Search results for 'Julie Cook Lucas' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Mohammed Abu-Nimer, Terence Ball, Linell Cady, Shaun Casey, Martin Cook, David Cortright, Richard Dagger, Amitai Etzoni, Félix Gutiérrez, Mitchell R. Haney, George Lucas, Oscar J. Martinez, Joan McGregor, Christopher McLeod, Jeffrie Murphy, Brian Orend, Darren Ranco, Roberto Suro, Rebecca Tsosie & Angela Wilson (2005). War and Border Crossings: Ethics When Cultures Clash. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.score: 2400.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Julie Cook (1998). The Philosophical Colonization of Ecofeminism. Environmental Ethics 20 (3):227-246.score: 240.0
    There is general agreement among ecofeminists regarding the desirability of a variety of expressions of ecofeminism, but this pluralism is under threat with the emergence of an approach that emphasizes the primacy of a philosophical ecofeminism which claims the authority to prescribe what ecofeminism should be. The recent anthology Ecological Feminism is symptomatic of this trend, with contributors who affirm the philosophical significance of ecological feminism by privileging philosophers’ voices over those of other ecofeminists, rather than by engaging in critical (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Takeshi Morimoto, Tejal K. Gandhi, Julie M. Fiskio, Andrew C. Seger, Joseph W. So, E. Francis Cook, Tsuguya Fukui & David W. Bates (2004). An Evaluation of Risk Factors for Adverse Drug Events Associated with Angiotensin‐Converting Enzyme Inhibitors. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 10 (4):499-509.score: 240.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Julie Adkins, Kathleen Arnold, Kurt Borchard, David Cook, Jeff Ferrell, Vincent Lyon-Callo, Jürgen von Mahs, Don Mitchell, Rob Rosenthal, Michael Rowe, Lynn A. Staeheli & J. Talmadge Wright (2012). Professional Lives, Personal Struggles: Ethics and Advocacy in Research on Homelessness. Lexington Books.score: 240.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Nancy Armstrong, Deborah Cook, James Cruise, Lisa Eck, Megan Heffernan, David Jenemann, Nigel Joseph, Tom McCall, Lucy McNeece, JoAnne Myers, Julie Orlemanski, Jonathon Penny, Dale Shin, Vivasvan Soni, Frederick Turner & Philip Weinstein (2011). Individualism: The Cultural Logic of Modernity. Lexington Books.score: 240.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Julie Cook (2003). [Book Review] Ecofeminist Philosophy. [REVIEW] Environmental Values 12 (1):131-133.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Patricia Cook Lucas (1987). Vico and Joyce. New Vico Studies 5:180-181.score: 240.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Billy Joe Lucas (2002). Logical Constructivism, Modal Logic, and Metaphysics: A Reply to Professor Pruss' ``Professor Lucas' Second Epistemic Way''. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 52 (3):143-157.score: 180.0
  9. J. R. Lucas (1998). Transcendental Tense: J.R. Lucas. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 72 (1):45–56.score: 180.0
  10. J. R. Lucas (1984). Lucas, Godel and Astaire: A Rejoinder. Philosophical Quarterly 34 (137):507-508.score: 180.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Billy Joe Lucas (1997). The Second Epistemic Way Revisited: Reply to Professor Beard's, 'Professor Lucas on Omniscience'. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 42 (3):143-162.score: 180.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. John R. Lucas (1984). Lucas Against Mechanism II: A Rejoinder. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14 (June):189-91.score: 180.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Deborah Cook (1987). Arthur Kroker and David Cook, The Postmodern Scene: Excremental Culture and Hyperaesthetics Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 7 (3):114-116.score: 180.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Cecil H. Smith, C. Amy Hutton & Wyndham Francis Cook (1909). Catalogue of the Antiquities (Greek, Etruscan, and Roman) in the Collection of the Late Wyndham Francis Cook, Esquire. Journal of Hellenic Studies 29:375.score: 180.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. R. M. D., A. J. B. Wace & F. H. Cook (1935). Mediterranean and Near East Embroideries From the Collection of Mrs. F. H. Cook. Journal of Hellenic Studies 55:271.score: 180.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. R. M. Cook & J. M. C. Toynbee (1953). Festgabe für Arnold von Salis zu seinem siebzigsten Geburtstag am 29 Juli 1951. Pp. 305; 4 plates, 66 text figs. Basel: Schwabe, 1951. Paper, 12 Sw. fr. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 3 (3-4):209-210.score: 120.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Fatima Alvarez-Castillo, Julie Cook Lucas & Rosa Cordillera Castillo (2009). Gender and Vulnerable Populations in Benefit Sharing: An Exploration of Conceptual and Contextual Points. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 18 (02):130-.score: 87.0
  18. John W. Cook (1999). Morality and Cultural Differences. Oxford University Press.score: 60.0
    The scholars who defend or dispute moral relativism, the idea that a moral principle cannot be applied to people whose culture does not accept it, have concerned themselves with either the philosophical or anthropological aspects of relativism. This study, shows that in order to arrive at a definitive appraisal of moral relativism, it is necessary to understand and investigate both its anthropological and philosophical aspects. Carefully examining the arguments for and against moral relativism, Cook exposes not only that anthropologists (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. J. R. Lucas, The Huxley-Wilberforce Debate Revisited.score: 60.0
    According to the legend, Bishop Wilberforce (``Soapy Sam'') at a meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science in Oxford on Saturday, June 30th, 1860, turned to Thomas Huxley, and asked him ``Is it on your grandfather's or your grandmother's side that you claim descent from a monkey''; whereupon Huxley delivered a devastating rebuke, thereby establishing the primacy of scientific truth over ecclesiastical obscurantism. Although the legend is historically untrue in almost every detail, its persistence suggests that (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. John W. Cook (1994). Wittgenstein's Metaphysics. Cambridge University Press.score: 60.0
    Wittgenstein's Metaphysics offers a radical new interpretation of the fundamental ideas of Ludwig Wittgenstein. It takes issue with the conventional view that after 1930 Wittgenstein rejected the philosophy of the Tractatus and developed a wholly new conception of philosophy. By tracing the evolution of Wittgenstein's ideas Cook shows that they are neither as original nor as difficult as is often supposed. Wittgenstein was essentially an empiricist, and the difference between his early views (as set forth in the Tractatus) and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. M. A. Cook (2000). Commanding Right and Forbidding Wrong in Islamic Thought. Cambridge University Press.score: 60.0
    What kind of duty do we have to try to stop other people doing wrong? The question is intelligible in just about any culture, but few of them seek to answer it in a rigorous fashion. The most striking exception is found in the Islamic tradition, where 'commanding right' and 'forbidding wrong' is a central moral tenet already mentioned in the Koran. As an historian of Islam whose research has ranged widely over space and time, Michael Cook is well (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Nicholas Cook (1990). Music, Imagination, and Culture. Oxford University Press.score: 60.0
    Drawing on psychological and philosophical materials as well as the analysis of specific musical examples, Cook here defines the difference between music...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. John W. Cook (2000). Wittgenstein, Empiricism, and Language. Oxford University Press.score: 60.0
    This provocative study exposes the ways in which Wittgenstein's philosophical views have been misunderstood, including the failure to recognize the reductionist character of Wittgenstein's work. Author John Cook provides well-documented proof that Wittgenstein did not hold views commonly attributed to him, arguing that Wittgenstein's later work was mistakenly seen as a development of G. E. Moore's philosophy--which Wittgenstein in fact vigorously attacked. He also points to an underestimation of Russell's influence on Wittgenstein's thinking. Cook goes on to show (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Roy T. Cook & Philip A. Ebert (2005). Abstraction and Identity. Dialectica 59 (2):121–139.score: 60.0
    A co-authored article with Roy T. Cook forthcoming in a special edition on the Caesar Problem of the journal Dialectica. We argue against the appeal to equivalence classes in resolving the Caesar Problem.
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. John Cook (2006). Did Wittgenstein Practise What He Preached? Philosophy 81 (3):445-462.score: 60.0
    Wittgenstein made numerous pronouncements about philosophical method. But did he practice what he preached? Cook addresses this question by studying Wittgenstein’s treatment of the problem of other minds, tracing a line of argument that runs through his writings and lectures from the early 1930s to the 1950s. Cook finds that there is an inconsistency between Wittgenstein’s methodological advice and his actual practice. Instead of bringing words back from their metaphysical to their everyday use, he allows himself to use (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Aaron Meskin & Roy T. Cook (eds.) (2012). The Art of Comics: A Philosophical Approach. Wiley-Blackwell.score: 60.0
    Machine generated contents note: Foreword (Warren Ellis).Introduction (Roy T. Cook and Aaron Meskin).PART I: The Nature and Kinds of Comics.1. Redefining Comics (John Holbo).2. The Ontology of Comics (Aaron Meskin).3. Comics and Collective Authorship (Christy Mag Uidhir).4. Comics and Genre (Catharine Abell).PART 2: Comics and Representation.5. Wordy Pictures: Theorizing the Relationship between Image and Text in Comics (Thomas E. Wartenberg).6. What's So Funny? Comic Content in Depiction (Patrick Maynard).7. The Language of Comics (Darren Hudson Hick).PART 3: Comics and the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Brian Lucas (2013). Religious Confession Privilege and the Common Law [Book Review]. Australasian Catholic Record, The 90 (1):113.score: 60.0
    Lucas, Brian Review(s) of: Religious confession privilege and the common law, by Keith Thompson (Leiden: Matinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2011), pp.395, E135.00.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. J. R. Lucas (2000). The Conceptual Roots of Mathematics: An Essay on the Philosophy of Mathematics. Routledge.score: 60.0
    The Conceptual Roots of Mathematics is a comprehensive study of the foundation of mathematics. Lucas, one of the most distinguished Oxford scholars, covers a vast amount of ground in the philosophy of mathematics, showing us that it is actually at the heart of the study of epistemology and metaphysics.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. J. R. Lucas, I Have Recently Had an E-Mail From Mr Evin Harris of Trinity College Dublin:.score: 60.0
    Dear Mr. Lucas, I was wondering if you had come across Query 44 of George Berkeley's ``Analyst: A discourse addressed to an infidel mathematician"?. It reads: ``Whether the difference between a mere computer and a man of science be not that one computes on principles clearly conceived and by rules evidently demonstrated, whereas the other [i.e a man] doth not?" Not bad for 1734!
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Brian Lucas (2012). The Price of Freedom: Edmund Rice Educational Leader [Book Review]. Australasian Catholic Record, The 89 (1):121.score: 60.0
    Lucas, Brian Review(s) of: The price of freedom: Edmund Rice educational leader, by Denis McLaughlin, East Kew: David Lovell Publishing, 2007, pp.397, $45.00.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. J. R. Lucas (1997). Comments: Reality and Time. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 11 (1):97 – 108.score: 60.0
    (1997). Comments: Reality and time. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science: Vol. 11, Festschrift for J. R. Lucas, pp. 97-108. doi: 10.1080/02698599708573553.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. B. G. Cook (2012). Ibn Sab'în and Islamic Orthodoxy: A Reassessment. Journal of Islamic Philosophy 8 (2012):Article - 2.score: 60.0
    Benjamin G. Cook, Ibn Sabʿîn and Islamic Orthodoxy: A Reassessment.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Deborah Cook (2012). Völker Heins, Between Friend and Foe: The Politics of Critical Theory. Journal of Critical Realism 11 (2):266 - 268.score: 60.0
    Völker Heins, Between Friend and Foe: The Politics of Critical Theory Content Type Journal Article Category Book Review Pages 266-268 Authors Deborah Cook, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Avenue, Windsor, Ontario, N9B 3P4, Canada Journal Journal of Critical Realism Online ISSN 1572-5138 Print ISSN 1476-7430 Journal Volume Volume 11 Journal Issue Volume 11, Number 2 / 2012.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Brian Lucas (2012). The Episcopal Conference in the Communications Marketplace: Issues and Challenges for Catholic Identity and Ecclesiology. Australasian Catholic Record, The 89 (4):408.score: 60.0
    Lucas, Brian This article deals with the role of the Episcopal Conference in the area of social communications and the tensions that arise with respect to the respective roles of the diocesan bishop and the Episcopal Conference, including lay heads of ecclesial agencies, in presenting 'the face of the Church' in the public forum. The article is divided into two sections: i)The Church as 'visible institution' and the ecclesiological and juridical foundations for identifying those who represent it in the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. J. R. Lucas, The Open Society €“ and ..score: 60.0
    There was once a leak from Hebdomadal Council. The Assessor told her husband, who told my wife, who told me that Monday afternoon had been spent discussing what Lucas would say if various courses of action were adopted, leading to the conclusion that it would be best to do nothing. I was flattered, but a bit surprised. The tide of philosophical scepticism had ebbed, and it was generally allowed that a reasonable way of discovering what someone would say (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Hello John Lucas, About Me.score: 60.0
    Hello Mr John Lucas, I go to school in Perth in Western Australia. In the subject mathematics at my school, we were given a project to research a given mathematician and write a report on them. I was given you. I have to incorporate some information about the mathematical times in which you live and to attempt to include details of the contribution that you made to the field of mathematics. I also have to include a short biography (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Brian Lucas (2011). Pope Benedict XVI and the Sexual Abuse Crisis - Working for Reform and Renewal [Book Review]. Australasian Catholic Record, The 88 (3):381.score: 60.0
    Lucas, Brian Review(s) of: Pope benedict XVI and the sexual abuse crisis - working for reform and renewal, Gregory Erlandson and Matthew Bunson, (Huntington, Indiana: Our Sunday Visitor Publishing Division, 2010), pb, pp.207.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. M. A. Cook (2003). Forbidding Wrong in Islam: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.score: 60.0
    Michael Cook's classic study, Commanding Right and Forbidding Wrong in Islamic Thought (Cambridge, 2001), reflected upon the Islamic injunction to forbid wrongdoing. This book is a short, accessible survey of the same material. Using Islamic history to illustrate his argument, Cook unravels the complexities of the subject by demonstrating how the past informs the present. At the book's core is an important message about the values of Islamic traditions and their relevance in the modern world.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Rebecca J. Cook, Bernard M. Dickens & Mahmoud F. Fathalla (2003). Reproductive Health and Human Rights: Integrating Medicine, Ethics, and Law. Clarendon Press.score: 60.0
    The concept of reproductive health promises to play a crucial role in improving women's health and rights around the world. It was internationally endorsed by a United Nations conference in 1994, but remains controversial because of the challenge it presents to conservative agencies: it challenges policies of suppressing public discussion on human sexuality and regulating its private expressions. Reproductive Health and Human Rights is designed to equip healthcare providers and administrators to integrate ethical, legal, and human rights principles in protection (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. J. R. Lucas (2011). Conceptual Roots of Mathematics. Routledge.score: 60.0
    The Conceptual Roots of Mathematics is a comprehensive study of the foundation of mathematics. J.R. Lucas, one of the most distinguished Oxford scholars, covers a vast amount of ground in the philosophy of mathematics, showing us that it is actually at the heart of the study of epistemology and metaphysics.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. J. R. Lucas (2003). Knowing the Unknowable God: How Faith Thrives on Divine Mystery. Waterbrook Press.score: 60.0
    Meet the God Who Is Greater Than Your Biggest Questions. The Bible never shies away from seeming contradictions. We are told both to resist our enemies and to love them, and that our all-knowing God can sometimes forget. Unable to reconcile such biblical paradoxes, some people abandon Christianity, while others pretend that the seeming contradictions don’t exist–preferring to believe in an uncomplicated, easy-to-comprehend God. Yet countless others are hungry for new insight into the God behind the Bible’s mysterious paradoxes. Responding (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. J. R. Lucas (1995). Responsibility. Clarendon Press.score: 60.0
    Responsibility is a key concept in our moral, social and political thinking, but is not itself properly understood. In this book J R Lucas elucidates it in terms of answerability - the obligation to answer the question 'Why did you do it?' He develops this account to include negative responsiblity - 'Why did you not do something about it?' - and share responsibility, which together yield the rationale of political responsibility. In disentangling these two strands of argument, he points (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Michael Altschul (1987). Mary Lyon, Bryce Lyon, and Henry S. Lucas (†), with the Collaboration of Jean de Sturler (†), The Wardrobe Book of William de Norwell 12 July 1338 to 27 May 1340. Brussels: Académie Royale de Belgique, Commission Royale d'Histoire (Koninklijke Commissie Voor Geschiedenis), 1983. Paper. Pp. Cxxiii, 546. [REVIEW] Speculum 62 (2):440-442.score: 50.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. John R. Lucas (1961). Minds, Machines and Godel. Philosophy 36 (April-July):112-127.score: 30.0
    Goedel's theorem states that in any consistent system which is strong enough to produce simple arithmetic there are formulae which cannot be proved-in-the-system, but which we can see to be true. Essentially, we consider the formula which says, in effect, "This formula is unprovable-in-the-system". If this formula were provable-in-the-system, we should have a contradiction: for if it were provablein-the-system, then it would not be unprovable-in-the-system, so that "This formula is unprovable-in-the-system" would be false: equally, if it were provable-in-the-system, then it (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. John R. Lucas, The Implications of Godel's Theorem.score: 30.0
    In 1931 Kurt Gödel proved two theorems about the completeness and consistency of first-order arithmetic. Their implications for philosophy are profound. Many fashionable tenets are shown to be untenable: many traditional intuitions are vindicated by incontrovertible arguments.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. J. Thomas Cook (1987). Deciding to Believe Without Self-Deception. Journal of Philosophy 84 (August):441-446.score: 30.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. John R. Lucas & Michael Redhead (2007). Truth and Provability. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (2):331-2.score: 30.0
    The views of Redhead ([2004]) are defended against the argument by Panu Raatikainen ([2005]). The importance of informal rigour is canvassed, and the argument for the a priori nature of induction is explained. The significance of Gödel's theorem is again rehearsed.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. John R. Lucas, The Godelian Argument: Turn Over the Page.score: 30.0
    I have no quarrel with the first two sentences: but the third, though charitable and courteous, is quite untrue. Although there are criticisms which can be levelled against the Gödelian argument, most of the critics have not read either of my, or either of Penrose's, expositions carefully, and seek to refute arguments we never put forward, or else propose as a fatal objection one that had already been considered and countered in our expositions of the argument. Hence my title. The (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. John R. Lucas (1968). Satan Stultified: A Rejoinder to Paul Benacerraf. The Monist 52 (1):145-58.score: 30.0
    The argument is a dialectical one. It is not a direct proof that the mind is something more than a machine, but a schema of disproof for any particular version of mechanism that may be put forward. If the mechanist maintains any specific thesis, I show that [146] a contradiction ensues. But only if. It depends on the mechanist making the first move and putting forward his claim for inspection. I do not think Benacerraf has quite taken the point. He (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. John W. Cook (2008). Bouwsma on Wittgenstein's Philosophical Method. Philosophical Investigations 31 (4):285-317.score: 30.0
    It is argued that Wittgenstein was a greatly misunderstood philosopher, both as regards his own philosophical views and his ideas about philosophical method. O. K. Bouwsma's interpretation of Wittgenstein is used to illustrate the most common misunderstandings.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000