10 found
Sort by:
  1. Juho Ritola (forthcoming). Jonathan E. Adler and Lance J. Rips (Eds): Reasoning: Studies of Human Inference and Its Foundations. Argumentation:1-8.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Juho Ritola (2012). Critical Thinking is Epistemically Responsible. Metaphilosophy 43 (5):659-678.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Juha Räikkä & Juho Ritola (2011). Eric Racine , Pragmatic Neuroethics: Improving Treatment and Understanding of the Mind-Brain . Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 31 (3):228-231.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Juho Ritola (2011). Justificationist Social Epistemology and Critical Thinking. Educational Theory 61 (5):565-585.
    In this essay Juho Ritola develops a justificationist approach to social epistemology, which holds that normatively satisfactory social processes pertaining to the acquisition, storage, dissemination, and use of knowledge must be evidence-based processes that include appropriate reflective attitudes by the relevant agents and, consequently, the relevant institutions. This implies that the teaching of critical thinking and reasoning in general should strive to bring about such attitudes in students. Ritola begins by sketching a justificationist approach and defending it on a general (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Juho Ritola (ed.) (2010). Argument Cultures: Proceedings of OSSA 2009. OSSA.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Juho Ritola (2008). Harmless Epistemic Circularity? Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 53:227-233.
    Epistemic circularity is a problem of arguments purporting to establish the reliability of our different sources of belief‐acquisition. For example:(TRA)At t1, S formed the perceptual belief that p, and p.At t2, S formed the perceptual belief that q, and q.At t3, …Therefore, sense perception is reliable source of beliefs.The problem is that any arguer putting forth this argument is ompelled to rely on the thing to be proven in establishing the second conjuncts of each premise. But relying on the thing (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Juho Ritola (2008). Walton's Informal Logic: A Pragmatic Approach. Informal Logic 28 (4):335-345.
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Juho Ritola (2006). Justified and Justifiable Beliefs: The Case of Question-Begging. Philosophical Studies 128 (3):565 - 583.
    This paper discusses Lippert-Rasmussen’s [Philosophical Studies 104, (2001) 123–141] claim that there are reasonable question-begging arguments. It is first argued that his arguments devalue the distinction between justifiable and justified beliefs, a distinction that is important for the fallacy theory. Second, it is argued that the role of the argument in the discussed cases can be questioned. In addition, the role of second order beliefs is discussed.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Juho Ritola (2003). Begging the Question: A Case Study. [REVIEW] Argumentation 17 (1):1-19.
    The essay starts by presenting two accounts of begging the question, John Biro's epistemic account and David Sanford's doxastic account. After briefly comparing these accounts, the essay will study an argument suspected of begging the question and subsequently apply the epistemic and doxastic accounts to this test case. It is found that the accounts of Biro and Sanford do not analyse the test case adequately, therefore a new account is developed using the idea of a knowledge-base.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Juhani Pietarinen & Juho Ritola (2000). Brutian's Logic, Language and Argumentation in Projection of Philosophical Knowledge. Informal Logic 20 (2).
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation