Search results for 'Keith Anderson' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
See also:
Profile: Keith Anderson (Simon Fraser University)
  1. Katharine Anderson (2008). Keith R. Benson; Helen M. Rozwadowski .Extremes: Oceanography's Adventures at the Poles. Xiv + 393 Pp., Illus., Bibl., Index. Sagamore Beach, Mass.: Science History Publications/USA, 2007. $54.95. [REVIEW] Isis 99 (2):438-439.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. William Alexander, Keith Anderson, Jane Harris, Julian Ingram, Tom Nelson, Katherine Woods & Judy Svensen, On Good and Bad: Whether Happiness is the Highest Good.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Keith Anderson, Katherine Woods, William Alexander, Julian Ingram & Mark Johnson, Characters of the Dialogue.
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 RECORDER'S PREFACE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (...)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  16
    Pamela Sue Anderson, Hent DeVries, David Ray Griffin, William Hasker, Fergus Kerr, John Macquarrie, Adrian Peperzak, Philip L. Quinn, William J. Wainwright & Keith Ward (2005). Part One: Articles. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 58:207-214.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Paul E. Meehl, C. Anthony Anderson & Keith Gunderson (1991). Selected Philosophical and Methodological Papers. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  6.  14
    Chuck Huff, Ronald E. Anderson, Joyce Currie Little, Deborah Johnson, Rob Kling, C. Dianne Martin & Keith Miller (1996). Integrating the Ethical and Social Context of Computing Into the Computer Science Curriculum. Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (2):211-224.
    This paper describes the major components of ImpactCS, a program to develop strategies and curriculum materials for integrating social and ethical considerations into the computer science curriculum. It presents, in particular, the content recommendations of a subcommittee of ImpactCS; and it illustrates the interdisciplinary nature of the field, drawing upon concepts from computer science, sociology, philosophy, psychology, history and economics.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  1
    David Anderson, Keith B. Lucas, Ian S. Ginns & Lynn D. Dierking (2000). Development of Knowledge About Electricity and Magnetism During a Visit to a Science Museum and Related Post‐Visit Activities. Science Education 84 (5):658-679.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  87
    L. V. Anderson (1984). Lyle V. Anderson -- The Representation and Resolution of the Nuclear Conflict. Philosophy and Social Criticism 10 (3-4):67-79.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  5
    Elizabeth S. Anderson (1995). The Democratic University: The Role of Justice in the Production of Knowledge*: ELIZABETH S. ANDERSON. Social Philosophy and Policy 12 (2):186-219.
    What is the proper role of politics in higher education? Many policies and reforms in the academy, from affirmative action and a multicultural curriculum to racial and sexual harassment codes and movements to change pedagogical styles, seek justice for oppressed groups in society. They understand justice to require a comprehensive equality of membership: individuals belonging to different groups should have equal access to educational opportunities; their interests and cultures should be taken equally seriously as worthy subjects of study, their persons (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  10. Elizabeth Anderson (2008). I—Elizabeth Anderson: Expanding the Egalitarian Toolbox: Equality and Bureaucracy. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 82 (1):139-160.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11.  3
    John R. Anderson & Alison Gopnik, Marshall M. Weinberg Conference: The Future of Cognitive Science - Thursday Afternoon (Oct. 16, 2008) Session: John R. Anderson and Alison Gopnik. [REVIEW]
    Six leading experts speak about the future of cognitive science.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  2
    Pamela Sue Anderson, Engaging the "Forbidden Texts" of Philosophy: Pamela Sue Anderson Talks to Alison Jasper.
    This article is made available under Creative Commons licence CC BY-NC-ND, which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. John Anderson, Graham Cullum & Kimon Lycos (1982). Art & Reality John Anderson on Literature and Aesthetics.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  14.  2
    E. Bruce Flory & Anna May Anderson (1976). Ernest Paul Anderson 1947-1976. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 50 (2):135 -.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. John Anderson, John Anderson Lecture Notes and Other Writings.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Tyson Anderson (1974). Some Remarks on ‘Physicalism and Immortality’—Reply to David Mouton: Tyson Anderson. Religious Studies 10 (1):81-84.
