Search results for 'Kevin Diller' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Kevin Diller (2010). Karl Barth and the Relationship Between Philosophy and Theology. Heythrop Journal 51 (6):1035-1052.score: 240.0
    It is commonly held that Karl Barth emphatically rejected the usefulness of philosophy for theology. In this essay I explore the implications of Barth's theological epistemology for the relationship and proper boundaries between philosophy and theology, given its origin in Barth's theology of revelation. I seek to clarify Barth's position with respect to philosophy by distinguishing the contingency of its offence from any necessary incompatibility. Barth does not reject philosophy per se, but the way in which philosophy is typically conducted. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Kevin Diller (2008). Are Sin and Evil Necessary for a Really Good World?: Questions for Alvin Plantinga's Felix Culpa Theodicy. Faith and Philosophy 25 (1):87-101.score: 240.0
    Arguably, the most philosophically nuanced defense of a Felix Culpa theodicy, born out of serious theological reflection, is to be found in Alvin Plantinga’srecent article entitled “Superlapsarianism, or ‘O Felix Culpa.’” In this paper I look at Plantinga’s argument for the necessity of evil as a means to God’s fargreater ends and raise four objections to it. The arguments I give are aimed at the theological adequacy of explaining the emergence of evil as a functionalgood. I conclude that Plantinga’s Felix (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Kevin S. Diller (2011). Can Arguments Boost Warrant for Christian Belief? Warrant Boosting and the Primacy of Divine Revelation. Religious Studies 47 (2):185-200.score: 240.0
    It is well known that in Reformed circles there is significant doubt about the extent of the role natural theology might play in warranting Christian belief. I argue that even if we accept the core theological reservations and philosophical commitments shared by the likes of Karl Barth and Reformed epistemologists, there remains room for the arguments of natural theology to serve a vital, positive function. I offer a proposal for how we might think about the co-ordination of multiple sources of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Justus Diller (2008). Functional Interpretations of Constructive Set Theory in All Finite Types. Dialectica 62 (2):149–177.score: 60.0
    Gödel's dialectica interpretation of Heyting arithmetic HA may be seen as expressing a lack of confidence in our understanding of unbounded quantification. Instead of formally proving an implication with an existential consequent or with a universal antecedent, the dialectica interpretation asks, under suitable conditions, for explicit 'interpreting' instances that make the implication valid. For proofs in constructive set theory CZF-, it may not always be possible to find just one such instance, but it must suffice to explicitly name a set (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. N. Laland Kevin, Marcus John Odling-Smee & Jeremy Kendal W. Feldman (2009). Conceptual Barriers to Progress Within Evolutionary Biology. Foundations of Science 14 (3).score: 30.0
    In spite of its success, Neo-Darwinism is faced with major conceptual barriers to further progress, deriving directly from its metaphysical foundations. Most importantly, neo-Darwinism fails to recognize a fundamental cause of evolutionary change, “niche construction”. This failure restricts the generality of evolutionary theory, and introduces inaccuracies. It also hinders the integration of evolutionary biology with neighbouring disciplines, including ecosystem ecology, developmental biology, and the human sciences. Ecology is forced to become a divided discipline, developmental biology is stubbornly difficult to reconcile (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Antoni Diller (2008). Testimony From a Popperian Perspective. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (4):419-456.score: 30.0
    Currently, testimony is studied extensively in Anglo-American philosophy. However, most of this work is done from a justificationist perspective in which philosophers try to justify our reliance on testimony in some way. I agree with Popper that justificationism is radically mistaken. Thus, I construct an account of how we respond to testimony that in no way attempts to justify our reliance on it. This account is not a straightforward exegesis of Popper, as he never tackled testimony systematically. It makes use, (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Wm Wildes S. J. Kevin (1999). More Questions Than Answers: The Commodification of Health Care. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (3):307 – 311.score: 30.0
    The changing world of health care finance has led to a paradigm shift in health care with health care being viewed more and more as a commodity. Many have argued that such a paradigm shift is incompatible with the very nature of medicine and health care. But such arguments raise more questions than they answer. There are important assumptions about basic concepts of health care and markets that frame such arguments.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. J. Diller & A. S. Troelstra (1984). Realizability and Intuitionistic Logic. Synthese 60 (2):253 - 282.score: 30.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Jeanine Diller (2007). Response to Bishop's “How a Modest Fideism May Constrain Theistic Commitments”. Philosophia 35 (3-4):403-406.score: 30.0
