14 found
Sort by:
See also:
Profile: Katrien Devolder (University of Ghent)
  1. Laura Capitaine, Katrien Devolder & Guido Pennings (2013). Lifespan Extension and the Doctrine of Double Effect. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 34 (3):207-226.
    Recent developments in biogerontology—the study of the biology of ageing—suggest that it may eventually be possible to intervene in the human ageing process. This, in turn, offers the prospect of significantly postponing the onset of age-related diseases. The biogerontological project, however, has met with strong resistance, especially by deontologists. They consider the act of intervening in the ageing process impermissible on the grounds that it would (most probably) bring about an extended maximum lifespan—a state of affairs that they deem intrinsically (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Katrien Devolder (2013). A Reply to Levick's' Were It Physically Safe, Reproductive Human Cloning Would Not Be Acceptable'. In Arthur L. Caplan & Robert Arp (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Bioethics. John Wiley & Sons. 98--100.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Katrien Devolder (2013). Killing Discarded Embryos and the Nothing‐is‐Lost Principle. Journal of Applied Philosophy 30 (4):289-303.
    A widely held view holds that it is permissible to conduct destructive research on embryos discarded following fertility treatment, but not on embryos especially created for research. One argument in support of this view appeals to the nothing-is-lost principle. It holds that because discarded embryos will die soon in any case, and something good is expected to come out of using them for research, it is presumptively permissible to do so. It is then claimed that no equivalent justification can be (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Katrien Devolder (2013). Reply to Levick. In Arthur L. Caplan & Robert Arp (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Bioethics. John Wiley & Sons. 25--98.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Katrien Devolder (2013). Were It Physically Safe, Reproductive Human Cloning Would Be Acceptable. In Arthur L. Caplan & Robert Arp (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Bioethics. John Wiley & Sons. 79--88.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Thomas Douglas, Pieter Bonte, Farah Focquaert, Katrien Devolder & Sigrid Sterckx (2013). Coercion, Incarceration, and Chemical Castration: An Argument From Autonomy. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10 (3):393-405.
    In several jurisdictions, sex offenders may be offered chemical castration as an alternative to further incarceration. In some, agreement to chemical castration may be made a formal condition of parole or release. In others, refusal to undergo chemical castration can increase the likelihood of further incarceration though no formal link is made between the two. Offering chemical castration as an alternative to further incarceration is often said to be partially coercive, thus rendering the offender’s consent invalid. The dominant response to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Thomas Douglas & Katrien Devolder (2013). Procreative Altruism: Beyond Individualism in Reproductive Selection. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (4):400-419.
    Existing debate on procreative selection focuses on the well-being of the future child. However, selection decisions can also have significant effects on the well-being of others. Moreover, these effects may run in opposing directions; some traits conducive to the well-being of the selected child may be harmful to others, whereas other traits that limit the child’s well-being may preserve or increase that of others. Prominent selection principles defended to date instruct parents to select a child, of the possible children they (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Simon Rippon, Pablo Stafforini, Katrien Devolder, Russell Powell & Thomas Douglas (2010). Resisting Sparrow's Sexy Reductio : Selection Principles and the Social Good. American Journal of Bioethics 10 (7):16-18.
    Principles of procreative beneficence (PPBs) hold that parents have good reasons to select the child with the best life prospects. Sparrow (2010) claims that PPBs imply that we should select only female children, unlesswe attach normative significance to “normal” human capacities. We argue that this claim fails on both empirical and logical grounds. Empirically, Sparrow’s argument for greater female wellbeing rests on a selective reading of the evidence and the incorrect assumption that an advantage for females would persist even when (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Katrien Devolder (2007). Review of Kerry Lynn Macintosh, Illegal Beings. Human Clones and the Law. [REVIEW] American Journal of Bioethics 7 (2):97-98.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Katrien Devolder & John Harris (2007). The Ambiguity of the Embryo: Ethical Inconsistency in the Human Embryonic Stem Cell Debate. Metaphilosophy 38 (2-3):153–169.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Katrien Devolder & Christopher M. Ward (2007). Rescuing Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research: The Possibility of Embryo Reconstitution After Stem Cell Derivation. Metaphilosophy 38 (2-3):245–263.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Katrien Devolder (2005). Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research: Why the Discarded-Created-Distinction Cannot Be Based on the Potentiality Argument. Bioethics 19 (2):167-186.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Katrien Devolder & John Harris (2005). Compromise and Moral Complicity in the Embryonic Stem Cell Debate. In Nafsika Athanassoulis (ed.), Philosophical Reflections on Medical Ethics. Palgrave Macmillan.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Katrien Devolder & Julian Savulescu (2005). The Moral Imperative to Conduct Embryonic Stem Cell and Cloning Research. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 15 (01):7-21.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation