52 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Jules L. Coleman [53]Jules Leslie Coleman [1]
  1.  44
    Jules L. Coleman (2001). The Practice of Principle: In Defence of a Pragmatist Approach to Legal Theory. Oxford University Press.
    Jules Coleman, one of the world's leading philosophers of law, here presents his most mature work so far on substantive issues in legal theory and the appropriate methodology for legal theorizing. In doing so, he takes on the views of highly respected contemporaries such as Brian Leiter, Stephen Perry, and Ronald Dworkin.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   41 citations  
  2.  59
    Jules L. Coleman (2007). Beyond the Separability Thesis: Moral Semantics and the Methodology of Jurisprudence. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 27 (4):581-608.
    Next SectionIn emphasizing the importance of the separability thesis, legal philosophers have inadequately appreciated other philosophically important ways in which law and morality are or might be connected with one another. In this article, I argue that the separability thesis cannot shoulder the philosophical burdens that it has been asked to bear. I then turn to two issues of greater importance to jurisprudence. These are ‘the moral semantics of law’ and ‘the normativity of theory construction in jurisprudence’. The moral semantics (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  3. Jules L. Coleman & Scott Shapiro (eds.) (2002). The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law. Oxford University Press.
    One of the first volumes in the new series of prestigious Oxford Handbooks, The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law brings together specially commissioned essays by twenty-seven of the foremost legal theorists currently writing, to provide a state of the art overview of jurisprudential scholarship. Each author presents an account of the contending views and scholarly debates animating their field of enquiry as well as setting the agenda for further study. This landmark publication will be essential reading for (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  4.  2
    Jules L. Coleman (1992/2002). Risks and Wrongs. Oxford University Press.
    This book by one of America's preeminent legal theorists is concerned with the conflict between the goals of justice and economic efficiency in the allocation of risk, especially risk pertaining to safety. The author approaches his subject from the premise that the market is central to liberal political, moral, and legal theory. In the first part of the book, he rejects traditional "rational choice" liberalism in favor of the view that the market operates as a rational way of fostering stable (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   15 citations  
  5. Joel Feinberg & Jules L. Coleman (1999). Philosophy of Law. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  6. Jules L. Coleman (ed.) (2001). Hart's Postscript: Essays on the Postscript to the Concept of Law. Oxford University Press.
    The Postscript to 'The Concept of Law' contains Herbert Hart's only sustained and considered response to the objections made by his distinguished critic, Ronald Dworkin. In this extraordinary collection, an array of leading legal philosophers evaluates the success of Hart's response to Dworkin.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  7. Jules L. Coleman & Ori Simchen (2003). 'Law'. Legal Theory 9 (1):1-41.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  8.  13
    Jules L. Coleman (1998). Incorporationism, Conventionality, and the Practical Difference Thesis. Legal Theory 4 (4):381-425.
    H.L.A. Hart's The Concept of Law is the most important and influential book in the legal positivist tradition. Though its importance is undisputed, there is a good deal less consensus regarding its core commitments, both methodological and substantive. With the exception of an occasional essay, Hart neither further developed nor revised his position beyond the argument of the book. The burden of shaping the prevailing understanding of his views, therefore, has fallen to others: notably, Joseph Raz among positivists, and Ronald (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  9.  18
    Jules L. Coleman, Theories of Tort Law. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  10. Jules L. Coleman (2009). Beyond Inclusive Legal Positivism. Ratio Juris 22 (3):359-394.
    In this essay, I characterize the original intervention that became Inclusive Legal Positivism, defend it against a range of powerful objections, explain its contribution to jurisprudence, and display its limitations and its modest jurisprudential significance. I also show how in its original formulations ILP depends on three notions that are either mistaken or inessential to law: the separability thesis, the rule of recognition, and the idea of criteria of legality. The first is false and is in event inessential to legal (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11. Jules L. Coleman & Brian Leiter (1996). Legal Positivism. In Dennis M. Patterson (ed.), A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. Blackwell Publishers
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  12.  49
    Jules L. Coleman & John Ferejohn (1986). Democracy and Social Choice. Ethics 97 (1):6-25.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  13.  22
    Jules L. Coleman (1988/1998). Markets, Morals, and the Law. Oxford University Press.
    This collection of essays by one of America's leading legal theorists is unique in its scope: it shows how traditional problems of philosophy can be understood more clearly when considered in terms of law, economics, and political science.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  14.  45
    Jules L. Coleman, Christopher W. Morris & Gregory S. Kavka (eds.) (1998). Rational Commitment and Social Justice: Essays for Gregory Kavka. Cambridge University Press.
    Greg Kavka (1947-1994) was a prominent and influential figure in contemporary moral and political philosophy. The new essays in this volume are concerned with fundamental issues of rational commitment and social justice to which Kavka devoted his work as a philosopher. The essays take Kavka's work as a point of departure and seek to advance the respective debates. The topics include: the relationship between intention and moral action as part of which Kavka's famous 'toxin puzzle' is a focus of discussion, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  15.  26
    Jules L. Coleman (2003). The Grounds of Welfare. Yale Law Journal 112:1511.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  16.  49
    Jules L. Coleman (1984). Economics and the Law: A Critical Review of the Foundations of the Economic Approach to Law. Ethics 94 (4):649-679.
  17.  19
    Jules L. Coleman (2001). Naturalized Jurisprudence and Naturalized Epistemology. Philosophical Topics 29 (1/2):113-126.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  18.  25
    Jody S. Kraus & Jules L. Coleman (1987). Morality and the Theory of Rational Choice. Ethics 97 (4):715-749.
  19.  4
    Jules L. Coleman (1995). Truth and Objectivity in Law. Legal Theory 1 (1):33-68.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  20.  98
    Joel Feinberg, Jules L. Coleman & Allen E. Buchanan (eds.) (1994). In Harm's Way: Essays in Honor of Joel Feinberg. Cambridge University Press.
    For several decades the work of Joel Feinberg has been the most influential in legal, political, and social philosophy in the English-speaking world. This volume honours that body of work by presenting fifteen original essays, many of them by leading legal and political philosophers, that explore the problems that have engaged Feinberg over the years. Amongst the topics covered are issues of autonomy, responsibility, and liability. It will be a collection of interest to anyone working in moral, legal, or political (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  21.  15
    Jules L. Coleman (1987). Competition and Cooperation. Ethics 98 (1):76-90.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  22.  16
    Jules L. Coleman (2001). The Conventionality Thesis. Noûs 35 (s1):354 - 387.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  23.  26
    Jules L. Coleman (1993). Contracts and Torts. Law and Philosophy 12 (1):71 - 93.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  24.  37
    Jules L. Coleman (1982). Moral Theories of Torts: Their Scope and Limits: Part I. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 1 (3):371 - 390.
    One approach to legal theory is to provide some sort of rational reconstruction of all or of a large body of the common law. For philosophers of law this has usually meant trying to rationalize a body of law under one or another principle of justice. This paper explores the efforts of the leading tort theorists to provide a moral basis — for the law of torts. The paper is divided into two parts. In the first part I consider and (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  24
    Jules L. Coleman (1983). Moral Theories of Torts: Their Scope and Limits: Part II. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 2 (1):5 - 36.
    One approach to legal theory is to provide some sort of rational reconstruction of all or of a large body of the common law. For philosophers of law this has usually meant trying to rationalize a body of law under one or another principle of justice. This paper explores the efforts of the leading tort theorists to provide a moral basis - in the sense of rational reconstruction based on alleged moral principles - for the law of torts. The paper (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  26. Jules L. Coleman (1982). The Economic Analysis of Law. In J. Roland Pennock & John William Chapman (eds.), Ethics, Economics, and the Law. New York University Press 96--97.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  27.  10
    Jules L. Coleman (1980). Legal Duty and Moral Argument. Social Theory and Practice 5 (3-4):377-407.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  3
    Jules L. Coleman (1994). Corrective Justice and Property Rights. Social Philosophy and Policy 11 (2):124-138.
    Suppose the prevailing distribution of property rights is unjust as determined by the relevant conception of distributive justice. You have far more than you should have under that theory and I have far less. Then I defraud you and in doing so reallocate resources so that our holdings ex post more closely approximate what distributive justice requires. Do I have a duty to return the property to you? There are many good reasons for requiring me to return to you what (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  29.  25
    Jules L. Coleman (1974). On the Moral Argument for the Fault System. Journal of Philosophy 71 (14):473-490.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  14
    Jules L. Coleman (1974). Justice and the Argument for No-Fault. Social Theory and Practice 3 (2):161-180.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  3
    Jules L. Coleman (2000). Constraints on the Criteria of Legality. Legal Theory 6 (2):171-183.
    No one denies that moral principles figure in legal argument and practice. However, the kind of role morality can or must play in law has been a topic of debate not only between positivists and their critics, but also within the positivist camp. The topic was brought into contemporary prominence by Ronald Dworkin, who in TheModelofRulesI made the provocative observation that the legality of norms appears to depend sometimes on their substantive (moral) merits, and not just on their pedigree or (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  5
    Jules L. Coleman (1997). Rational Choice and Rational Cognition. Legal Theory 3 (2):183-203.
    There is a close but largely unexplored connection between law and economics and cognitive psychology. Law and economics applies economic models, modes of analysis, and argument to legal problems. Economic theory can be applied to legal problems for predictive, explanatory, or evaluative purposes. In explaining or assessing human action, economic theory presupposes a largely unarticulated account of rational, intentional action. Philosophers typically analyze intentional action in terms of desires and beliefs . I intend to perform some action because I believe (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  2
    Roger Ariew, John Cottingham, Tom Sorrell, Richard J. Blackwell, Robert de Lucca, David Boucher, Bruce Haddock, Warren Breckman, Elena Castellani & Jules L. Coleman (1999). Appearance in This List Neither Guarantees nor Precludes a Future Review of the Book. Adamson, Jane, Freadman, Richard and Parker, David (Eds.), Renegotiating Ethics in Literature, Philosophy, and Theory, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, 1999, Pp. 294,£ 35.00,£ 12.95. Annas, Julia, Platonic Ethics Old and New, Ithaca, New York, USA, Cornell Univer. [REVIEW] Mind 108:430.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  12
    Jules L. Coleman & Michael Perloff (1975). On the Purported Inconsistency of Act-Utilitarianism. Philosophical Studies 28 (4):297 - 298.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  8
    Jules L. Coleman (1985). Market Contractarianism and the Unanimity Rule. Social Philosophy and Policy 2 (2):69.
    This essay is part of a larger project exploring the extent to which the market paradigm might be usefully employed to explain and in some instances justify nonmarket institutions. The focus of the market paradigm in this essay is the relationship between the idea of a perfectly competitive market and aspects of both the rationality of political association and the theory of collective choice. In particular, this essay seeks to identify what connections, if any, exist between one kind of market (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  4
    Jules L. Coleman (1973). Justice and Preferential Hiring. Journal of Critical Analysis 5 (1):27-30.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  29
    Jules L. Coleman (ed.) (1994). Crimes and Punishments. Garland Pub..
    Meeting of the Aristotelian Society at 21, Bedford Square, London, WCI, on 29/A October,, at 7.30 pm PAPERS READ BEFORE THE ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Jules L. Coleman (2005). 18 Facts, Fictions, and the Grounds of Law. In Joseph Keim Campbell, Michael O'Rourke & David Shier (eds.), Law and Social Justice. MIT Press 3--327.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Jules L. Coleman & Anthony James Sebok (eds.) (1994). Jurisprudence. Garland Pub..
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Jules L. Coleman (1988). Markets, Morals and the Law. Cambridge University Press.
    This collection of essays by one of America's leading legal theorists is unique in its scope: It shows how traditional problems of philosophy can be understood more clearly when considered in terms of law, economics and political science. There are four sections in the book. The first offers a new version of legal positivism and an original theory of legal rights. The second section critically evaluates the economic approach to law, and the third considers the relationship of justice to liability (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Jules L. Coleman (2002). Markets, Morals, and the Law. OUP Oxford.
    This collection of essays by one of America's leading legal theorists is unique in its scope: It shows how traditional problems of philosophy can be understood more clearly when considered in terms of law, economics and political science.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Jules L. Coleman & Ellen Frankel Paul (eds.) (1987). Philosophy and Law. B. Blackwell for the Social Philosophy and Policy Center, Bowling Green State University.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  23
    Jules L. Coleman (ed.) (1994). Private Law Theory. Garland Pub..
    The Tragedy of the Commons The population prohlem has no technical solution; it requires a fundamental extension in morality. ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Jules L. Coleman (ed.) (1994). Rights and Their Foundations. Garland Pub..
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Jules L. Coleman & Christopher W. Morris (eds.) (2009). Rational Commitment and Social Justice: Essays for Gregory Kavka. Cambridge University Press.
    Gregory S. Kavka was a prominent and influential figure in contemporary moral and political philosophy. The essays in this volume are concerned with fundamental issues of rational commitment and social justice to which Kavka devoted his work as a philosopher. The essays take Kavka's work as a point of departure and seek to advance the respective debates. The topics include: the relationship between intention and moral action as part of which Kavka's famous 'toxin puzzle' is a focus of discussion, the (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Jules L. Coleman & Christopher W. Morris (eds.) (2011). Rational Commitment and Social Justice: Essays for Gregory Kavka. Cambridge University Press.
    Gregory S. Kavka was a prominent and influential figure in contemporary moral and political philosophy. The essays in this volume are concerned with fundamental issues of rational commitment and social justice to which Kavka devoted his work as a philosopher. The essays take Kavka's work as a point of departure and seek to advance the respective debates. The topics include: the relationship between intention and moral action as part of which Kavka's famous 'toxin puzzle' is a focus of discussion, the (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Jules L. Coleman & Christopher W. Morris (eds.) (2007). Rational Commitment and Social Justice: Essays for Gregory Kavka. Cambridge University Press.
    Gregory S. Kavka was a prominent and influential figure in contemporary moral and political philosophy. The essays in this volume are concerned with fundamental issues of rational commitment and social justice to which Kavka devoted his work as a philosopher. The essays take Kavka's work as a point of departure and seek to advance the respective debates. The topics include: the relationship between intention and moral action as part of which Kavka's famous 'toxin puzzle' is a focus of discussion, the (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  26
    Jules L. Coleman (ed.) (1999). Readings in the Philosophy of Law. Garland Pub..
    An extraordinary collection of the finest essays in the core areas of legal philosophy, Readings in Philosophy of Law is a perfect introduction to the breadth of issues covered in the philosophy of law. The essays are all classic papers chosen as much for their clarity of thought and comprehensiveness as for their distinctiveness and importance to the subject matters of legal philosophy. This collection is ideal for the professional as well as the student, as it brings together classic essays (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Jules L. Coleman (1978). Reply to Pilon. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 59 (3):307.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Jules L. Coleman (2001). The Conventionality Thesis. Philosophical Issues 11 (1):354-387.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 52