9 found
Sort by:
  1. Kalyan Bagchi (2007). Hermeneutics and Phenomenology. In Manjulika Ghosh & Raghunath Ghosh (eds.), Language and Interpretation: Hermeneutics From East-West Perspective. Northern Book Centre 11--10.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. K. Bagchi (2003). Value Perspectives in Indian Philosophy by Bijayananda Kar. Indian Philosophical Quarterly 30 (3):470-476.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Kalyan Kumar Bagchi (1992). An Indian Interaction with Phenomenology: Perspectives on the Philosophy of KC Bhattacharyya'. In D. P. Chattopadhyaya, Lester E. Embree & Jitendranath Mohanty (eds.), Phenomenology and Indian Philosophy. Indian Council of Philosophical Research in Association with Motilal Banarsidass Publishers
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Kalyan Kumar Bagchi (1990). The Primitiveness of the T as Speaker. In Margaret Chatterjee (ed.), The Philosophy of Nikunja Vihari Banerjee. Indian Council of Philosophical Research in Association with Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. K. Bagchi (1987). What Is Truth? In Morality Within the Life-and Social World. Analecta Husserliana 22:389-395.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. K. Bagchi (1981). Towards a Metaphysic of Self. Journal of Indian Philosophy 9 (1):19-37.
  7. Kalyankumar Bagchi (1980). Descriptive Metaphysics and Phenomenology. Prajñā.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Kalyankumar Bagchi (1972). Metalanguage and Transcendental Idealism. Centre of Advanced Study in Philosophy, Visva-Bharati.
  9. K. Bagchi (1971). Kant's Transcendental Problem as a Linguistic Problem. Philosophy 46 (178):341 - 345.
    Kant's system of Transcendental Idealism may be regarded, in the contemporary philosophical perspective, as concerned with the problem whether any linguistic or conceptual system can be regarded as adequately explained in terms of the facts which the system organises. ‘ Transcendental ’ may be understood as what is ‘ non-reducible ’. Kant seems to hold that a linguistic scheme cannot be reduced to the facts which fall within the scheme, and thus it is transcendental to those facts. Formulated in such (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation