Search results for 'Keith Acheson' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Keith Acheson (2000). Disciplined Stories in the Governance of the New Institutional Economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 7 (3):341-371.score: 240.0
    The New Institutional Economics (NIE) occupies an important space in the rapidly expanding theory of organization. Traditional testing techniques have only been applied to less complex parts of the NIE. A rich body of evidence generated by the experiences of firms and other organizations lies fallow. The limited domain of traditional testing will persist because of the nature of the central concepts of the NIE, the difficulty posed for integrating transaction cost into an optimizing framework by self-reference, and the particularly (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Heather E. Keith (2001). Pornography Contextualized: A Test Case for a Feminist-Pragmatist Ethics. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 15 (2):122-136.score: 30.0
  3. B. William Silcock, Carol B. Schwalbe & Susan Keith (2008). "Secret" Casualties: Images of Injury and Death in the Iraq War Across Media Platforms. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 23 (1):36 – 50.score: 30.0
    This study examined more than 2,500 war images from U.S. television news, newspapers, news magazines, and online news sites during the first five weeks of the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in 2003 and found that only 10% showed injury or death. The paper analyzes which media platforms were most willing to show casualties and offers insights on when journalists should use gruesome war images or keep them secret.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Lisa H. Newton, Louis Hodges & Susan Keith (2004). Accountability in the Professions: Accountability in Journalism. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 19 (3 & 4):166 – 190.score: 30.0
    Accountability is viewed as a civilizing element in society, with professional accountability formalized in most cases as duties dating to the Greeks and Socrates; journalists must find their own way, without formal professional or government regulation or licensing. Three scholars look at the process in a line from the formal professional discipline to suggesting problems the journalism fraternity faces without regulation to suggesting serious internal ethics conferences as 1 solution to the problem.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. S. Grodzinsky Frances, W. Miller Keith & J. Wolf Marty (forthcoming). The Ethics of Designing Artificial Agents. Ethics and Information Technology.score: 30.0
    In their important paper “Autonomous Agents”, Floridi and Sanders use “levels of abstraction” to argue that computers are or may soon be moral agents. In this paper we use the same levels of abstraction to illuminate differences between human moral agents and computers. In their paper, Floridi and Sanders contributed definitions of autonomy, moral accountability and responsibility, but they have not explored deeply some essential questions that need to be answered by computer scientists who design artificial agents. One such question (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Susan Keith, Carol B. Schwalbe & B. William Silcock (2006). Images in Ethics Codes in an Era of Violence and Tragedy. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 21 (4):245 – 264.score: 30.0
    In an analysis of 47 U.S. journalism ethics codes, we found that although most consider images, only 9 address a gripping issue: how to treat images of tragedy and violence, such as those produced on the battlefields of Iraq, during the 2005 London bombings, and after Hurricane Katrina. Among codes that consider violent and tragic images, there is agreement on what images are problematic and a move toward green-light considerations of ethical responsibilities. However, the special problems of violence and truth (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Heather E. Keith (2009). Transforming Ren: The De of George Herbert Mead's Social Self. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 36 (1):69-84.score: 30.0
  8. William M. Keith & David E. Beard (2008). Toulmin's Rhetorical Logic: What's the Warrant for Warrants? Philosophy and Rhetoric 41 (1):22-50.score: 30.0
  9. Anthony Parel & Ronald C. Keith (eds.) (1992). Comparative Political Philosophy: Studies Under the Upas Tree. Sage.score: 30.0
    Like many disciplines, the study of political philosophy has, to a large extent, been the study of modern western political philosophy, particularly liberalism, utilitarianism, and socialism. As a consequence, the study of comparative political philosophy is still in its infancy. The contributors to this volume move beyond this Eurocentric bias to facilitate and exchange perspectives originating in European, Chinese, Indian, and Islamic communities. They document the responses to the perilous transition from "tradition" to "modernity" and address the commonality of human (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Arthur Berriedale Keith (1923/1974). Buddhist Philosophy in India and Ceylon. Gordon Press.score: 30.0
    Asl. Atthasalinl of Buddhaghosa, ed. PTS. 1897. BB. Bibliotheca Buddhica, Petrograd. BC. Buddhacarita, ed. Cowell, Oxford, 1893. BCA. ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. William Keith (1995). De Rhetorica Fullerae. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (4):488-496.score: 30.0
    I should say at the outset that I actually like this book a lot, but I am not sure how comfortable I am with liking it. It is the sort of innovative, exciting, exasperating, infuriating, and provocative book that's good even when it's bad, because it sets everyone to talking and arguing about all kinds of things. Initially, I will give a brief gloss (if such a thing makes sense in reference to a piece of Steve Fuller's writing) of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Nancy K. Keith, Charles E. Pettijohn & Melissa S. Burnett (2003). An Empirical Evaluation of the Effect of Peer and Managerial Ethical Behaviors and the Ethical Predispositions of Prospective Advertising Employees. Journal of Business Ethics 48 (3):251-265.score: 30.0
    An advertising firm''s ethical culture (as defined by the firm''s managerial and peer ethical behaviors) may affect the employees'' comfort levels and ethical behaviors. In this research, scenarios were used to describe advertising firms with various ethical cultures. Respondents'' perceived comfort levels in working for the firms described in the scenarios and the respondents'' behavioral intentions when faced with various advertising situations were assessed. Results of the study indicate that peer ethical behavior exerts a strong influence on the comfort or (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Susan Keith (2000). The Existential Copy Editor. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 15 (1):43 – 57.score: 30.0
    Newspaper copy editors labor in anonymity and struggle for respect in their newsrooms. These conditions may make it difficult for them to realize their potential as the last line of defense against violations of ethical practice. By adopting existentialism as a guiding moral philosophy, however, copy editors can find the courage and confidence to act as final guardians of ethical journalism. This article examines how copy editors are often overlooked in the literature of journalism ethics and suggests ways in which (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Jerry W. Rudy & Julian R. Keith (1997). LTP and Memory: Déjà Vu. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):629-629.score: 30.0
    Shors & Matzel's conclusion that LTP is not related to learning is similar to one we reached several years ago. We discuss some methodological advances that have relevance to the issue and applaud the authors for challenging existing dogma.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. William Keith (1994). Artificial Intelligences, Feminist and Otherwise. Social Epistemology 8 (4):333 – 340.score: 30.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. William Keith (1990). Cognitive Science on a Wing and a Prayer. Social Epistemology 343 (October-December):343-355.score: 30.0
  17. William Keith (1990). Response to Slezak: Nein, Ich Verstehe Nicht. Social Epistemology 4 (4):361 – 367.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Arthur Berriedale Keith (1918/1975). A History of the Sāṁkhya Philosophy: The Sāṁkhya System. Nag Publishers.score: 30.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Arthur Berriedale Keith (1921/1968). Indian Logic and Atomism. New York, Greenwood Press.score: 30.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Kevin T. Keith (2009). Life Extension : Proponents, Opponents, and the Social Impact of the Defeat of Death. In Michael K. Bartalos (ed.), Speaking of Death: America's New Sense of Mortality. Praeger.score: 30.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Arthur Berriedale Keith (1921/1978). The Karma-Mīmāṁsā. Exclusively Distributed by Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers.score: 30.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Arthur Berriedale Keith (1925/1971). The Religion and Philosophy of the Veda and Upanishads. Westport, Conn.,Greenwood Press.score: 30.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Hannah Tierney & Nicholas D. Smith (2012). Keith Lehrer on the Basing Relation. Philosophical Studies 161 (1):27-36.score: 24.0
    In this paper, we review Keith Lehrer’s account of the basing relation, with particular attention to the two cases he offered in support of his theory, Raco (Lehrer, Theory of knowledge, 1990; Theory of knowledge, (2nd ed.), 2000) and the earlier case of the superstitious lawyer (Lehrer, The Journal of Philosophy, 68, 311–313, 1971). We show that Lehrer’s examples succeed in making his case that beliefs need not be based on the evidence, in order to be justified. These cases (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. María G. Navarro (2012). Review of 'New Waves in Philosophy of Action' Edited by Jesús H. Aguilar, Andrei A. Buckareff and Keith Frankish. [REVIEW] Metapsychology Online Reviews 16 (51).score: 24.0
    New Waves in Philosophy, a book collection that stands out for giving a snapshot of research in all areas of philosophy is a successful editorial project addressed by Vincent F. Hendricks and Duncan Pritchard. New Waves in Philosophy of Action is one of its last titles, edited by Jesús H. Aguilar, Andrei A. Buckareff and Keith Frankish. -/- The book is aimed at the researchers of all fields and readers in general interested in this sub-discipline of philosophy very difficult (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Richard Brian Davis (2002). Haecceities, Individuation and the Trinity: A Reply to Keith Yandell. Religious Studies 38 (2):201-213.score: 18.0
    In this paper I reply to Keith Yandell's recent charge that Anselmian theists cannot also be Trinitarians. Yandell's case turns on the contention that it is impossible to individuate Trinitarian members, if they exist necessarily. Since the ranks of Anselmian Trinitarians includes the likes of Alvin Plantinga, Robert Adams, and Thomas Flint, Yandell's claim is of considerable interest and import. I argue, by contrast, that Anselmians can appeal to what Plantinga calls an essence or haecceity – a property essentially (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Kent Johnson, Keith Donnellan.score: 18.0
    Keith Donnellan (1931 – ) began his studies at the University of Maryland, and earned his Bachelor’s degree from Cornell University. He stayed on at Cornell, earning a Master’s and a PhD in 1961. He also taught at there for several years before moving to UCLA in 1970, where he is currently Emeritus Professor of Philosophy. Donnellan’s work is mainly in the philosophy of language, with an emphasis on the connections between semantics and pragmatics. His most influential work was (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Brian Barry (2003). Capitalists Rule. Ok? A Commentary on Keith Dowding. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 2 (3):323-341.score: 18.0
    In response to criticisms made by Keith Dowding (hereafter KD) of `Capitalists Rule OK', this article argues (1) that there is a genuine structural conflict of interest between consumers and producers, voters and politicians, and capitalists and governments, and (2) that only by ad hoc and arbitrary limitations on the scope of the concept of power can it be denied that consumers collectively have power over producers and capitalists (collectively) have power over government. KD accepts that voters (collectively) have (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Erik J. Olsson (ed.) (2003). The Epistemology of Keith Lehrer. Kluwer Academic Publishers.score: 18.0
    Keith Lehrer is one of the leading proponents of a coherence theory of knowledge that seeks to explain what it means to know in a characteristically human way. Central to his account are the pivotal role played by a principle of self-trust and his insistence that a sound epistemology must ultimately be ecumenical in nature, combining elements of internalism and externalism. The present book is an extensive, self-contained, up-to-date study of Lehrer's epistemological work. Covering all major aspects, it contains (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Jeroen van Bouwel (2004). Individualism and Holism, Reduction and Pluralism: A Comment on Keith Sawyer and Julie Zahle. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (4):527-535.score: 18.0
    Commenting on recent articles by Keith Sawyer and Julie Zahle, the author questions the way in which the debate between methodological individualists and holists has been presented and contends that too much weight has been given to metaphysical and ontological debates at the expense of giving attention to methodological debates and analysis of good explanatory practice. Giving more attention to successful explanatory practice in the social sciences and the different underlying epistemic interests and motivations for providing explanations or reducing (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Jens Greve (2013). Response to R. Keith Sawyer. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43 (2):246-256.score: 18.0
    R. Keith Sawyer rightly claimed that the formulation of several cross-level regularities does not disprove the “autonomy” of sciences. Nevertheless, first, this autonomy becomes gradual because cross-level regularities narrow the scope for strong emergence and, second, these examples do not disprove the metaphysical premises of Kim’s critique. Sawyer and I concur on the thesis according to which the proof of strong emergence is in part an empirical question. However, it also depends on the concept of individualism applied whether a (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. J. Andrew DeWoody, John W. Bickham, Charles H. Michler, Krista M. Nichols, Olin E. Rhodes & Keith E. Woeste (2011). Conservation Genetics for Natural ResourcesMolecular Approaches in Natural Resource Conservation and Management.J. Andrew DeWoody , John W. Bickham , Charles H. Michler , Krista M. Nichols , Olin E. Rhodes Jr. , and Keith E. Woeste , Eds . Cambridge University Press , 2010 . 392 Pp., Illus. $55.00 (ISBN 9780521731348 Paper). [REVIEW] Bioscience 61 (4):330-331.score: 18.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Keith Hossack (2007). Actuality: Scott Soames and Keith Hossack: Actuality and Modal Rationalism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 107:433 - 456.score: 18.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Esther Kroeker (forthcoming). Response to Keith Lehrer: Thomas Reid on Common Sense and Morals. 11 (2):131-143.score: 18.0
    This paper is a response to Keith Lehrer's ‘Reid on Common Sense and Morals.’ I start by defending the general claim that it is appropriate to call Reid a moral realist. I continue by discussing three aspects of Reid's account of moral ideas. First, our first moral conceptions are non-propositional mental states that are essential ingredients of moral perception. Our first moral conceptions are not gross, indistinct and egocentric but are uninformed mental states that might be about others. Second, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Christian Piller (1991). On Keith Lehrer's Belief in Acceptance. Grazer Philosophische Studien 40:37-61.score: 18.0
    Keith Lehrer's notion of acceptance and its relation to the notion of belief is analyzed in a way that a person only accepts some proposition p if she decides to believe it in order to reach the epistemic aim. This view of acceptance turns out to be untenable: Under the empirical claim that we don't have the power to decide what to beheve it follows that we cannot accept anything. If reaching the truth is the epistemic aim acceptance proves (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Keith Bain (2010). Keith Bain on Movement. Currency House.score: 18.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Peter Burke & Brian Harrison (eds.) (2000). Civil Histories: Essays Presented to Sir Keith Thomas. OUP Oxford.score: 18.0
    Sir Keith Thomas is one of the most innovative and influential of English historians, and a scholar of unusual range. These essays, presented to him on his retirement as President of Corpus Christi College, Oxford, concentrate on one of the broad themes illuminated by his work - changing notions of civility in the past. From the sixteenth century onwards, civility was a term applied to modes of behaviour as well as to cultural and civic attributes. Its influence extended from (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Peter Burke, Brian Harrison & Paul Slack (2000). Keith Thomas. In Peter Burke & Brian Harrison (eds.), Civil Histories: Essays Presented to Sir Keith Thomas. Oup Oxford. 8--10.score: 18.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. The Editors (2000). Keith Thomas. In Peter Burke & Brian Harrison (eds.), Civil Histories: Essays Presented to Sir Keith Thomas. Oup Oxford.score: 18.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Giles Mandelbrote (2000). The Published Writings of Keith Thomas, 1957-1998. In Peter Burke & Brian Harrison (eds.), Civil Histories: Essays Presented to Sir Keith Thomas. Oup Oxford.score: 18.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Keith Roby (1984). Challenges for Einstein's Children: Keith Roby's Vision of Science in Community Life. Keith Roby Memorial Fund, Murdoch University.score: 18.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Peter Baumann (2010). The Case for Contextualism: Knowledge, Skepticism, and Context, Vol. I – Keith DeRose. Philosophical Quarterly 60 (239):424-427.score: 15.0
    (No abstract is available for this citation).
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Jonathan Ichikawa (2009). Review of Keith DeRose, The Case for Contextualism: Knowledge, Skepticism, and Context, Vol. 1. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (12).score: 15.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. W. A. Davis (2011). The Case for Contextualism: Knowledge, Skepticism, and Context, Vol. 1, by Keith DeRose. Mind 119 (476):1152-1157.score: 15.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Roderick M. Chisholm (1990). Keith Lehrer and Thomas Reid. Philosophical Studies 60 (1-2):33 - 38.score: 15.0
  45. Ryan Cox (2012). Book Note: 'New Waves in Philosophy of Action', Edited by Jes's H. Aguilar, Andrei A. Buckareff, and Keith Frankish. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (2):411-411.score: 15.0
    Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Volume 0, Issue 0, Page 1, Ahead of Print.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. W. D. Hart (2009). The Metaphysics of Knowledge • by Keith Hossack. Analysis 69 (1):178-181.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. James Fielding (2010). Wittgenstein on Rules and Nature – by Keith Dromm. [REVIEW] Philosophical Investigations 33 (3):270-274.score: 15.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Timothy Williamson (2000). Skepticism, Semantic Externalism, and Keith's Mom. Southern Journal of Philosophy 38 (S1):149-158.score: 15.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. P. Ylikoski (2009). Book Review: Sawyer, R. Keith. (2005). Social Emergence: Societies as Complex Systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (3):527-530.score: 15.0
  50. J. P. Moreland (1989). Keith Campbell and the Trope View of Predication. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 67 (4):379 – 393.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000