Search results for 'Kelley Ann Newton' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  15
    Willard Downs & Kelley Ann Newton (1989). Legal Implications in Development and Use of Expert Systems in Agriculture. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 2 (1):53-58.
    Applications of Artificial Intelligence, particularly Expert Systems, are rapidly increasing. This science promises to give computer-based systems the capability of reasoning and decision making in near human-like fashion. Whether used for farm management or intelligent machine control, Expert Systems will find many agricultural applications. Much of the development and distribution of such systems will probably take place in the public sector, particularly the Cooperative Extension Service. A major nontechnical factor affecting the development and extensive use of Expert Systems is the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Willard Downs & Kelley Ann Newton (1989). Legal Implications in Development and Use of Expert Systems in Agriculture. Journal of Agricultural Ethics 2 (1):53-58.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  6
    Ann E. Kelley (1987). Dopamine and Mental Illness: Phenomenological and Anatomical Considerations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10 (2):219.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Lisa H. Newton, Edward M. Spencer, Ann E. Mills, Mary V. Rorty & Patricia H. Werhane (2002). A Fine Effort to Square a CircleOrganization Ethics in Health Care. Business Ethics Quarterly 12 (4):539.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  25
    Isaac Newton (1953). Newton's Philosophy of Nature: Selections From His Writings. Dover Publications.
    Aside from the Principia and occasional appearances of the Opticks , Newton' writings have remained largely inaccessible to students of philosophy, science, and literature as well as to other readers. This book provides a remedy with wide representation of the interests, problems, and diverse philosophic issues that preoccupied the greatest scientific mind of the seventeenth century. Grouped in sections corresponding to methods, principles, and theological considerations, these selections feature explanatory notes and cross-references to related essays.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  6. Isaac Newton & H. W. Turnbull (1961). The Correspondence of Isaac Newton. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 12 (47):255-258.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   27 citations  
  7. Isaac Newton, I. Bernard Cohen & Robert E. Schofield (1959). Isaac Newton's Papers and Letters on Natural Philosophy. Science and Society 23 (3):279-282.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  8.  4
    W. M. Kelley, R. L. Buckner & S. E. Petersen (1998). Response From Kelley, Buckner and Petersen. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2 (11):421.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. D. T. Whiteside & Isaac Newton (1984). The Mathematical Papers of Isaac Newton, Volume VIII: 1697-1722. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35 (3):303-307.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  10.  3
    J. Herivel & Isaac Newton (1962). Newton on Rotating Bodies. Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 53:212-218.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  1
    William Newman & Isaac Newton (1987). Newton's Clavis as Starkey's Key. Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 78:564-574.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  12. A. Rupert Hall, Isaac Newton & Laura Tilling (1979). The Correspondence of Isaac Newton. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30 (2):173-177.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  13.  1
    J. Mcguire, Martin Tamny & Isaac Newton (1985). Newton's Astronomical Apprenticeship: Notes of 1664/5. Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 76:349-365.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. I. Bernard Cohen, Isaac Newton & Benjamin Franklin (1956). Franklin and Newton an Inquiry Into Speculative Newtonian Experimental Science and Franklin's Work in Electricity as an Example Thereof. American Philosophical Society.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. J. W. Herivel & Isaac Newton (1962). Newton on Rotating Bodies. Isis 53 (2):212-218.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Donald R. Kelley, Anthony Grafton & J. H. M. Salmon (2001). Historians and Ideologues Essays in Honor of Donald R. Kelley. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Mike Kelley (2007). 13 Mike Kelley. In Diarmuid Costello & Jonathan Vickery (eds.), Art: Key Contemporary Thinkers. Berg 13.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. John Milton & Thomas Newton (1758). Paradise Lost, a Poem. From the Text of T. Newton.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. John Milton & Thomas Newton (1758). Paradise Regain'd, a Poem. To Which is Added Samson Agonistes: And Poems Upon Several Occasions. From the Text of T. Newton. [REVIEW]
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. K. M. Newton (1981). George Eliot, Romantic Humanist a Study of the Philosophical Structure of Her Novels /K.M. Newton. --. --. Barnes & Noble Books,1981.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Einstein Y. La Noción De Newton (2001). I NTRODUCCIÓN M ucha gente tiende a pensar que con la teoría de la relatividad de Einstein, el concepto de tiempo absoluto de Isaac Newton quedó totalmente refutado. 1 En este trabajo nos proponemos explorar la idea de que, al. Signos Filosóficos 5:65-81.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. William Newman & Issac Newton (1987). Newton's Clavis as Starkey's Key. Isis 78 (4):564-574.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Isaac Newton & Marquise du Chastellet (1968). Principes mathématiques de la philosophie naturelle, t. I, Préfaces, suivies des Livres 1 et 2 de Newton : Du Mouvement des Corps, t. II : Livre 3 de Newton : Du système du monde. [REVIEW] Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 73 (3):378-382.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Isaac Newton & H. W. Turnbull (1963). The Correspondence of Isaac Newton. Vol. III: 1688-1694. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 13 (52):332-334.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Ivo Schneider, Kolumban Hutter, Isaac Newton & Friedrich Steinle (1993). Isaac Newton. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 24 (1):169-185.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. J. F. Scott & Isaac Newton (1968). The Correspondence of Isaac Newton, Vol. IV: 1694-1709. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19 (3):268-269.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Richard S. Westfall (1996). Technical NewtonLes "Principia" de NewtonMichel BlayThe Key to Newton's Dynamics: The Kepler Problem and the PrincipiaJ. Bruce Brackenridge Mary Ann RossiNewton's Principia for the Common ReaderSubrahmanyan ChandrasekharForce and Geometry in Newton's PrincipiaFrancois de Gandt Curtis WilsonNewton's Principia: The Central ArgumentDana Densmore William H. Donahue. Isis 87 (4):701-706.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  2
    Kelley M. Wickham-Crowley (2013). Lori Ann Garner, Structuring Spaces: Oral Poetics and Architecture in Early Medieval England. (Poetics of Orality and Literacy.) Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2011. Pp. Xvi, 367; 32 B&W Figs. $45. ISBN: 9780268029807. [REVIEW] Speculum 88 (1):292-294.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Ann Shteir (2013). Theresa M. Kelley.Clandestine Marriage: Botany and Romantic Culture. Xi + 342 Pp., Illus., Bibl., Index. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2012. $55. [REVIEW] Isis 104 (4):857-857.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Marius Stan (forthcoming). Euler, Newton, and Foundations for Mechanics. In Chris Smeenk & Eric Schliesser (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Newton. Oxford University Press
    This chapter looks at Euler’s relation to Newton, and at his role in the rise of ‘Newtonian’ mechanics. It aims to give a sense of Newton’s complicated legacy for Enlightenment science, and to raise awareness that some key ‘Newtonian’ results really come from Euler.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Marius Stan (forthcoming). Newton's Concepts of Force Among the Leibnizians. In Mordechai Feingold (ed.), The Reception of Newton in Europe. Cambridge University Press
    I argue that the key dynamical concepts and laws of Newton's Principia never gained a solid foothold in Germany before Kant in the 1750s. I explain this absence as due to Leibniz. Thus I make a case for a robust Leibnizian legacy for Enlightenment science, and I solve what Jonathan Israel called “a meaningful historical problem on its own,” viz. the slow and hesitant reception of Newton in pre-Kantian Germany.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  16
    Ray Scott Percival (1998). Nitpicking Newton Review Of: (Pierre Simon Laplace: A Life in Exact Science). [REVIEW] New Scientist (2123).
    ONE of the most celebrated mathematical physicists, Pierre-Simon Laplace is often remembered as the mathematician who showed that despite appearances, the Solar System does conform to Newton’s theories. Together with distinguished scholars Robert Fox and Ivor Grattan-Guinness, Charles Gillispie gives us a new perspective, showing that Laplace did not merely vindicate Newton’s system, but had a uniquely creative and independent mind.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  62
    Koenraad Johan van Vlaenderen, Classical Electrodynamics in Agreement with Newton’s Third Law of Motion.
    The force law of Maxwell’s classical electrodynamics does not agree with Newton’s third law of motion (N3LM), in case of open circuit magnetostatics. Initially, a generalized magnetostatics theory is presented that includes two additional physical fields B_Φ and B_l, defined by scalar functions. The scalar magnetic field B_l mediates a longitudinal Ampère force that balances the transverse Ampère force (aka the magnetic field force), such that the sum of the two forces agrees with N3LM for all stationary current distributions. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  62
    Hylarie Kochiras (2009). Gravity and Newton's Substance Counting Problem. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 40 (3):267-280.
    A striking feature of Newton’s thought is the very broad reach of his empiricism, potentially extending even to immaterial substances, including God, minds, and should one exist, a non-perceiving immaterial medium. Yet Newton is also drawn to certain metaphysical principles—most notably the principle that matter cannot act where it is not—and this second, rationalist feature of his thought is most pronounced in his struggle to discover ‘gravity’s cause’. The causal problem remains vexing, for he neither invokes primary causation, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  35.  24
    Charles H. Cho, Dennis M. Patten & Robin W. Roberts (2006). Corporate Political Strategy: An Examination of the Relation Between Political Expenditures, Environmental Performance, and Environmental Disclosure. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 67 (2):139 - 154.
    Two fundamental business ethics issues that repeatedly surface in the academic literature relate to business's role in the development of public policy [Suarez, S. L.: 2000, Does Business Learn? (The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI); Roberts, R. W. and D. D. Bobek: 2004, Accounting, Organizations and Society 29(5-6), 565-590] and its role in responsibly managing the natural environment [Newton, L.: 2005, Business Ethics and the Natural Environment (Blackwell Publishing, Oxford)]. When studied together, researchers often examine if, and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   17 citations  
  36. Marius Stan (2015). Absolute Space and the Riddle of Rotation: Kant’s Response to Newton. Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 7:257-308.
    Newton had a fivefold argument that true motion must be motion in absolute space, not relative to matter. Like Newton, Kant holds that bodies have true motions. Unlike him, though, Kant takes all motion to be relative to matter, not to space itself. Thus, he must respond to Newton’s argument above. I reconstruct here Kant’s answer in detail. I prove that Kant addresses just one part of Newton’s case, namely, his “argument from the effects” of rotation. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  82
    G. Bolton (2002). Literature to Heal the Divide. Medical Humanities 28 (2):97-100.
    Commentator: Saul Miller Commentator: Sonia Holmes and Amanda Howe Commentator: Heather Ashworth, Gill Stillwell, and Ann Kelley.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  24
    Eric Schliesser (2011). Newton's Substance Monism, Distant Action, and the Nature of Newton's Empiricism: Discussion of H. Kochiras “Gravity and Newton's Substance Counting Problem”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1):160-166.
    This paper is a critical response to Hylarie Kochiras’ “Gravity and Newton’s substance counting problem,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 40 267–280. First, the paper argues that Kochiras conflates substances and beings; it proceeds to show that Newton is a substance monist. The paper argues that on methodological grounds Newton has adequate resources to respond to the metaphysical problems diagnosed by Kochiras. Second, the paper argues against the claim that Newton is committed to two (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  39. Joshua Anderson (2012). Huey P. Newton and the Radicalization of the Urban Poor. In Leonard R. Koos (ed.), Hidden Cities: Understanding Urban Popcultures. Inter-Disciplinary Press
    Huey P. Newton, founder of the Black Panther Party, is perhaps one of the most interesting and intriguing American intellectuals from the last half of the 20th century. Newton’s genius rested in his ability to amalgamate and synthesize others’ thinking, and then reinterpreting and making it relevant to the situation that existed in the United States in his time, particularly for African-Americans in the densely populated urban centers in the North and West. Newton saw himself continuing the (...)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  99
    Eric Schliesser (2011). Newton's Challenge to Philosophy: A Programmatic Essay. Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 1 (1):101-128.
    I identify a set of interlocking views that became (and still are) very influential within philosophy in the wake of Newton’s success. These views use the authority of natural philosophy/mechanics to settle debates within philosophy. I label these “Newton’s Challenge.”.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  41.  65
    Edward Slowik (2009). Newton's Metaphysics of Space: A “Tertium Quid” Betwixt Substantivalism and Relationism, or Merely a “God of the Gaps”? Perspectives on Science 17 (4):pp. 429-456.
    This paper investigates the question of, and the degree to which, Newton’s theory of space constitutes a third-way between the traditional substantivalist and relationist ontologies, i.e., that Newton judged that space is neither a type of substance/entity nor purely a relation among such substances. A non-substantivalist reading of Newton has been famously defended by Howard Stein, among others; but, as will be demonstrated, these claims are problematic on various grounds, especially as regards Newton’s alleged rejection of (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  42.  70
    Edward Slowik (2013). Newton's Neo-Platonic Ontology of Space. Foundations of Science 18 (3):419-448.
    This paper investigates Newton’s ontology of space in order to determine its commitment, if any, to both Cambridge neo-Platonism, which posits an incorporeal basis for space, and substantivalism, which regards space as a form of substance or entity. A non-substantivalist interpretation of Newton’s theory has been famously championed by Howard Stein and Robert DiSalle, among others, while both Stein and the early work of J. E. McGuire have downplayed the influence of Cambridge neo-Platonism on various aspects of (...)’s own spatial hypotheses. Both of these assertions will be shown to be problematic on various grounds, with special emphasis placed on Stein’s influential case for a non-substantivalist reading. Our analysis will strive, nonetheless, to reveal the unique or forward-looking aspects of Newton’s approach, most notably, his critical assessment of substance ontologies, that help to distinguish his theory of space from his neo-Platonic contemporaries and predecessors. (shrink)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  43. Nicholas Maxwell (2014). Three Criticisms of Newton’s Inductive Argument in the Principia. Advances in Historical Studies 3 (1):2-11.
    In this paper, I discuss how Newton’s inductive argument of the Principia can be defended against criticisms levelled against it by Duhem, Popper and myself. I argue that Duhem’s and Popper’s criticisms can be countered, but mine cannot. It requires that we reconsider, not just Newton’s inductive argument in the Principia, but also the nature of science more generally. The methods of science, whether conceived along inductivist or hypothetico-deductivist lines, make implicit metaphysical presuppositions which rigour requires we make (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  26
    H. Kochiras, Newton on Matter and Space in De Gravitatione Et Aequipondio Fluidorum.
    This paper explicates the concepts of matter and space that Newton develops in De gravitatione. As I interpret Newton’s account of created substances, bodies are constructed from qualities alone, as configured by God. Although regions of space and then “determined quantities of extension” appear to replace the Aristotelian substrate by functioning as property-bearers, they actually serve only as logical subjects. An implication of the interpretation I develop is that only space is extended by having parts outside parts; material (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  11
    Olaf L. Mueller (2016). Prismatic Equivalence – A New Case of Underdetermination: Goethe Vs. Newton on the Prism Experiments. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 24 (2):323-347.
    Goethe's objections to Newton's theory of light and colours are better than often acknowledged. You can accept the most important elements of these objections without disagreeing with Newton about light and colours. As I will argue, Goethe exposed a crucial weakness of Newton's methodological self-assessment. Newton believed that with the help of his prism experiments, he could prove that sunlight was composed of variously coloured rays of light. Goethe showed that this step from observation to theory (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. J. E. McGuire & Edward Slowik (2012). Newton's Ontology of Omnipresence and Infinite Space. Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 6.
    This essay explores the role of God’s omnipresence in Newton’s natural philosophy, with special emphasis placed on how God is related to space. Unlike Descartes’ conception, which denies the spatiality of God, or Gassendi and Charleton’s view, which regards God as completely whole in every part of space, it is argued that Newton accepts spatial extension as a basic aspect of God’s omnipresence. The historical background to Newton’s spatial ontology assumes a large part of our investigation, but (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  47.  60
    Steffen Ducheyne (2009). Understanding (in) Newton's Argument for Universal Gravitation. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 40 (2):227 - 258.
    In this essay, I attempt to assess Henk de Regt and Dennis Dieks recent pragmatic and contextual account of scientific understanding on the basis of an important historical case-study: understanding in Newton’s theory of universal gravitation and Huygens’ reception of universal gravitation. It will be shown that de Regt and Dieks’ Criterion for the Intelligibility of a Theory (CIT), which stipulates that the appropriate combination of scientists’ skills and intelligibility-enhancing theoretical virtues is a condition for scientific understanding, is too (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  48.  64
    Edward Slowik (2011). Newton, the Parts of Space, and the Holism of Spatial Ontology. Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 1 (2):249-272.
    This article investigates the problem of the identity of the parts of space in Newton’s natural philosophy, as well as the holistic or structuralist nature of Newton’s ontology of space. Additionally, this article relates the lessons reached in this historical and philosophical investigation to analogous debates in contemporary space-time ontology. While previous contributions, by Nerlich, Huggett, and others, have proven to be informative in evaluating Newton’s claims, it will be argued that the underlying goals of Newton’s (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  72
    María G. Navarro (2011). Review of 'The Great Ocean of Knowledge. The Influence of Travel Literature on the Work of John Locke' by Ann Talbot. [REVIEW] Seventeenth-Century News 69 (3&4):162-164.
    The resercher Ann Talbot presents in this book one of the more complex and in-depth studies ever written about the influence of travel literature on the work of the British philospher John Locke (1632-1704). At the end of the 18th century the study of travel literature was an alternative to academic studies. The philosopher John Locke recommended with enthousiasm these books as a way to comprehend human understanding. Several members of the Royal Society like John Harris (1966-1719) affirmed that the (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  86
    Quayshawn Spencer (2004). Do Newton's Rules of Reasoning Guarantee Truth ... Must They? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 35 (4):759-782.
    Newton’s Principia introduces four rules of reasoning for natural philosophy. Although useful, there is a concern about whether Newton’s rules guarantee truth. After redirecting the discussion from truth to validity, I show that these rules are valid insofar as they fulfill Goodman’s criteria for inductive rules and Newton’s own methodological program of experimental philosophy; provided that cross-checks are used prior to applications of rule 4 and immediately after applications of rule 2 the following activities are pursued: (1) (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
1 — 50 / 1000