming a certain form of the argument from evil, a method which involves adopting a view known as sceptical theism.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Essaka Joshua (2006). Wordsworth Amongst the Aristotelians. Journal of the History of Ideas 67 (3):511-522.score: 30.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Christian Miller (2005). Review of Joshua Gert, Brute Rationality: Normativity and Human Action. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (3).score: 12.0
    This is the first book by Joshua Gert, son of the well-known moral philosopher Bernard Gert. Among other things, Gert argues for a novel account of both objective and subjective rationality, a new theory of normative reasons, and a distinctive approach to construing the relationship between reasons for action and rationality. The result is an impressive book filled with interesting arguments and objections, which should advance philosophical discussions on a number of important issues.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Jane Duran (1999). The Moral Status of the Joshua Tree. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 13 (1):113-120.score: 12.0
    The notion that plants, as well as animals, have a moral status is examined both in general, and with respect to the status of particularly rare plants that may be deemed to be lacking in general instrumentality, such as the Joshua tree. The work of Passmore, Singer and Santos is adduced, and several lines of argument revolving around preservation, sentiency and attractiveness to humans are constructed.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Joshua Cohen (2001). Money, Politics, Political Equality Joshua Cohen. In Alex Byrne, Robert Stalnaker & Ralph Wedgwood (eds.), Fact and Value. Mit Press. 47.score: 12.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Jerome F. D. Creach (2012). Joshua 13–21 and the Politics of Land Division. Interpretation 66 (2):153-163.score: 12.0
    Joshua 13–21 makes the remarkable claim that the Lord conquered, possessed, and gave the land as a gift to Israel. Although these chapters likely originated in political concerns of Israelite kings, the theological cast of the material outstrips any political motivations that gave rise to the material. The enduring role of this section of Joshua is to shape a society devoted to and dependent on God.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. L. Daniel Hawk (2012). The Truth About Conquest: Joshua as History, Narrative, and Scripture. Interpretation 66 (2):129-140.score: 12.0
    The Book of Joshua constitutes a vital biblical resource for interpreting modern narratives of conquest and colonialism. As a historical narrative, it reveals the fluid and complex character of national memory; as a national narrative of origins, it points to processes and motifs that shaped the identities of both Israel and the United States; as a scriptural narrative, it presents a revelatory vision that illumines contemporary narratives of conquest and evokes the stories of both colonizing and colonized peoples.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Carolyn J. Sharp (2012). “Are You For Us, or For Our Adversaries?”: A Feminist and Postcolonial Interrogation of Joshua 2–12 for the Contemporary Church. [REVIEW] Interpretation 66 (2):141-152.score: 12.0
    This essay seeks to engage the narrative art of the book of Joshua in ways that may prove valuable for contemporary communities of faith. The argument draws on the feminist and postcolonial critical tradition for defining insights about the construction of the subject, the interrogation of power dynamics, and the reformation of community. The essay then explores Joshua’s representations of authority and its use of liminal moments in Israel’s narrative of conquest in order to suggest possible avenues of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Walter Brueggemann (2012). The God of Joshua…Give or Take the Land. Interpretation 66 (2):164-175.score: 12.0
    YHWH, the God of Israel, is not only a character embedded in the plot of the Book of Joshua. YHWH is the chief protagonist and the engine that drives the plot. Even when there are other actors in the plot, notably Joshua, their performances in the plot are at the behest of and in response to the intention of YHWH.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Stephen Farris (2012). Preaching Joshua. Interpretation 66 (2):176-188.score: 12.0
    Preaching from the Book of Joshua can often be “trouble” because of the book’s content. To avoid trouble in a sermon is to rob the text of its potential healing power. In our contemporary world, preaching from this difficult book may prove necessary. This essay explores several homiletical approaches.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Renato Somberg Pfeffer (2011). Reflexões sobre a educação contemporânea: a contribuição de Abraham Joshua Heschel a partir de suas raízes judaicas. Conjectura: Filosofia E Educação 16 (3):68-77.score: 12.0
    A filosofia da educação de Abraham Joshua Heschel busca, na tradição judaica, uma luz para o homem moderno. Esta tradição afirma que o mundo descansa sobre três pilares: estudar para participar da sabedoria divina, cultuar o Criador e ter compaixão pelo nosso próximo. Nossa civilização, afirma o filósofo, subverteu esses pilares fazendo do estudo uma forma de alcançar o poder, da caridade um instrumento de relações públicas e do culto uma forma de adorar nosso próprio ego. Essa crise extrema (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Richard Dean (2010). Does Neuroscience Undermine Deontological Theory? Neuroethics 3 (1):43-60.score: 9.0
    Joshua Greene has argued that several lines of empirical research, including his own fMRI studies of brain activity during moral decision-making, comprise strong evidence against the legitimacy of deontology as a moral theory. This is because, Greene maintains, the empirical studies establish that “characteristically deontological” moral thinking is driven by prepotent emotional reactions which are not a sound basis for morality in the contemporary world, while “characteristically consequentialist” thinking is a more reliable moral guide because it is characterized by (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Wlodek Rabinowicz (2008). Value Relations. Theoria 74 (1):18-49.score: 9.0
    Abstract: The paper provides a general account of value relations. It takes its departure in a special type of value relation, parity, which according to Ruth Chang is a form of evaluative comparability that differs from the three standard forms of comparability: betterness, worseness and equal goodness. Recently, Joshua Gert has suggested that the notion of parity can be accounted for if value comparisons are interpreted as normative assessments of preference. While Gert's basic idea is attractive, the way he (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. David J. Frost (2012). Book Review of Alexander, Joshua. Experimental Philosophy: An Introduction. Philosophia 40 (4):903-917.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Eric Wiland (2007). Intentional Action and "in Order To". Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 27 (1):113-118.score: 9.0
    I. Thanks largely to Joshua Knobe, philosophers now frequently empirically investigate the folk psychological concept of intentional action. Knobe (2003, 2004a, 2004b) argues that application of this concept is often surprisingly sensitive to one’s moral views. In particular, it seems that people are much more willing to regard a bit of behavior as intentional, if they think that the action in question is bad or wrong. There is much controversy about both the design and the interpretation of the experiments (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Timothy Williamson (forthcoming). Review of Joshua Alexander, Experimental Philosophy: An Introduction. Philosophy.score: 9.0
  17. Mark van Roojen (2011). Review of Joshua Gert, Brute Rationality: Normativity and Human Action. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 82 (2):543-546.score: 9.0
  18. Joshua Knobe (2007). Acting Intentionally and Acting for a Reason. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 27 (1):119-122.score: 9.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. John Michael McGuire (2012). Side-Effect Actions, Acting for a Reason, and Acting Intentionally. Philosophical Explorations 15 (3):317 - 333.score: 9.0
    What is the relation between acting intentionally and acting for a reason? While this question has generated a considerable amount of debate in the philosophy of action, on one point there has been a virtual consensus: actions performed for a reason are necessarily intentional. Recently, this consensus has been challenged by Joshua Knobe and Sean Kelly, who argue against it on the basis of empirical evidence concerning the ways in which ordinary speakers of the English language describe and explain (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Kenneth Royce Moore (2008). Plato's Fable: On the Mortal Condition in Shadowy Times – Joshua Mitchell. Philosophical Quarterly 58 (232):539–541.score: 9.0
  21. Pablo Gilabert (2012). Is There a Human Right to Democracy? A Response to Joshua Cohen. Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofia Politica / Latin American Journal of Political Philosophy 1 (2):1-37.score: 9.0
  22. Giovanna Perini (1988). Sir Joshua Reynolds and Italian Art and Art Literature. A Study of the Sketchbooks in the British Museum and in Sir John Soane's Museum. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 51:141-168.score: 9.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Graham Hubbs (2014). Transparency, Corruption, and Democratic Institutions. Les Ateliers de l'Éthique / the Ethics Forum 9 (1):65-83.score: 9.0
    This essay examines some of the institutional arrangements that underlie corruption in democracy. It begins with a discussion of institutions as such, elaborating and extending some of John Searle’s remarks on the topic. It then turns to an examination of specifically democratic institutions; it draws here on Joshua Cohen’s recent Rousseau: A Free Community of Equals. One of the central concerns of Cohen’s Rousseau is how to arrange civic institutions so that they are able to perform their public functions (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Lawrence Blum (2001). Joshua Cohen, Matthew Howard, and Martha C. Nussbaum, Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?:Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? Ethics 111 (3):622-625.score: 9.0
  25. A. M. Viens (2008). Joshua Gert, Brute Rationality: Normativity and Human Action (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), Pp. XIII + 244. [REVIEW] Utilitas 20 (2):246-248.score: 9.0
  26. Johan E. Gustafsson (2013). Value-Preference Symmetry and Fitting-Attitude Accounts of Value Relations. Philosophical Quarterly 63 (252):476–491.score: 9.0
    Joshua Gert and Wlodek Rabinowicz have developed frameworks for value relations that are rich enough to allow for non-standard value relations such as parity. Yet their frameworks do not allow for any non-standard preference relations. In this paper, I shall defend a symmetry between values and preferences, namely, that for every value relation, there is a corresponding preference relation, and vice versa. I claim that if the arguments that there are non-standard value relations are cogent, these arguments, mutatis mutandis, (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. D. Miller (2010). Philosophy, Politics, Democracy * by Joshua Cohen. Analysis 71 (1):202-204.score: 9.0
    (No abstract is available for this citation).
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Robyn Bluhm (forthcoming). No Need for Alarm: A Critical Analysis of Greene's Dual-Process Theory of Moral Decision-Making. Neuroethics:1-18.score: 9.0
    Joshua Greene and his colleagues have proposed a dual-process theory of moral decision-making to account for the effects of emotional responses on our judgments about moral dilemmas that ask us to contemplate causing direct personal harm. Early formulations of the theory contrast emotional and cognitive decision-making, saying that each is the product of a separable neural system. Later formulations emphasize that emotions are also involved in cognitive processing. I argue that, given the acknowledgement that emotions inform cognitive decision-making, a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Günter Leypoldt (1999). A Neoclassical Dilemma in Sir Joshua Reynolds's Reflections on Art. British Journal of Aesthetics 39 (4):330-349.score: 9.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Jukka Mikkonen (2013). How to Do Things with FictionsBy Joshua Landy. Analysis 73 (3):597-598.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Walter J. Hipple Jr (1953). General and Particular in the Discourses of Sir Joshua Reynolds: A Study in Method. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 11 (3):231-247.score: 9.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Binoy Kampmark (2006). Karen J. Greenberg and Joshua Dratel, The Torture Papers: The Road to Abu Ghraib:The Torture Papers: The Road to Abu Ghraib. Ethics 116 (2):421-425.score: 9.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Diane Enns (2006). Review of Joshua Kates, Essential History: Jacques Derrida and the Development of Deconstruction. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (5).score: 9.0
  34. D. Ellis Evans (1972). Ancient Gallic Dialects Joshua Whatmough: The Dialects of Ancient Gaul: Prolegomena and Records of the Dialects. Pp. Xix+85+1376; 4 Maps. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1970. Cloth, $30.00. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 22 (02):243-245.score: 9.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Leslie MacAvoy (2009). Review of Joshua James Shaw, Emmanuel Levinas on the Priority of Ethics: Putting Ethics First. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (9).score: 9.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Charles Pigden (2014). Normative Bedrock: Response-Dependence, Rationality, and Reasons, by Joshua Gert. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92 (1):207-208.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. A. D. Sanger (1903). Book Review:National Education. H. E. Armstrong, H. W. Eve, Joshua Fitch, W. A. Hewins, John C. Medd, T. A. Organ, A. D. Provand, B. Reynolds, Francis Stoves, Laurie Magnus. [REVIEW] Ethics 13 (3):395-.score: 9.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. E. Jennifer Ashworth (2010). Review of Joshua P. Hochschild, The Semantics of Analogy: Rereading Cajetan's De Nominum Analogia. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (7).score: 9.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Charles Pigden (2013). Book Note: Gert, Joshua, Normative Bedrock: Response-Dependence Rationality and Reasons, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013, X + 218 Pp, Hardback. [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy (1):1-1.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Gary Banham (2008). Joshua Kates, Essential History: Jacques Derrida and the Development of Deconstruction (Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press, 2005), 352pp, $29.95 (USD), ISBN 10: 0810123274, ISBN-13: 978-0810123274. [REVIEW] Derrida Today 5 (1):131-133.score: 9.0
    This book promises a ‘radical reappraisal’ (Kates 2005, xv) of Derrida, concentrating particularly on the relationship of Derrida to philosophy, one of the most vexed questions in the reception of his work. The aim of the book is to provide the grounds for this reappraisal through a reinterpretation in particular of two of the major works Derrida published in 1967: Speech and Phenomena and Of Grammatology. However the study of the development of Derrida's work is the real achievement of the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Tom Martin (2012). Joshua Glasgow, A Theory of Race (New York: Routledge, 2009). Philosophical Papers 41 (1):175-179.score: 9.0
    Philosophical Papers, Volume 41, Issue 1, Page 175-179, March 2012.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Martin McNamara (2009). From Joshua to Caiaphas: High Priests After the Exile. By James C. VanderKam. Heythrop Journal 50 (6):1015-1015.score: 9.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Nick Fotion (2010). Review of Joshua Rust, John Searle. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (5).score: 9.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Sebastian Köhler (2013). Normative Bedrock: Response-Dependence, Rationality and Reasons By Joshua Gert. Analysis 74 (1):ant094.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Reuven Kimelman (2009). Abraham Joshua Heschel's Theology of Judaism and the Rewriting of Jewish Intellectual History. Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 17 (2):207-238.score: 9.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. G. F. Schueler (2013). Review of Joshua Gert: Normative Bedrock: Resopnse-Dependence, Rationality, and Reasons. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2013 (05.24).score: 9.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Barbara Crostini (2011). Byzantine Jewry in the Mediterranean Economy. By Joshua Holo. Heythrop Journal 52 (3):482-483.score: 9.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. William Eastman (1972). The Appeal to the Given: A Study in Epistemology. By Jacob Joshua Ross. London: George Allen and Unwin; Toronto: Methuen. 1970. Pp. 224. $6.00. [REVIEW] Dialogue 11 (04):649-651.score: 9.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. W. Jenkyn Jones (1901). Book Review:Educational Aims and Methods. Joshua Fitch. [REVIEW] Ethics 11 (3):404-.score: 9.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Yehuda Halper (2013). Maimonides & Spinoza: Their Conflicting Views of Human Nature by Joshua Parens (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 51 (2):319-320.score: 9.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000