30 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Kenneth P. Winkler [30]Kenneth Park Winkler [1]
  1. Kenneth P. Winkler (1989). Berkeley: An Interpretation. Oxford University Press Uk.
    David Hume wrote that Berkeley's arguments `admit of no answer but produce no conviction'. This book aims at the kind of understanding of Berkeley's philosophy that comes from seeing how we ourselves might be brought to embrace it. Berkeley held that matter does not exist, and that the sensations we take to be caused by an indifferent and independent world are instead caused directly by God. Nature becomes a text, with no existence apart from the spirits who transmit and receive (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   17 citations  
  2. Kenneth P. Winkler (1991). The New Hume. Philosophical Review 100 (4):541-579.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   13 citations  
  3.  3
    Kenneth P. Winkler (2016). British Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century by Sarah Hutton. Journal of the History of Philosophy 54 (4):677-678.
    Most of our histories of philosophy, in our books and especially in our courses, are what William James called “appreciative chronicle[s] of human master-strokes”. They resemble tours of grand and isolated monuments. Sarah Hutton’s magnificent British Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century is a different kind of history, in which masterpieces are placed in conversation with books that are now neglected or all but forgotten. By means of this “conversation model,” Hutton provides what she justly terms “a ‘thick description’ of seventeenth-century (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  7
    Kenneth P. Winkler, Anne Conway, Allison P. Coudert & Taylor Corse (1999). The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy. Philosophical Review 108 (4):585.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  27
    Kenneth P. Winkler (2011). Continuous Creation1. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 35 (1):287-309.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  6.  67
    Kenneth P. Winkler (1983). Berkeley on Abstract Ideas. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 65 (1):63-80.
    There are three propositions that this author demonstrates in his argument: the contention that berkeley 's attack on abstract ideas is not made wholly compatible with his atomic sensationalism, that berkeley does not provide or employ a single definition or criterion for determining the limit of abstraction and that the doctrine of abstract ideas furnishes no real support to berkeley 's argument against the existence of material substance independent of perception.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  7.  25
    Kenneth P. Winkler (2000). “All Is Revolution in Us”: Personal Identity in Shaftesbury and Hume. Hume Studies 26 (1):3-40.
  8.  30
    Kenneth P. Winkler (2014). Berkeley's Idealism: A Critical Examination. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 123 (4):541-544.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  5
    Kenneth P. Winkler (1989). Essays on Berkeley: A Tercentennial Celebration. [REVIEW] Noûs 23 (2):263-265.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  10.  3
    Kenneth P. Winkler (2016). Van Cleve and Reid on Conceptions and Qualities. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 93 (1):225-231.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  10
    Kenneth P. Winkler (2005). Berkeley and the Doctrine of Signs. In Kenneth Winkler (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley. Cambridge University Press 125.
  12.  14
    Kenneth P. Winkler (1996). Hutcheson and Hume on the Color of Virtue. Hume Studies 22 (1):3-22.
  13.  30
    Kenneth P. Winkler (1985). Scepticism and Anti-Realism. Mind 94 (373):36-52.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  14.  40
    Kenneth P. Winkler (2010). P.J.E. Kail's Projection and Realism in Hume's Philosophy. [REVIEW] Philosophical Books 51 (3):144-159.
  15. Kenneth P. Winkler (2008). Berkeley and Kant. In Daniel Garber & Béatrice Longuenesse (eds.), Kant and the Early Moderns. Princeton University Press
  16.  43
    Kenneth P. Winkler (2009). Signification, Intention, Projection. Philosophia 37 (3):477-501.
    Locke is what present-day aestheticians, critics, and historians call an intentionalist. He believes that when we interpret speech and writing, we aim—in large part and perhaps even for the most part—to recover the intentions, or intended meanings, of the speaker or writer. Berkeley and Hume shared Locke’s commitment to intentionalism, but it is a theme that recent philosophical interpreters of all three writers have left largely unexplored. In this paper I discuss the bearing of intentionalism on more familiar themes in (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  31
    Kenneth P. Winkler (1986). Berkeley, Newton and the Stars. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 17 (1):23-42.
  18. Kenneth P. Winkler (2011). Hume and the Sensible Qualities. In Lawrence Nolan (ed.), Primary and Secondary Qualities: The Historical and Ongoing Debate. Oxford University Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  24
    Kenneth P. Winkler (1985). Berkeley on Volition, Power, and the Complexity of Causation. History of Philosophy Quarterly 2 (1):53 - 69.
  20.  18
    Kenneth P. Winkler (1993). Grades of Cartesian Innateness. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 1 (2):23 – 44.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  13
    Kenneth P. Winkler (1992). Berkeley. Idealistic Studies 22 (3):300-301.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  20
    Kenneth P. Winkler (2007). Locke's Philosophy of Language - By Walter Ott. Philosophical Books 48 (1):76-78.
  23.  13
    Kenneth P. Winkler (1993). Descartes and the Names of God. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 67 (4):451-466.
  24.  20
    Kenneth P. Winkler (2009). Early Modern Intentionalism: Replies to LoLordo's Comments. Philosophia 37 (3):507-509.
    I clarify Locke’s intentionalism and explain what we might gain by paying more attention to the role of linguistic intentions in the work of the British empiricists.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  2
    Kenneth P. Winkler (2008). Chapter 8. Berkeley and Kant. In Béatrice Longuenesse & Daniel Garber (eds.), Kant and the Early Moderns. Princeton University Press 142-171.
  26. Kenneth P. Winkler & Jonathan Dancy (1991). Berkeley: An Introduction. Philosophical Review 100 (2):329.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Kenneth P. Winkler, David Pears & Annette C. Baier (1994). Hume's System: An Examination of the First Book of His Treatise.A Progress of Sentiments: Reflections on Hume's Treatise. Philosophical Review 103 (4):755.
  28. Kenneth P. Winkler (1992). Ideas, Sentiments, and Qualities. In Phillip D. Cummins (ed.), Minds, Ideas, and Objects: Essays in the Theory of Representation in Modern Philosophy. Ridgeview Publishing Company
  29. Kenneth P. Winkler (2010). Kant, the Empiricists, and the Enterprise of Deduction. In Paul Guyer (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  32
    Kenneth P. Winkler (ed.) (2005). The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley. Cambridge University Press.
    George Berkeley is one of the greatest and most influential modern philosophers. In defending the immaterialism for which he is most famous, he redirected modern thinking about the nature of objectivity and the mind's capacity to come to terms with it. Along the way, he made striking and influential proposals concerning the psychology of the senses, the workings of language, the aims of science, and the scope of mathematics. In this Companion volume a team of distinguished authors not only examines (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography