33 found
Sort by:
See also:
Profile: Karen Jones (University of Melbourne)
  1. Karen Jones (2014). Intersectionality and Ameliorative Analyses of Race and Gender. Philosophical Studies 171 (1):99-107.
    This discussion of Sally Haslanger’s recent book, Resisting Reality: Social Construction and Social Critique (Oxford 2012), investigates how her theory of race and gender handles the problem of intersectionality; that is, the problem of how to understand the ways in which one’s location in multiple socially constructed categories affects one’s lived experiences, social roles, and relative privilege or disadvantage. Haslanger defines race and gender as locations within hierarchical social structures. This high-level structural analysis allows her to find commonality without claiming (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Karen Jones & François Schroeter (2014). Co-Deliberation, Joint Decision, and Testimony About Reasons. Analyse & Kritik 36 (1):209-216.
    We defend the claim that there can be testimonial transfer of reasons against Steinig’s recent objections. In addition, we argue that the literature on testimony about moral reasons misunderstands what is at stake in the possibility of second-hand orientation towards moral reasons. A moral community faces two different but related tasks: one theoretical and one practical . In between, simultaneously theoretical and practical, lies the activity of co-deliberation. Virtuous participation in co-deliberation can require limited moral deference. Refusal to recognize this, (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Karen Jones (2012). Trustworthiness. Ethics 123 (1):61-85.
    I present and defend an account of three-place trustworthiness according to which B is trustworthy with respect to A in domain of interaction D, if and only if she is competent with respect to that domain, and she would take the fact that A is counting on her, were A to do so in this domain, to be a compelling reason for acting as counted on. This is not the whole story of trustworthiness, however, for we want those we can (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Karen Jones (2012). The Politics of Intellectual Self-Trust. Social Epistemology 26 (2):237-251.
    Just as testimony is affected by unjust social relations, so too is intellectual self-trust. I defend an account of intellectual self-trust that explains both why it is properly thought of as trust and why it is directed at the self, and explore its relationship to social power. Intellectual self-trust is neither a matter of having dispositions to rely on one?s epistemic methods and mechanisms, nor having a set of beliefs about which ones are reliable. Instead, it is a stance that (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Karen Jones & François Schroeter (2012). Moral Expertise. Analyse & Kritik 34 (2):217-230.
    This paper surveys recent work on moral expertise. Much of that work defends an asymmetry thesis according to which the cognitive deference to expertise that characterizes other areas of inquiry is out of place in morality. There are two reasons why you might think asymmetry holds. The problem might lie in the existence of expertise or in deferring to it. We argue that both types of arguments for asymmetry fail. They appear to be stronger than they are because of their (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Henry S. Richardson, Katarzyna de Lazari-Radek, Peter Singer, Karen Jones, Sergio Tenenbaum, Diana Raffman, Simon Căbulea May, Stephen C. Makin & Nancy E. Snow (2012). 10. Douglas Portmore, Commonsense Consequentialism: Wherein Morality Meets Rationality Douglas Portmore, Commonsense Consequentialism: Wherein Morality Meets Rationality (Pp. 179-183). [REVIEW] Ethics 123 (1).
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Karen Jones (2010). Trust and Personhood. Counting on One Another. In Arne Grøn & Claudia Welz (eds.), Trust, Sociality, Selfhood. Mohr Siebeck
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Karen Jones (2008). How to Change the Past. In Kim Atkins & Catriona Mackenzie (eds.), Practical Identity and Narrative Agency. Routledge
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Karen Jones (2007). Review of Robert Solomon (Ed.), Thinking About Feeling: Contemporary Philosophers on Emotion. [REVIEW] Sophia 46 (1):107-108.
  10. Luca Ferrero Faulkner, Amy Gutmann, Paul Harris, Pamela Hieronymi, Karen Jones, Adam Leite, Wolfgang Mann, Peter de Marneffc, David Owens Minar & Connie Rosati (2006). Getting Told and Being Believed. In Jennifer Lackey & Ernest Sosa (eds.), The Epistemology of Testimony. Oxford University Press
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Karen Jones (2006). Metaethics and Emotions Research: A Response to Prinz. Philosophical Explorations 9 (1):45-53.
    Prinz claims that empirical work on emotions and moral judgement can help us resolve longstanding metaethical disputes in favour of simple sentimentalism. I argue that the empirical evidence he marshals does not have the metaethical implications he claims: the studies purporting to show that having an emotion is sufficient for making a moral judgement are tendentiously described. We are entitled to ascribe competence with moral concepts to experimental subjects only if we suppose that they would withdraw their moral judgement on (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Karen Jones (2006). Quick and Smart? Modularity and the Pro-Emotion Consensus. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 32 (5S):3-27.
  13. Karen Jones (2005). Moral Epistemology. In Frank Jackson & Michael Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy. Oxford University Press
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Sandra Lee Bartky, Paul Benson, Sue Campbell, Claudia Card, Robin S. Dillon, Jean Harvey, Karen Jones, Charles W. Mills, James Lindemann Nelson, Margaret Urban Walker, Rebecca Whisnant & Catherine Wilson (2004). Moral Psychology: Feminist Ethics and Social Theory. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    Moral psychology studies the features of cognition, judgement, perception and emotion that make human beings capable of moral action. Perspectives from feminist and race theory immensely enrich moral psychology. Writers who take these perspectives ask questions about mind, feeling, and action in contexts of social difference and unequal power and opportunity. These essays by a distinguished international cast of philosophers explore moral psychology as it connects to social life, scientific studies, and literature.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Karen Jones (2004). Deforesting the Earth: From Prehistory to Global Crisis. [REVIEW] Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 95:685-686.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Karen Jones (2004). Emotional Rationality as Practical Rationality. In Cheshire Calhoun (ed.), Setting the Moral Compass: Essays by Women Philosophers. Oxford University Press
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Karen Jones (2004). Gender and Rationality. In Alfred Mele & Piers Rawling (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Rationality. Oxford University Press
  18. Karen Jones (2004). Trust and Terror. In Peggy DesAutels & Margaret Urban Walker (eds.), Moral Psychology: Feminist Ethics and Social Theory. Rowman & Littlefield 3--18.
  19. Karen Jones (2003). [Book Review][Emotional Reason]. [REVIEW] Ethics 114 (1):179-182.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Karen Jones (2003). Emotion, Weakness of Will, and the Normative Conception of Agency. In A. Hatzimoysis (ed.), Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement. Cambridge University Press 181-200.
    Empirical work on and common observation of the emotions tells us that our emotions sometimes key us to the presence of real and important reason-giving considerations without necessarily presenting that information to us in a way susceptible of conscious articulation and, sometimes, even despite our consciously held and internally justified judgment that the situation contains no such reasons. In this paper, I want to explore the implications of the fact that emotions show varying degrees of integration with our conscious agency—from (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Karen Jones (2003). Bennett Helm, Emotional Reason: Deliberation, Motivation and the Nature of Value:Emotional Reason: Deliberation, Motivation and the Nature of Value. Ethics 114 (1):179-182.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Karen Jones (2002). 'A Fierce Green Fire': Passionate Pleas and Wolf Ecology. Ethics, Place and Environment 5 (1):35 – 43.
    This paper considers the relationship between scientific rationality and emotional value in determining ideas about canine biology in North America. While science has been assumed to be objective, unassailable and devoid of value judgments, esoteric theories concerning wild predators have changed radically over time. Biologists acted as important agents in the campaign to eradicate Canis lupus from the USA during the late 1800s and early 1900s. From the 1920s onwards, scientists promulgated ecological ideas in order to redeem native carnivores. This (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Karen Jones (2002). The Politics of Credibility. In Louise Antony & Charlotte Witt (eds.), A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity. Westview Press
  24. Oliver H. Turnbull, Karen Jones & Judith Reed-Screen (2002). Implicit Awareness of Deficit in Anosognosia? An Emotion-Based Account of Denial of Deficit. Comment. Neuro-Psychoanalysis 4 (1):69-86.
  25. Glyn Elwyn Mrcgp, William Rosenberg, Adrian Edwards, Wendy Chatham Mcsp, Karen Jones, Sarah Matthews & Fergus Macbeth Frcr (2000). Diaries of Evidence‐Based Tutors: Beyond 'Numbers Needed to Teach'.. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 6 (2):149-154.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Karen Jones (1999). Second-Hand Moral Knowledge. Journal of Philosophy 96 (2):55-78.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Jill Macleod Clark, Jill Maben, Karen Jones & Midwifery Health Visiting English National Board for Nursing (1996). Project 2000 Perceptions of the Philosophy and Practice of Nursing. English National Board for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Karen Jones (1996). Trust as an Affective Attitude. Ethics 107 (1):4-25.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Karen Jones, Russell Hardin & Lawrence C. Becker (1996). A Symposium on Trust. Ethics 107 (1):4-61.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Susan Dodds & Karen Jones (1989). A Response to Purdy. Bioethics 3 (1):35–39.
  31. Susan Dodds & Karen Jones (1989). Surrogacy and Autonomy. Bioethics 3 (1):1–17.
  32. Joan R. Moore, Karen N. Jones & Charles F. Gettys (1980). Prediction of Two Haptic Illusions From the Differential Adaptation Theory. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 15 (3):197-199.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. N. Jack Kanak & Karen N. Jones (1974). Mixed- List Manipulations of Implicit Associative Responses in Verbal Discrimination Learning. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 3 (3):234-236.