Search results for 'Laurence A. BonJour' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1. Laurence BonJour (2010). In Defense of Pure Reason: A Rationalist Account of a Priori Justification. Cambridge University Press.
    This book is concerned with the alleged capacity of the human mind to arrive at beliefs and knowledge about the world on the basis of pure reason without any dependence on sensory experience. Most recent philosophers reject the view and argue that all substantive knowledge must be sensory in origin. Laurence BonJour provocatively reopens the debate by presenting the most comprehensive exposition and defence of the rationalist view that a priori insight is a genuine basis for knowledge. This (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Laurence BonJour (2011). In Defense of Pure Reason: A Rationalist Account of a Priori Justification. Cambridge University Press.
    This book is concerned with the alleged capacity of the human mind to arrive at beliefs and knowledge about the world on the basis of pure reason without any dependence on sensory experience. Most recent philosophers reject the view and argue that all substantive knowledge must be sensory in origin. Laurence BonJour provocatively reopens the debate by presenting the most comprehensive exposition and defence of the rationalist view that a priori insight is a genuine basis for knowledge. This (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Laurence BonJour (1997). In Defense of Pure Reason: A Rationalist Account of a Priori Justification. Cambridge University Press.
    This book is concerned with the alleged capacity of the human mind to arrive at beliefs and knowledge about the world on the basis of pure reason without any dependence on sensory experience. Most recent philosophers reject the view and argue that all substantive knowledge must be sensory in origin. Laurence BonJour provocatively reopens the debate by presenting the most comprehensive exposition and defence of the rationalist view that a priori insight is a genuine basis for knowledge. This (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Laurence BonJour & Ernest Sosa (2003). Epistemic Justification: Internalism Vs. Externalism, Foundations Vs. Virtues. Wiley-Blackwell.
    Ever since Plato it has been thought that one knows only if one's belief hits the mark of truth and does so with adequate justification. The issues debated by Laurence BonJour and Ernest Sosa concern mostly the nature and conditions of such epistemic justification, and its place in our understanding of human knowledge. Presents central issues pertaining to internalism vs. externalism and foundationalism vs. virtue epistemology in the form of a philosophical debate. Introduces students to fundamental questions within (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  5. Laurence BonJour & Ernest Sosa (2003). Epistemic Justification: Internalism Vs. Externalism, Foundations Vs. Virtues. Wiley-Blackwell.
    Ever since Plato it has been thought that one knows only if one's belief hits the mark of truth and does so with adequate justification. The issues debated by Laurence BonJour and Ernest Sosa concern mostly the nature and conditions of such epistemic justification, and its place in our understanding of human knowledge. Presents central issues pertaining to internalism vs. externalism and foundationalism vs. virtue epistemology in the form of a philosophical debate. Introduces students to fundamental questions within (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  6. Laurence BonJour & Ernest Sosa (2008). Epistemic Justification: Internalism Vs. Externalism, Foundations Vs. Virtues. Wiley-Blackwell.
    Ever since Plato it has been thought that one knows only if one's belief hits the mark of truth and does so with adequate justification. The issues debated by Laurence BonJour and Ernest Sosa concern mostly the nature and conditions of such epistemic justification, and its place in our understanding of human knowledge. Presents central issues pertaining to internalism vs. externalism and foundationalism vs. virtue epistemology in the form of a philosophical debate. Introduces students to fundamental questions within (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  57
    Laurence BonJour (2000). Four Theses Concerning a Priori Justification. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 5:13-20.
    In my book In Defense of Pure Reason, I offer an extended defense of the idea of a priori justification and, more specifically, of a rationalist conception of such justification: one according to which rational insight or intuition provides genuine justification for claims that need not be merely definitional or tautological in character. In the relatively brief space available to me on the present occasion, I want to present and defend, necessarily in rather broad strokes, four of the most central (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Laurence BonJour & Ernest Sosa (2003). Epistemic Justification: Internalism Vs. Externalism, Foundations Vs. Virtues. Blackwell Pub..
    The regress problem and foundationalism -- Externalist accounts of justification -- In search of coherentism -- Back to foundationalism -- The conceptualization of sensory experience and the problem of the external world -- Knowledge and justification -- Does knowledge have foundation -- Skepticism and the internal/external divide -- A virtue epistemology -- Reply to Sosa -- Reply to Bonjour.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   72 citations  
  9. Laurence BonJour (1978). Can Empirical Knowledge Have a Foundation? American Philosophical Quarterly 15 (1):1-14.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   25 citations  
  10.  65
    Laurence BonJour (2013). Is There a Priori Knowledge? In Matthias Steup & John Turri (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. Blackwell 177.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  5
    Can Empirical Knowledge Have A. Foundation & Laurence Bonjour (1978). Current Periodical Articles. American Philosophical Quarterly 15 (1).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  12. Laurence Bonjour (2002). Review: Boghossian, Paul, New Essays on the A Priori. [REVIEW] Mind 111 (443):647-652.
  13.  69
    Laurence BonJour (1991). Is Thought a Symbolic Process? Synthese 89 (3):331-52.
  14. Laurence BonJour & Robert Audi (1995). A Priori. In Audi Robert (ed.), The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. Cambridge University Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  15.  34
    Laurence Bonjour (2000). Evan Fales, a Defense of the Given (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1996). Noûs 34 (3):468–480.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  16.  27
    Laurence Bonjour (1986). A Reconsideration of the Problem of Induction. Philosophical Topics 14 (1):93-124.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  17.  36
    Laurence Bonjour (1995). Toward a Moderate Rationalism. Philosophical Topics 23 (1):47-78.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  13
    Laurence Bonjour (1992). A Rationalist Manifesto. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 22 (sup1):53-88.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Laurence Bonjour (1985). Paul Ziff, Epistemic Analysis: A Coherence Theory of Knowledge. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 5:410-412.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  5
    Laurence Bonjour (2002). New Essays on the A Priori. Mind 111 (443):647-652.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Laurence BonJour (1985). Paul Ziff, Epistemic Analysis: A Coherence Theory of Knowledge Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 5 (9):410-412.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Laurence Bonjour (2003). 40. Toward a Moderate Rationalism. In Steven Luper (ed.), Essential Knowledge: Readings in Epistemology. Longman 402.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Laurence BonJour (1998). In Defense of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press.
    A comprehensive defence of the rationalist view that insight independent of experience is a genuine basis for knowledge.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   146 citations  
  24. Laurence BonJour (1985). The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Harvard University Press.
    1 Knowledge and Justification This book is an investigation of one central problem which arises in the attempt to give a philosophical account of empirical ...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   250 citations  
  25. Laurence BonJour (2010). Epistemology: Classic Problems and Contemporary Responses. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc..
    Introduction -- Part I: The classical problems of epistemology -- Descartes's epistemology -- The concept of knowledge -- The problem of induction -- A priori justification and knowledge -- Immediate experience -- Knowledge of the external world -- Some further epistemological issues : other minds, testimony, and memory -- Part II: Contemporary responses to the cartesian epistemological program -- Introduction to part II -- Foundationalism and coherentism -- Internalism and externalism -- Quine and naturalized epistemology -- Knowledge and skepticism.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   28 citations  
  26. Laurence Bonjour (1980). Externalist Theories of Empirical Knowledge. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 5 (1):53-73.
    One of the many problems that would have t o be solved by a satisfactory theory of empirical knowledge, perhaps the most central is a general structural problem which I shall call the epistemic regress problem: the problem of how to avoid an in- finite and presumably vicious regress of justification in ones account of the justifica- tion of empirical beliefs. Foundationalist theories of empirical knowledge, as we shall see further below, attempt t o avoid the regress by locating a (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   74 citations  
  27. Richard Fumerton, Laurence Bonjour, John L. Pollock & Alvin Plantinga (2000). Resurrecting Old-Fashioned Foundationalism. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    The contributions in this volume make an important effort to resurrect a rather old fashioned form of foundationalism. They defend the position that there are some beliefs that are justified, and are not themselves justified by any further beliefs. This epistemic foundationalism has been the subject of rigorous attack by a wide range of theorists in recent years, leading to the impression that foundationalism is a thing of the past. DePaul argues that it is precisely the volume and virulence of (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   27 citations  
  28. Laurence Bonjour (2009). Epistemology: Classic Problems and Contemporary Responses. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    In Epistemology, Laurence Bonjour introduces the serious philosophy student to the history and concepts of epistemology, while simultaneously challenging them to take an active part in its ongoing debates. The text reflects BonJour's conviction that the place to start any discussion of the theories of knowledge is with the classical problems, beginning with and centered around Descartes.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Laurence Bonjour (2009). Epistemology: Classic Problems and Contemporary Responses. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    In Epistemology, Laurence Bonjour introduces the serious philosophy student to the history and concepts of epistemology, while simultaneously challenging them to take an active part in its ongoing debates. The text reflects BonJour's conviction that the place to start any discussion of the theories of knowledge is with the classical problems, beginning with and centered around Descartes.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Laurence BonJour (1999). Foundationalism and the External World. Philosophical Perspectives 13 (s13):229-249.
    Outlines a tenable version of a traditional foundationalist account\nof empirical justification and its implications for the justification\nof beliefs about physical or material objects. Presupposing the acceptability\nof other beliefs about physical objects; Concept of a basic belief;\nMetabeliefs about one's own occurrent beliefs; Beliefs about sensory\nexperience.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   21 citations  
  31. Alvin Goldman, Ernest Sosa, Hilary Kornblith, John Greco, Jonathan Dancy, Laurence Bonjour, Linda Zagrebsky, Julia Driver, James Montmarquet, Chirstopher Hookway, Ricard Paul, Guy Axtell & Casey Swank (eds.) (2000). Knowledge, Belief, and Character: Readings in Contemporary Virtue Epistemology. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    This is a unique collection of new and recently-published articles which debate the merits of virtue-theoretic approaches to the core epistemological issues of knowledge and justified belief. The readings all contribute to our understanding of the relative importance, for a theory of justified belief, of the reliability of our cognitive faculties and of the individuals responsibility in gathering and weighing evidence. Highlights of the readings include direct exchanges between leading exponents of this approach and their critics.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  32. Laurence BonJour, Epistemological Problems of Perception. Stanford Online Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    The historically most central epistemological issue concerning perception, to which this article will be almost entirely devoted, is whether and how beliefs about physical objects and about the physical world generally can be justified or warranted on the basis of sensory or perceptual experience—where it is internalist justification, roughly having a reason to think that the belief in question is true, that is mainly in question (see the entry justification, epistemic: internalist vs. externalist conceptions of). This issue, commonly referred to (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  33. William P. Alston, Laurence Bonjour, Carl Ginet, Alvin I. Goldman, John Greco, George I. Mavrodes, Philip L. Quinn, Alessandra Tanesini, Nicholas Wolterstorff & Linda Zagzebski (2005). Perspectives on the Philosophy of William P. Alston. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    One of the most influential analytic philosophers of the late twentieth century, William P. Alston is a leading light in epistemology, philosophy of religion, and the philosophy of language. In this volume, twelve leading philosophers critically discuss the central topics of his work in these areas, including perception, epistemic circularity, justification, the problem of religious diversity, and truth.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  34. Jonathan L. Kvanvig, Laurence Bonjour, Earl Conee, Richard Feldman, Richard Foley, Peter Klein, Jonathan Kvanvig, Keith Lehrer, William Lycan, Peter Markie, George Pappas, Alvin Plantinga, Ernest Sosa, Marshall Swain & Bas van Fraassen (1996). Warrant in Contemporary Epistemology: Essays in Honor of Plantinga's Theory of Knowledge. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    In his widely influential two-volume work, Warrant: The Current Debate and Warrant and Proper Function, Alvin Plantinga argued that warrant is that which explains the difference between knowledge and true belief. Plantinga not only developed his own account of warrant but also mapped the terrain of epistemology. Motivated by Plantinga's work, fourteen prominent philosophers have written new essays investigating Plantingian warrant and its contribution to contemporary epistemology. The resulting collection, representing a broad array of views, not only gives readers a (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  35.  76
    Stephen Laurence (2010). A Chomskian Alternative to Convention-Based Semantics. In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Mind. Routledge 269--301.
    In virtue of what do the utterances we make mean what they do? What facts about these signs, about us, and about our environment make it the case that they have the meanings they do? According to a tradition stemming from H.P. Grice through David Lewis and Stephen Schiffer it is in virtue of facts about conventions that we participate in as language users that our utterances mean what they do (see Gr'ice 1957, Lewis 1969, 1983, Schiffer 1972, 1982). This (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  36.  82
    Stephen Laurence (1996). A Chomskian Alternative to Convention-Based Semantics. Mind 105 (418):269-301.
    In virtue of what do the utterances we make mean what they do? What facts about these signs, about us, and about our environment make it the case that they have the meanings they do? According to a tradition stemming from H.P. Grice through David Lewis and Stephen Schiffer it is in virtue of facts about conventions that we participate in as language users that our utterances mean what they do (see Gr'ice 1957, Lewis 1969, 1983, Schiffer 1972, 1982). This (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  37. Stephen N. Laurence (1993). Naturalism and Language: A Study of the Nature of Linguistic Kinds and Mental Representation. Dissertation, Rutgers the State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick
    In this dissertation I argue for a broadly Chomskian account of all natural language linguistic properties, including semantic properties. But the dissertation is as much concerned with methodological issues as with this substantive question. ;In chapter one, I argue that the standard motivation for Naturalistic accounts of language and mind is misguided. Rather such accounts should be motivated by the potential explanatory gains afforded by successful Naturalistic accounts. Accordingly, we should seek accounts that increase the science's evidentiary basis and explain (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  1
    Nikolaj Nottelmann (2012). A Critique of Laurence BonJour's Central Arguments for a Priori Fallibilism. Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 45:89-105.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Stephen Laurence (2003). Is Linguistics a Branch of Psychology? In A. Barbar (ed.), The Epistemology of Language. OUP
  40.  6
    Lawrence BonJour, Jonathan Dancy, Julia Driver, Alvin Goldman, John Greco & Christopher Hookway (2000). Guy Axtell has Taught Philosophy at the University of Nevada, Reno, Since Receiving His Ph. D. In 1991. He has Written Articles on Epistemology, Philosophy of Science, American Pragmatism, and Philosophy of Religion. He is Currently at Work on a Book Entitled Pragmatic Pluralism: Understanding Philosophical Diversity. [REVIEW] In Guy Axtell (ed.), Knowledge, Belief, and Character: Readings in Virtue Epistemology. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  41.  5
    Stephen Laurence (1996). A Chomskian Alternative to Convention-Based. Mind 105:418.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  18
    Ray Laurence (2000). S. T. A. M. Mols: Wooden Furniture in Herculaneum. Form, Technique and Function . Pp. 321, 201 Ills. Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben, 1999. Cased, Hfl. 345. ISBN: 90-5063-317-X. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 50 (01):373-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  12
    Ray Laurence (1999). Roman Ostia Revisited A. G. Zevi, A. Claridge (Edd.): Roman Ostia Revisited: Archaeological and Historical Papers in Memory of Russell Meiggs . Pp. Xix + 307, Ills. London: British School at Rome in Collaboration with the Soprintendenza Archeologica di Ostia, 1996. ISBN: 0-904152-29-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 49 (01):220-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  12
    Ray Laurence (2005). Romans on the Bay of Naples J. H. D'Arms: Romans on the Bay of Naples and Other Essays on Roman Campania . Edited by F. Zevi with a Preface by A. Tchernia. (Pragmateiai: Collana di Studi E Testi Per la Storia Economica, Sociale E Amministrativa Del Mondo Antico 9.). Pp. Viii + 498, Maps, Ills, Pls. Bari: Edipuglia, 2003. Cased, €40. ISBN: 88-7228-355-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 55 (02):619-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  10
    Ray Laurence (2005). A Pompeii Sourcebook A. E. Cooley, M. G. L. Cooley: Pompeii: A Sourcebook . Pp. Xiv + 254, Maps, Ills. London and New York: Routledge, 2004. Paper, £16.99. ISBN: 0-415-26212-7 (0-415-26211-9 Hbk). [REVIEW] The Classical Review 55 (01):271-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  10
    Ray Laurence (2000). R. E. L. B. De Kind: Houses in Herculaneum. A New View on the Town Planning and the Building of Insulae III and IV . Pp. Vi + 332, 27 Plans. Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben, 1988. Cased, Hfl. 145. ISBN: 90-5063-517-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 50 (01):371-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  7
    Ray Laurence (2008). The Insula of the Menander (P.M.) Allison The Insula of the Menander at Pompeii. Volume III: The Finds, a Contextual Study. Pp. Xlvi + 506, Pls. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006. Cased, £195. ISBN: 978-0-19-926312-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 58 (02):593-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  6
    Ray Laurence (2001). THE Longue Durée of the Mediterranean P. Horden, N. Purcell: The Corrupting Sea. A Study of Mediterranean History. Pp. Xiii + 761, 34 Maps. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2000. Paper, £24.99 (Cased, £70). ISBN: 0631-21890-4 (0631-13666-5 Hbk). [REVIEW] The Classical Review 51 (01):99-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  5
    R. Laurence (1996). Review. A villa near Pompeii. Pompei. Vecchi scavi sconosciuti. La villa rinvenuta del marchese Giovanni Imperiali in localita Civita (1907-1908). [REVIEW] The Classical Review 46 (2):353-354.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  1
    Ray Laurence (1996). A Villa Near Pompeii. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 46 (2):353-354.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000