5 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Ken Waters [4]Kenneth Waters [1]
  1.  30 DLs
    Ken Waters, Molecular Genetics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2.  18 DLs
    Kenneth Waters, Why Genic and Multilevel Selection Theories Are Here to Stay.
    I clarify the difference between pluralist and monist interpretations of levels of selection disputes. Lloyd has challenged my claim that a plurality of models correctly accounts for situations such as maintenance of the sickle-cell trait, and I revisit this example to show that competing theories don’t disagree about the existence of ‘high-level’ or ‘lowlevel’ causes; rather, they parse these causes differently. Applying Woodward’s theory of causation, I analyze Sober’s distinction between ‘selection of’ versus ‘selection for’. My analysis shows that this (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3.  8 DLs
    Ken Waters (2008). The Ethical Challenges of Reporting on Tragedy. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 23 (2):178 – 179.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4.  6 DLs
    Ken Waters (2001). Competing Moral Visions: Ethics and the Stealth Bible. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 16 (1):48 – 61.
    Advocacy publications, particularly those focused on the reporting and analysis of religious news and theology, have proliferated throughout American history. Today some 3,000 religious periodicals continue to vie for the eyes and hearts of American readers. Like their mainstream journalistic counterparts, advocacy publications over the years have formed professional associations that provide ongoing seminars, workshops, and professional standards for conduct and mutual accountability such as codes of ethics.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5.  1 DLs
    Ken Waters (2007). Book Review: Tracing the Origins and Evolution of Press Freedom. [REVIEW] Journal of Mass Media Ethics 22 (4):367 – 370.