Search results for 'Keith E. Jones' (try it on Scholar)

431 found
Sort by:
  1. V. E. & A. H. M. Jones (1942). The Greek City From Alexander to Justinian. Journal of Hellenic Studies 62:98.score: 1200.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Malcolm Finbow, Mike Harrison & Phil Jones (1995). Malcolm E. Finbow, Michael Harrison and Phillip Jones Reply. Bioessays 17 (8):745-745.score: 390.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Keith E. Jones (1973). Verisimilitude Versus Probable Verisimilitude. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (2):174-176.score: 290.0
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Bernard E. Jones (2011). Earnest Enquirers After Truth: A Gifford Anthology: Excerpts From Gifford Lectures 1888-1968. Routledge.score: 260.0
    First published in 1970, Bernard E. Jones’s selection of Gifford lectures includes excerpts from the writings of over ninety scholars who occupied a Gifford Chair between 1888 and 1968. Lord Gifford had asked his lecturers to be ‘honest to God’, insisting that they should be ‘earnest enquirers after truth’ and had always envisaged the lectures being published. Dr Jones’s anthology is arranged under headings suggested by phrases from Lord Gifford’s will. The selection, which includes names such as William (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Michael S. Jones (2010). Carl E. Braaten, No Other Gospel! Christianity Among the World's Religions. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 3 (9):162-167.score: 210.0
    Carl E. Braaten, No Other Gospel! Christianity among the World's Religions Minneapolis, USA: Fortress Press, 1992. Paperback: 146 pp. including endnotes and index.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. S. Bartsch O'Gorman, S. M. Goldberg, E. Paratore, N. P. Miller, P. V. Jones, D. S. Levene, R. Martin, R. Syme, J. Ginsburg & C. Pelling (2012). Jakob Andersson. Kingship in the Early Mesopotamian Onomasticon 2800–2200 B. C. E. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Studia Semitica Upsaliensia, 28. Up-Psala: Uppsala University Library, 2012. Pp. Xxxix, 440. SEK 392 (Pb.). ISBN 978-91-554-8270-1. [REVIEW] Classical World 106 (1):149-154.score: 210.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Peter Dear, Ian Hacking, Matthew L. Jones, Lorraine Daston & Peter Galison (2012). Objectivity in Historical Perspective. Metascience 21 (1):11-39.score: 150.0
    Objectivity in historical perspective Content Type Journal Article Category Book Symposium Pages 11-39 DOI 10.1007/s11016-011-9597-2 Authors Peter Dear, Department of History, Cornell University, 435 McGraw Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA Ian Hacking, Department of Philosophy, University of Toronto, 170 St. George St., Toronto, ON M5R 2M8, Canada Matthew L. Jones, Department of History, Columbia University, 514 Fayerweather Hall, 1180 Amsterdam Ave., New York, NY 10027, USA Lorraine Daston, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Boltzmannstraße 22, 14195 Berlin, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. S. Sharkey, R. Jones, J. Smithson, E. Hewis, T. Emmens, T. Ford & C. Owens (2011). Ethical Practice in Internet Research Involving Vulnerable People: Lessons From a Self-Harm Discussion Forum Study (SharpTalk). Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (12):752-758.score: 150.0
    The internet is widely used for health information and support, often by vulnerable people. Internet-based research raises both familiar and new ethical problems for researchers and ethics committees. While guidelines for internet-based research are available, it is unclear to what extent ethics committees use these. Experience of gaining research ethics approval for a UK study (SharpTalk), involving internet-based discussion groups with young people who self-harm and health professionals is described. During ethical review, unsurprisingly, concerns were raised about the vulnerability of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Jeffery Aubin, Marie Chantal, Dianne M. Cole, Julio Cesar Dias Chaves, Cathelyne Duchesne, Christel Freu, Steve Johnston, Brice C. Jones, Amaury Levillayer, Stã©Phanie Machabã©E., Paul-Hubert Poirier, Philippe Therrien, Jonathan I. von Kodar, Martin Voyer & Jennifer K. Wees (2013). Littérature et histoire du christianisme ancien. Laval Thã©Ologique Et Philosophique 69 (2):327-402.score: 150.0
    Jeffery Aubin ,Marie Chantal ,Dianne Cole ,Julio Chaves ,Cathelyne Duchesne ,Christel Freu ,Steve Johnston ,Brice Jones ,Amaury Levillayer ,Stéphanie Machabée ,Paul-Hubert Poirier ,Philippe Therrien ,Jonathan von Kodar ,Martin Voyer ,Jennifer Wees ,Eric Crégheur.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Richard A. Jones (2009). The Politics of Black Fictive Space. Radical Philosophy Review 12 (1/2):391-418.score: 150.0
    Historically, for Black writers, literary fiction has been a site for transforming the discursive disciplinary spaces of political oppression. From 19th century “slave narratives” to the 20th century, Black novelists have created an impressive literary counter-canon in advancing liberatory struggles. W.E.B. Du Bois argued that “all art is political.” Many Black writers have used fiction to create spaces for political and social freedom—from the early work of Harriet Wilson’s Our Nig; or, Sketches from the Life of a Free Black (1859)—to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Bruce E. Cain & W. T. Jones (1979). Modes of Rationality and Irrationality. Philosophical Studies 36 (November):333-343.score: 140.0
  12. Mark E. Eberhart & Travis E. Jones (2013). The Two Faces of Chemistry: Can They Be Reconciled? [REVIEW] Foundations of Chemistry 15 (3):277-285.score: 140.0
    Shortly before his death, Richard Bader commented in this Journal on the dichotomy that exists within chemistry and between chemists. We believe that the dichotomy results from different goals and objectives inherent in the chemical disciplines. At one extreme are designers who synthesize new molecules with interesting properties. For these chemists, the rationale underpinning molecular synthesis is far less important than the end product—the molecules themselves. At the other extreme are the chemists who seek a fundamental understanding of molecular properties. (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Ross King, Whelan D., E. Kenneth, Ffion Jones, Reiser M., G. K. Philip, Christopher Bryant, Muggleton H., H. Stephen, Douglas Kell, Oliver B. & G. Stephen (2004). Functional Genomic Hypothesis Generation and Experimentation by a Robot Scientist. Nature 427 (6971):247--52.score: 140.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. R. E. Ashcroft, S. Jones & A. V. Campbell (2000). Solidarity in the UK Welfare State Reforms. Health Care Analysis 8:377-394.score: 140.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Becky A. Ball, John S. Kominoski, Heather E. Adams, Stuart E. Jones, Evan S. Kane, Terrance D. Loecke, Wendy M. Mahaney, Jason P. Martina, Chelse M. Prather, Todd M. P. Robinson & Christopher T. Solomon (2010). Direct and Terrestrial Vegetation-Mediated Effects of Environmental Change on Aquatic Ecosystem Processes. Bioscience 60 (8):590-601.score: 140.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Fernanda Ferreira, Paul E. Engelhardt & Manon W. Jones (2009). Good Enough Language Processing: A Satisficing Approach. In. In N. A. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. 413--418.score: 140.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. R. E. Graves & B. S. Jones (1992). Conscious Visual Perceptual Awareness Vs Non-Conscious Visual Spatial Localisation Examined with Normal Subjects Using Possible Analogues of Blindsight and Neglect. Cognitive Neuropsychology 9:487-508.score: 140.0
  18. E. Kyriakidis & D. W. Jones (2001). Peak Sanctuaries and Sacred Caves in Minoan Crete. Journal of Hellenic Studies 121:206.score: 140.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Joel H. Rosenthal, J. E. Drexel Godfrey, R. V. Jones, Arthur S. Hulnick, David W. Mattausch, Kent Pekel, Tony Pfaff, John P. Langan, John B. Chomeau, Anne C. Rudolph, Fritz Allhoff, Michael Skerker, Robert M. Gates, Andrew Wilkie, James Ernest Roscoe, Lincoln P. Bloomfield Jr, Charles R. Beitz, David L. Perry, James A. Barry, Loch K. Johnson, Jean Maria Arrigo, Roger Homan, Martin Bulmer, David Price, Linda Trevino, Gary Weaver & Darren Charters (2005). Ethics of Spying: A Reader for the Intelligence Professional. Scarecrow Press.score: 140.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Robert E. Schofield & J. Jones (1999). Essay Review-Priestley Enlightened-The Enlightenment of Joseph Priestley: A Study of His Life and Work From 1733 to 1773. [REVIEW] Annals of Science 56 (1):95-98.score: 140.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Alexander J. Sutton, Keith R. Abrams & David R. Jones (2001). An Illustrated Guide to the Methods of Meta‐Analysis. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 7 (2):135-148.score: 140.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Russell E. Jones (2007). Escapism and Luck. Religious Studies 43 (2):205-216.score: 120.0
    I argue that the problem of religious luck posed by Zagzebski poses a problem for the theory of hell proposed by Buckareff and Plug, according to which God adopts an open-door policy toward those in hell. Though escapism is not open to many of the criticisms Zagzebski raises against potential solutions to the problem of luck, escapism fails to solve the problem: it merely pushes luck forward into the afterlife. I suggest a hybrid solution to the problem which combines escapism (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Russell E. Jones (2010). Truth and Contradiction in Aristotle's De Interpretatione 6-9. Phronesis 55 (1):26-67.score: 120.0
    In De Interpretatione 6-9, Aristotle considers three logical principles: the principle of bivalence, the law of excluded middle, and the rule of contradictory pairs (according to which of any contradictory pair of statements, exactly one is true and the other false). Surprisingly, Aristotle accepts none of these without qualification. I offer a coherent interpretation of these chapters as a whole, while focusing special attention on two sorts of statements that are of particular interest to Aristotle: universal statements not made universally (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Ward E. Jones (1998). Religious Conversion, Self-Deception, and Pascal's Wager. Journal of the History of Philosophy 36 (2):167-188.score: 120.0
  25. Gary E. Jones (1986). Lying and Intentions. Journal of Business Ethics 5 (4):347 - 349.score: 120.0
    In this essay I criticize recent attempts to prove that the concept of lying does not include the intent to deceive. I argue that examples by Isenberg and Carson fail to prove that one can lie without intending to deceive and, furthermore, that untoward consequences would follow if these authors were correct. I conclude that since intending to deceive is indeed a necessary condition of lying, the class of statements that constitute lies is smaller than what Isenberg et (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Ward E. Jones (2012). A Lover's Shame. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (5):615-630.score: 120.0
    Shame is one of the more painful consequences of loving someone; my beloved’s doing something immoral can cause me to be ashamed of her. The guiding thought behind this paper is that explaining this phenomenon can tell us something about what it means to love. The phenomenon of beloved-induced shame has been largely neglected by philosophers working on shame, most of whom conceive of shame as being a reflexive attitude. Bennett Helm has recently suggested that in order to account for (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Ward E. Jones (2002). Explaining Our Own Beliefs: Non-Epistemic Believing and Doxastic Instability. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 111 (3):217 - 249.score: 120.0
    It has often been claimed that ourbelieving some proposition is dependent uponour not being committed to a non-epistemicexplanation of why we believe that proposition.Very roughly, I cannot believe that p andalso accept a non-epistemic explanation of mybelieving that p. Those who have assertedsuch a claim have drawn from it a range ofimplications: doxastic involuntarism, theunacceptability of Humean naturalism, doxasticfreedom, restrictions upon the effectiveness ofpractical (Pascalian) arguments, as well asothers. If any of these implications are right,then we would do well to (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Ward E. Jones (2000). Underdetermination and the Explanation of Theory-Acceptance: A Response to Samir Okasha. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14 (3):299 – 304.score: 120.0
    After a thorough examination of the claim that "the underdetermination of theory by evidence forces us to seek sociological explanations of scientists' cognitive choices", Samir Okasha concludes that the only significant problem with this argument is that the thesis of underdetermination is not adequately supported. Against Okasha, I argue (1) that there is a very good reason to question the inference from the underdetermination of a theory to a sociological account of that theory's acceptance, and (2) that Okasha's own objection (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Ward E. Jones (2011). Being Moved by a Way the World is Not. Synthese 178 (1):131 - 141.score: 120.0
    At the end of Lecture 3 of The Empirical Stance, Bas van Fraassen suggests that we see the change of view involved in scientific revolutions as being, at least in part, emotional. In this paper, I explore one plausible way of cashing out this suggestion. Someone's emotional approval of a description of the world, I argue, thereby shows that she takes herself to have reason to take that description seriously. This is true even if she is convinced— as a scientific (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Ward E. Jones (2009). Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Ratio 22 (3):369-373.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. B. E. Jones (1998). The Neural Basis of Consciousness Across the Sleep-Waking Cycle. In H. Jasper, L. Descarries, V. Castellucci & S. Rossignol (eds.), Consciousness: At the Frontiers of Neuroscience. Lippincott-Raven.score: 120.0
  32. Ward E. Jones (2006). The Function and Content of Amusement. South African Journal of Philosophy 25 (2):126-137.score: 120.0
    Once we establish that the fundamental subject matter of the study of humour is a mental state – which I will call finding funny – then it immediately follows that we need to find the content and function of this mental state. The main contender for the content of finding funny is the incongruous (the incongruity thesis ); the main contenders for the function of finding funny are grounded either in its generally being an enjoyable state (the gratification thesis ) (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Ward E. Jones (2002). Dissident Versus Loyalist: Which Scientists Should We Trust? [REVIEW] Journal of Value Inquiry 36 (4):511-520.score: 120.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Russell E. Jones (2006). Piety as a Virtue in the Euthyphro: A Response to Rabbås. Ancient Philosophy 26 (2):385-390.score: 120.0
  35. W. H. S. Jones (1954). I. E. Drabkin: Caelius Aurelianus, On Acute Diseases and On Chronic Diseases. Pp. Xxvi+Vii+1019. Chicago: University of Chicago Press (London: Cambridge University Press), 1951. Cloth, 112s. 6d. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 4 (02):171-172.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Russell E. Jones (2012). Rational and Nonrational Desires in Meno and Protagoras. Analytic Philosophy 53 (2):224-233.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Gary E. Jones (1983). The Right to Health Care and the State. Philosophical Quarterly 33 (132):279-287.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Werner Menski, Carl Olson, William Cenkner, Anne E. Monius, Sarah Hodges, Jeffrey J. Kripal, Carol Salomon, Deepak Sarma, William Cenkner, John E. Cort, Peter A. Huff, Joseph A. Bracken, Larry D. Shinn, Jonathan S. Walters, Ellison Banks Findly, John Grimes, Loriliai Biernacki, David L. Gosling, Thomas Forsthoefel, Michael H. Fisher, Ian Barrow, Srimati Basu, Natalie Gummer, Pradip Bhattacharya, John Grimes, Heather T. Frazer, Elaine Craddock, Andrea Pinkney, Joseph Schaller, Michael W. Myers, Lise F. Vail, Wayne Howard, Bradley B. Burroughs, Shalva Weil, Joseph A. Bracken, Christopher W. Gowans, Dan Cozort, Katherine Janiec Jones, Carl Olson, M. D. McLean, A. Whitney Sanford, Sarah Lamb, Eliza F. Kent, Ashley Dawson, Amir Hussain, John Powers, Jennifer B. Saunders & Ramdas Lamb (2005). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] International Journal of Hindu Studies 9 (1-3):153-228.score: 120.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. W. E. Jones (2011). Art and Ethical Criticism, Edited by Garry L. Hagberg. Mind 119 (476):1171-1174.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. G. O. Jones, D. J. Miller & M. E. M. Thomas (2010). Mildness and the Density of Rational Points on Certain Transcendental Curves. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 52 (1):67-74.score: 120.0
    We use a result due to Rolin, Speissegger, and Wilkie to show that definable sets in certain o-minimal structures admit definable parameterizations by mild maps. We then use this parameterization to prove a result on the density of rational points on curves defined by restricted Pfaffian functions.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. A. M. Sillito, H. E. Jones, G. L. Gerstein & D. C. West (1994). Feature-Linked Synchronization of Thalamic Relay Cell Firing Induced by Feedback From the Visual Cortex. Nature 369:479-82.score: 120.0
  42. E. E. C. Jones (1910). Mr. Russell's Objections to Frege's Analysis of Propositions. Mind 19 (75):379-386.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Gwen E. Jones & Michael J. Kavanagh (1996). An Experimental Examination of the Effects of Individual and Situational Factors on Unethical Behavioral Intentions in the Workplace. Journal of Business Ethics 15 (5):511 - 523.score: 120.0
    Using a 2×2×2 experimental design, the effects of situational and individual variables on individuals' intentions to act unethically were investigated. Specifically examined were three situational variables: (1) quality of the work experience (good versus poor), (2) peer influences (unethical versus ethical), and (3) managerial influences (unethical versus ethical), and three individual variables: (4) locus of control, (5) Machiavellianism, and (6) gender, on individuals' behavioral intentions in an ethically ambiguous dilemma in an work setting. Experiment 1 revealed main effects for quality (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. E. E. Constance Jones (1911). A New `Law of Thought' and its Implications. Mind 20 (77):41-53.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Keith Jones (1986). Is Kuhn a Sociologist? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (4):443-452.score: 120.0
  46. Ward E. Jones (2003). Is Scientific Theory-Commitment Doxastic or Practical? Synthese 137 (3):325 - 344.score: 120.0
    Associated with Bayesianism is the claim that insofar as thereis anything like scientific theory-commitment, it is not a doxastic commitment to the truth of the theory or any proposition involving the theory, but is rather an essentiallypractical commitment to behaving in accordance with a theory. While there are a number of a priori reasons to think that this should be true, there is stronga posteriori reason to think that it is not in fact true of current scientific practice.After outlining a (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. E. E. C. Jones (1905). Lewis Carroll's Logical Paradox. Mind 14 (53):146-148.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. E. E. Constance Jones (1894). Rational Hedonism. International Journal of Ethics 5 (1):79-97.score: 120.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Gary E. Jones (1980). Sartre, Consciousness, and Responsibility. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 41 (1/2):234-237.score: 120.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Ward E. Jones (1997). Why Do We Value Knowledge? American Philosophical Quarterly 34 (4):423 - 439.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 431