    Bishop’s main claims are: (I) that James’ criteria on the admissibility of faith leaps need the addition of two moral criteria to be complete; (II) that a Kantian, at least, could not admissibly leap toward God, classically understood, and (III) that a Kantian, and anyone else, could admissibly leap toward God, understood his way. Here I will affirm (I) with a qualification; deny (II); affirm (III); and close with some reservations about Bishop’s novel model of God. This paper was delivered (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Jeanine Diller (2007). Introduction. Philosophia 35 (3-4):261-272.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. A. H. O. Kevin (2007). Simmel on Acceleration, Boredom, and Extreme Aesthesia. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 37 (4):447–462.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. T. O. H. Kevin (2010). The Predication Thesis and a New Problem About Persistent Fundamental Legal Controversies. Utilitas 22 (3):331-350.score: 30.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. A. H. O. Kevin (2010). The Psychopathology of American Shyness: A Hermeneutic Reading. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 40 (2):190-206.score: 30.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. M. Huttegger Simon, Rory Smead Brian Skyrms & J. S. Zollman Kevin (2010). Evolutionary Dynamics of Lewis Signaling Games: Signaling Systems Vs. Partial Pooling. Synthese 172 (1).score: 30.0
    Transfer of information between senders and receivers, of one kind or another, is essential to all life. David Lewis introduced a game theoretic model of the simplest case, where one sender and one receiver have pure common interest. How hard or easy is it for evolution to achieve information transfer in Lewis signaling?. The answers involve surprising subtleties. We discuss some if these in terms of evolutionary dynamics in both finite and infinite populations, with and without mutation.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Aubrey Diller (1961). The Greek Codices of Palla Strozzi and Guarino Veronese. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 24 (3/4):313-321.score: 30.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Sister Kevin & J. S. (1956). For Wisdom's Sake, a Word That All Men Love. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 17 (2):236-238.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Antoni Diller (1993). On the Sense of Unsaturated Expressions. Philosophical Papers 22 (1):71-79.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. O'Rourke O. Kevin (2006). Reflections on the Papal Allocution Concerning Care for Persistent Vegetative State Patients. Christian Bioethics 12 (1):83-97.score: 30.0
  19. Ann Diller (1975). On Tacit Knowing and Apprenticeship. Educational Philosophy and Theory 7 (1):55–63.score: 30.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Lawrence H. Diller (2005). Fallout From the Pharma Scandals:. Hastings Center Report 35 (3):28-29.score: 30.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Taylor Martin, Karen Rayne, Nate J. Kemp, Jack Hart & Kenneth R. Diller (2005). Teaching for Adaptive Expertise in Biomedical Engineering Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (2):257-276.score: 30.0
    This paper considers an approach to teaching ethics in bioengineering based on the How People Learn (HPL) framework. Curricula based on this framework have been effective in mathematics and science instruction from the kindergarten to the college levels. This framework is well suited to teaching bioengineering ethics because it helps learners develop “adaptive expertise”. Adaptive expertise refers to the ability to use knowledge and experience in a domain to learn in unanticipated situations. It differs from routine expertise, which requires using (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Catherine Kevin (ed.) (2009). Feminism and the Body: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Cambridge Scholars.score: 30.0
  23. K. Schütte, Justus Diller & G. H. Müller (eds.) (1975). Isilc Proof Theory Symposion: Dedicated to Kurt Schütte on the Occasion of His 65th Birthday: Proceedings of the International Summer Institute and Logic Colloquium, Kiel, 1974. Springer-Verlag.score: 30.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Brian Francis Scarlett (2012). Obituary: William Kevin Presa. Sophia 51 (4):581-582.score: 24.0
    In this obituary, I detail the life and contribution of William Kevin Presa.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Andrew B. Irvine (2014). Introduction: A Symposium on Kevin Schilbrack's Philosophy and the Study of Religions: A Manifesto. Sophia 53 (3):363-365.score: 24.0
    It is an exciting time to pursue philosophy of religion, not least because of an earnest and widening conversation about what philosophers of religion should be doing in the future. This conversation is driven by factors including the growing presence of philosophers who do not presume as normative the subject position of so-called western traditions of thought, the relentless historicization—especially along Foucaultian lines—of the modern study of religion (or ‘religion’) by critics working across the range of implicated disciplines, and by (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Andrew B. Irvine (2014). On Kevin Schilbrack's Philosophy and the Study of Religions: A Manifesto. Sophia 53 (3):367-372.score: 24.0
    Kevin Schilbrack’s recent book sets out a series of well-considered, well-wrought arguments promoting a lively future for philosophy of religion. In the following comments on selected chapters, I seek to raise questions that require further elaboration of Schilbrack’s constructive vision and/or distinction from alternative visions with which he disagrees.Chapter 1: ‘The Full Task of Philosophy of Religion’Schilbrack begins this chapter characterizing ‘traditional philosophy of religion’ (TPR) in terms of the task that the discipline sets for itself: to evaluate the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. J. Kevin O'Regan & Ned Block (2012). Discussion of J. Kevin O'Regan's “Why Red Doesn't Sound Like a Bell: Understanding the Feel of Consciousness”. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 3 (1):89-108.score: 21.0
    Discussion of J. Kevin O’Regan’s “Why Red Doesn’t Sound Like a Bell: Understanding the Feel of Consciousness” Content Type Journal Article Pages 1-20 DOI 10.1007/s13164-012-0090-7 Authors J. Kevin O’Regan, Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, CNRS - Université Paris Descartes, Centre Biomédical des Saints Pères, 45 rue des Sts Pères, 75270 Paris cedex 06, France Ned Block, Departments of Philosophy, Psychology and Center for Neural Science, New York University, 5 Washington Place, New York, NY 10003, USA Journal Review of (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Herbert Hochberg & Kevin Mulligan (2005). Review of Herbert Hochberg, Kevin Mulligan (Eds.), Relations and Predicates. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (10).score: 18.0
    This book is presumably a collection of essays delivered at a conference, though it's hard to say. There is no cover description and the editors' introduction, where this information might have been found, is missing from the volume (at least from my copy) in spite of being listed in the table of contents. A curious editorial slip. In fact, from an editorial perspective this book is a disaster. Not only is the format reminiscent of those camera ready volumes that jammed (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Kevin C. Klement (2012). Kevin C. Klement. Theoria 78:146-167.score: 18.0
    Most advocates of the so-called “neologicist” movement in the philosophy of mathematics identify themselves as “Neo-Fregeans” (e.g., Hale and Wright): presenting an updated and revised version of Frege’s form of logicism. Russell’s form of logicism is scarcely discussed in this literature, and when it is, often dismissed as not really logicism at all (in lights of its assumption of axioms of infinity, reducibiity and so on). In this paper I have three aims: firstly, to identify more clearly the primary metaontological (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Nicholas Wolterstorff (2013). Reply to Kevin Carnahan and Erik A. Anderson. Philosophia 41 (2):429-435.score: 18.0
    In my response to Kevin Carnahan, I explain the concept of religion that I have been working with in my writings on the place of religious reasons in public political discourse. While acknowledging that religion is often privatized, my concern has been with religion as a way of life. It is religion so understood that raises the most serious issues concerning the role of religion in public discourse. In my response to Erik A. Anderson, I go beyond what I (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Anita Konzelmann Ziv, Knowledge, Emotion, Value and Inner Normativity: KEVIN Probes Collective Persons. Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Kevin Mulligan.score: 18.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Kevin Kelly, Kevin Kelly, Oliver Schulte, Vincent Hendricks.score: 18.0
    Philosophical logicians proposing theories of rational belief revision have had little to say about whether their proposals assist or impede the agent's ability to reliably arrive at the truth as his beliefs change through time. On the other hand, reliability is the central concern of formal learning theory. In this paper we investigate the belief revision theory of Alchourron, Gardenfors and Makinson from a learning theoretic point of view.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Lawrence Shapiro & Kevin Ryan (2012). Krytyczna Historia Ucieleśniania Jako Paragydmatu Badawczego Nauk o Poznaniu:(Lawrence Shapiro, Embodied Cognitive)/Kevin Ryan. Avant 3 (1):386 - 389.score: 18.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Gregory E. Ganssle (2005). Metaphysics, Ethics and Personhood: A Response to Kevin Corcoran. Faith and Philosophy 22 (3):370-376.score: 18.0
    In a recent issue of this journal, Kevin Corcoran has argued that the metaphysical theory one holds to about the nature of human persons is irrelevant to the sort of ethical questions that occupy bioethicists as well as the general public. Specifically, he argues that whether one holds a constitution view of human persons, an animalist view, or a substance dualist view, the real work in one’s ethical reasoning is done by certain moral principles rather than by metaphysical ones. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Jan Rivkin (1999). Reviews: Out of Control: The New Biology of Machines, Social Systems, and the Economic World, Kevin Kelly. [REVIEW] Emergence 1 (2):179-182.score: 18.0
    (1999). Reviews: Out of Control: The New Biology of Machines, Social Systems, and the Economic World, Kevin Kelly. Emergence: Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 179-182.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Kevin Kelly, Kevin T. Kelly and Oliver Schulte.score: 18.0
    We argue that uncomputability and classical scepticism are both re ections of inductive underdetermination, so that Church's thesis and Hume's problem ought to receive equal emphasis in a balanced approach to the philosophy of induction. As an illustration of such an approach, we investigate how uncomputable the predictions of a hypothesis can be if the hypothesis is to be reliably investigated by a computable scienti c method.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. James McLachlan (2014). Kevin Schilbrack on Defining Religion and the Field of the Study of Religions. Sophia 53 (3):379-382.score: 18.0
    Kevin Schilbrack’s manifesto Philosophy and the Study of Religions is an important foundational work for two fields: philosophy of religion and religious studies. The philosophers of religion sometimes appear to better fit Donald Wiebe’s characterization of religionists as crypto-theologians. They seem only really concerned with Christian theology or at the most theism, despite the fact that Christianity only accounts for about a third of what we could call religious people on the planet and theism only about half. They seem (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Kevin R. Stoner (1993). Book Review: Balance of Philosophical and Practice: Reviewed by Kevin R. Stoner. [REVIEW] Journal of Mass Media Ethics 8 (1):58 – 60.score: 18.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Wolfgang Burr (2000). A Diller-Nahm-Style Functional Interpretation of $Hbox{Sf KP} Omega$. Archive for Mathematical Logic 39 (8):599-604.score: 18.0
    The Dialectica-style functional interpretation of Kripke-Platek set theory with infinity ( $\hbox{\sf KP} \omega$ ) given in [1] uses a choice functional (which is not a definable set function of ( $hbox{\sf KP} \omega$ ). By means of a Diller-Nahm-style interpretation (cf. [4]) it is possible to eliminate the choice functional and give an interpretation by set functionals primitive recursive in $x\mapsto\omega$ . This yields the following characterization: The class of $\Sigma$ -definable set functions of $\hbox{\sf KP} \omega$ coincides (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Stephen Bush (forthcoming). Kevin Schilbrack: Philosophy and the Study of Religions: A Manifesto. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion:1-5.score: 18.0
    This book review essay summarizes the key arguments of Kevin Schilbrack’s Philosophy and the Study of Religions: A Manifesto and offers two critical responses.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Kevin Hart & George Aichele (2005). The Word Becomes Text: A Dialogue Between Kevin Hart and George Aichele. In Yvonne Sherwood & Kevin Hart (eds.), Derrida and Religion: Other Testaments. Routledge.score: 18.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Kevin T. Kelly, Julie Clague, Bernard Hoose & Gerard Mannion (eds.) (2008). Moral Theology for the Twenty-First Century: Essays in Celebration of Kevin Kelly. T & T Clark.score: 18.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Kevin Kubota (2011). Kevin Kubotas Lighting Notebook: 101 Lighting Styles and Setups for Digital Photographers. Wiley.score: 18.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. J. Kevin O'Regan (2001). The 'Feel'of Seeing:: An Interview with J. Kevin O'Regan. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5 (6):278-279.score: 18.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. John Hick (2006). Exclusivism Versus Pluralism in Religion: A Response to Kevin Meeker. Religious Studies 42 (2):207-212.score: 15.0
    I argue that Meeker is mistaken in two crucial respects. First, contrary to both myself and Plantinga, he treats exclusivism as a theory about the relation between the religions, and then claims that it is superior to the pluralist theory. But he does not say what his exclusivist theory is. Second, he bases his claim of a fundamental self-contradiction in my pluralist position on a view which I disavow, namely that altruism is the core of religion. He omits the central (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Jonny Anomaly (2011). Review of Kevin Welner, Vouchers: The Emergence of Tuition Tax Credits for Private Schooling. [REVIEW] Education Review.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Wolfgang Künne (2010). Replies to Paul Boghossian and Kevin Mulligan. Dialectica 64 (4):585-615.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. John Garner (2010). Giorgio Agamben: The Signature of All Things: On Method, Luca D'Isanto with Kevin Attell (Tr.). [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 43 (4):579-588.score: 15.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Maudemarie Clark (2005). Review of R. Kevin Hill, Nietzsche's Critiques: The Kantian Foundations of His Thought. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (1).score: 15.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Lois McNay (2007). Foucault and the Iranian Revolution: Gender and the Seductions of Islamism - by Janet Afary and Kevin B. Anderson. Constellations 14 (2):295-297.score: 15.0
1 — 50 / 1000