    In a recent articles David Mouton has argued that immortality is compatible with one sort of physicalism. I believe that he fails to establish this thesis and that, moreover, this article contains several misconceptions having to do with the topic of immortality.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Hall Anderson (2010). Still Rainin' Still Dreamin': Hall Anderson's Ketchikan. University of Alaska Press.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. G. Anderson (1999). 'We Went Through Psychological Hell': A Case Report of Prenatal Diagnosis-Response by Gwen Anderson, Shriver Center for Mental Retardation, Waltham MA, USA-Prenatal Genetics Services Signal a Much Deeper Problem in Health Care Delivery. Nursing Ethics 6 (3):254-256.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  11
    Richard J. Blackwell (1977). "Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 6: Induction, Probability, and Confirmation," Ed. Grover Maxwell and Robert M. Anderson, Jr.; and "Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 7: Language, Mind, and Knowledge," Ed. Keith Gunderson. [REVIEW] Modern Schoolman 54 (3):307-308.
  20.  6
    Judith Genova (1994). Response to Anderson and Keith. Social Epistemology 8 (4):341 – 343.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  12
    Greg Anderson (2003). The Athenian Experiment: Building an Imagined Political Community in Ancient Attica, 508-490 B.C. University of Michigan Press.
    In barely the space of one generation, Athens was transformed from a conventional city-state into something completely new--a region-state on a scale previously unthinkable. This book sets out to answer a seemingly simple question: How and when did the Athenian state attain the anomalous size that gave it such influence in Greek politics and culture in the classical period? Many scholars argue that Athens's incorporation of Attica was a gradual development, largely completed some two hundred years before the classical era. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  22.  34
    Michael Anderson, On the Grounds of (X)-Grounded Cognition.
    For the least the last 10 years, there has been growing interest in, and grow- ing evidence for, the intimate relations between more abstract or higher order cognition—such as reasoning, planning, and language use—and the more con- crete, immediate, or lower order operations of the perceptual and motor sys- tems that support seeing, feeling, moving, and manipulating. A sub-field of the larger research program in embodied cognition (Clark, 1997, 1998; Wilson, 2001; Anderson, 2003, 2007d, 2008; Gibbs, 2006), this work (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  21
    Lisa Anderson (1992). Remaking the Middle East: The Prospects for Democracy and Stability. Ethics and International Affairs 6 (1):163–178.
    Anderson explores the ramifications for the Middle East of the profound transformations in global politics at the end of the Cold War and the birth of a new, American-dominated world order.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  48
    Hannah Tierney & Nicholas D. Smith (2012). Keith Lehrer on the Basing Relation. Philosophical Studies 161 (1):27-36.
    In this paper, we review Keith Lehrer’s account of the basing relation, with particular attention to the two cases he offered in support of his theory, Raco (Lehrer, Theory of knowledge, 1990; Theory of knowledge, (2nd ed.), 2000) and the earlier case of the superstitious lawyer (Lehrer, The Journal of Philosophy, 68, 311–313, 1971). We show that Lehrer’s examples succeed in making his case that beliefs need not be based on the evidence, in order to be justified. These cases (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   16 citations  
  25.  89
    Charles Pigden (2011). Getting the Wrong Anderson? A Short and Opinionated History of New Zealand Philosophy. In Graham Oppy & Nick Trakakis (eds.), The Antipodean Philosopher: Public Lectures on Philosophy in Australia and New Zealand. Lexington Books 169-195.
    Is the history of philosophy primarily a contribution to PHILOSOPHY or primarily a contribution to HISTORY? This paper is primarily contribution to history (specifically the history of New Zealand) but although the history of philosophy has been big in New Zealand, most NZ philosophers with a historical bent are primarily interested in the history of philosophy as a contribution to philosophy. My essay focuses on two questions: 1) How did New Zealand philosophy get to be so good? And why, given (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  4
    Nathaniel Goldberg (2016). R. Lanier Anderson, The Poverty of Conceptual Truth: Kant’s Analytic/Synthetic Distinction and the Limits of Metaphysics New York: Oxford University Press, 2015 Pp. 384 ISBN 9780198724575 £50.00. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 21 (1):146-151.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  59
    Alasdair Urquhart (2010). Anderson and Belnap's Invitation to Sin. Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (4):453 - 472.
    Quine has argued that modal logic began with the sin of confusing use and mention. Anderson and Belnap, on the other hand, have offered us a way out through a strategy of nominahzation. This paper reviews the history of Lewis's early work in modal logic, and then proves some results about the system in which "A is necessary" is intepreted as "A is a classical tautology.".
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  28.  8
    Edward J. O'Boyle (2011). Anderson and Escher's The MBA Oath: Review Essay. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 101 (2):285 - 295.
    Max Anderson and Peter Escher's The MBA Oath addresses the need for a set of ethical standards to provide guidance to MBA graduates as they go about their everyday professional business. Their oath is relevant to the concerns of others in business but clearly was inspired by the special problems they encountered in the classroom as members of the Harvard MBA class of 2009. The oath and the book itself evolved from the financial meltdown of 2008 for which MBAs (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  29.  26
    María G. Navarro (2012). Review of 'New Waves in Philosophy of Action' Edited by Jesús H. Aguilar, Andrei A. Buckareff and Keith Frankish. [REVIEW] Metapsychology Online Reviews 16 (51).
    New Waves in Philosophy, a book collection that stands out for giving a snapshot of research in all areas of philosophy is a successful editorial project addressed by Vincent F. Hendricks and Duncan Pritchard. New Waves in Philosophy of Action is one of its last titles, edited by Jesús H. Aguilar, Andrei A. Buckareff and Keith Frankish. -/- The book is aimed at the researchers of all fields and readers in general interested in this sub-discipline of philosophy very difficult (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  8
    Kim Kleinman (1999). His Own Synthesis: Corn, Edgar Anderson, and Evolutionary Theory in the 1940s. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 32 (2):293 - 320.
    Tracing the contributions of Edgar Anderson (1897-1969) of the Missouri Botanical Garden to the important discussions in evolutionary biology in the 1940s, this paper argues that Anderson turned to corn research rather than play a more prominent role in what is now known as the Evolutionary Synthesis. His biosystematic studies of Iris and Tradescantia in the 1930s reflected such Synthesis concerns as the species question and population thinking. He shared the 1941 Jesup Lectures with Ernst Mayr. But rather (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  31.  8
    Kim Kleinman (2013). Systematics and the Origin of Species From the Viewpoint of a Botanist: Edgar Anderson Prepares the 1941 Jesup Lectures with Ernst Mayr. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 46 (1):73-101.
    The correspondence between Edgar Anderson and Ernst Mayr leading into their 1941 Jesup Lectures on “Systematics and the Origin of Species” addressed population thinking, the nature of species, the relationship of microevolution to macroevolution, and the evolutionary dynamics of plants and animals, all central issues in what came to be known as the Evolutionary Synthesis. On some points, they found ready agreement; for others they forged only a short term consensus. They brought two different working styles to this project (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  6
    Sherah Bloor (2014). Claiming Kant for Feminism: A Discussion of Anderson's Re-Visioning Gender in Philosophy of Religion. Sophia 53 (2):299-303.
    I wish to expose the possibility of a Kantian feminism made actual by Pamela Sue Anderson’s recent book Re-visioning Gender in Philosophy of Religion: Reason, Love and Epistemic Locatedness. In this paper I show how Kantian philosophy structures Anderson’s project, and I argue that in embodying the spirit of Kantian critique, this project may be used to turn that spirit against the letter of its expression in an act that would claim Kant for feminism.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  20
    Charles Taliaferro (2007). Transcendence and Feminism: Response to Anderson's “Feminist Challenges to Conceptions of God”. Philosophia 35 (3-4):371-373.
    An argument that Pamela Sue Anderson’s critique of Irigaray commits her to a version of the Ideal Observer Theory, a theory Anderson rejects. This paper was delivered in the APA Pacific 2007 Mini-Conference on Models of God.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  1
    Patrice Haynes (2014). Encouraging a Thoughtful Love of Life: Pamela Sue Anderson and Gillian Howie on Practising Philosophy. Sophia 53 (2):199-213.
    Wherever you turn your eyes the world can shine like transfiguration. You don’t have to bring a thing to it except a little willingness to see. Only, who could have the courage to see it?—Marilynne RobinsonMarilynne Robinson, Gilead (London: Virago Press, 2004), p. 280.Preamble: Going the Bloody Hard WayThe writings of Pamela Sue Anderson and Gillian Howie have been, and continue to be, important in helping to shape the development of my own philosophical vision. Yet my commitment to (a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  1
    Gert-Jan C. Lokhorst (2008). Anderson's Relevant Deontic and Eubouliatic Systems. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 49 (1):65-73.
    We present axiomatizations of the deontic fragment of Anderson's relevant deontic logic (the logic of obligation and related concepts) and the eubouliatic fragment of Anderson's eubouliatic logic (the logic of prudence, safety, risk, and related concepts).
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  1
    Brook Thomas (1984). The Legal Fictions of Herman Melville and Lemuel Shaw. Critical Inquiry 11 (1):24-51.
    I have three aims in this essay. I want to offer an example of an interdisciplinary historical inquiry combining literary criticism with the relatively new field of critical legal studies. I intend to use this historical inquiry to argue that the ambiguity of literary texts might better be understood in terms of an era’s social contradictions rather than in terms of the inherent qualities of literary language or rhetoric and, conversely, that a text’s ambiguity can help us expose the contradictions (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. N. Georgopoulos & Michael Heim (eds.) (1995). Being Human in the Ultimate Studies in the Thought of John M. Anderson. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    For John M. Anderson philosophy, as the love of wisdom, is a concern for what is ultimate. The essays in this volume take to heart this understanding of philosophy, and are therefore responses to the ultimate. The first four essays by Kaelin, Schrag, Baillif and Johnstone, deal with Anderson's own account of ultimacy as it is presented in his reflections on the aesthetic occasion, the experience of the sublime, on freedom and on insight. The concern for what is (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  43
    Matthew A. Benton, John Hawthorne & Dani Rabinowitz (eds.) (forthcoming). Knowledge, Belief, and God: New Insights in Religious Epistemology. Oxford University Press.
    A collection of 16 new essays in the epistemology of religion, broadly construed. Includes work from historical perspectives (the medieval period; Hume; Scotus; Maimonides); in social epistemology (on testimony, disagreement, and expertise); formal epistemology (especially fine-tuning and many-worlds hypotheses); and rationality considerations (practical factors, modal arguments, phenomenal conservatism). -/- Contributors: Charity Anderson, Richard Cross, Billy Dunaway, Dani Rabinowitz, Isaac Choi, Hans Halvorson, John Hawthorne & Yoaav Isaacs, Roger White, Max Baker-Hytch, Rachel Elizabeth Fraser, Jennifer Lackey, Paulina Sliwa, Matthew Benton, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  7
    Elizabeth D. Burns (2015). Pamela Sue Anderson: Re-Visioning Gender in Philosophy of Religion: Reason, Love and Epistemic Locatedness. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 77 (2):187-189.
  40.  3
    Keith Chrzan (1991). God and Gratuitous Evil: A Reply to Yandell: Keith Chrzan. Religious Studies 27 (1):99-103.
    In his recent paper ‘Gratuitous Evil and Divine Existence’. Keith Yandell declares the deductive argument from evil solved. He notes, however, that what persists is a probabilistic version of the argument from evil, one concluding from the evidence of evil that it is ‘highly improbable’ that God exists. Yandell attempts to refute this probabilistic argument from gratuitous evil; as shown below, however, he fails.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  4
    Benjamin Noys (2009). Ends in Sight: Marx/Fukuyama/Hobsbawm/Anderson. Historical Materialism 17 (4):157-163.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Radu J. Bogdan (1981). Keith Lehrer.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  43. Johannes Brandl, Wolfgang Gombocz & Christian Piller (eds.) (1992). Metamind, Knowledge, and Coherence: Essays on the Philosophy of Keith Lehrer. Rodopi.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. John Danaher (2014). Skeptical Theism and Divine Permission - A Reply to Anderson. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 75 (2):101-118.
    Skeptical theism (ST) may undercut the key inference in the evidential argument from evil, but it does so at a cost. If ST is true, then we lose our ability to assess the all things considered (ATC) value of natural events and states of affairs. And if we lose that ability, a whole slew of undesirable consequences follow. So goes a common consequential critique of ST. In a recent article, Anderson has argued that this consequential critique is flawed. (...) claims that ST only has the consequence that we lack epistemic access to potentially God-justifying reasons for permitting a prima facie “bad” (or “evil”) event. But this is very different from lacking epistemic access to the ATC value of such events. God could have an (unknowable) reason for not intervening to prevent E and yet E could still be (knowably) ATC-bad. Ingenious though it is, this article argues that Anderson’s attempted defence of ST is flawed. This is for two reasons. First, and most importantly, the consequential critique does not rely on the questionable assumption he identifies. Indeed, the argument can be made quite easily by relying purely on Anderson’s distinction between God-justifying reasons for permitting E and the ATC value of E. And second, Anderson’s defence of his position, if correct, would serve to undermine the foundations of ST. (shrink)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  45. Peter Beilharz (2010). Review: John Anderson, Lectures on Political Theory 1941—45, Ed. Creagh McLean Cole (Sydney University Press, 2007) Bernard Smith, The Formalesque — A Guide to Modern Art and Its History (Macmillan, 2007). [REVIEW] Thesis Eleven 101 (1):134-136.
    Review: John Anderson, Lectures on Political Theory 1941—45, ed. Creagh McLean Cole Bernard Smith, The Formalesque — A Guide to Modern Art and Its History.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  14
    Scott F. Aikin & Robert B. Talisse (2015). Reply to Joshua Anderson. The Pluralist 10 (3):335-343.
    We are pleased to find that our 2005 paper “Why Pragmatists Cannot Be Pluralists” continues to draw critical attention. It seems to us that despite the many responses to our paper, its central challenge has not been met. That challenge is for pragmatists to articulate a genuine pluralism that is consistent with their broader commitments. Unfortunately, much of the wrangling over our paper has aimed to capture the word “pluralism” for pragmatist deployment; little has been done to clarify what that (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  3
    José M. Méndez & Gemma Robles (2016). The Logic Determined by Smiley’s Matrix for Anderson and Belnap’s First-Degree Entailment Logic. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 26 (1):47-68.
    The aim of this paper is to define the logical system Sm4 characterised by the degree of truth-preserving consequence relation defined on the ordered set of values of Smiley’s four-element matrix MSm4. The matrix MSm4 has been of considerable importance in the development of relevant logics and it is at the origin of bilattice logics. It will be shown that Sm4 is a most interesting paraconsistent logic which encloses a sound theory of logical necessity similar to that of Anderson (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  57
    Friederike Moltmann (forthcoming). States Versus Tropes. Comments on C. Anderson and M. Morzycki: 'Degrees as Kinds'. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory.
    In their paper ‘Degrees as Kinds’, Anderson and Morzycki, demonstrate how certain constructions in a range of languages treat kinds, manners, and degrees alike. Their proposal is to identify degrees with kinds of states and they consider states to be interchangeable with tropes. In these comments, I will raise some issues about the interchangeability of (concrete) states and tropes as well as the category of concrete states as well as Anderson and Morzycki's analysis of the comparative.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  71
    Jens Greve (2013). Response to R. Keith Sawyer. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43 (2):246-256.
    R. Keith Sawyer rightly claimed that the formulation of several cross-level regularities does not disprove the “autonomy” of sciences. Nevertheless, first, this autonomy becomes gradual because cross-level regularities narrow the scope for strong emergence and, second, these examples do not disprove the metaphysical premises of Kim’s critique. Sawyer and I concur on the thesis according to which the proof of strong emergence is in part an empirical question. However, it also depends on the concept of individualism applied whether a (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  29
    Hugh V. McLachlan & J. K. Swales (2000). Babies, Child Bearers and Commodification: Anderson, Brazier Et Al., and the Political Economy of Commercial Surrogate Motherhood. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 8 (1):1-18.
    It is argued by Anderson and also in the BrazierReport that Commercial Surrogate Motherhood (C.S.M.)contracts and agencies should be illegal on thegrounds that C.S.M. involves the commodification ofboth mothers and babies. This paper takes issue withthis view and argues that C.S.M. is not inconsistentwith the proper respect for, and treatment of,children and women. A case for the legalisation ofC.S.M. is made.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
1 — 50 / 1000