21 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Julian Hochberg [17]Julian E. Hochberg [4]
  1.  1
    E. H. Gombrich, Julian Hochberg & Max Black (1974). Art, Perception, and Reality. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 34 (3):450-451.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   35 citations  
  2.  9
    Julian Hochberg & Edward McAlister (1953). A Quantitative Approach, to Figural "Goodness". Journal of Experimental Psychology 46 (5):361.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   38 citations  
  3. Julian Hochberg (1970). Attention, Organization, and Consciousness. In D. Mostofsky (ed.), Attention: Contemporary Theory and Analysis. Appleton-Century-Crofts 99--124.
  4.  8
    Julian Hochberg (1981). On Cognition in Perception: Perceptual Coupling and Unconscious Inference. Cognition 10 (1-3):127-134.
  5.  4
    Julian E. Hochberg, William Triebel & Gideon Seaman (1951). Color Adaptation Under Conditions of Homogeneous Visual Stimulation (Ganzfeld). Journal of Experimental Psychology 41 (2):153.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  6.  5
    Julian Hochberg (1984). The Perception of Pictorial Representations. Social Research 51.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  4
    Julian Hochberg & Virginia Brooks (1958). Effects of Previously Associated Annoying Stimuli (Auditory) on Visual Recognition Thresholds. Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 (5):490.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  14
    Julian Hochberg (2001). In the Mind's Eye: Perceptual Coupling and Sensorimotor Contingencies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):986-986.
    The theoretical proposal that perceptual experience be thought of as expectancies about sensorimotor contingencies, rather than as expressions of mental representations, is endorsed; examples that effectively enforce that view are discussed; and one example (of perceptual coupling) that seems to demand a mental representation, with all of the diagnostic value such a tool would have, is raised for consideration.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  2
    Julian E. Hochberg & Jacob Beck (1954). Apparent Spatial Arrangement and Perceived Brightness. Journal of Experimental Psychology 47 (4):263.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  10.  1
    Julian E. Hochberg (1950). Figure-Ground Reversal as a Function of Visual Satiation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 40 (5):682.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11.  3
    Julian Hochberg & Leon Festinger (1979). Is There Curvature Adaptation Not Attributable to Purely Intravisual Phenomena? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (1):71.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  8
    Julian Hochberg (2001). Direct Information on the Cutting Room Floor. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):107-108.
    Norman's assigning of the constructivist percept-percept coupling approach and the ecological affordances approach to the ventral and dorsal visual systems, respectively, makes a more workable metatheory than each taken separately, but brings both under closer inspection.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  9
    Julian Hochberg (2003). Backdrop, Flat, and Prop: The Stage for Active Perceptual Inquiry. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):414-415.
    Lehar's revival of phenomenology and his all-encompassing Gestalt Bubble model are ambitious and stimulating. I offer an illustrated caution about phenomenology, a more fractured alternative to his Bubble model, and two lines of phenomena that may disqualify his isomorphism. I think a perceptual-inquiry model can contend.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  9
    Julian Hochberg (1999). Perception as Purposeful Inquiry: We Elect Where to Direct Each Glance, and Determine What is Encoded Within and Between Glances. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):619-620.
    In agreement with Barsalou's point that perceptions are not the records or the products of a recording system, and with a nod to an older system in which perception is an activity of testing what future glances bring, I argue that the behavior of perceptual inquiry necessarily makes choices in what is sampled; in what and how the sample is encoded, and what structure across samples is pursued and tested; and when to conclude the inquiry. Much of this is now (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  1
    Julian Hochberg & Edward McAlister (1954). "A Quantitative Approach to Figural Goodness": Erratum. Journal of Experimental Psychology 47 (2):136-136.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  16. Julian Hochberg & Mary A. Peterson (1987). Piecemeal Organization and Cognitive Components in Object Perception: Perceptually Coupled Responses to Moving Objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 116 (4):370-380.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  17.  2
    Julian Hochberg (2001). TEC – Some Problems and Some Prospects. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):888-889.
    The Theory of Event Coding (TEC) is a significant contribution to the study of purposeful perceptual behavior, and can be made more so by recognizing a major context (the work of Tolman, Liberman, Neisser); some significant problems (tightening predictions and defining distal stimuli); and an extremely important area of potential application (ongoing anticipation and perceptual inquiry, as in reading and movies).
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Julian E. Hochberg (1957). Effects of the Gestalt Revolution: The Cornell Symposium on Perception. Psychological Review 64 (2):73-84.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Julian Hochberg (1956). Perception: Toward the Recovery of a Definition. Psychological Review 63 (6):400-405.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Julian Hochberg (1989). The Perception of Moving Images. Iris 9:41-68.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Gardner Murphy & Julian Hochberg (1951). Perceptual Development: Some Tentative Hypotheses. Psychological Review 58 (5):332-349.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography