12 found
See also:
Profile: Koshy Tharakan (Goa University)
  1.  25
    Koshy Tharakan (1998). Husserl's Notion of Objectivity: A Phenomenological Analysis. Indian Philosophical Quarterly 25 (2):213-226.
  2.  21
    Koshy Tharakan (1999). Husserl and Contemporary Philosophy of Mind. In MenonSangeetha (ed.), Scientific and Philosophical Studies on Consciousness. National Institute of Advanced Studies 182-192.
    The idea that science explains or ought to explain every phenomenon finds Cartesian dualism of mind and body to be an unsatisfactory thesis. Consequently we have a variety of materialist theories regarding mind and consciousness. In recent times, we come across many philosophers who are committed to the scientific world picture, trying to locate mind within a world that is essentially physical.The central problems these philosophers have to tackle consist of consciousness and mental causation. In what follows we discuss how (...)
    Direct download  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  3.  15
    Koshy Tharakan (2006). Consciousness and Society: In Defence of a Phenomenological Approach to Social Reality. In A. V. Afonso (ed.), Consciousness, Society and Values. Indian Institute of Advanced Study 129-146.
    With the advent of Postmodernism, the recent discussions in Continental thought has called into question the philosophy of the Subject, particularly the Cartesian “cogito” and the related method of reflection. One of the important ramifications of these questioning of the reflective subject is to do with the phenomenological doctrine of intentionality of consciousness. Recently, David Carr, himself a phenomenologist, has advanced a serious objection to the phenomenological approach to social reality. In what follows, I will be attempting a defence of (...)
    Direct download  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  4.  17
    Koshy Tharakan (2011). Anthropocentrism and Ecocentrism: On the Metaphysical Debate in Environmental Ethics. Jadavpur Journal of Philosophy 21 (2):27-42.
  5. Koshy Tharakan & Alito Siqueira (2009). Science of Nature: Garcia de Orta as a Philosopher of Science. In Anabela Mendes (ed.), Garcia de Orta and Alexander von Humboldt: Across the East and the West. Universidade Católica Editora 31--38.
  6.  14
    Koshy Tharakan (2004). Paradox of Method: Suresh Chandra on Social Scientific Research. In R. C. Pradhan (ed.), Philosophy of Suresh Chandra. Indian Council of Philosophical Research 270-282.
  7.  13
    Koshy Tharakan (2004). Understanding Polls and Predictions. Seminar (539).
  8.  96
    Koshy Tharakan (2008). Science Amidst Religion: The Politics of Knowledge. Current Science 94 (6):714.
  9.  8
    Koshy Tharakan (2008). Rethinking Religious Language in the Age of Science. Journal of Dharma 33 (1-4):405-411.
    Relation of science and religion has been at the centre of many discourses in the past as well as in the recent times. Some of these were meant to refute religious claims in the light of scientific truths about the world, while others took the pain of explaining the essential compatibility between the two. The former subjects religion to the scrutiny of science while the latter reads science in religion or religion in science.Both these attempts are ill-conceived as they conflate (...)
    Direct download  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  10.  83
    Koshy Tharakan (2010). Making Sense of Other Culture: Phenomenological Critique of Cultural Relativism. Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research 25 (4):61-74.
  11.  78
    Koshy Tharakan (2006). Methodology of Social Sciences: Positivism, Anti-Positivism and the Phenomenological Mediation. Indian Journal of Social Work 67 (1):16-31.
  12.  52
    Koshy Tharakan (2011). Questioning the Body: From Technology Towards a Sense of Body. Kritike: An Online Journal of Philosophy 5 (2):112-122.
    Many attempts of contemporary philosophers to reduce ‘mind’ to ‘body’ notwithstanding, where the ‘body’ is understood in the Cartesian framework, the continental philosophers in general repeatedly remind us that body has a significance that goes beyond its materiality as a bio-chemical physical substance. In “questioning body,” we wish to take up the philosophical underpinnings of the significance of body as a framework or tool to understand ‘technology’. By doing so, we are able to see the link between technology and body (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography