5 found
Sort by:
  1. Daniel M. T. Fessler & Katinka J. P. Quintelier (2013). Suicide Bombings, Weddings, and Prison Tattoos: An Evolutionary Perspective on Subjective Commitment and Objective Commitment. In Kim Sterelny, Richard Joyce, Brett Calcott & Ben Fraser (eds.), Cooperation and its Evolution. MIT Press.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Katinka J. P. Quintelier, Keiko Ishii, Jason Weeden, Robert Kurzban & Johan Braeckman (2013). Individual Differences in Reproductive Strategy Are Related to Views About Recreational Drug Use in Belgium, The Netherlands, and Japan. Human Nature 24 (2):196-217.
    Individual differences in moral views are often explained as the downstream effect of ideological commitments, such as political orientation and religiosity. Recent studies in the U.S. suggest that moral views about recreational drug use are also influenced by attitudes toward sex and that this relationship cannot be explained by ideological commitments. In this study, we investigate student samples from Belgium, The Netherlands, and Japan. We find that, in all samples, sexual attitudes are strongly related to views about recreational drug use, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Katinka J. P. Quintelier, Daniel M. T. Fessler & Delphine De Smet (2012). The Case of the Drunken Sailor: On the Generalisable Wrongness of Harmful Transgressions. Thinking and Reasoning 18 (2):183 - 195.
    There is a widespread conviction that people distinguish two kinds of acts: on the one hand, acts that are generalisably wrong because they go against universal principles of harm, justice, or rights; on the other hand, acts that are variably right or wrong depending on the social context. In this paper we criticise existing methods that measure generalisability. We report new findings indicating that a modification of generalisability measures is in order. We discuss our findings in light of recent criticisms (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Katinka J. P. Quintelier & Daniel M. T. Fessler (2011). Naturalizing the Normative and the Bridges Between “is” and “Ought”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):266.
    Elqayam & Evans (E&E) suggest descriptivism as a way to avoid fallacies and research biases. We argue, first, that descriptive and prescriptive theories might be better off with a closer interaction between and Moreover, while we acknowledge the problematic nature of the discussed fallacies and biases, important aspects of research would be lost through a broad application of descriptivism.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Katinka J. P. Quintelier & Daniel M. T. Fessler (2011). Naturalizing the Normative and the Bridges Between 'Is' and 'Ought&Quot;. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):266.
    Elqayam & Evans (E&E) suggest descriptivism as a way to avoid fallacies and research biases. We argue, first, that descriptive and prescriptive theories might be better off with a closer interaction between and Moreover, while we acknowledge the problematic nature of the discussed fallacies and biases, important aspects of research would be lost through a broad application of descriptivism.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation