See also:
Profile: Keren Gorodeisky (Auburn University)
  1. Keren Gorodeisky (2013). Schematizing Without a Concept? Imagine That! In Margit Ruffing, Claudio La Rocca, Alfredo Ferrarin & Stefano Bacin (eds.), Kant Und Die Philosophie in Weltb├╝rgerlicher Absicht: Akten des Xi. Kant-Kongresses 2010. De Gruyter. 59-70.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Keren Gorodeisky (2011). (Re)Encountering Individuality: Schlegel's Romantic Imperative as a Response to Nihilism. Inquiry 54 (6):567 - 590.
    Abstract According to Friedrich Schlegel: ?The Romantic imperative demands [that] all nature and science should become art [and] art should become nature and science?; ?[P]oetry and philosophy should be made unified?, and ?life and society [should be made] poetic?. The aim of this paper is to explain why Schlegel believes that this is an imperative that constrains philosophy and ordinary life. I argue that the answer to this question requires that we regard the Romantic imperative as a response to the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Keren Gorodeisky (2010). A New Look at Kant's View of Aesthetic Testimony. British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (1):53-70.
    In this paper I explore the following threefold question: first, is there a genuine problem of grounding aesthetic judgement in testimony? Second, if there is such a problem, what exactly is its nature? And lastly, can Kant help us get clearer on the problem? Following Kant, I argue that the problem with aesthetic testimony is explained by norms that govern what it takes to judge a beautiful object aesthetically, rather than theoretically or practically, not by norms that govern what it (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation