10 found
Order:
  1.  11
    Katherine Thomson-Jones (forthcoming). How to Teach Philosophy of Film in Advance. Teaching Philosophy.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  53
    Katherine Thomson-Jones (2009). Cinematic Narrators. Philosophy Compass 4 (2):296-311.
    This article surveys the current debate among analytic philosophers and film narratologists about the logic and phenomenology of cinematic narration. Particular attention is given to the question of whether every film that represents a fictional narrative also represents a narrator's fictional narration.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3.  12
    Katherine Thomson-Jones (2005). Inseparable Insight: Reconciling Cognitivism and Formalism in Aesthetics. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63 (4):375–384.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  4.  11
    Katherine Thomson-Jones (2008). Aesthetics and Film. Continuum.
    explanation is of course that Arnheim was working against the assumption that film cannot be art because it is mere mechanical recording. Thus what he needed to emphasize were all the ways in which film fails to accurately reproduce reality.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5.  36
    Katherine Thomson-Jones (2007). The Literary Origins of the Cinematic Narrator. British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (1):76-94.
    This paper reveals an ulterior motive for insisting on the necessary presence of narrators in film: the desire to fit film into a literary paradigm. Despite important theoretical links between film and literature, the assumption that films must be like novels in always having narrators is unsound. By moving beyond literature in the comparison of narrative media, and focusing specifically on cases of ‘breaking the fourth wall’ in film and theatre, we find that the presence and function of a cinematic (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  24
    Katherine Thomson-Jones (2012). Art, Ethics, and Critical Pluralism. Metaphilosophy 43 (3):275-293.
    Those who have views about the relation between aesthetic and ethical value often also have views about the nature of art criticism. Yet no one has paid much attention to the compatibility of views in one debate with views in the other. This is worrying in light of a tension between two popular kinds of view: namely, between critical pluralism and any view in the art and ethics debate that presupposes an invariant relation between aesthetic value and ethical value. Specifically, (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  13
    Katherine Thomson-Jones (2011). A Philosophy of Cinematic Art – Berys Gaut. Philosophical Quarterly 61 (243):445-446.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  2
    Katherine Thomson-Jones (2008). The Philosophy of Motion Picturesby Carroll, Noël. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66 (4):401-403.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  89
    Kathleen Stock & Katherine Thomson-Jones (eds.) (2008). New Waves in Aesthetics. Palgrave Macmillan.
    Leading young scholars present a collection of wide-ranging essays covering central problems in meta-aesthetics and aesthetic issues in the philosophy of mind, as well as offering analyses of key aesthetic concepts, new perspectives on the history of aesthetics, and specialized treatment of individual art forms.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Katherine Thomson-Jones (2016). Current Controversies in Philosophy of Film. Routledge.
    This volume advances the contemporary debate on five central issues in the philosophy of film. These issues concern the relation between the art and technology of film, the nature of film realism, how narrative fiction films narrate, how we engage emotionally with films, and whether films can philosophize. Two new essays by leading figures in the field present different views on each issue. The paired essays contain significant points of both agreement and disagreement; new theories and frameworks are proposed at (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography