27 found
Order:
  1. Henrik Singmann, Karl Christoph Klauer & David Over (2014). New Normative Standards of Conditional Reasoning and the Dual-Source Model. Frontiers in Psychology 5.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2. Karl Christoph Klauer, Jochen Musch, J. Musch & K. C. Klauer (2003). Affective Priming: Findings and Theories. In Jochen Musch & Karl C. Klauer (eds.), The Psychology of Evaluation: Affective Processes in Cognition and Emotion. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  3.  1
    Sarah Teige-Mocigemba & Karl Christoph Klauer (2013). On the Controllability of Evaluative-Priming Effects: Some Limits That Are None. Cognition and Emotion 27 (4):632-657.
  4.  16
    Andreas B. Eder & Karl Christoph Klauer (2007). Common Valence Coding in Action and Evaluation: Affective Blindness Towards Response-Compatible Stimuli. Cognition and Emotion 21 (6):1297-1322.
  5.  28
    Henrik Singmann & Karl Christoph Klauer (2011). Deductive and Inductive Conditional Inferences: Two Modes of Reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning 17 (3):247 - 281.
    A number of single- and dual-process theories provide competing explanations as to how reasoners evaluate conditional arguments. Some of these theories are typically linked to different instructions?namely deductive and inductive instructions. To assess whether responses under both instructions can be explained by a single process, or if they reflect two modes of conditional reasoning, we re-analysed four experiments that used both deductive and inductive instructions for conditional inference tasks. Our re-analysis provided evidence consistent with a single process. In two new (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  6.  9
    Niels Skovgaard-Olsen, Henrik Singmann & Karl Christoph Klauer (2016). The Relevance Effect and Conditionals. Cognition 150:26-36.
    More than a decade of research has found strong evidence for P(if A, then C) = P(C|A) (“the Equation”). We argue, however, that this hypothesis provides an overly simplified picture due to its inability to account for relevance. We manipulated relevance in the evaluation of the probability and acceptability of indicative conditionals and found that relevance moderates the effect of P(C|A). This corroborates the Default and Penalty Hypothesis put forward in this paper. Finally, the probability and acceptability of concessive conditionals (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  2
    Kerstin Dittrich & Karl Christoph Klauer (2012). Does Ignoring Lead to Worse Evaluations? A New Explanation of the Stimulus Devaluation Effect. Cognition and Emotion 26 (2):193-208.
  8. Karl Christoph Klauer, Jochen Musch & Birgit Naumer (2000). On Belief Bias in Syllogistic Reasoning. Psychological Review 107 (4):852-884.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  9.  18
    Karl Christoph Klauer (1997). Working Memory Involvement in Propositional and Spatial Reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning 3 (1):9 – 47.
    Four experiments assessed the relative involvement of different working memory components in two types of reasoning tasks: propositional and spatial reasoning. Using the secondary-task methodology, visual, central-executive, and phonological loads were realised. Although the involvement of visuospatial resources in propositional reasoning has traditionally been considered to be small, an overall analysis of the present data suggests an alternative account. A theoretical analysis of the pattern of results in terms of Evans' (1984, 1989) twostage theory of reasoning is proposed and tested (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  10. Karl Christoph Klauer & Kerstin Dittrich (2010). From Sunshine to Double Arrows: An Evaluation Window Account of Negative Compatibility Effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 139 (3):490-519.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11.  4
    Jochen Musch & Karl Christoph Klauer (2001). Locational Uncertainty Moderates Affective Congruency Effects in the Evaluative Decision Task. Cognition and Emotion 15 (2):167-188.
  12.  5
    Sarah Teige-Mocigemba, Barnabas Penzl, Manuel Becker, Laura Henn & Karl Christoph Klauer (forthcoming). Controlling the “Uncontrollable”: Faking Effects on the Affect Misattribution Procedure. Cognition and Emotion:1-15.
  13. Andreas B. Eder & Karl Christoph Klauer (2009). A Common-Coding Account of the Bidirectional Evaluation–Behavior Link. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 138 (2):218-235.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  14. Karl Christoph Klauer (1999). On the Normative Justification for Information Gain in Wason's Selection Task. Psychological Review 106 (1):215-222.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  15.  22
    Christoph Stahl, Karl Christoph Klauer & Edgar Erdfelder (2008). Matching Bias in the Selection Task is Not Eliminated by Explicit Negations. Thinking and Reasoning 14 (3):281 – 303.
    The processes that guide performance in Wason's selection task (WST) are still under debate. The matching bias effect in the negations paradigm and its elimination by explicit negations are central arguments against a substantial role for inferential processes. Two WST experiments were conducted in the negations paradigm to replicate the basic finding and to compare effects of implicit and explicit negations. Results revealed robust matching bias in implicit negations. In contrast to previous findings, matching bias was reduced but not eliminated (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Karl Christoph Klauer, Anthony G. Greenwald & Sean C. Draine (1998). Correcting for Measurement Error in Detecting Unconscious Cognition: Comment on Draine and Greenwald. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 127 (3):318-319.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  17.  14
    Edgar Erdfelder, Karl Christoph Klauer & Christoph Stahl (2008). Matching Bias in the Selection Task is Not Eliminated by Explicit Negations. Thinking and Reasoning 14 (3):281-303.
    The processes that guide performance in Wason's selection task (WST) are still under debate. The matching bias effect in the negations paradigm and its elimination by explicit negations are central arguments against a substantial role for inferential processes. Two WST experiments were conducted in the negations paradigm to replicate the basic finding and to compare effects of implicit and explicit negations. Results revealed robust matching bias in implicit negations. In contrast to previous findings, matching bias was reduced but not eliminated (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Mandy Hütter, Steven Sweldens, Christoph Stahl, Christian Unkelbach & Karl Christoph Klauer (2012). Dissociating Contingency Awareness and Conditioned Attitudes: Evidence of Contingency-Unaware Evaluative Conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 141 (3):539-557.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. David Kellen, Karl Christoph Klauer & Henrik Singmann (2012). On the Measurement of Criterion Noise in Signal Detection Theory: The Case of Recognition Memory. Psychological Review 119 (3):457-479.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. David Kellen, Karl Christoph Klauer & Henrik Singmann (2013). On the Measurement of Criterion Noise in Signal Detection Theory: Reply to Benjamin. Psychological Review 120 (3):727-730.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. David Kellen & Karl Christoph Klauer (2015). Signal Detection and Threshold Modeling of Confidence-Rating ROCs: A Critical Test with Minimal Assumptions. Psychological Review 122 (3):542-557.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Karl Christoph Klauer & Jochen Musch (2005). Accounting for Belief Bias in a Mental Model Framework? No Problem! Reply to Garnham and Oakhill. Psychological Review 112 (2):519-520.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Karl Christoph Klauer & David Kellen (2011). Assessing the Belief Bias Effect with ROCs: Reply to Dube, Rotello, and Heit. Psychological Review 118 (1):164-173.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Karl Christoph Klauer & Zengmei Zhao (2004). Double Dissociations in Visual and Spatial Short-Term Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 133 (3):355-381.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Karl Christoph Klauer, Kerstin Dittrich, Christine Scholtes & Andreas Voss (2015). The Invariance Assumption in Process-Dissociation Models: An Evaluation Across Three Domains. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 144 (1):198-221.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Karl Christoph Klauer & David Kellen (2012). The Law of Categorical Judgment Extended: A Note on Rosner and Kochanski. Psychological Review 119 (1):216-220.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Christoph Stahl, Andreas Voss, Florian Schmitz, Mandy Nuszbaum, Oliver Tüscher, Klaus Lieb & Karl Christoph Klauer (2014). Behavioral Components of Impulsivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 143 (2):850-886.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography