Search results for 'Karl R. Wallace' (try it on Scholar)

168 found
Sort by:
  1. Elkhonon Goldberg, Kenneth Podell, J. Proust, Karl H. Pribram, Vittorio Gallese, Marianne Hammerl, Andy P. Field, Frederick Travis, R. Keith Wallace & J. Allan Cheyne (1999). Kai Vogeley, Martin Kurthen, Peter Falkai, and Wolfgang Maier. Essential Functions of the Human. Consciousness and Cognition 8:270.score: 810.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. R. Jay Wallace (1996). Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments. Harvard University Press.score: 480.0
    R. Jay Wallace argues in this book that moral accountability hinges on questions of fairness: When is it fair to hold people morally responsible for what they do? Would it be fair to do so even in a deterministic world? To answer these questions, we need to understand what we are doing when we hold people morally responsible, a stance that Wallace connects with a central class of moral sentiments, those of resentment, indignation, and guilt. To hold someone (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. R. Jay Wallace (ed.) (2006). Normativity and the Will: Selected Papers on Moral Psychology and Practical Reason. Oxford University Press.score: 480.0
    Normativity and the Will collects fourteen important papers on moral psychology and practical reason by R. Jay Wallace, one of the leading philosophers currently working in these areas. The papers explore the interpenetration of normative and psychological issues in a series of debates that lie at the heart of moral philosophy. Themes that are addressed include reason, desire, and the will; responsibility, identification, and emotion; and the relation between morality and other normative domains. Wallace's treatments of these topics (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. John Laird (1944). Francis Bacon on Communication and Rhetoric: Or The Art of Applying Reason to Imagination for the Better Moving of the Will. By Karl R. Wallace. (The University of North Carolina Press. 1943. Pp. Xi + 277. Price $5.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 19 (73):175-.score: 450.0
  5. Richard J. Wallace (1972). Spatial S-R Compatibility Effects Involving Kinesthetic Cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology 93 (1):163.score: 360.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Richard J. Wallace (1971). S-R Compatibility and the Idea of a Response Code. Journal of Experimental Psychology 88 (3):354.score: 360.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Harvey R. Brown & David Wallace (2005). Solving the Measurement Problem: De Broglie-Bohm Loses Out to Everett. [REVIEW] Foundations of Physics 35 (4):517-540.score: 280.0
    The quantum theory of de Broglie and Bohm solves the measurement problem, but the hypothetical corpuscles play no role in the argument. The solution finds a more natural home in the Everett interpretation.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. J. Bronkhorst, C. K. Chapple, L. L. Patton, Geoffrey Brian Samuel, S. R. Sarbacker & V. Wallace (2011). Contextualizing the History of Yoga in Geoffrey Samuel's The Origins of Yoga and Tantra: A Review Symposium. [REVIEW] International Journal of Hindu Studies 15 (3):303-357.score: 280.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Barry E. Stein, Terrance R. Stanford, Mark T. Wallace, J. William Vaughan & Wan Jiang (2004). Crossmodal Spatial Interactions in Subcortical and Cortical Circuits. In Charles Spence & Jon Driver (eds.), Crossmodal Space and Crossmodal Attention. Oup Oxford.score: 280.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. E. D. Richmond-Welty, W. G. Hayward, G. Kempen, J. C. Marshall, M. D. Mellor, M. J. Tarr, R. Treiman, W. P. Wallace & A. Zukowski (1995). Share, DL, 151 Sherman, HL, 85 Spivey-Knowlton, M., 227 Stewart, MT, 85. Cognition 55:343.score: 280.0
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Manish Saggar, Brandon G. King, Anthony P. Zanesco, Katherine A. MacLean, Stephen R. Aichele, Tonya L. Jacobs, David A. Bridwell, Phillip R. Shaver, Erika L. Rosenberg, Baljinder K. Sahdra, Emilio Ferrer, Akaysha C. Tang, George R. Mangun, B. Alan Wallace, Risto Miikkulainen & Clifford D. Saron (2012). Intensive Training Induces Longitudinal Changes in Meditation State-Related EEG Oscillatory Activity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6:256-256.score: 280.0
    The capacity to focus one’s attention for an extended period of time can be increased through training in contemplative practices. However, the cognitive processes engaged during meditation that support trait changes in cognition are not well characterized. We conducted a longitudinal wait-list controlled study of intensive meditation training. Retreat participants practiced focused attention meditation techniques for three months during an initial retreat. Wait-list participants later undertook formally identical training during a second retreat. Dense-array scalp-recorded electroencephalogram (EEG) data were collected during (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Barry E. Stein, Terrence R. Stanford, Mark T. Wallace, J. William Vaughan & Jiang & Wan (2004). Crossmodal Spatial Interactions in Subcortical and Cortical Circuits. In Charles Spence & Jon Driver (eds.), Crossmodal Space and Crossmodal Attention. Oup Oxford.score: 280.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Barry E. Stein, Terrence R. Stanford & Mark T. Wallace (2003). Sensory Integration, Neural Basis Of. In L. Nadel (ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. Nature Publishing Group.score: 280.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. R. Jay Wallace (2002). Scanlon's Contractualism. Ethics 112 (3):429-470.score: 240.0
    T. M. Scanlon's magisterial book What We Owe to Each Other is surely one of the most sophisticated and important works of moral philosophy to have appeared for many years. It raises fundamental questions about all the main aspects of the subject, and I hope and expect that it will have a decisive influence on the shape and direction of moral philosophy in the years to come. In this essay I shall focus on four sets of issues raised by Scanlon's (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. R. Jay Wallace (1999). Three Conceptions of Rational Agency. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (3):217-242.score: 240.0
    Rational agency may be thought of as intentional activity that is guided by the agent's conception of what they have reason to do. The paper identifies and assesses three approaches to this phenomenon, which I call internalism, meta-internalism, and volitionalism. Internalism accounts for rational motivation by appeal to substantive desires of the agent's that are conceived as merely given; I argue that it fails to do full justice to the phenomenon of guidance by one's conception of one's reasons. Meta-internalism explains (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. R. Jay Wallace (1999). Addiction as Defect of the Will: Some Philosophical Reflections. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 18 (6):621–654.score: 240.0
    It is both common and natural to think of addiction as a kind of defect of the will. Addicts, we tend to suppose, are subject to impulses or cravings that are peculiarly unresponsive to their evaluative reflection about what there is reason for them to do. As a result of this unresponsiveness, we further suppose, addicts are typically impaired in their ability to act in accordance with their own deliberative conclusions. My question in this paper is whether we can make (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. R. Jay Wallace (2010). Hypocrisy, Moral Address, and the Equal Standing of Persons. Philosophy and Public Affairs 38 (4):307-341.score: 240.0
  18. R. Jay Wallace (1990). How to Argue About Practical Reason. Mind 99 (395):355-385.score: 240.0
    What are the comparative roles of reason and the passions in explaining human motivation and behaviour? Accounts of practical reason divide on this central question, with proponents of different views falling into rationalist and Humean camps. By 'rationalist' accounts of practical reason, I mean accounts which make the characteristically Kantian claim that pure reason can be practical in its issue. To reject this view is to take the Humean position that reasoning or ratiocination is not by itself capable of giving (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. R. Jay Wallace (2001). Normativity, Commitment, and Instrumental Reason. Philosophers' Imprint 1 (4):1-26.score: 240.0
    This paper addresses some connections between conceptions of the will and the theory of practical reason. The first two sections argue against the idea that volitional commitments should be understood along the lines of endorsement of normative principles. A normative account of volition cannot make sense of akrasia, and it obscures an important difference between belief and intention. Sections three and four draw on the non-normative conception of the will in an account of instrumental rationality. The central problem is to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. R. Jay Wallace, Practical Reason. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.score: 240.0
    Practical reason is the general human capacity for resolving, through reflection, the question of what one is to do. Deliberation of this kind is practical in at least two senses. First, it is practical in its subject matter, insofar as it is concerned with action. But it is also practical in its consequences or its issue, insofar as reflection about action itself directly moves people to act. Our capacity for deliberative self-determination raises two sets of philosophical problems. First, there are (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Niko Kolodny & R. Jay Wallace (2003). Promises and Practices Revisited. Philosophy and Public Affairs 31 (2):119–154.score: 240.0
    Promising is clearly a social practice or convention. By uttering the formula, “I hereby promise to do X,” we can raise in others the expectation that we will in fact do X. But this succeeds only because there is a social practice that consists (inter alia) in a disposition on the part of promisers to do what they promise, and an expectation on the part of promisees that promisers will so behave. It is equally clear that, barring special circumstances of (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. R. Jay Wallace (2010). Reasons, Values and Agent-Relativity. Dialectica 64 (4):503-528.score: 240.0
    According to T. M. Scanlon's buck-passing account, the normative realm of reasons is in some sense prior to the domain of value. Intrinsic value is not itself a property that provides us with reasons; rather, to be good is to have some other reason-giving property, so that facts about intrinsic value amount to facts about how we have reason to act and to respond. The paper offers an interpretation and defense of this approach to the relation between reasons and values. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. R. Jay Wallace (2007). Reasons, Relations, and Commands: Reflections on Darwall. Ethics 118 (1):24-36.score: 240.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. R. Jay Wallace (2009). The Publicity of Reasons. Philosophical Perspectives 23 (1):471-497.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. R. Jay Wallace (2003). Explanation, Deliberation, and Reasons. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (2):429–435.score: 240.0
    Jonathan Dancy’s Practical Reality defends a strikingly nonpsychologistic account of motivating reasons for action. I agree wholeheartedly with Dancy that normative reasons do not in general consist in psychological states. I also agree with Dancy that motivating reasons should be understood in a way that preserves their connection to the kinds of normative consideration that recommend or speak in favor of actions. Despite these significant points of agreement, however, I find myself resisting Dancy’s nonpsychologistic conclusion.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. R. Jay Wallace, Rahul Kumar & Samuel Richard Freeman (eds.) (2011). Reasons and Recognition: Essays on the Philosophy of T. M. Scanlon. Oxford University Press.score: 240.0
    Reasons and Recognition brings together fourteen new papers on an array of topics from the many areas to which Scanlon has made path-breaking contributions, ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. R. Jay Wallace (2003). Review of Richard Joyce, The Myth of Morality. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2003 (11).score: 240.0
    This book is an impressive and stimulating treatment of central issues in metaethics. It is extremely well-written, combining clarity and precision with an individual style that is engaging and very often witty. It presents a general commentary on the contemporary metaethical debate, on the way to defending a position in that debate—moral fictionalism—that is distinctive and worthy of reaching a wider audience. The book is full of arguments, presenting a wealth of stimulating ideas, objections, and suggestions on all the topics (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. R. Jay Wallace (2002). Précis of Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (3):680–681.score: 240.0
  29. R. Jay Wallace (2012). Duties of Love. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 86 (1):175-198.score: 240.0
    A defence of the idea that there are sui generis duties of love: duties, that is, that we owe to people in virtue of standing in loving relationships with them. I contrast this non-reductionist position with the widespread reductionist view that our duties to those we love all derive from more generic moral principles. The paper mounts a cumulative argument in favour of the non-reductionist position, adducing a variety of considerations that together speak strongly in favour of adopting it. The (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. R. Jay Wallace (2007). XII-The Argument From Resentment. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 107 (1pt3):295-318.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. R. Jay Wallace (2002). Replies. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (3):707–727.score: 240.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. R. Jay Wallace, Moral Motivation. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy.score: 240.0
    Questions about the possibility and nature of moral motivation occupy a central place in the history of ethics. Philosophers disagree, however, about the role that motivational investigations should play within the larger subject of ethical theory. These disagreements surface in the dispute about whether moral thought is necessarily motivating – ‘internalists’ affirming that it is,‘externalists’ denying this. [...] There are also important questions about the content of moral motivations. A moral theory should help us to make sense of the fact (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. R. Jay Wallace (2004). Constructing Normativity. Philosophical Topics 32 (1/2):451-476.score: 240.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. R. Jay Wallace (2000). An Anti-Philosophy of the Emotions? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (2):469-477.score: 240.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. R. Jay Wallace (ed.) (2004). Reason and Value: Themes From the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz. Oxford University Press.score: 240.0
    Reason and Value collects 15 new papers by leading contemporary philosophers on themes from the work of Joseph Raz. Raz has made major contributions in a wide range of areas, including jurisprudence, political philosophy, and the theory of practical reason; but all of his work displays a deep engagement with central themes in moral philosophy. The subtlety and power of Raz's reflections on ethical topics make his writings a fertile source for anyone working in this area. Especially significant are his (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Frederick T. Travis & R. K. Wallace (1999). Autonomic and EEG Patterns During Eyes-Closed Rest and Transcendental Meditation (TM) Practice: The Basis for a Neural Model of TM Practice. Consciousness and Cognition 8 (3):302-318.score: 240.0
    In this single-blind within-subject study, autonomic and EEG variables were compared during 10-min, order-balanced eyes-closed rest and Transcendental Meditation (TM) sessions. TM sessions were distinguished by (1) lower breath rates, (2) lower skin conductance levels, (3) higher respiratory sinus arrhythmia levels, and (4) higher alpha anterior-posterior and frontal EEG coherence. Alpha power was not significantly different between conditions. These results were seen in the first minute and were maintained throughout the 10-min sessions. TM practice appears to (1) lead to a (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. R. M. Wallace (2001). Paul Franco: Hegel's Philosophy of Freedom. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 110 (4):606-608.score: 240.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. R. Jay Wallace (2001). Moralische Gründe: Aus der Sicht des Handelnden. Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 55 (1):3 - 23.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. R. Jay Wallace (1996). Book Review:Identity, Character, and Morality: Essays in Moral Psychology. Owen Flanagan, Amelie Oksenberg Rorty. [REVIEW] Ethics 106 (2):451-.score: 240.0
  40. John R. Wallace (1965). Sortal Predicates and Quantification. Journal of Philosophy 62 (1):8-13.score: 240.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. R. Frank Wallace & David W. Mulder (1973). Fixed-Ratio Responding with Human Subjects. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1 (5):359-362.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. R. Jay Wallace (2004). Sarah Buss and Lee Overton, Eds., Contours of Agency: Essays on Themes From Harry Frankfurt:Contours of Agency: Essays on Themes From Harry Frankfurt. Ethics 114 (4):810-815.score: 240.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. R. Jay Wallace (1991). Virtue, Reason, and Principle. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 21 (4):469-495.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. R. C. Wallace (1971). The Concept of Miracle, By Richard Swinburne. (London: Macmillan, 1970 Pp. 76. 65p.). Philosophy 46 (178):366-.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. R. J. Wallace (2000). Freedom and Responsibility. Philosophical Review 109 (4):592-595.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. R. C. Wallace (1970). Hume, Flew, and the Miraculous. Philosophical Quarterly 20 (80):230-243.score: 240.0
    1. HUME’S ARGUMENT, FLEW CORRECTLY EXPLAINS, IS NOT THAT MIRACLES CANNOT HAPPEN, BUT THAT THERE MUST BE A CONFLICT IN THE EVIDENCE TO SHOW THAT THEY DO. 2. (I) FLEW FURTHER APPEALS TO THE INHERENT WEAKNESS OF HISTORICAL AS OPPOSED TO SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE. BUT ONE’S ASSESSMENT OF THE EVIDENCE MUST DEPEND ON WHETHER THE CONCEPT IS POSSIBLE. (II) FLEW CLAIMS THAT HUME CAN BE TAKEN TO MEAN THAT WHAT IS ALLOWED TO BE A LOGICAL POSSIBILITY SHOULD YET BE DISMISSED AS (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. R. M. Wallace (1999). How Hegel Reconciles Private Freedom with Citizenship. Journal of Political Philosophy 7 (4):419–433.score: 240.0
  48. John R. Wallace (1966). Lawlikeness=Truth? Journal of Philosophy 63 (24):780-781.score: 240.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. R. Jay Wallace (2004). Normativity and the Will. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 55:195-216.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. R. Jay Wallace (2003). Review: Explanation, Deliberation, and Reasons. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (2):429 - 435.score: 240.0
1 — 50 / 168