Search results for 'Laurence A. BonJour' (try it on Scholar)

139 found
Sort by:
  1. Laurence BonJour (2000). Four Theses Concerning a Priori Justification. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 5:13-20.score: 900.0
    In my book In Defense of Pure Reason, I offer an extended defense of the idea of a priori justification and, more specifically, of a rationalist conception of such justification: one according to which rational insight or intuition provides genuine justification for claims that need not be merely definitional or tautological in character. In the relatively brief space available to me on the present occasion, I want to present and defend, necessarily in rather broad strokes, four of the most central (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Laurence BonJour (2013). What is It Like to Be Human (Instead of a Bat). American Philosophical Quarterly 50 (4):373-386.score: 810.0
    My purpose in this paper is to discuss and defend an objection to physicalist or materialist accounts of the mind.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Laurence BonJour (1978). Can Empirical Knowledge Have a Foundation? American Philosophical Quarterly 15 (1):1-14.score: 810.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Laurence Bonjour (2002). Review: New Essays on the a Priori. [REVIEW] Mind 111 (443):647-652.score: 810.0
  5. Laurence BonJour (1991). Is Thought a Symbolic Process? Synthese 89 (3):331-52.score: 810.0
  6. Laurence Bonjour (2000). Evan Fales, a Defense of the Given (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1996). Noûs 34 (3):468–480.score: 810.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Laurence Bonjour (1995). Toward a Moderate Rationalism. Philosophical Topics 23 (1):47-78.score: 810.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Laurence Bonjour (1986). A Reconsideration of the Problem of Induction. Philosophical Topics 14 (1):93-124.score: 810.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Laurence BonJour (2013). Is There a Priori Knowledge? In Matthias Steup & John Turri (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. Blackwell. 177.score: 810.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Laurence Bonjour (1992). A Rationalist Manifesto. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 22 (sup1):53-88.score: 810.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Laurence Bonjour (2002). New Essays on the A Priori. Mind 111 (443):647-652.score: 810.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Can Empirical Knowledge Have A. Foundation & Laurence Bonjour (1978). Current Periodical Articles. American Philosophical Quarterly 15 (1).score: 810.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Laurence BonJour & Robert Audi (1995). A Priori. In Audi Robert (ed.), The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.score: 810.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Laurence BonJour (1985). Paul Ziff, Epistemic Analysis: A Coherence Theory of Knowledge Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 5 (9):410-412.score: 810.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Laurence Bonjour (2003). 40. Toward a Moderate Rationalism. In Steven Luper (ed.), Essential Knowledge: Readings in Epistemology. Longman. 402.score: 810.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Laurence BonJour & Ernest Sosa (2003). Epistemic Justification: Internalism Vs. Externalism, Foundations Vs. Virtues. Blackwell Pub..score: 720.0
    The regress problem and foundationalism -- Externalist accounts of justification -- In search of coherentism -- Back to foundationalism -- The conceptualization of sensory experience and the problem of the external world -- Knowledge and justification -- Does knowledge have foundation -- Skepticism and the internal/external divide -- A virtue epistemology -- Reply to Sosa -- Reply to Bonjour.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Laurence Bonjour (1980). Externalist Theories of Empirical Knowledge. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 5 (1):53-73.score: 450.0
    One of the many problems that would have t o be solved by a satisfactory theory of empirical knowledge, perhaps the most central is a general structural problem which I shall call the epistemic regress problem: the problem of how to avoid an in- finite and presumably vicious regress of justification in ones account of the justifica- tion of empirical beliefs. Foundationalist theories of empirical knowledge, as we shall see further below, attempt t o avoid the regress by locating a (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Laurence BonJour (1985). The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Harvard University Press.score: 450.0
    1 Knowledge and Justification This book is an investigation of one central problem which arises in the attempt to give a philosophical account of empirical ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Laurence BonJour (1999). Foundationalism and the External World. Philosophical Perspectives 13 (s13):229-249.score: 450.0
    Outlines a tenable version of a traditional foundationalist account\nof empirical justification and its implications for the justification\nof beliefs about physical or material objects. Presupposing the acceptability\nof other beliefs about physical objects; Concept of a basic belief;\nMetabeliefs about one's own occurrent beliefs; Beliefs about sensory\nexperience.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Laurence BonJour, Epistemological Problems of Perception. Stanford Online Encyclopedia of Philosophy.score: 450.0
    The historically most central epistemological issue concerning perception, to which this article will be almost entirely devoted, is whether and how beliefs about physical objects and about the physical world generally can be justified or warranted on the basis of sensory or perceptual experience—where it is internalist justification, roughly having a reason to think that the belief in question is true, that is mainly in question (see the entry justification, epistemic: internalist vs. externalist conceptions of). This issue, commonly referred to (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Laurence BonJour (2010). Epistemology: Classic Problems and Contemporary Responses. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc..score: 450.0
    Introduction -- Part I: The classical problems of epistemology -- Descartes's epistemology -- The concept of knowledge -- The problem of induction -- A priori justification and knowledge -- Immediate experience -- Knowledge of the external world -- Some further epistemological issues : other minds, testimony, and memory -- Part II: Contemporary responses to the cartesian epistemological program -- Introduction to part II -- Foundationalism and coherentism -- Internalism and externalism -- Quine and naturalized epistemology -- Knowledge and skepticism.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Laurence BonJour (1998). In Defense of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press.score: 450.0
