49 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Jules L. Coleman [43]Jules Coleman [7]
  1. Jules Coleman & Alexander Sarch (2012). Blameworthiness and Time. Legal Theory 18 (2):101-137.
    Reactive emotion accounts hold that blameworthiness should be analyzed in terms of the familiar reactive emotions. However, despite the attractions of such views, we are not persuaded that blameworthiness is ultimately a matter of correctly felt reactive emotion. In this paper, we draw attention to a range of little-discussed considerations involving the moral significance of the passage of time that drive a wedge between blameworthiness and the reactive emotions: the appropriateness of the reactive emotions is sensitive to the passage of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Jules L. Coleman (2009). Beyond Inclusive Legal Positivism. Ratio Juris 22 (3):359-394.
    In this essay, I characterize the original intervention that became Inclusive Legal Positivism, defend it against a range of powerful objections, explain its contribution to jurisprudence, and display its limitations and its modest jurisprudential significance. I also show how in its original formulations ILP depends on three notions that are either mistaken or inessential to law: the separability thesis, the rule of recognition, and the idea of criteria of legality. The first is false and is in event inessential to legal (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Jules L. Coleman, Theories of Tort Law. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Jules L. Coleman (2007). Beyond the Separability Thesis: Moral Semantics and the Methodology of Jurisprudence. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 27 (4):581-608.
    Next SectionIn emphasizing the importance of the separability thesis, legal philosophers have inadequately appreciated other philosophically important ways in which law and morality are or might be connected with one another. In this article, I argue that the separability thesis cannot shoulder the philosophical burdens that it has been asked to bear. I then turn to two issues of greater importance to jurisprudence. These are ‘the moral semantics of law’ and ‘the normativity of theory construction in jurisprudence’. The moral semantics (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Jules Coleman (2005). Joel Feinberg, 1926-2004. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 78 (5):172 - 174.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Jules L. Coleman (2005). 18 Facts, Fictions, and the Grounds of Law. In Joseph Keim Campbell, Michael O'Rourke & David Shier (eds.), Law and Social Justice. Mit Press. 3--327.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Jules L. Coleman (2003). The Grounds of Welfare. Yale Law Journal 112:1511.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Jules L. Coleman & Ori Simchen (2003). 'Law'. Legal Theory 9 (1):1-41.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Jules Coleman (2002). Methodology. In Jules Coleman & Scott J. Shapiro (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law. Oup Oxford.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Jules L. Coleman & Scott Shapiro (eds.) (2002). The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law. Oxford University Press.
    One of the first volumes in the new series of prestigious Oxford Handbooks, The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law brings together specially commissioned essays by twenty-seven of the foremost legal theorists currently writing, to provide a state of the art overview of jurisprudential scholarship. Each author presents an account of the contending views and scholarly debates animating their field of enquiry as well as setting the agenda for further study. This landmark publication will be essential reading for (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Jules Coleman (2001). Tort Law and Tort Theory: Preliminary Reflections on Method. In Gerald J. Postema (ed.), Philosophy and the Law of Torts. Cambridge University Press. 183.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Jules L. Coleman (ed.) (2001). Hart's Postscript: Essays on the Postscript to the Concept of Law. Oxford University Press.
    The Postscript to 'The Concept of Law' contains Herbert Hart's only sustained and considered response to the objections made by his distinguished critic, Ronald Dworkin. In this extraordinary collection, an array of leading legal philosophers evaluates the success of Hart's response to Dworkin.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Jules L. Coleman (2001). Naturalized Jurisprudence and Naturalized Epistemology. Philosophical Topics 29 (1/2):113-126.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Jules L. Coleman (2001). The Practice of Principle: In Defence of a Pragmatist Approach to Legal Theory. Oxford University Press.
    Jules Coleman, one of the world's leading philosophers of law, here presents his most mature work so far on substantive issues in legal theory and the appropriate methodology for legal theorizing. In doing so, he takes on the views of highly respected contemporaries such as Brian Leiter, Stephen Perry, and Ronald Dworkin.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Jules L. Coleman (2001). The Conventionality Thesis. Noûs 35 (s1):354 - 387.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Jules L. Coleman (2000). Constraints on the Criteria of Legality. Legal Theory 6 (2):171-183.
    No one denies that moral principles figure in legal argument and practice. However, the kind of role morality can or must play in law has been a topic of debate not only between positivists and their critics, but also within the positivist camp. The topic was brought into contemporary prominence by Ronald Dworkin, who in TheModelofRulesI made the provocative observation that the legality of norms appears to depend sometimes on their substantive (moral) merits, and not just on their pedigree or (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Roger Ariew, John Cottingham, Tom Sorrell, Richard J. Blackwell, Robert de Lucca, David Boucher, Bruce Haddock, Warren Breckman, Elena Castellani & Jules L. Coleman (1999). Appearance in This List Neither Guarantees nor Precludes a Future Review of the Book. Adamson, Jane, Freadman, Richard and Parker, David (Eds.), Renegotiating Ethics in Literature, Philosophy, and Theory, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, 1999, Pp. 294,£ 35.00,£ 12.95. Annas, Julia, Platonic Ethics Old and New, Ithaca, New York, USA, Cornell Univer. [REVIEW] Mind 108:430.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Jules L. Coleman (ed.) (1999). Readings in the Philosophy of Law. Garland Pub..
    An extraordinary collection of the finest essays in the core areas of legal philosophy, Readings in Philosophy of Law is a perfect introduction to the breadth of issues covered in the philosophy of law. The essays are all classic papers chosen as much for their clarity of thought and comprehensiveness as for their distinctiveness and importance to the subject matters of legal philosophy. This collection is ideal for the professional as well as the student, as it brings together classic essays (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Jules L. Coleman (1998). Incorporationism, Conventionality, and the Practical Difference Thesis. Legal Theory 4 (4):381-425.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Jules L. Coleman, Christopher W. Morris & Gregory S. Kavka (eds.) (1998). Rational Commitment and Social Justice: Essays for Gregory Kavka. Cambridge University Press.
    Greg Kavka (1947-1994) was a prominent and influential figure in contemporary moral and political philosophy. The new essays in this volume are concerned with fundamental issues of rational commitment and social justice to which Kavka devoted his work as a philosopher. The essays take Kavka's work as a point of departure and seek to advance the respective debates. The topics include: the relationship between intention and moral action as part of which Kavka's famous 'toxin puzzle' is a focus of discussion, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Jules L. Coleman (1997). Rational Choice and Rational Cognition. Legal Theory 3 (2):183-203.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Jules L. Coleman & Brian Leiter (1996). Legal Positivism. In Dennis M. Patterson (ed.), A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. Blackwell Publishers.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Jules L. Coleman (1995). Truth and Objectivity in Law. Legal Theory 1 (1):33-68.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Allen Buchanan & Jules Coleman (eds.) (1994). In Harm's Way: Essays in Honor of Joel Feinberg. Cambridge University Press.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Jules L. Coleman (ed.) (1994). Crimes and Punishments. Garland Pub..
    Meeting of the Aristotelian Society at 21, Bedford Square, London, WCI, on 29/A October,, at 7.30 pm PAPERS READ BEFORE THE ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Jules L. Coleman (1994). Corrective Justice and Property Rights. Social Philosophy and Policy 11 (2):124-138.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Jules L. Coleman (ed.) (1994). Private Law Theory. Garland Pub..
    The Tragedy of the Commons The population prohlem has no technical solution; it requires a fundamental extension in morality. ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Jules L. Coleman (ed.) (1994). Rights and Their Foundations. Garland Pub..
  29. Jules L. Coleman & Anthony James Sebok (eds.) (1994). Jurisprudence. Garland Pub..
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Joel Feinberg, Jules L. Coleman & Allen E. Buchanan (eds.) (1994). In Harm's Way: Essays in Honor of Joel Feinberg. Cambridge University Press.
    For several decades the work of Joel Feinberg has been the most influential in legal, political, and social philosophy in the English-speaking world. This volume honours that body of work by presenting fifteen original essays, many of them by leading legal and political philosophers, that explore the problems that have engaged Feinberg over the years. Amongst the topics covered are issues of autonomy, responsibility, and liability. It will be a collection of interest to anyone working in moral, legal, or political (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Jules L. Coleman (1993). Contracts and Torts. Law and Philosophy 12 (1):71 - 93.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Jules L. Coleman (1992/2002). Risks and Wrongs. Oxford University Press.
    This book by one of America's preeminent legal theorists is concerned with the conflict between the goals of justice and economic efficiency in the allocation of risk, especially risk pertaining to safety. The author approaches his subject from the premise that the market is central to liberal political, moral, and legal theory. In the first part of the book, he rejects traditional "rational choice" liberalism in favor of the view that the market operates as a rational way of fostering stable (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Jules Coleman (1989). On the Relationship Between Law and Morality. Ratio Juris 2 (1):66-78.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Jules L. Coleman (1988/1998). Markets, Morals, and the Law. Oxford University Press.
    This collection of essays by one of America's leading legal theorists is unique in its scope: it shows how traditional problems of philosophy can be understood more clearly when considered in terms of law, economics, and political science.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Jules L. Coleman (1987). Competition and Cooperation. Ethics 98 (1):76-90.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Jules L. Coleman & Ellen Frankel Paul (eds.) (1987). Philosophy and Law. B. Blackwell for the Social Philosophy and Policy Center, Bowling Green State University.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Jody S. Kraus & Jules L. Coleman (1987). Morality and the Theory of Rational Choice. Ethics 97 (4):715-749.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Jules L. Coleman & John Ferejohn (1986). Democracy and Social Choice. Ethics 97 (1):6-25.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Jules Coleman & Charles Silver (1986). Justice in Settlements. Social Philosophy and Policy 4 (01):102-.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Jules L. Coleman (1985). Market Contractarianism and the Unanimity Rule. Social Philosophy and Policy 2 (02):69-.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Jules L. Coleman (1984). Economics and the Law: A Critical Review of the Foundations of the Economic Approach to Law. Ethics 94 (4):649-679.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Jules L. Coleman (1983). Moral Theories of Torts: Their Scope and Limits: Part II. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 2 (1):5 - 36.
    One approach to legal theory is to provide some sort of rational reconstruction of all or of a large body of the common law. For philosophers of law this has usually meant trying to rationalize a body of law under one or another principle of justice. This paper explores the efforts of the leading tort theorists to provide a moral basis - in the sense of rational reconstruction based on alleged moral principles - for the law of torts. The paper (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Jules L. Coleman (1982). Moral Theories of Torts: Their Scope and Limits: Part I. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 1 (3):371 - 390.
    One approach to legal theory is to provide some sort of rational reconstruction of all or of a large body of the common law. For philosophers of law this has usually meant trying to rationalize a body of law under one or another principle of justice. This paper explores the efforts of the leading tort theorists to provide a moral basis — for the law of torts. The paper is divided into two parts. In the first part I consider and (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Jules L. Coleman (1982). The Economic Analysis of Law. In J. Roland Pennock & John William Chapman (eds.), Ethics, Economics, and the Law. New York University Press. 96--97.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Jules L. Coleman (1980). Legal Duty and Moral Argument. Social Theory and Practice 5 (3-4):377-407.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Jules L. Coleman & Michael Perloff (1975). On the Purported Inconsistency of Act-Utilitarianism. Philosophical Studies 28 (4):297 - 298.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Jules L. Coleman (1974). Justice and the Argument for No-Fault. Social Theory and Practice 3 (2):161-180.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Jules L. Coleman (1974). On the Moral Argument for the Fault System. Journal of Philosophy 71 (14):473-490.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Jules L. Coleman (1973). Justice and Preferential Hiring. Journal of Critical Analysis 5 (1):27-30.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation