Search results for 'Julie Cook Lucas' (try it on Scholar)

999 found
Sort by:
  1. Mohammed Abu-Nimer, Terence Ball, Linell Cady, Shaun Casey, Martin Cook, David Cortright, Richard Dagger, Amitai Etzoni, Félix Gutiérrez, Mitchell R. Haney, George Lucas, Oscar J. Martinez, Joan McGregor, Christopher McLeod, Jeffrie Murphy, Brian Orend, Darren Ranco, Roberto Suro, Rebecca Tsosie & Angela Wilson (2005). War and Border Crossings: Ethics When Cultures Clash. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.score: 2400.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Julie Cook (1998). The Philosophical Colonization of Ecofeminism. Environmental Ethics 20 (3):227-246.score: 240.0
    There is general agreement among ecofeminists regarding the desirability of a variety of expressions of ecofeminism, but this pluralism is under threat with the emergence of an approach that emphasizes the primacy of a philosophical ecofeminism which claims the authority to prescribe what ecofeminism should be. The recent anthology Ecological Feminism is symptomatic of this trend, with contributors who affirm the philosophical significance of ecological feminism by privileging philosophers’ voices over those of other ecofeminists, rather than by engaging in critical (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Takeshi Morimoto, Tejal K. Gandhi, Julie M. Fiskio, Andrew C. Seger, Joseph W. So, E. Francis Cook, Tsuguya Fukui & David W. Bates (2004). An Evaluation of Risk Factors for Adverse Drug Events Associated with Angiotensin‐Converting Enzyme Inhibitors. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 10 (4):499-509.score: 240.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Julie Adkins, Kathleen Arnold, Kurt Borchard, David Cook, Jeff Ferrell, Vincent Lyon-Callo, Jürgen von Mahs, Don Mitchell, Rob Rosenthal, Michael Rowe, Lynn A. Staeheli & J. Talmadge Wright (2012). Professional Lives, Personal Struggles: Ethics and Advocacy in Research on Homelessness. Lexington Books.score: 240.0
    This is the first book published that specifically examines questions of ethics and advocacy that arise in conducting research on homelessness, exploring the issues through the deeply personal experiences of some of the field’s leading scholars. By examining the central queries from a broad range of perspectives, the authors presented here draw upon years of rich investigations to generate a framework that will be instructive for researchers across a wide spectrum of areas of inquiry.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Nancy Armstrong, Deborah Cook, James Cruise, Lisa Eck, Megan Heffernan, David Jenemann, Nigel Joseph, Tom McCall, Lucy McNeece, JoAnne Myers, Julie Orlemanski, Jonathon Penny, Dale Shin, Vivasvan Soni, Frederick Turner & Philip Weinstein (2011). Individualism: The Cultural Logic of Modernity. Lexington Books.score: 240.0
    Individualism: The Cultural Logic of Modernity is an edited collection of sixteen essays on the idea of the modern sovereign individual in the western cultural tradition. Reconsidering the eighteenth-century realist novel, twentieth-century modernism, and underappreciated topics on individualism and literature, this volume provocatively revises and enriches our understanding of individualism as the generative premise of modernity itself.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Julie Cook (2003). [Book Review] Ecofeminist Philosophy. [REVIEW] Environmental Values 12 (1):131-133.score: 240.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Patricia Cook Lucas (1987). Vico and Joyce. New Vico Studies 5:180-181.score: 240.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Billy Joe Lucas (2002). Logical Constructivism, Modal Logic, and Metaphysics: A Reply to Professor Pruss' ``Professor Lucas' Second Epistemic Way''. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 52 (3):143-157.score: 180.0
  9. J. R. Lucas (1998). Transcendental Tense: J.R. Lucas. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 72 (1):45–56.score: 180.0
  10. J. R. Lucas (1984). Lucas, Godel and Astaire: A Rejoinder. Philosophical Quarterly 34 (137):507-508.score: 180.0
  11. John R. Lucas (1984). Lucas Against Mechanism II: A Rejoinder. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14 (June):189-91.score: 180.0
  12. Billy Joe Lucas (1997). The Second Epistemic Way Revisited: Reply to Professor Beard's, 'Professor Lucas on Omniscience'. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 42 (3):143-162.score: 180.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Deborah Cook (1987). Arthur Kroker and David Cook, The Postmodern Scene: Excremental Culture and Hyperaesthetics Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 7 (3):114-116.score: 180.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. R. M. D., A. J. B. Wace & F. H. Cook (1935). Mediterranean and Near East Embroideries From the Collection of Mrs. F. H. Cook. Journal of Hellenic Studies 55:271.score: 180.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Cecil H. Smith, C. Amy Hutton & Wyndham Francis Cook (1909). Catalogue of the Antiquities (Greek, Etruscan, and Roman) in the Collection of the Late Wyndham Francis Cook, Esquire. Journal of Hellenic Studies 29:375.score: 180.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. R. M. Cook & J. M. C. Toynbee (1953). Festgabe für Arnold von Salis zu seinem siebzigsten Geburtstag am 29 Juli 1951. Pp. 305; 4 plates, 66 text figs. Basel: Schwabe, 1951. Paper, 12 Sw. fr. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 3 (3-4):209-210.score: 120.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Fatima Alvarez-Castillo, Julie Cook Lucas & Rosa Cordillera Castillo (2009). Gender and Vulnerable Populations in Benefit Sharing: An Exploration of Conceptual and Contextual Points. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 18 (02):130-.score: 87.0
  18. John W. Cook (1999). Morality and Cultural Differences. Oxford University Press.score: 60.0
    The scholars who defend or dispute moral relativism, the idea that a moral principle cannot be applied to people whose culture does not accept it, have concerned themselves with either the philosophical or anthropological aspects of relativism. This study, shows that in order to arrive at a definitive appraisal of moral relativism, it is necessary to understand and investigate both its anthropological and philosophical aspects. Carefully examining the arguments for and against moral relativism, Cook exposes not only that anthropologists (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. J. R. Lucas, The Open Society €“ and ..score: 60.0
    There was once a leak from Hebdomadal Council. The Assessor told her husband, who told my wife, who told me that Monday afternoon had been spent discussing what Lucas would say if various courses of action were adopted, leading to the conclusion that it would be best to do nothing. I was flattered, but a bit surprised. The tide of philosophical scepticism had ebbed, and it was generally allowed that a reasonable way of discovering what someone would say (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. J. R. Lucas, The Huxley-Wilberforce Debate Revisited.score: 60.0
    According to the legend, Bishop Wilberforce (``Soapy Sam'') at a meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science in Oxford on Saturday, June 30th, 1860, turned to Thomas Huxley, and asked him ``Is it on your grandfather's or your grandmother's side that you claim descent from a monkey''; whereupon Huxley delivered a devastating rebuke, thereby establishing the primacy of scientific truth over ecclesiastical obscurantism. Although the legend is historically untrue in almost every detail, its persistence suggests that (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. John W. Cook (1994). Wittgenstein's Metaphysics. Cambridge University Press.score: 60.0
    Wittgenstein's Metaphysics offers a radical new interpretation of the fundamental ideas of Ludwig Wittgenstein. It takes issue with the conventional view that after 1930 Wittgenstein rejected the philosophy of the Tractatus and developed a wholly new conception of philosophy. By tracing the evolution of Wittgenstein's ideas Cook shows that they are neither as original nor as difficult as is often supposed. Wittgenstein was essentially an empiricist, and the difference between his early views (as set forth in the Tractatus) and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Nicholas Cook (1990). Music, Imagination, and Culture. Oxford University Press.score: 60.0
    Drawing on psychological and philosophical materials as well as the analysis of specific musical examples, Cook here defines the difference between music...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. M. A. Cook (2000). Commanding Right and Forbidding Wrong in Islamic Thought. Cambridge University Press.score: 60.0
    What kind of duty do we have to try to stop other people doing wrong? The question is intelligible in just about any culture, but few of them seek to answer it in a rigorous fashion. The most striking exception is found in the Islamic tradition, where 'commanding right' and 'forbidding wrong' is a central moral tenet already mentioned in the Koran. As an historian of Islam whose research has ranged widely over space and time, Michael Cook is well (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Roy T. Cook & Philip A. Ebert (2005). Abstraction and Identity. Dialectica 59 (2):121–139.score: 60.0
    A co-authored article with Roy T. Cook forthcoming in a special edition on the Caesar Problem of the journal Dialectica. We argue against the appeal to equivalence classes in resolving the Caesar Problem.
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. John W. Cook (2000). Wittgenstein, Empiricism, and Language. Oxford University Press.score: 60.0
    This provocative study exposes the ways in which Wittgenstein's philosophical views have been misunderstood, including the failure to recognize the reductionist character of Wittgenstein's work. Author John Cook provides well-documented proof that Wittgenstein did not hold views commonly attributed to him, arguing that Wittgenstein's later work was mistakenly seen as a development of G. E. Moore's philosophy--which Wittgenstein in fact vigorously attacked. He also points to an underestimation of Russell's influence on Wittgenstein's thinking. Cook goes on to show (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Aaron Meskin & Roy T. Cook (eds.) (2012). The Art of Comics: A Philosophical Approach. Wiley-Blackwell.score: 60.0
    Machine generated contents note: Foreword (Warren Ellis).Introduction (Roy T. Cook and Aaron Meskin).PART I: The Nature and Kinds of Comics.1. Redefining Comics (John Holbo).2. The Ontology of Comics (Aaron Meskin).3. Comics and Collective Authorship (Christy Mag Uidhir).4. Comics and Genre (Catharine Abell).PART 2: Comics and Representation.5. Wordy Pictures: Theorizing the Relationship between Image and Text in Comics (Thomas E. Wartenberg).6. What's So Funny? Comic Content in Depiction (Patrick Maynard).7. The Language of Comics (Darren Hudson Hick).PART 3: Comics and the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. John Cook (2006). Did Wittgenstein Practise What He Preached? Philosophy 81 (3):445-462.score: 60.0
    Wittgenstein made numerous pronouncements about philosophical method. But did he practice what he preached? Cook addresses this question by studying Wittgenstein’s treatment of the problem of other minds, tracing a line of argument that runs through his writings and lectures from the early 1930s to the 1950s. Cook finds that there is an inconsistency between Wittgenstein’s methodological advice and his actual practice. Instead of bringing words back from their metaphysical to their everyday use, he allows himself to use (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. J. R. Lucas (1995). Responsibility. Clarendon Press.score: 60.0
    Responsibility is a key concept in our moral, social, and political thinking, but it is not itself properly understood. J.R. Lucas here presents a lively, broad, and accessible discussion of responsibility in various areas of human life, from personal and sexual relations to politics.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. J. R. Lucas, I Have Recently Had an E-Mail From Mr Evin Harris of Trinity College Dublin:.score: 60.0
    Dear Mr. Lucas, I was wondering if you had come across Query 44 of George Berkeley's ``Analyst: A discourse addressed to an infidel mathematician"?. It reads: ``Whether the difference between a mere computer and a man of science be not that one computes on principles clearly conceived and by rules evidently demonstrated, whereas the other [i.e a man] doth not?" Not bad for 1734!
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Brian Lucas (2013). Religious Confession Privilege and the Common Law [Book Review]. Australasian Catholic Record, The 90 (1):113.score: 60.0
    Lucas, Brian Review(s) of: Religious confession privilege and the common law, by Keith Thompson (Leiden: Matinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2011), pp.395, E135.00.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. J. R. Lucas (2000). The Conceptual Roots of Mathematics: An Essay on the Philosophy of Mathematics. Routledge.score: 60.0
    The Conceptual Roots of Mathematics is a comprehensive study of the foundation of mathematics. Lucas, one of the most distinguished Oxford scholars, covers a vast amount of ground in the philosophy of mathematics, showing us that it is actually at the heart of the study of epistemology and metaphysics.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Roy T. Cook (2014). The Yablo Paradox: An Essay on Circularity. Oup Oxford.score: 60.0
    Roy T Cook examines the Yablo paradox--a paradoxical, infinite sequence of sentences, each of which entails the falsity of all others that follow it. He focuses on questions of characterization, circularity, and generalizability, and pays special attention to the idea that it provides us with a semantic paradox that involves no circularity.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. B. G. Cook (2012). Ibn Sab'în and Islamic Orthodoxy: A Reassessment. Journal of Islamic Philosophy 8 (2012):Article - 2.score: 60.0
    Benjamin G. Cook, Ibn Sabʿîn and Islamic Orthodoxy: A Reassessment.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Brian Lucas (2012). The Price of Freedom: Edmund Rice Educational Leader [Book Review]. Australasian Catholic Record, The 89 (1):121.score: 60.0
    Lucas, Brian Review(s) of: The price of freedom: Edmund Rice educational leader, by Denis McLaughlin, East Kew: David Lovell Publishing, 2007, pp.397, $45.00.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Hello John Lucas, About Me.score: 60.0
    Hello Mr John Lucas, I go to school in Perth in Western Australia. In the subject mathematics at my school, we were given a project to research a given mathematician and write a report on them. I was given you. I have to incorporate some information about the mathematical times in which you live and to attempt to include details of the contribution that you made to the field of mathematics. I also have to include a short biography (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. J. R. Lucas (1997). Comments: Reality and Time. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 11 (1):97 – 108.score: 60.0
    (1997). Comments: Reality and time. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science: Vol. 11, Festschrift for J. R. Lucas, pp. 97-108. doi: 10.1080/02698599708573553.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Deborah Cook (2012). Völker Heins, Between Friend and Foe: The Politics of Critical Theory. Journal of Critical Realism 11 (2):266 - 268.score: 60.0
    Völker Heins, Between Friend and Foe: The Politics of Critical Theory Content Type Journal Article Category Book Review Pages 266-268 Authors Deborah Cook, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Avenue, Windsor, Ontario, N9B 3P4, Canada Journal Journal of Critical Realism Online ISSN 1572-5138 Print ISSN 1476-7430 Journal Volume Volume 11 Journal Issue Volume 11, Number 2 / 2012.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Brian Lucas (2012). The Episcopal Conference in the Communications Marketplace: Issues and Challenges for Catholic Identity and Ecclesiology. Australasian Catholic Record, The 89 (4):408.score: 60.0
    Lucas, Brian This article deals with the role of the Episcopal Conference in the area of social communications and the tensions that arise with respect to the respective roles of the diocesan bishop and the Episcopal Conference, including lay heads of ecclesial agencies, in presenting 'the face of the Church' in the public forum. The article is divided into two sections: i)The Church as 'visible institution' and the ecclesiological and juridical foundations for identifying those who represent it in the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Brian Lucas (2011). Pope Benedict XVI and the Sexual Abuse Crisis - Working for Reform and Renewal [Book Review]. Australasian Catholic Record, The 88 (3):381.score: 60.0
    Lucas, Brian Review(s) of: Pope benedict XVI and the sexual abuse crisis - working for reform and renewal, Gregory Erlandson and Matthew Bunson, (Huntington, Indiana: Our Sunday Visitor Publishing Division, 2010), pb, pp.207.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. M. A. Cook (2003). Forbidding Wrong in Islam: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.score: 60.0
    Michael Cook's classic study, Commanding Right and Forbidding Wrong in Islamic Thought (Cambridge, 2001), reflected upon the Islamic injunction to forbid wrongdoing. This book is a short, accessible survey of the same material. Using Islamic history to illustrate his argument, Cook unravels the complexities of the subject by demonstrating how the past informs the present. At the book's core is an important message about the values of Islamic traditions and their relevance in the modern world.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Rebecca J. Cook, Bernard M. Dickens & Mahmoud F. Fathalla (2003). Reproductive Health and Human Rights: Integrating Medicine, Ethics, and Law. Clarendon Press.score: 60.0
    The concept of reproductive health promises to play a crucial role in improving health care provision and legal protection for women around the world. This is an authoritative and much-needed introduction to and defence of the concept of reproductive health, which though internationally endorsed, is still contested. The authors are leading authorities on reproductive medicine, women's health, human rights, medical law, and bioethics. They integrate their disciplines to provide an accessible but comprehensive picture. They analyse 15 cases from different countries (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. J. R. Lucas (2011). Conceptual Roots of Mathematics. Routledge.score: 60.0
    The Conceptual Roots of Mathematics is a comprehensive study of the foundation of mathematics. J.R. Lucas, one of the most distinguished Oxford scholars, covers a vast amount of ground in the philosophy of mathematics, showing us that it is actually at the heart of the study of epistemology and metaphysics.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. J. R. Lucas (2003). Knowing the Unknowable God: How Faith Thrives on Divine Mystery. Waterbrook Press.score: 60.0
    Meet the God Who Is Greater Than Your Biggest Questions. The Bible never shies away from seeming contradictions. We are told both to resist our enemies and to love them, and that our all-knowing God can sometimes forget. Unable to reconcile such biblical paradoxes, some people abandon Christianity, while others pretend that the seeming contradictions don’t exist–preferring to believe in an uncomplicated, easy-to-comprehend God. Yet countless others are hungry for new insight into the God behind the Bible’s mysterious paradoxes. Responding (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Michael Altschul (1987). Mary Lyon, Bryce Lyon, and Henry S. Lucas (†), with the Collaboration of Jean de Sturler (†), The Wardrobe Book of William de Norwell 12 July 1338 to 27 May 1340. Brussels: Académie Royale de Belgique, Commission Royale d'Histoire (Koninklijke Commissie Voor Geschiedenis), 1983. Paper. Pp. Cxxiii, 546. [REVIEW] Speculum 62 (2):440-442.score: 50.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. John R. Lucas (1970). Mechanism: A Rejoinder. Philosophy 45 (April):149-51.score: 30.0
    PROFESSOR LEWIS 1 and Professor Coder 2 criticize my use of Gödel's theorem to refute Mechanism. 3 Their criticisms are valuable. In order to meet them I need to show more clearly both what the tactic of my argument is at one crucial point and the general aim of the whole manoeuvre.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. John R. Lucas (1961). Minds, Machines and Godel. Philosophy 36 (April-July):112-127.score: 30.0
    Goedel's theorem states that in any consistent system which is strong enough to produce simple arithmetic there are formulae which cannot be proved-in-the-system, but which we can see to be true. Essentially, we consider the formula which says, in effect, "This formula is unprovable-in-the-system". If this formula were provable-in-the-system, we should have a contradiction: for if it were provablein-the-system, then it would not be unprovable-in-the-system, so that "This formula is unprovable-in-the-system" would be false: equally, if it were provable-in-the-system, then it (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. J. Lucas (2003). The Implications of Gödel Theorem. Etica E Politica 5 (1):1.score: 30.0
    After a brief and informal explanation of the Gödel’s theorem as a version of the Epimenides’ paradox applied to Elementary Number Theory formulated in first-order logic, Lucas shows some of the most relevant consequences of this theorem, such as the impossibility to define truth in terms of provability and so the failure of Verificationist and Intuitionist arguments. He shows moreover how Gödel’s theorem proves that first-order arithmetic admits non-standard models, that Hilbert’s programme is untenable and that second-order logic is (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. John Lucas (2003). The Gödelian Argument: Turn Over the Page. Etica E Politica 5 (1):1.score: 30.0
    In this paper Lucas suggests that many of his critics have not read carefully neither his exposition nor Penrose’s one, so they seek to refute arguments they never proposed. Therefore he offers a brief history of the Gödelian argument put forward by Gödel, Penrose and Lucas itself: Gödel argued indeed that either mathematics is incompletable – that is axioms can never be comprised in a finite rule and so human mind surpasses the power of any finite machine – (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. J. Thomas Cook (1987). Deciding to Believe Without Self-Deception. Journal of Philosophy 84 (August):441-446.score: 30.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. John R. Lucas & Michael Redhead (2007). Truth and Provability. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (2):331-2.score: 30.0
    The views of Redhead ([2004]) are defended against the argument by Panu Raatikainen ([2005]). The importance of informal rigour is canvassed, and the argument for the a priori nature of induction is explained. The significance of Gödel's theorem is again rehearsed.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 999