20 found
Sort by:
  1. Kathleen Cranley Glass, Charles Weijer, Trudo Lemmens, Roberta M. Palmour & Stanley H. Shapiro (forthcoming). Structuring the Review of Human Genetics Protocols Part II: Diagnostic and Screening Studies. Irb.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Katherine Wayne & Kathleen Cranley Glass (2010). The Research Imperative Revisited Considerations for Advancing the Debate Surrounding Medical Research as Moral Imperative. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 53 (3):373-387.
    The continuous pursuit and support of medical research on both a societal and individual level is frequently presupposed as laudable, or even obligatory. However, some critics have challenged the assumption that medical research ought to be conducted. These critics reject claims that there is a moral obligation to pursue research, and that medical research may always be justifiable given adequate safeguards and regulations. We align ourselves with critics of the research imperative to the extent that we believe that medical research (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Kathleen Cranley Glass & Ariella Binik (2008). Rethinking Risk in Pediatric Research. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (3):567-576.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Kathleen Cranley Glass & Franco A. Carnevale (2006). Decisional Challenges for Children Requiring Assisted Ventilation at Home. HEC Forum 18 (3):207-221.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Kathleen Cranley Glass, David B. Resnik, Stephen Olufemi Sodeke, Halley S. Faust, Rebecca Dresser, Nancy M. P. King, C. D. Herrera, David Orentlicher & Lynn A. Jansen (2006). Protection of Human Subjects and Scientific Progress: Can the Two Be Reconciled? Hastings Center Report 36 (1):4-9.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Jonathan Kimmelman, Françoise Baylis & Kathleen Cranley Glass (2006). Stem Cell Trials: Lessons From Gene Transfer Research. Hastings Center Report 36 (1):23-26.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Kathleen Cranley Glass & Duff Waring (2005). The Physician/Investigator's Obligation to Patients Participating in Research: The Case of Placebo Controlled Trials. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (3):575-585.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Kathleen Cranley Glass & Duff Waring (2002). Effective Trial Design Need Not Conflict with Good Patient Care. American Journal of Bioethics 2 (2):25 – 26.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Charles Weijer, Stanley H. Shapiro & Kathleen Cranley Glass, Clinical Equipoise and Not the Uncertainty Principle Is the Moral Underpinning of the Randomised Controlled Trial.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Kathleen Cranley Glass (1999). LeRoy Walters and Julie Gage Palmer, the Ethics of Human Gene Therapy. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (5):489-490.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Kathleen Cranley Glass, Charles Weijer, Denis Cournoyer, Trudo Lemmens, Roberta M. Palmour, Stanley H. Shapiro & Benjamin Freedman (1999). Structuring the Review of Human Genetics Protocols. Irb 21.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Angela Campbell, Kathleen Cranley Glass & Louis C. Charland (1998). Describing Our “Humanness”: Can Genetic Science Alter What It Means to Be “Human”? Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (4):413-426.
    Over the past several decades, geneticists have succeeded in identifying the genetic mutations associated with disease. New strategies for treatment, including gene transfer and gene therapy, are under development. Although genetic science has been welcomed for its potential to predict and treat disease, interventions may become ethically objectionable if they threaten to alter characteristics that are distinctively human. Before we can determine whether or not a genetic technique carries this risk, we must clarify what it means to be “human”. This (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Benjamin Freedman, Kathleen Cranley Glass & Charles Weijer (1996). Placebo Orthodoxy in Clinical Research II: Ethical, Legal, and Regulatory Myths. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 24 (3):252-259.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Benjamin Freedman, Charles Weijer & Kathleen Cranley Glass (1996). Placebo Orthodoxy in Clinical Research I: Empirical and Methodological Myths. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 24 (3):243-251.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Kathleen Cranley Glass & Marc Speyer-Ofenberg (1996). Incompetent Persons as Research Subjects and the Ethics of Minimal Risk. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 5 (03):362-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Kathleen Cranley Glass, Charles Weijer, Roberta M. Palmour, Stanley H. Shapiro, Trudo M. Lemmens & Karen Lebacqz, Structuring the Review of Human Genetics Protocols: Gene Localization and Identification Studies.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Kathleen Cranley Glass (1995). Reply to Dr. Ellen Burgess. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 23 (2):212-212.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Charles Weijer, Stanley Shapiro, Abraham Fuks, Kathleen Cranley Glass & Myriam Skrutkowska, Monitoring Clinical Research: An Obligation Unfulfilled.
    The revelation that data obtained for the US-based National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) from subjects enrolled at Hôpital Saint-Luc in Montreal was falsified has eroded public trust in research. Institutions can educate researchers and help prevent unethical research practices by establishing procedures to monitor research involving human subjects. Research monitoring encompasses four categories of activity: annual reviews of continuing research, monitoring of informed consent, monitoring of adherence to approved protocols and monitoring of the integrity of data. The (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Kathleen Cranley Glass (1994). Toward a Duty to Report Clinical Trials Accurately: The Clinical Alert and Beyond. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 22 (4):327-338.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Benjamin Freedman & Kathleen Cranley Glass (1990). Weiss V. Solomon: A Case Study in Institutional Responsibility for Clinical Research. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 18 (4):395-403.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation