18 found
Order:
  1.  51
    Kenneth J. Perszyk (2000). Molinism and Compatibilism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 48 (1):11-33.
  2.  46
    Kenneth J. Perszyk (2003). Molinism and the Consequence Argument. Faith and Philosophy 20 (2):131-151.
  3.  39
    Kenneth J. Perszyk (1999). Compatibilism and the Free Will Defence: A Reply to Bishop. Australasian Journal of Philosopy 77 (1):92-105.
    This paper 1) argues that libertarians are virtually as badly off as compatibilists in the face of the objection to the Free Will Defence that omnipotent God could have ensured that all free beings always but freely did right, and 2) explores the prospects for an "upgraded" Free Will Defense which takes freedom merely as a necessary condition for a further higher good which logically could not be achieved if God employed any of the available strategies--under both compatibilist and libertarian (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  4.  24
    Kenneth J. Perszyk (1998). An Anti-Molinist Argument. Philosophical Studies 90 (3):215-235.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  5.  39
    Kenneth J. Perszyk (1998). Free Will Defence with and Without Molinism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 43 (1):29-64.
  6.  22
    Kenneth J. Perszyk (1998). Molinism and Theodicy. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 44 (3):163-184.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  7.  2
    Kenneth J. Perszyk (1999). Compatibilism and the Free Will Defence: A Reply to Bishop. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77 (1):92-105.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  28
    Kenneth J. Perszyk (1999). Stump's Theodicy of Redemptive Suffering and Molinism. Religious Studies 35 (2):191-211.
    Eleonore Stump develops and defends a theodicy of redemptive suffering. In particular, God's permission of suffering (at least some classes, if not instances, of serious undeserved, involuntary suffering due to natural or free causes) is justified just in case it benefits those who suffer, it is the best possible means in the circumstances for their benefit, and God knows this is the case. The main aim of this paper is to show that for Stump's theodicy to have a good chance (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  24
    Kenneth J. Perszyk (1984). Negative Entities and Negative Facts in Navya-Nyāya. Journal of Indian Philosophy 12 (3):265-275.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10.  25
    Kenneth J. Perszyk (1993). Against Extended Modal Realism. Journal of Philosophical Logic 22 (2):205 - 214.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  16
    Kenneth J. Perszyk (1987). Tractatus 5.54–5.5422. Philosophia 17 (2):111-126.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  12.  15
    Kenneth J. Perszyk (1988). The Ontology of the Tractatus. Philosophia 18 (1):39-59.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  8
    Kenneth J. Perszyk (1984). The Nyāya and Russell on Empty Terms. Philosophy East and West 34 (2):131-146.
    The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how the navya-Nyaya school of indian philosophy determines the truth or falsity of a sentence which contains an empty term, And to point out some similarities and differences between its method of analysis and truth-Value determinations of such sentences and that of bertrand russell.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  14. Kenneth J. Perszyk (1993). Nonexistent Objects Meinong and Contemporary Philosophy.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  15.  8
    Kenneth J. Perszyk (1989). What's Wrong with Impossible Objects? Philosophical Papers 18 (3):241-251.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  10
    Kenneth J. Perszyk (1983). 'Virtue is Not Blue': Navya-Nyāya and Some Western Views. [REVIEW] Journal of Indian Philosophy 11 (4):325-338.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  7
    Kenneth J. Perszyk, Raphael Falk & David Shatz (1987). Critical Studies. Philosophia 17 (3):355-364.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Kenneth J. Perszyk (1999). Stump's Theodicy of Redemptive Suffering and Molinism. Religious Studies 35 (2):191-211.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography