11 found
Order:
  1.  1
    Kevin J. Vanhoozer (2010). Remythologizing Theology: Divine Action, Passion, and Authorship. Cambridge University Press.
    Machine generated contents note: Preface; Introduction: what is remythologizing?; Part I. 'God' in Scripture and Theology: 1. Biblical representation (Vorstellung): divine communicative action and passion; 2. Theological conceptualization (Begriff): varieties of theism and panentheism; 3. The new kenotic-perichoretic relational ontotheology: some 'classical' concerns; Part II. Communicative Theism and the Triune God: 4. God's being is in communicating; 5. God in three persons: the one who lights and lives in love; Part III. God and World: Authorial Action and Interaction: 6. Divine (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  2.  8
    Kevin J. Vanhoozer (2004). Praising in Song: Beauty and the Arts. In Stanley Hauerwas & Samuel Wells (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Christian Ethics. Blackwell Pub. 110.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  7
    Kevin J. Vanhoozer (2012). “Ascending the Mountain, Singing the Rock: Biblical Interpretation Earthed, Typed, and Transfigured”. Modern Theology 28 (4):781-803.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  1
    Kevin J. Vanhoozer (1994). Paul Ricoeur. Oneself as Another . Pp. 363. . £23.95. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 30 (3):368.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  55
    Kevin J. Vanhoozer (1990). Biblical Narrative in the Philosophy of Paul Ricoeur: A Study in Hermeneutics and Theology. Cambridge University Press.
    Although Paul Ricoeur's writings are widely and appreciatively read by theologians, this is the first book to offer a full, sympathetic yet critical account of Ricoeur's theory of narrative interpretation and its contribution to theology. Unlike many previous studies of Ricoeur, Part I argues that Ricoeur's hermeneutics must be viewed in the light of his overall philosophical agenda, as a fusion and continuation of the unfinished projects of Kant and Heidegger. Particularly helpful is the focus on Ricoeur's recent narrative theory (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Kevin J. Vanhoozer (2007). Biblical Narrative in the Philosophy of Paul Ricoeur: A Study in Hermeneutics and Theology. Cambridge University Press.
    Although Paul Ricoeur's writings are widely and appreciatively read by theologians, this book offers a full, sympathetic yet critical account of Ricoeur's theory of narrative interpretation and its contribution to theology. Unlike many previous studies of Ricoeur, Part I argues that Ricoeur's hermeneutics must be viewed in the light of his overall philosophical agenda, as a fusion and continuation of the unfinished projects of Kant and Heidegger. Particularly helpful is the focus on Ricoeur's recent narrative theory as the context in (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Kevin J. Vanhoozer (2011). Biblical Narrative in the Philosophy of Paul Ricoeur: A Study in Hermeneutics and Theology. Cambridge University Press.
    Although Paul Ricoeur's writings are widely and appreciatively read by theologians, this book offers a full, sympathetic yet critical account of Ricoeur's theory of narrative interpretation and its contribution to theology. Unlike many previous studies of Ricoeur, Part I argues that Ricoeur's hermeneutics must be viewed in the light of his overall philosophical agenda, as a fusion and continuation of the unfinished projects of Kant and Heidegger. Particularly helpful is the focus on Ricoeur's recent narrative theory as the context in (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Kevin J. Vanhoozer, James K. A. Smith & Bruce Ellis Benson (eds.) (2006). Hermeneutics at the Crossroads. Indiana University Press.
    In this multi-faceted volume, Christian and other religiously committed theorists find themselves at an uneasy point in history—between premodernity, modernity, and postmodernity—where disciplines and methods, cultural and linguistic traditions, and religious commitments tangle and cross. Here, leading theorists explore the state of the art of the contemporary hermeneutical terrain. As they address the work of Gadamer, Ricoeur, and Derrida, the essays collected in this wide-ranging work engage key themes in philosophical hermeneutics, hermeneutics and religion, hermeneutics and the other arts, hermeneutics (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Kevin J. Vanhoozer, James K. A. Smith & Bruce Ellis Benson (eds.) (2006). Hermeneutics at the Crossroads. Indiana University Press.
    In this multi-faceted volume, Christian and other religiously committed theorists find themselves at an uneasy point in history—between premodernity, modernity, and postmodernity—where disciplines and methods, cultural and linguistic traditions, and religious commitments tangle and cross. Here, leading theorists explore the state of the art of the contemporary hermeneutical terrain. As they address the work of Gadamer, Ricoeur, and Derrida, the essays collected in this wide-ranging work engage key themes in philosophical hermeneutics, hermeneutics and religion, hermeneutics and the other arts, hermeneutics (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Kevin J. Vanhoozer (1991). Philosophical Antecedents to Ricoeur's Time and Narrative. In David Wood (ed.), On Paul Ricoeur: Narrative and Interpretation. Routledge 34--54.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Kevin J. Vanhoozer (ed.) (2003). The Cambridge Companion to Postmodern Theology. Cambridge University Press.
    Postmodernity allows for no absolutes and no essence. Yet theology is concerned with the absolute, the essential. How then does theology sit within postmodernity? Is postmodern theology possible, or is such a concept a contradiction in terms? Should theology bother about postmodernism or just get on with its own thing? Can it? Theologians have responded in many different ways to the challenges posed by theories of postmodernity. In this introductory 2003 guide to a complex area, editor Kevin J. Vanhoozer addresses (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography