Search results for 'Kelley Ann Newton' (try it on Scholar)

999 found
Order:
  1.  6
    Willard Downs & Kelley Ann Newton (1989). Legal Implications in Development and Use of Expert Systems in Agriculture. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 2 (1):53-58.
    Applications of Artificial Intelligence, particularly Expert Systems, are rapidly increasing. This science promises to give computer-based systems the capability of reasoning and decision making in near human-like fashion. Whether used for farm management or intelligent machine control, Expert Systems will find many agricultural applications. Much of the development and distribution of such systems will probably take place in the public sector, particularly the Cooperative Extension Service. A major nontechnical factor affecting the development and extensive use of Expert Systems is the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  3
    Ann E. Kelley (1987). Dopamine and Mental Illness: Phenomenological and Anatomical Considerations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10 (2):219.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  21
    Isaac Newton (1953/2005). Newton's Philosophy of Nature: Selections From His Writings. Dover Publications.
    Aside from the Principia and occasional appearances of the Opticks , Newton' writings have remained largely inaccessible to students of philosophy, science, and literature as well as to other readers. This book provides a remedy with wide representation of the interests, problems, and diverse philosophic issues that preoccupied the greatest scientific mind of the seventeenth century. Grouped in sections corresponding to methods, principles, and theological considerations, these selections feature explanatory notes and cross-references to related essays.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  4. Isaac Newton & H. W. Turnbull (1961). The Correspondence of Isaac Newton. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 12 (47):255-258.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  5.  1
    J. Herivel & Isaac Newton (1962). Newton on Rotating Bodies. Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 53:212-218.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  1
    J. Mcguire, Martin Tamny & Isaac Newton (1985). Newton's Astronomical Apprenticeship: Notes of 1664/5. Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 76:349-365.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  1
    William Newman & Isaac Newton (1987). Newton's Clavis as Starkey's Key. Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 78:564-574.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Isaac Newton, I. Bernard Cohen & Robert E. Schofield (1959). Isaac Newton's Papers and Letters on Natural Philosophy. Science and Society 23 (3):279-282.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  9. D. T. Whiteside & Isaac Newton (1984). The Mathematical Papers of Isaac Newton, Volume VIII: 1697-1722. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35 (3):303-307.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10. I. Bernard Cohen, Isaac Newton & Benjamin Franklin (1956). Franklin and Newton an Inquiry Into Speculative Newtonian Experimental Science and Franklin's Work in Electricity as an Example Thereof. American Philosophical Society.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. A. Rupert Hall, Isaac Newton & Laura Tilling (1979). The Correspondence of Isaac Newton. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30 (2):173-177.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Donald R. Kelley, Anthony Grafton & J. H. M. Salmon (2001). Historians and Ideologues Essays in Honor of Donald R. Kelley. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Mike Kelley (2007). 13 Mike Kelley. In Diarmuid Costello & Jonathan Vickery (eds.), Art: Key Contemporary Thinkers. Berg 13.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  0
    W. M. Kelley, R. L. Buckner & S. E. Petersen (1998). Response From Kelley, Buckner and Petersen. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2 (11):421.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. John Milton & Thomas Newton (1758). Paradise Lost, a Poem. From the Text of T. Newton.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. John Milton & Thomas Newton (1758). Paradise Regain'd, a Poem. To Which is Added Samson Agonistes: And Poems Upon Several Occasions. From the Text of T. Newton. [REVIEW]
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. K. M. Newton (1981). George Eliot, Romantic Humanist a Study of the Philosophical Structure of Her Novels /K.M. Newton. --. --. Barnes & Noble Books,1981.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Einstein Y. La Noción De Newton (2001). I NTRODUCCIÓN M ucha gente tiende a pensar que con la teoría de la relatividad de Einstein, el concepto de tiempo absoluto de Isaac Newton quedó totalmente refutado. 1 En este trabajo nos proponemos explorar la idea de que, al. Signos Filosóficos 5:65-81.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Isaac Newton & Marquise du Chastellet (1968). Principes mathématiques de la philosophie naturelle, t. I, Préfaces, suivies des Livres 1 et 2 de Newton : Du Mouvement des Corps, t. II : Livre 3 de Newton : Du système du monde. [REVIEW] Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 73 (3):378-382.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Isaac Newton & H. W. Turnbull (1963). The Correspondence of Isaac Newton. Vol. III: 1688-1694. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 13 (52):332-334.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Ivo Schneider, Kolumban Hutter, Isaac Newton & Friedrich Steinle (1993). Isaac Newton. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 24 (1):169-185.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. J. F. Scott & Isaac Newton (1968). The Correspondence of Isaac Newton, Vol. IV: 1694-1709. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19 (3):268-269.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  3
    E. J. Aiton (1973). Introduction to Newton'S' Principia'edited by I. Bernard Cohen; Isaac Newton'S' Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica'edited by Alexandre Koyré and I. Bernard Cohen with the Assistance of Anne Whitman. [REVIEW] History of Science 11:217-230.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  2
    Kelley M. Wickham-Crowley (2013). Lori Ann Garner, Structuring Spaces: Oral Poetics and Architecture in Early Medieval England. (Poetics of Orality and Literacy.) Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2011. Pp. Xvi, 367; 32 B&W Figs. $45. ISBN: 9780268029807. [REVIEW] Speculum 88 (1):292-294.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  55
    Marius Stan (forthcoming). Newton's Concepts of Force Among the Leibnizians. In Mordechai Feingold (ed.), The Reception of Newton in Europe. Cambridge University Press
    I argue that the key dynamical concepts and laws of Newton's Principia never gained a solid foothold in Germany before Kant in the 1750s. I explain this absence as due to Leibniz. Thus I make a case for a robust Leibnizian legacy for Enlightenment science, and I solve what Jonathan Israel called “a meaningful historical problem on its own,” viz. the slow and hesitant reception of Newton in pre-Kantian Germany.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  67
    Marius Stan (forthcoming). Euler, Newton, and Foundations for Mechanics. In Chris Smeenk & Eric Schliesser (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Newton. Oxford University Press
    This chapter looks at Euler’s relation to Newton, and at his role in the rise of ‘Newtonian’ mechanics. It aims to give a sense of Newton’s complicated legacy for Enlightenment science, and to raise awareness that some key ‘Newtonian’ results really come from Euler.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  54
    Hylarie Kochiras (2009). Gravity and Newton's Substance Counting Problem. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 40 (3):267-280.
    A striking feature of Newton’s thought is the very broad reach of his empiricism, potentially extending even to immaterial substances, including God, minds, and should one exist, a non-perceiving immaterial medium. Yet Newton is also drawn to certain metaphysical principles—most notably the principle that matter cannot act where it is not—and this second, rationalist feature of his thought is most pronounced in his struggle to discover ‘gravity’s cause’. The causal problem remains vexing, for he neither invokes primary causation, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  28.  19
    Charles H. Cho, Dennis M. Patten & Robin W. Roberts (2006). Corporate Political Strategy: An Examination of the Relation Between Political Expenditures, Environmental Performance, and Environmental Disclosure. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 67 (2):139 - 154.
    Two fundamental business ethics issues that repeatedly surface in the academic literature relate to business's role in the development of public policy [Suarez, S. L.: 2000, Does Business Learn? (The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI); Roberts, R. W. and D. D. Bobek: 2004, Accounting, Organizations and Society 29(5-6), 565-590] and its role in responsibly managing the natural environment [Newton, L.: 2005, Business Ethics and the Natural Environment (Blackwell Publishing, Oxford)]. When studied together, researchers often examine if, and (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   14 citations  
  29. Marius Stan (forthcoming). Absolute Space and the Riddle of Rotation: Kant’s Response to Newton. Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 7.
    Newton had a fivefold argument that true motion must be motion in absolute space, not relative to matter. Like Newton, Kant holds that bodies have true motions. Unlike him, though, Kant takes all motion to be relative to matter, not to space itself. Thus, he must respond to Newton’s argument above. I reconstruct here Kant’s answer in detail. I prove that Kant addresses just one part of Newton’s case, namely, his “argument from the effects” of rotation. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  18
    Eric Schliesser (2011). Newton's Substance Monism, Distant Action, and the Nature of Newton's Empiricism: Discussion of H. Kochiras “Gravity and Newton's Substance Counting Problem”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1):160-166.