    A comprehensive defence of the rationalist view that insight independent of experience is a genuine basis for knowledge.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Nikolaj Nottelmann (2012). A Critique of Laurence BonJour's Central Arguments for a Priori Fallibilism. Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 45:89-105.score: 405.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Lawrence BonJour, Jonathan Dancy, Julia Driver, Alvin Goldman, John Greco & Christopher Hookway (2000). Guy Axtell has Taught Philosophy at the University of Nevada, Reno, Since Receiving His Ph. D. In 1991. He has Written Articles on Epistemology, Philosophy of Science, American Pragmatism, and Philosophy of Religion. He is Currently at Work on a Book Entitled Pragmatic Pluralism: Understanding Philosophical Diversity. [REVIEW] In Guy Axtell (ed.), Knowledge, Belief, and Character: Readings in Virtue Epistemology. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.score: 360.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. James Beebe (2008). Bonjour's Arguments Against Skepticism About the A Priori. Philosophical Studies 137 (2):243 - 267.score: 261.0
    I reconstruct and critique two arguments Laurence BonJour has recently offered against skepticism about the a priori. While the arguments may provide anti-skeptical, internalist foundationalists with reason to accept the a priori, I show that neither argument provides sufficient reason for believing the more general conclusion that there is no rational alternative to accepting the a priori.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Laurence BonJour (2004). In Search of Direct Realism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (2):349-367.score: 240.0
  27. Laurence BonJour (2010). The Myth of Knowledge. Philosophical Perspectives 24 (1):57-83.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Laurence BonJour, Analytic Philosophy and the Nature of Thought.score: 240.0
    In this paper, I will discuss three arguments which have been advanced by three of the most important recent analytic philosophers: Willard Van Orman Quine, Hilary Putnam, and Michael Dummett. Each argument is central to the views of the philosopher in question, and each leads to sweeping and, to my mind, highly implausible conclusions concerning the content of our thoughts about the world. The philosophers in question claim, of course, that these implications should be accepted, but few others have been (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Laurence Bonjour (2004). C. I. Lewis on the Given and its Interpretation. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 28 (1):195–208.score: 240.0
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Laurence Bonjour (1976). The Coherence Theory of Empirical Knowledge. Philosophical Studies 30 (5):281 - 312.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Laurence Bonjour (2006). Kornblith on Knowledge and Epistemology. Philosophical Studies 127 (2):317 - 335.score: 240.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Laurence Bonjour (1994). Against Naturalized Epistemology. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 19 (1):283-300.score: 240.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Laurence Bonjour (2006). Précis. Philosophical Studies 131 (3):669 - 675.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Laurence Bonjour (2001). Précis of in Defense of Pure Reason. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (3):625–631.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Laurence BonJour (2001). Michael DePaul and William Ramsey (Eds) Rethinking Intuition: The Psychology of Intuition and its Role in Philosophical Inquiry. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (1):151-158.score: 240.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Laurence BonJour (2001). The Indispensability of Internalism. Philosophical Topics 29 (1/2):47-65.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Laurence BonJour (1976). Deeterminism, Libertarianism, and Agent Causation. Southern Journal of Philosophy 14 (2):145-56.score: 240.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Laurence Bonjour (2006). Replies. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 131 (3):673-698.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Laurence Bonjour (1997). Haack on Justification and Experience. Synthese 112 (1):13-23.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Laurence Bonjour (1995). Sosa on Knowledge, Justification, and Aptness. Philosophical Studies 78 (3):207--220.score: 240.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Laurence Bonjour (2001). Replies. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (3):673–698.score: 240.0
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Laurence Bonjour (1989). Reply to Steup. Philosophical Studies 55 (1):57 - 63.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Laurence Bonjour (2006). Review: Replies. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 131 (3):743 - 759.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Laurence Bonjour (2001). Review: Précis of In Defense of Pure Reason. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (3):625 - 631.score: 240.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Laurence Bonjour (1990). Reply to Solomon. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50 (4):779-782.score: 240.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Laurence BonJour (1994). Fumerton on Coherence Theories. Journal of Philosophical Research 19:103-108.score: 240.0
    I argue that while Fumerton’s criticisms of pure coherence theories of truth are both important and extremely cogent, their application both to the main historical views usually identified as coherence theories of truth, viz. the views of the absolute idealists, and to contemporary anti-realism is more problematic. In addition, while Fumerton is again undeniably correct in his objection to pure coherence theories of justification, an impure coherence theory of justification may still be defensible.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Laurence Bonjour (1991). Empirical Knowledge, by Alan Goldman. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (3):707-710.score: 240.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Laurence Bonjour (1976). Rescher's Idealistic Pragmatism. Review of Metaphysics 29 (4):702 - 726.score: 240.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Laurence BonJour (1986). Reply to Christlieb. Southern Journal of Philosophy 24 (3):415-429.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Lawrence A. Bonjour (1973). Sellars on Truth and Picturing. International Philosophical Quarterly 13 (2):243-265.score: 240.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 139