Search results for 'Kelly Alberts' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Kelly Alberts (1987). Intentionality and First Person Reference. Philosophy Research Archives 13:613-636.score: 240.0
    Roderick Chisholm contrasts semantic theories that presuppose “the primacy of the intentional” with those that presuppose “the primacy of the linguistic”. In The First Person he attempts to develop an analysis of first person singular reference that presupposes the primacy of the intentional. In this paper I attempt to develop a semantics of first person singular reference (what I call ‘I-reference’) that presupposes the primacy of the linguistic. I do three things in the paper. First, I criticize Chisholm’s (and Frege’s) (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Kevin Kelly, Kevin Kelly, Oliver Schulte, Vincent Hendricks.score: 180.0
    Philosophical logicians proposing theories of rational belief revision have had little to say about whether their proposals assist or impede the agent's ability to reliably arrive at the truth as his beliefs change through time. On the other hand, reliability is the central concern of formal learning theory. In this paper we investigate the belief revision theory of Alchourron, Gardenfors and Makinson from a learning theoretic point of view.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. George Armstrong Kelly (1979). A Reply From George Armstrong Kelly. The Owl of Minerva 10 (4):10-11.score: 180.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Michael Kelly, Edgar Morin: Introduction (Special Issue Edited by Michael Kelly).score: 180.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Kevin Kelly, Kevin T. Kelly and Oliver Schulte.score: 180.0
    We argue that uncomputability and classical scepticism are both re ections of inductive underdetermination, so that Church's thesis and Hume's problem ought to receive equal emphasis in a balanced approach to the philosophy of induction. As an illustration of such an approach, we investigate how uncomputable the predictions of a hypothesis can be if the hypothesis is to be reliably investigated by a computable scienti c method.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Mary Kelly (2007). 17 Mary Kelly. In Diarmuid Costello & Jonathan Vickery (eds.), Art: Key Contemporary Thinkers. Berg. 17.score: 180.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Kevin T. Kelly, Julie Clague, Bernard Hoose & Gerard Mannion (eds.) (2008). Moral Theology for the Twenty-First Century: Essays in Celebration of Kevin Kelly. T & T Clark.score: 180.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. James Forrester (1990). Kelly Thomas Alberts 1948-1990. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 64 (1):21 - 22.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Debra Kelly (2011). How to Live? One Question and Six or Seven Life Lessons with Albert Memmi. Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy 19 (2):67-95.score: 120.0
    Memmi’s work is every sense a “life project”: a coherent project pursued throughout his long life as an intellectual, but also as the member of a minority group as he has consistently reminded his readers. It is therefore a personal project that is intimately intertwined with the life experiences of an individual, yet has implications for understanding broader communities and societies. The implication – and sometimes the stated intention – is that this is a life project from which the individual (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. W. F. Vallicella, Virginia Held, John Davenport, John J. Stuhr, John McCumber, Celia Wolf-Devine, Albert Cinelli, Henry Simoni-Wastila, Eugene Kelly & Brian Leiter (1997). Letters to the Editor. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 71 (2):107 - 122.score: 80.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Harry Oldmeadow (2007). Review of Peter Kelly, Buddha in a Bookshop. [REVIEW] Sophia 46 (3):315-316.score: 21.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Adam Leite (2007). Epistemic Instrumentalism and Reasons for Belief: A Reply to Tom Kelly's "Epistemic Rationality as Instrumental Rationality: A Critique". Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (2):456–464.score: 18.0
    Tom Kelly argues that instrumentalist aeeounts of epistemie rationality fail beeause what a person has reason to believe does not depend upon the eontent of his or her goals. However, his argument fails to distinguish questions about what the evidence supports from questions about what a person ought to believe. Once these are distinguished, the instrumentalist ean avoid Kelly’s objeetions. The paperconcludes by sketehing what I take to be the most defensible version of the instrumentalist view.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Simon Fitzpatrick (2013). Kelly on Ockham's Razor and Truth-Finding Efficiency. Philosophy of Science 80 (2):298-309.score: 18.0
    This paper discusses Kevin Kelly’s recent attempt to justify Ockham’s Razor in terms of truth-finding efficiency. It is argued that Kelly’s justification fails to warrant confidence in the empirical content of theories recommended by Ockham’s Razor. This is a significant problem if, as Kelly and many others believe, considerations of simplicity play a pervasive role in scientific reasoning, underlying even our best tested theories, for the proposal will fail to warrant the use of these theories in practical (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Walter Gulick (2013). All Things Shining: Reading the Western Classics to Find Meaning in a Secular World by Hubert Dreyfus and Sean Dorrance Kelly (Review). American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 34 (1):74-78.score: 18.0
    Rarely have I encountered a book like All Things Shining. It bravely engages issues that are truly significant for our time, yet flaws run through it like faults in the California landscape. The book has spawned contentious critique unusual for a work by contemporary philosophers. Before I offer my own critical analysis, it is fitting first to appreciate what Dreyfus and Kelly attempt to achieve.The foremost contemporary problems the authors combat are what they term "the burden of choice" and (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Carl Thomen (2011). Sublime Kinetic Melody: Kelly Slater and the Extreme Spectator. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 4 (3):319-331.score: 18.0
    This paper aims to examine the awesome, almost spiritual feeling I experience as an ?extreme spectator? while watching Kelly Slater ride the monstrous waves of Pipeline. Drawing on the aesthetics of Kant and Schopenhauer, I examine the experience of the sublime and how it, in conjunction with the perceived kinetic melody of Slater's movements and his karmic connection to the environment in which he thrives, gives rise to the deeply felt awe of the extreme spectator. My intention is to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Lansana Keita (2006). Practical Rationality in Social Science Explanation: A Reply to Terrence Kelly. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (2):219-226.score: 18.0
    Terrence Kelly argues for a theory of practical rationality to explain and handle the issue of residential segregation in the United States. Kelly claims that theories of "racism as irrational" and rational choice are not explanatorily adequate in this regard. I argue that the theory of practical rationality is also not adequate because by allowing agents to offer accounts of their calculated behaviour, it allows little appraisal of the behaviour itself. I argue instead that better explanations could be (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Evelyn Fox Keller (1989). The Gender/Science System: Response to Kelly Oliver. Hypatia 3 (3):149 - 152.score: 18.0
    I welcome the opportunity to respond to Kelly Oliver's critique of my paper published earlier in this journal for at least three reasons: out of respect for the tradition of intellectual exchange to which Oliver's invitation tacitly appeals; because the issues are of quite general importance, even far beyond feminist theory; and out of fidelity to the goals of contemporary feminist theory, central to which I take to be the unravelling of classical dichotomies. This commitment inspires me to protest (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Karl Hefty (2012). Book Review: Jeffrey Hanson and Michael R. Kelly, Eds. Michel Henry: The Affects of Thought. [REVIEW] Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy 20 (2):203-207.score: 18.0
    A review of Jeffrey Hanson and Michael R. Kelly, eds., Michel Henry: The Affects of Thought (London: Continuum, 2012), 177 pp.
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Patrick Fortune, Thomas Petzinger, George Romme & Mike Simmons (1999). Reviews: The Complexity Advantage: How the Science of Complexity Can Help Your Business Achieve Peak Performance, Susanne Kelly and Mary Ann Allison. [REVIEW] Emergence 1 (2):62-70.score: 18.0
    (1999). Reviews: The Complexity Advantage: How the science of complexity can help your business achieve peak performance, Susanne Kelly and Mary Ann Allison. Emergence: Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 62-70.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Kelly Ward (1997). Book Review: Discipline-Based Approaches to Teaching Ethics: A Book Review by Kelly Ward. [REVIEW] Journal of Mass Media Ethics 12 (1):63 – 64.score: 18.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Jan Rivkin (1999). Reviews: Out of Control: The New Biology of Machines, Social Systems, and the Economic World, Kevin Kelly. [REVIEW] Emergence 1 (2):179-182.score: 18.0
    (1999). Reviews: Out of Control: The New Biology of Machines, Social Systems, and the Economic World, Kevin Kelly. Emergence: Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 179-182.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Elissa Marder (2012). The Elephant and the Scaffold: Response to Kelly Oliver. Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (s1):95-106.score: 18.0
    This paper responds to Kelly Oliver's “See Topsy ‘Ride the Lightning’: The Scopic Machinery of Death” by questioning the presuppositions and implications of her discussion of the spectacle of elephant executions and their relation to Derrida's writings about animals and the death penalty. This paper proposes to reframe the approach to Derrida's reflections on the death penalty and its problematic relation to the category of the human by focusing on the double function of the concept of the scaffold in (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Mark Wilkinson (1997). Burning Straw Men Sheds Little Light: A Reply to Whiting and Kelly. Acta Biotheoretica 45 (1).score: 18.0
    Wilkinson (1991a) developed arguments that the distributions of primitive character states may delimit clades, and proposed a method that exploited the evidence of primitive character state distributions for inferring clades. Whiting and Kelly (1995) presented a critique of these ideas, arguing that they are logically incoherent and that the method does not succeed in its aims. This critique severely misrepresents the original arguments and the method, and amounts to no more than an attack on a straw man.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Frederick R. Ablondi (2002). Kelly and McDowell on Perceptual Content. Electronic Journal of Analytic Philosophy 7.score: 18.0
    [0] In a recent issue of _EJAP_, Sean Kelly [1998] defended the position that perceptual content is non-conceptual. More specifically, he claimed that John McDowell's view that concepts involved in perception can be understood as expressible through the use of demonstratives is ultimately untenable. In what follows, I want to look more closely at Kelly's position, as well as suggest possible responses one could make on McDowell's behalf.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Helen Bergin (2014). Priest, Poet and Theologian: Essays in Honour of Anthony Kelly CSSR [Book Review]. Australasian Catholic Record, The 91 (3):370.score: 18.0
    Bergin, Helen Review of: Priest, poet and theologian: Essays in honour of Anthony Kelly CSSR, by Neil Ormerod and Robert Gascoigne, eds, , pp. 253, $36.95.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Peter Herissone-Kelly (2011). Reasons, Rationalities, and Procreative Beneficence: Need Häyry Stand Politely By While Savulescu and Herissone-Kelly Disagree? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (2):258-267.score: 18.0
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Roger Wasserman (2008). On a Common and Unmooted (Neo-)Platonic Source for the Husserlian and Augustinian Conceptions of Memory: A Response to Michael R. Kelly. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 82 (2):293-315.score: 18.0
    Although Michael Kelly, in his article, “On the Mind’s Pronouncement of Time” (Proceedings of the ACPA 78 [2005]: 247–62), is correct to maintain that Augustine and Husserl share a common conception of time-consciousness, I argue that the similarity does not lie where he thinks nor is it restricted to Husserl’s early period. Instead I locate the source of this commonality in a shared response to a particular Platonic problematic, which I find expressed at Parmenides 151e–152e. This essay shows how (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Alva Noë (2008). Reply to Campbell, Martin, and Kelly. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (3):691–706.score: 15.0
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. David Owen (1996). G. Gutting (Ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Foucault. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. Xxii + 360pp. M. Kelly (Ed.) Critique and Power: Recasting the FoucaultlHabermas Debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994. Viii + 413pp. J. Simons, Foucault and the Political. London: Routledge, 1995. Viii + 152pp. R. Visker, Michel Foucault: Genealogy as Critique, Trans. Chris Turner. London: Verso, 1995. X + 179pp. S. K. White (Ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Habermas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995. Ix + 354pp. [REVIEW] History of the Human Sciences 9 (2):119-138.score: 15.0
  30. Timothy Schroeder (2012). Kelly , Daniel . Yuck! The Nature and Moral Significance of Disgust . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2011. Pp. 194. $30.00 (Cloth). [REVIEW] Ethics 122 (2):430-434.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Mitchell G. Ash, Horst Gundlach & Thomas Sturm (2010). Irreducible Mind? On E. Kelly Et Al., Irreducible Mind: Toward a Psychology for the 21st Century. [REVIEW] American Journal of Psychology 123:246-250.score: 15.0
    This is a review of a book that tries to re-establish mind-body dualism by using (a) empirical research on near-death experiences, placebo effects, creativity, claiming even that parapsychology should become a respected part of science, and (b) Frederic W. H. Myers' (1843-1901) metaphor of the brain as a kind of receiving device that records what the irreducible mind sends as messages. Among other things, we criticize the lack of philosophical clarity about mind-body relation, and question the book's tendency to refer (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Hillary S. Webb (2010). Book Review: Altered States of Consciousness and Psi: An Historical Survey and Research Prospectus (Parapsychological Monograph Series No. 18). Edward F. Kelly and Rafael G. Locke. [REVIEW] Anthropology of Consciousness 21 (2):224-226.score: 15.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Bettina Bergo (2003). Kelly Oliver, Witnessing: Beyond Recognition. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 36 (2):203-212.score: 15.0
  34. Virginia Held (1986). Book Review:The Man of Reason: "Male" and "Female" in Western Philosophy. Genevieve Lloyd; Women, History, and Theory: The Essays of Joan Kelly. Joan Kelly; Women's Views of the Political World of Men. Judith Hicks Stiehm. [REVIEW] Ethics 96 (3):652-.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. John Bishop (2013). Evidence and Religious Belief, by Kelly James Clark and Raymond J. VanArragon (Eds). Mind 122 (486):fzt054.score: 15.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. S. Luper (2011). Epistemology Modalized, by Kelly Becker. Mind 120 (478):507-511.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Logan Paul Gage (2012). Kelly James Clark and Raymond J. VanArragon: Evidence and Religious Belief. [REVIEW] American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 86 (2):372-375.score: 15.0
  38. Udo Reinhold Jeck (2000). Virtus Lapidum.- Zur Philosophischen Begründung Der Magischen Wirksamkeit Und Der Physikalischen Beschaffenheit Kostbarer Mineralien in Der Naturphilosophie Alberts Des Grossen. Early Science and Medicine 5 (1):33-46.score: 15.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Debra Bergoffen (2005). Book Review: Kelly Oliver. The Subject of Love: A Review of Family Values: Subjects Between Nature and Culture (New York: Routledge, 1997); and Witnessing: Beyond Recognition (Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 2001). [REVIEW] Hypatia 20 (2):202-207.score: 15.0
  40. J. M. Bernstein (2004). Review of Michael Kelly, Iconoclasm and Aesthetics. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2004 (3).score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Robert F. Brown (1982). A Reply to Kelly on Aquinas' Third Way. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 13 (4):225 - 227.score: 15.0
  42. Danielle Poe (2010). Women as Weapons of War: Iraq, Sex, and the Media. By KELLY OLIVER. Hypatia 25 (2):469-472.score: 15.0
  43. Alexandre Lefebvre (2011). Review of Michael R. Kelly (Ed.), Bergson and Phenomenology. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2011 (6).score: 15.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Chloë Taylor (2012). Animal Lessons: How They Teach Us to Be Human. By Kelly Oliver. New York: Columbia University Press, 2009. Hypatia 27 (3):672-675.score: 15.0
  45. Vasilis Grollios (2011). Georgios Varouxakis and Paul Kelly (Eds.), John Stuart Mill ― Thought and Influence: The Saint of Rationalism (London and New York: Routledge, 2010), Pp. X + 178. Utilitas 23 (03):359-361.score: 15.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Bertell Ollman (1973). Comment on Kelly's "Alienation". Political Theory 1 (1):51-53.score: 15.0
  47. Patrick Riley (1988). George Armstrong Kelly (1932-1987). Political Theory 16 (2):179-185.score: 15.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. W. H. Walsh (1942). A History of Modern Philosophy. By William Kelly Wright. (New York: The Macmillan Company. 1941. Pp. Ix + 634. Price 17s. 6d. Net.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 17 (67):282-.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. J. Gert (2012). Yuck! The Nature and Moral Significance of Disgust, by Daniel Kelly. Mind 121 (484):1077-1080.score: 15.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. L. Bretherton (2000). New Directions in Sexual Ethics: Moral Theology and the Challerage of AIDS, by Kevin T. Kelly. London: Geoffrey Chapman (Dublin: Columba), 1998. 192 Pp. Pb. 12.99. ISBN 0-225-66793-. [REVIEW] Studies in Christian Ethics 13 (2):129-130.score: 15.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000