    This paper is a critical response to Hylarie Kochiras’ “Gravity and Newton’s substance counting problem,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 40 267–280. First, the paper argues that Kochiras conflates substances and beings; it proceeds to show that Newton is a substance monist. The paper argues that on methodological grounds Newton has adequate resources to respond to the metaphysical problems diagnosed by Kochiras. Second, the paper argues against the claim that Newton is committed to two (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  31.  93
    Eric Schliesser (2011). Newton's Challenge to Philosophy: A Programmatic Essay. Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 1 (1):101-128.
    I identify a set of interlocking views that became (and still are) very influential within philosophy in the wake of Newton’s success. These views use the authority of natural philosophy/mechanics to settle debates within philosophy. I label these “Newton’s Challenge.”.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  32.  5
    Raffaele Pisano & Paolo Bussotti (2014). On the Jesuit Edition of Newton’s Principia. Science and Advanced Researches in the Western Civilization. Advances in Historical Studies 3 (1):33-55.
    In this research, we present the most important characteristics of the so called and so much explored Jesuit Edition of Newton’s Philosophi? Naturalis Principia Mathematica edited by Thomas Le Seur and Fran?ois Jacquier in the 1739-1742. The edition, densely annotated by the commentators (the notes and the comments are longer than Newton’s text itself) is a very treasure concerning Newton’s ideas and his heritage, e.g., Newton’s geometry and mathematical physics. Conspicuous pieces of information as to history (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  37
    Steffen Ducheyne (2009). Understanding (in) Newton's Argument for Universal Gravitation. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 40 (2):227 - 258.
    In this essay, I attempt to assess Henk de Regt and Dennis Dieks recent pragmatic and contextual account of scientific understanding on the basis of an important historical case-study: understanding in Newton’s theory of universal gravitation and Huygens’ reception of universal gravitation. It will be shown that de Regt and Dieks’ Criterion for the Intelligibility of a Theory (CIT), which stipulates that the appropriate combination of scientists’ skills and intelligibility-enhancing theoretical virtues is a condition for scientific understanding, is too (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  34.  59
    Nicholas Maxwell (2014). Three Criticisms of Newton’s Inductive Argument in the Principia. Advances in Historical Studies 3 (1):2-11.
    In this paper, I discuss how Newton’s inductive argument of the Principia can be defended against criticisms levelled against it by Duhem, Popper and myself. I argue that Duhem’s and Popper’s criticisms can be countered, but mine cannot. It requires that we reconsider, not just Newton’s inductive argument in the Principia, but also the nature of science more generally. The methods of science, whether conceived along inductivist or hypothetico-deductivist lines, make implicit metaphysical presuppositions which rigour requires we make (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  54
    Edward Slowik (2013). Newton's Neo-Platonic Ontology of Space. Foundations of Science 18 (3):419-448.
    This paper investigates Newton’s ontology of space in order to determine its commitment, if any, to both Cambridge neo-Platonism, which posits an incorporeal basis for space, and substantivalism, which regards space as a form of substance or entity. A non-substantivalist interpretation of Newton’s theory has been famously championed by Howard Stein and Robert DiSalle, among others, while both Stein and the early work of J. E. McGuire have downplayed the influence of Cambridge neo-Platonism on various aspects of (...)’s own spatial hypotheses. Both of these assertions will be shown to be problematic on various grounds, with special emphasis placed on Stein’s influential case for a non-substantivalist reading. Our analysis will strive, nonetheless, to reveal the unique or forward-looking aspects of Newton’s approach, most notably, his critical assessment of substance ontologies, that help to distinguish his theory of space from his neo-Platonic contemporaries and predecessors. (shrink)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  36.  3
    Raffaele Pisano & Paolo Bussotti (2014). Newton’s Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica "Jesuit" Edition: The Tenor of a Huge Work. Rendiconti Accademia Dei Lincei Matematica E Applicazioni 25 (4):413-444.
    This paper has the aim to provide a general view of the so called Jesuit Edition (hereafter JE) of Newton’s Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica (1739–1742). This edition was conceived to explain all Newton’s methods through an apparatus of notes and commentaries. Every Newton’s proposition is annotated. Because of this, the text – in four volumes – is one of the most important documents to understand Newton’s way of reasoning. This edition is well known, but systematic works (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Joshua Anderson (2012). Huey P. Newton and the Radicalization of the Urban Poor. In Leonard R. Koos (ed.), Hidden Cities: Understanding Urban Popcultures. Inter-Disciplinary Press
    Huey P. Newton, founder of the Black Panther Party, is perhaps one of the most interesting and intriguing American intellectuals from the last half of the 20th century. Newton’s genius rested in his ability to amalgamate and synthesize others’ thinking, and then reinterpreting and making it relevant to the situation that existed in the United States in his time, particularly for African-Americans in the densely populated urban centers in the North and West. Newton saw himself continuing the (...)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  78
    Quayshawn Spencer (2004). Do Newton's Rules of Reasoning Guarantee Truth ... Must They? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 35 (4):759-782.
    Newton’s Principia introduces four rules of reasoning for natural philosophy. Although useful, there is a concern about whether Newton’s rules guarantee truth. After redirecting the discussion from truth to validity, I show that these rules are valid insofar as they fulfill Goodman’s criteria for inductive rules and Newton’s own methodological program of experimental philosophy; provided that cross-checks are used prior to applications of rule 4 and immediately after applications of rule 2 the following activities are pursued: (1) (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  39.  18
    Patrick J. Connolly (2015). Space Before God? A Problem in Newton's Metaphysics. Philosophy 90 (1):83-106.
    My goal in this paper is to elucidate a problematic feature of Newton's metaphysics of absolute space. Specifically, I argue that Newton's theory has the untenable consequence that God depends on space for His existence and is therefore not an independent entity. I argue for this conclusion in stages. First, I show that Newton believed that space was an entity and that God and space were ontologically distinct entities. Part of this involves arguing that Newton denies (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  10
    Steffen Ducheyne & Erik Weber (2007). The Concept of Causation in Newton's Mechanical and Optical Work. Logic and Logical Philosophy 16 (4):265-288.
    In this essay the authors explore the nature of efficient causal explanation in Newton’s "Principia and The Opticks". It is argued that: (1) In the dynamical explanations of the Principia, Newton treats the phenomena under study as cases of Hall’s second kind of atypical causation. The underlying concept of causation is therefore a purely interventionist one. (2) In the descriptions of his optical experiments, Newton treats the phenomena under study as cases of Hall’s typical causation. The underlying (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  41.  11
    Liam P. Dempsey (2006). Written in the Flesh: Isaac Newton on the Mind–Body Relation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 (3):420-441.
    Isaac Newton’s views on the mind–body relation are of interest not only because of their somewhat unique departure from popular early modern conceptions of mind and its relation to body, but also because of their connections with other aspects of Newton’s thought. In this paper I argue that (1) Newton accepted an interesting sort of mind–body monism, one which defies neat categorization, but which clearly departs from Cartesian substance dualism, and (2) Newton took the power by (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  42.  21
    Chunghyoung Lee (2011). Infinity and Newton's Three Laws of Motion. Foundations of Physics 41 (12):1810-1828.
    It is shown that the following three common understandings of Newton’s laws of motion do not hold for systems of infinitely many components. First, Newton’s third law, or the law of action and reaction, is universally believed to imply that the total sum of internal forces in a system is always zero. Several examples are presented to show that this belief fails to hold for infinite systems. Second, two of these examples are of an infinitely divisible continuous body (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  40
    Ori Belkind (2013). Leibniz and Newton on Space. Foundations of Science 18 (3):467-497.
    This paper reexamines the historical debate between Leibniz and Newton on the nature of space. According to the traditional reading, Leibniz (in his correspondence with Clarke) produced metaphysical arguments (relying on the Principle of Sufficient Reason and the Principle of Identity of Indiscernibles) in favor of a relational account of space. Newton, according to the traditional account, refuted the metaphysical arguments with the help of an empirical argument based on the bucket experiment. The paper claims that Leibniz’s and (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  29
    Marius Stan (2012). Newton and Wolff. Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (3):459-481.
    Newton rested his theory of mechanics on distinct metaphysical and epistemological foundations. After Leibniz's death in 1716, the Principia ran into sharp philosophical opposition from Christian Wolff and his disciples, who sought to subvert Newton's foundations or replace them with Leibnizian ideas. In what follows, I chronicle some of the Wolffians' reactions to Newton's notion of absolute space, his dynamical laws of motion, and his general theory of gravitation. I also touch on arguments advanced by Newton's (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  14
    Edward Slowik (2011). Newton, the Parts of Space, and the Holism of Spatial Ontology. Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 1 (2):249-272.
    This article investigates the problem of the identity of the parts of space in Newton’s natural philosophy, as well as the holistic or structuralist nature of Newton’s ontology of space. Additionally, this article relates the lessons reached in this historical and philosophical investigation to analogous debates in contemporary space-time ontology. While previous contributions, by Nerlich, Huggett, and others, have proven to be informative in evaluating Newton’s claims, it will be argued that the underlying goals of Newton’s (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  29
    Andrew Janiak (2013). Metaphysics and Natural Philosophy in Descartes and Newton. Foundations of Science 18 (3):403-417.
    This paper compares Newton’s and Descartes’s conceptions of the complex relationship between physics and metaphysics.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  9
    Francisco Caruso & R. Moreira Xavier (1998). Sull'influenza di Cartesio, Leibniz e Newton nel primo approccio di Kant al problema dello spazio e della sua dimensionalita. Epistemologia 21 (2):211-224.
    L'idea di relazionare la dimensionalità dello spazio ad una legge fisica, contenuta nel primo scritto di Kant "Pensieri sulla veridica estima delle forze vive", svela un modo di guardare i rapporti tra Fisica e Matematica così nuovo ed originale che potè essere sviluppato e compreso nella sua plenitudine soltanto nel secolo XX. Ci riferiamo qui ala prospettiva aperta da Ehrenfest nel suo "In what way does it become manifest in the fundamental laws of physics that space has three dimensions?". In (...)
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  8
    Olivier Esser (1997). An Interpretation of the Zermelo‐Fraenkel Set Theory and the Kelley‐Morse Set Theory in a Positive Theory. Mathematical Logic Quarterly 43 (3):369-377.
    An interesting positive theory is the GPK theory. The models of this theory include all hyperuniverses . Here we add a form of the axiom of infinity and a new scheme to obtain GPK∞+. We show that in these conditions, we can interprete the Kelley-Morse theory in GPK∞+ . This needs a preliminary property which give an interpretation of the Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory in GPK∞+. We also see what happens in the original GPK theory. Before doing this, we first (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  19
    Joshua Anderson (2012). A Tension in the Political Thought of Huey P. Newton. Journal of African American Studies 16 (2):249-267.
    This article is a discussion of the political thought of Huey P. Newton, and by extension, the theory and practice of the Black Panther Party. More specifically, this article will explore a tension that exists between Newton's theory of Intercommunalism and the Black Panther Party Platform. To that end, there is, first, a discussion of the ideological development of the Black Panther Party, which culminated in Newton's theory of Intercommunalism. Second, there is a presentation of what will (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  25
    Liam P. Dempsey (2011). 'A Compound Wholly Mortal' : Locke and Newton on the Metaphysics of (Personal) Immortality. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (2):241-264.
    In this paper I consider a cluster of positions which depart from the immortalist and dualist anthropologies of Rene Descartes and Henry More. In particular, I argue that John Locke and Isaac Newton are attracted to a monistic mind-body metaphysics, which while resisting neat characterization, occupies a conceptual space distinct from the dualism of the immortalists, on the one hand, and thoroughgoing materialism of Thomas Hobbes, on the other. They propound a sort of property monism: mind and body are (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 999