4 found
Sort by:
See also:
  1. Kimberly Baltzer-Jaray & Jeff Mitscherling (2012). The Phenomenological Spring: Husserl and the Göttingen Circle. Symposium 16 (2):1-19.
    The article discusses research work of Heinrich Hofmann, who has completed doctoral studies in mathematics under Karl Weierstrass in Berlin. His first book "Philosophy of Arithmetic: Psychological and Logical Investigations With Supplementary Texts From 1887-1901" contains his thesis "In the Concept of Number: Psychological Analyses" completed in the guidance of Weierstrass.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Kimberly Baltzer-Jaray (2011). Robin D. Rollinger, Austrian Phenomenology: Brentano, Husserl, Meinong, and Others on Mind and Object. [REVIEW] Symposium: The Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy 15 (2):209-212.
  3. Kimberly Baltzer-Jaray (2010). Idea and Ontology: An Essay in Early Modern Metaphysics of Ideas Marc A. Hight University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2008; 278 Pp.; $55.00 ISBN 978-0-271-03383-9. [REVIEW] Dialogue 49 (3):497-500.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Kimberly Baltzer-Jaray (2009). Adolf Reinach is Not a Platonist. Symposium: The Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy 13 (1):100-112.
    Contemporary scholars have generally labelled Adolf Reinach, a founding member of early phenomenology’s Göttingen Circle, a Platonist. Because Reinach conceives of states of affairs as neither real nor ideal, as involved with timeless essences and necessary logical laws, many have hastily concluded that states of affairs are Platonic entities. In this essay, I analyse Barry Smith’s argument that Reinach is a Platonist. Smith’s widely accepted argument often becomes utilised to show that Reinach and other phenomenologists, including Husserl, are Platonic realists (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation