7 found
Sort by:
  1. Birte Siim & Judith Squires (2007). Contesting Citizenship: Comparative Analyses. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 10 (4):403-416.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Judith Squires (2007). Negotiating Equality and Diversity in Britain: Towards a Differentiated Citizenship? Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 10 (4):531-559.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Chris Armstrong & Judith Squires (2002). Beyond the Public/Private Dichotomy: Relational Space and Sexual Inequalities. Contemporary Political Theory 1 (3):261-283.
  4. Judith Squires (2000). Hugh Mercer Curtler: Rediscovering Values: Coming to Terms with Postmodernism. [REVIEW] Journal of Value Inquiry 34 (4):579-583.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Sandra Kemp & Judith Squires (eds.) (1998). Feminisms. Oxford University Press.
    Spanning nearly two decades, from 1980 to 1996, this Reader investigates the debates which have best characterized feminist theory. Including such articles as Pornography and Fantasy, The Body and Cinema, Nature as Female, and A Manifesto for Cyborgs, the extracts examine thoughts on sexualtiy as a domain of exploration, the visual representation of women, what being a feminist means, and why feminists are increasingly involved in political struggles to negotiate the context and meaning of technological development. With writings by bell (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Judith Squires (ed.) (1993). Principled Positions: Postmodernism and the Rediscovery of Value. Lawrence & Wishart.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Judith Squires (0040). Deliberation, Domination and Decision-Making. Theoria (=117;User_Persona=false;ord=1234):104-133.
    Feminist critiques of deliberative democracy have focused on the abstraction, impartiality and rationality of mainstream accounts of deliberation. This paper explores the claim, common to many of these critiques, that these features are problematic because they are gendered, and that a more women-friendly account of democracy would embrace corporeality, contextuality and the affective. While acknowledging the merit of such a claim, the paper nonetheless suggests that the pursuit of social justice and democratic inclusion actually leads many feminists to embrace a (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation