272 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Leon J. Goldstein [142]Laurence Goldstein [87]L. Goldstein [20]L. J. Goldstein [5]
Leonard Goldstein [5]Leon Goldstein [4]Leslie Friedman Goldstein [3]Lawrence Goldstein [3]

Not all matches are shown. Search with initial or firstname to single out others.

See also:
Profile: Laurence Goldstein (University of Kent at Canterbury)
  1. Leon J. Goldstein (1976). Epistemic Attitudes and History. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 37 (2):181-192.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Laurence Goldstein (2004). The Barber, Russell's Paradox, Catch-22, God, Contradiction and More: A Defence of a Wittgensteinian Conception of Contradiction. In Graham Priest, Jc Beall & Bradley Armour-Garb (eds.), The law of non-contradiction: new philosophical essays. Oxford University Press 295--313.
    outrageous remarks about contradictions. Perhaps the most striking remark he makes is that they are not false. This claim first appears in his early notebooks (Wittgenstein 1960, p.108). In the Tractatus, Wittgenstein argued that contradictions (like tautologies) are not statements (Sätze) and hence are not false (or true). This is a consequence of his theory that genuine statements are pictures.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3.  53
    Laurence Goldstein (2006). Fibonacci, Yablo, and the Cassationist Approach to Paradox. Mind 115 (460):867-890.
    A syntactically correct number-specification may fail to specify any number due to underspecification. For similar reasons, although each sentence in the Yablo sequence is syntactically perfect, none yields a statement with any truth-value. As is true of all members of the Liar family, the sentences in the Yablo sequence are so constructed that the specification of their truth-conditions is vacuous; the Yablo sentences fail to yield statements. The ‘revenge’ problem is easily defused. The solution to the semantical paradoxes offered here (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  4.  7
    S. Chopra, B. J. Copeland, E. Corazza, S. Donaho, F. Ferreira, H. Field, D. M. Gabbay, L. Goldstein, J. Heidema & M. J. Hill (2002). Benton, RA, 527 Blackburn, P., 281 Braüner, T., 359 Brink, C., 543. Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (615).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  5.  2
    Louis Goldstein, Marianne Pouplier, Larissa Chen, Elliot Saltzman & Dani Byrd (2007). Dynamic Action Units Slip in Speech Production Errors. Cognition 103 (3):386-412.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  6. Laurence Goldstein (2009). A Consistent Way with Paradox. Philosophical Studies 144 (3):377 - 389.
    Consideration of a paradox originally discovered by John Buridan provides a springboard for a general solution to paradoxes within the Liar family. The solution rests on a philosophical defence of truth-value-gaps and is consistent (non-dialetheist), avoids ‘revenge’ problems, imports no ad hoc assumptions, is not applicable to only a proper subset of the semantic paradoxes and implies no restriction of the expressive capacities of language.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  7.  52
    Laurence Goldstein (2001). Truth-Bearers and the Liar – a Reply to Alan Weir. Analysis 61 (2):115–126.
  8.  83
    L. Goldstein (2012). The Sorites is Nonsense Disguised by a Fallacy. Analysis 72 (1):61-65.
    It is uncontroversial that, on any run through a Sorites series, a subject, at some point, switches from an ‘F’ verdict on one exhibit to a non-‘F’ verdict on the next. (Where this ‘cut-off’ point occurs tend to differ from trial to trial.) It is a fallacy to infer that there must be a cut-off point simpliciter between F items and non-F items. The transition is from firm ground to swamp. In the Sorites reasoning, some conditionals of the form ‘If (...)
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  9.  36
    Laurence Goldstein (1992). `This Statement is Not True' is Not True. Analysis 52 (1):1-5.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  10. Leon J. Goldstein (1959). Mr Watkins on the Two Theses. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (39):240-241.
  11.  73
    Laurence Goldstein (1986). False Stipulation and Semantical Paradox. Analysis 46 (4):192-195.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  12. L. Goldstein (2006). Review: Wittgenstein: Meaning and Judgement. [REVIEW] Mind 115 (458):437-439.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  85
    L. Goldstein (2013). Paradoxical Partners: Semantical Brides and Set-Theoretical Grooms. Analysis 73 (1):33-37.
    Is there a key for ‘translating' some set-theoretical paradoxes into counterpart semantical paradoxes and vice-versa? There is, and this encourages the hope of a unified solution. The solution turns not on inventing new axioms that do not entail contradiction, but on imposing a completely intuitive restriction on the comprehension axiom of naive set theory in order to avoid illegitimate (circular) stipulation.
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  10
    Catherine P. Browman & Louis Goldstein (1995). Dynamics and Articulatory Phonology. In T. Van Gelder & Robert Port (eds.), Mind as Motion. MIT Press 175--193.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  15.  38
    Laurence Goldstein (1985). The Paradox of The Liar -- A Case of Mistaken Identity. Analysis 45 (1):9-13.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  16.  50
    Laurence Goldstein (2003). Farewell to Grelling. Analysis 63 (1):31–32.
    No categories
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  17.  51
    Laurence Goldstein (1986). Epimenides and Curry. Analysis 46 (3):117 - 121.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  18.  30
    Laurence Goldstein & Peter Cave (2008). A Unified Pyrrhonian Resolution of the Toxin Problem, the Surprise Examination, and Newcomb's Puzzle. American Philosophical Quarterly 45 (4):365 - 376.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  19.  13
    Laurence Goldstein (1999). Clear and Queer Thinking: Wittgenstein's Development and His Relevance to Modern Thought. Duckworth.
    Laurence Goldstein gives a straightforward and lively account of some of the central themes of Wittgenstein's writings on meaning, mind, and mathematics.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  20.  41
    Laurence Goldstein (1985). The Title of This Paper Is 'Quotation'. Analysis 45 (3):137 - 140.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  22
    Leon J. Goldstein (1975). Objectivity in Social Science. International Studies in Philosophy 7:210-212.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  20
    Laurence Goldstein (1984). Quotation of Types and Other Types of Quotation. Analysis 44 (1):1 - 6.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  23.  1
    Lawrence Goldstein (2010). Why Scientific Details Are Important When Novel Technologies Encounter Law, Politics, and Ethics. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 38 (2):204-211.
    This paper focuses on the issue of what to do if a couple who generates embryos chooses to lawfully, and in their (and my) view, ethnically discard those embryos. Specifically, is it appropriate to use the cells that come from “excess” embryos in medical research instead of discarding them when a couple has ceased trying to have any additional children?
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  24. Lawrence Goldstein (2010). Why Scientific Details Are Important When Novel Technologies Encounter Law, Politics, and Ethics. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):204-211.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  25.  16
    Leon J. Goldstein (1976). Making Sense of History. International Studies in Philosophy 8:266-267.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  24
    Laurence Goldstein (2000). A Unified Solution to Some Paradoxes. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100 (1):53–74.
    The Russell class does not exist because the conditions purporting to specify that class are contradictory, and hence fail to specify any class. Equally, the conditions purporting to specify the Liar statement are contradictory and hence, although the Liar sentence is grammatically in order, it fails to yield a statement. Thus the common source of these and related paradoxes is contradictory (or tautologous) specifying conditions-for such conditions fail to specify. This is the diagnosis. The cure consists of seeking and destroying (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  27.  19
    Leon J. Goldstein (1997). Why Waco? International Studies in Philosophy 29 (2):144-145.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  18
    Laurence Goldstein (2007). Kripke, Pierre and Constantinescu. The Reasoner 1 (5):4-5.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  18
    Laurence Goldstein (2007). Why the Substitution of Co-Referential Expressions in a Statement May Result in Change of Truth-Value (Concluding Part). The Reasoner 1 (2):6-7.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  66
    Laurence Goldstein (1999). Wittgenstein's Ph.D Viva—a Re-Creation. Philosophy 74 (4):499-513.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  31.  14
    Leon J. Goldstein (1965). Man, Time, and Society. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 62 (14):374-378.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  12
    Laurence Goldstein (1993). The Fallacy of the Simple Question. Analysis 53 (3):178 - 181.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  33.  17
    Leon J. Goldstein (1987). Narrative Logic. International Studies in Philosophy 19 (3):62-63.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  56
    Laurence Goldstein (1994). A Yabloesque Paradox in Set Theory. Analysis 54 (4):223-227.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  35.  65
    Laurence Goldstein (2003). Examining Boxing and Toxin. Analysis 63 (3):242–244.
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  36.  13
    Leon J. Goldstein (1978). The Dual Vision. International Studies in Philosophy 10:206-208.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  5
    L. Goldstein (2003). Farewell to Grelling. Analysis 63 (1):31-32.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  38.  12
    Leon J. Goldstein (1977). Philosophy, History and Politics. International Studies in Philosophy 9:201-201.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  12
    Laurence Goldstein (1993). Inescapable Surprises and Acquirable Intentions. Analysis 53 (2):93 - 99.
  40.  25
    Leon J. Goldstein (1974). The Political Philosophy of Giambattista Vico. International Studies in Philosophy 6:221-222.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  15
    Leon J. Goldstein (1993). Theories of Concepts. International Studies in Philosophy 25 (1):117-118.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  11
    Leon J. Goldstein (1963). Collected Papers. Volume I: The Problem of Social Reality. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 60 (19):557-562.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  11
    Leon J. Goldstein (1964). Phenomenology and the Human Sciences: A Contribution to a New Scientific Ideal. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 61 (14):428-431.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  11
    Leon J. Goldstein (1966). Studies in Social Theory, Volume II of Collected Papers. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 63 (7):190-196.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  83
    Laurence Goldstein (2000). How to Boil a Live Frog. Analysis 60 (2):170–178.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  28
    Laurence Goldstein (1988). Wittgenstein's Late Views on Belief, Paradox and Contradiction. Philosophical Investigations 11 (1):49-73.
  47.  78
    Laurence Goldstein (2002). Refuse Disposal. Analysis 62 (3):236–241.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  38
    Laurence Goldstein (1986). The Development of Wittgenstein's Views on Contradiction. History and Philosophy of Logic 7 (1):43-56.
    The views on contradiction and consistency that Wittgenstein expressed in his later writings have met with misunderstanding and almost uniform hositility. In this paper, I trace the roots of these views by attempting to show that, in his early writings, Wittgenstein accorded a ?unique status? to tautologies and contradictions, marking them off logically from genuine propositions. This is integral both to his Tractatus project of furnishing a theory of inference, and to the enterprise of explaining the nature of the Satz (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  49.  50
    Laurence Goldstein (1999). Circular Queue Paradoxes – the Missing Link. Analysis 59 (264):284–290.
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  50.  48
    Laurence Goldstein (2002). How Original a Work is the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus? Philosophy 77 (3):421-446.
    Wittgenstein's Tractatus is widely regarded as a masterpiece, a brilliant, if flawed attempt to achieve an ‘unassailable and definitive … final solution’ to a wide range of philosophical problems. Yet, in a 1931 notebook, Wittgenstein confesses: ‘I think there is some truth in my idea that I am really only reproductive in my thinking. I think I have never invented a line of thinking but that it was always provided for me by someone else’. This disarming self-assessment is, I believe (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
1 — 50 / 272