Search results for 'Leo Beem' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  14
    Karin Høst, Daniel Brugman, Louis Tavecchio & Leo Beem (1998). Students' Perception of the Moral Atmosphere in Secondary School and the Relationship Between Moral Competence and Moral Atmosphere. Journal of Moral Education 27 (1):47-70.
    Abstract This study of students? perceptions of the moral atmosphere in secondary schools was mainly inspired by the Just Community theory of Power, Higgins and Kohlberg (1989). The concepts they used in their intervention studies of schools developing into a Just Community were operationalised through a paper?and?pencil instrument for the measurement of students? perception of the moral atmosphere in school. To assess the reliability, validity and the power of the instrument a study was carried out in which 1553 students from (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  2. Werner Leo (1920). Leo, Werner, Diderot Als Kunstphilosoph. Kant-Studien 24 (1).
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  61
    Joop Leo (2008). Modeling Relations. Journal of Philosophical Logic 37 (4):353 - 385.
    In the ordinary way of representing relations, the order of the relata plays a structural role, but in the states themselves such an order often does not seem to be intrinsically present. An alternative way to represent relations makes use of positions for the arguments. This is no problem for the love relation, but for relations like the adjacency relation and cyclic relations, different assignments of objects to the positions can give exactly the same states. This is a puzzling situation. (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  4.  22
    Troy Leo & Kellene Eagen (2008). Professionalism Education: The Medical Student Response. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 51 (4):508-516.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  21
    Jerome H. Skolnick & Richard A. Leo (1992). The Ethics of Deceptive Interrogation. Criminal Justice Ethics 11 (1):3-12.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. John R. Leo & D. Cohen (2003). Broken Brains or Flawed Studies? A Critical Review of ADHD Neuroimaging Research. Journal of Mind and Behavior 24 (1):29-55.
  7. Richard A. Leo (1998). Responses to Emery. Criminal Justice Ethics 17 (1):44-49.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Nikolay Milkov (2004). Leo Tolstois Darlegung des Evangelium und seine theologisch-philosophische Ethik. Perspektiven der Philosophie 30:311-333.
    The paper discusses Leo Tolstoy's philosophy as developed in his works 'A Synoptic Presentation of the Four Gospels' and 'The Gospel in Brief'. Tolstoy considered Christian religion not as a belief but as an ethical doctrine about how to live, so that our life does not lose its meaning when confronted with the death. Jesus' doctrine teaches that we must lead our life following our spirit, not our flesh. This means that we must strive to understand other persons and to (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  28
    Matthew Sharpe (2011). 'In the Court of a Great King': Some Remarks on Leo Strauss' Introduction to the Guide for the Perplexed. Sophia 50 (1):141-158.
    This essay, which will be divided between two SOPHIA editions, proposes to test the consensus in Maimonidean scholarship on the alleged intellectualism of Leo Strauss’ Maimonides by making a close interpretive study of Strauss’ 1963 essay ‘How to Begin to Study the Guide for the Perplexed’. While the importance of this essay, which is Strauss’ last extended piece on the Guide, is established in Maimonidean scholarship, its recognised esotericism has been matched by a dearth of detailed studies of the piece. (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  18
    Laurence Lampert (1996). Leo Strauss and Nietzsche. University of Chicago Press.
    The influential political philosopher Leo Strauss has been credited by conservatives with the recovery of the great tradition of political philosophy stretching back to Plato. Among Strauss's most enduring legacies is a strongly negative assessment of Nietzsche as the modern philosopher most at odds with that tradition and most responsible for the sins of twentieth-century culture--relativism, godlessness, nihilism, and the breakdown of family values. In fact, this apparent denunciation has become so closely associated with Strauss that it (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11.  5
    José Daniel Parra Quintero (2010). Between Carl Schmitt and Thomas Hobbes: A Study of Modern Liberalism From Leo Strauss' Thought. [Spanish]. Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 12:48-86.
    Normal 0 21 false false false ES-CO X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Tabla normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;} This essay presents a reading of modern liberalism from Leo Strauss´thought. Starting with his analysis of Carl Schmitt’s Concept of the Political and its critique of liberal “neutralization and depolitization”, Strauss posits an affirmation of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Leo Apostel, F. Vandamme, R. Pinxten, Fernand J. Vandamme & Ingrid Van Dorren (1989). The Philosophy of Leo Apostel.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Yvanka B. Raynova & Susanne Moser (eds.) (2005). Das integrale und das gebrochene Ganze: Zum 100. Geburtstag von Leo Gabriel. Peter Lang.
    Dieser Band präsentiert, gemeinsam mit anderen Beiträgen, die anlässlich der Gedenkfeier zum 100. Geburtstag von Leo Gabriel gehaltenen Vorträge am Institut für Philosophie der Universität Wien. Lange vor den gegenwärtigen Bestrebungen zu einer europäischen Integration hat Gabriel die Entwicklung der geistigen Gestalten Europas und das Verhältnis von Einheit und Vielheit integrativ zu erfassen versucht. Die Autorinnen und Autoren erörtern die Quellen sowie die Aktualität des integralen Denkens und vergleichen es mit phänomenologisch-existentialistischen, hermeneutischen, strukturalistischen und postmodernen Theorien. Überdies beinhaltet der Band (...)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  3
    Georges Tamer (2001). Islamische Philosophie Und Die Krise der Moderne: Das Verhältnis von Leo Strauss Zu Alfarabi, Avicenna Und Averroes. Brill.
    This monograph deals with Leo Strauss's reception of the medieval Islamic Philosophy in the context of his reaction towards the problems of modernity. Using reconstructed material, the book introduces a different approach to Strauss developing a new perspective on the Islamic political philosophy.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Anne Norton (2004). Leo Strauss and the Politics of American Empire. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  16.  68
    Mark Bevir (2007). Esotericism and Modernity: An Encounter with Leo Strauss. Journal of the Philosophy of History 1 (2):201-218.
    Strauss championed a philosophy of history according to which philosophers characteristically hide their actual beliefs when writing about ethics and politics. This paper begins by suggesting that an esoteric philosophy of history encourages a set of specific biases when writing histories of philosophy. Proponents of esotericism are liable to be far too ready to conclude that philosophers intended to hide their beliefs; they are likely to be insufficiently attuned to the varied contexts in which philosophers write; and they are likely (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. David Novak (1996). Leo Strauss and Judaism Jerusalem and Athens Critically Revisited.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  18.  6
    Steven B. Smith (1997). "Destruktion" or Recovery?: Leo Strauss's Critique of Heidegger. Review of Metaphysics 51 (2):345 - 377.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  3
    Phillip M. Thompson (2004). Thomas Merton and Leo Szilard: The Parallel Paths of a Monk and a Nuclear Physicist. Zygon 39 (4):979-986.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. R. Beiner (1990). Arendt, Hannah and Strauss, Leo the Uncommenced Dialog. Political Theory 18 (2):238-254.
  21. Cropsey, Joseph & [From Old Catalog] (1964). Ancients and Moderns; Essays on the Tradition of Political Philosophy in Honor of Leo Strauss. New York, Basic Books.
  22. Peter Emberley & Barry Cooper (eds.) (1993). Faith and Political Philosophy: The Correspondence Between Leo Strauss and Eric Voegelin, 1934-1964. Penn State University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Gustav Glogau (1998). Leo Graf Tolstoi Ein Russischer Reformator : Ein Beitrag Zur Religionsphilosophie.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  5
    Leo Strauss (2013). Leo Strauss on Maimonides: The Complete Writings. The University of Chicago Press.
    Leo Strauss's essays and lectures on Maimonides -- Point of departure: why study medieval thinkers? -- How to study medieval philosophy (1944) -- On Maimonides -- Spinoza's critique of Maimonides (1930) -- Cohen and Maimonides (1931) -- The philosophic foundation of the law: Maimonides' doctrine of prophecy and its sources.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  9
    Leo Strauss (2012). Leo Strauss on Moses Mendelssohn. The University of Chicago Press.
    Leo Strauss's introductions to ten writings of Moses Mendelssohn -- Preliminary remark by Alexander Altmann -- Introduction to Pope a metaphysician! -- Introduction to "Epistle to Mr. Lessing in Leipzig" -- Introduction to Commentary on Moses Maimonides' "Logical terms" -- Introduction to Treatise on evidence in metaphysical sciences -- Introduction to Phädon -- Introduction to Treatise on the incorporeality of the human soul -- Introduction to "On a handwritten essay of Mr. de Luc's" -- Introduction to The soul -- Introduction (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  6
    Leo Strauss (2001). Leo Strauss on Plato's Symposium. University of Chicago Press.
    The first major piece of unpublished work by Leo Strauss to appear in more than thirty years, "Leo Strauss On Plato's "Symposium"" offers the public the unprecedented experience of encountering this renowned scholar as his students did.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  1
    Leo Strauss (2002). Leo Strauss: The Early Writings (1921-1932). State University of New York Press.
    Presents the early published writings of the distinguished political philosopher Leo Strauss, available here for the first time in English. “Zank places at the reader’s disposal the young Strauss’s passionate advocacy of political Zionism and his early confrontations with Spinoza, consideration of whom helped lead Strauss to formulate his teaching on ‘the quarrel between the ancients and the moderns.’” — National Review.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  96
    David Leech & Aku Visala (2013). The Cognitive Science of Religion and Theism Again: A Reply to Leo Näreaho. Religious Studies 50 (1):1-10.
    In this article we respond to Leo Nreaho construes what he takes to be our commitment to a thesis regarding the of the new bio-psychological theories of religion (in the case at hand, CSR). We suggest that Näreaho has misconstrued us on what the neutrality thesis actually is and what follows from it. We conclude that his own proposal for compatibility is not an alternative to ours but rather one permissible metaphysical reading of CSR among others.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. S. B. Smith (2013). Leo Strauss's Discovery of the Theologico-Political Problem. European Journal of Political Theory 12 (4):388-408.
    Leo Strauss once called the theologico-political problem ‘the theme of my investigations’ from the 1920s on. What justified this remark is by no means obvious. This article examines the origins of Strauss’s concern with political theology in his earliest writings on Zionism and Jewish thought during the Weimar period. Here we see Strauss, at the outset of his career as a young Zionist committed to a programme of political atheism, slowly begin to develop the idea that the conflict between unbelief (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  4
    Grant Havers (forthcoming). The Politics of Paradox: Leo Strauss’s Biblical Debt to Spinoza. Sophia:1-19.
    The political philosopher Leo Strauss is famous for contending that any synthesis of reason and revelation is impossible, since they are irreconcilable antagonists. Yet he is also famous for praising the secular regime of liberal democracy as the best regime for all human beings, even though he is well aware that modern philosophers such as Spinoza thought this regime must make use of biblical morality to promote good citizenship. Is democracy, then, both religious and secular? Strauss thought that (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. John P. McCormick (1994). Fear, Technology, and the State: Carl Schmitt, Leo Strauss, and the Revival of Hobbes in Weimar and National Socialist Germany. Political Theory 22 (4):619-652.
    It is striking that one of the most consequential representatives of [the] abstract scientific orientation of the seventeenth century [Thomas Hobbes] became so personalistic. This is because as a juristic thinker he wanted to grasp the reality of societal life just as much as he, as a philosopher and a natural scientist, wanted to grasp the reality of nature.... [J]uristic thought in those days had not yet become so overpowered by the natural sciences that he, in the intensity of his (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  14
    Leora Faye Batnitzky (2006). Leo Strauss and Emmanuel Levinas: Philosophy and the Politics of Revelation. Cambridge University Press.
    Leo Strauss and Emmanuel Levinas, two twentieth-century Jewish philosophers and two extremely provocative thinkers whose reputations have grown considerably over the last twenty years, are rarely studied together. This is due to the disparate interests of many of their intellectual heirs. Strauss has influenced political theorists and policy makers on the right while Levinas has been championed in the humanities by different cadres associated with postmodernist thought. In Leo Strauss and Emmanuel Levinas: Philosophy and the Politics of Revelation, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  33.  23
    Heinrich Meier (2006). Leo Strauss and the Theological-Political Problem. Cambridge University Press.
    By one of the most prominent interpreters of Leo Strauss's thought, this book is the first to examine the theme that Strauss considered to be key to his entire intellectual enterprise. The theologico-political problem refers to the confrontation between the theological and political alternative to philosophy as a way of life. Heinrich Meier clarifies the distinction between political theology and political philosophy and sheds new light on the unifying center of Strauss' philosophical work. The culmination of his work on the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  34.  7
    Samuel Moyn (2007). From Experience to Law: Leo Strauss and the Weimar Crisis of the Philosophy of Religion. History of European Ideas 33 (2):174-194.
    This paper is a study of the origins of Leo Strauss's thought, arguing that its early development must be understood in the context of the philosophy of religion of late Wilhelmine and Weimar Germany. More specifically, it shows that Strauss's early works were written against the background of Kantian philosophy and post-Kantian accounts of religious experience, and that his turn towards medieval law as a topic and ideal was precipitated by the critique of those accounts by radical Protestant theologians writing (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  35. Ulf Schmidt (2004). Justice at Nuremberg: Leo Alexander and the Nazi Doctors' Trial. Palgrave Macmillan.
    Justice at Nuremberg traces the history of the Nuremberg Doctors' Trial held in 1946-47, as seen through the eyes of the Austrian bliogemigrbliogé psychiatrist Leo Alexander. His investigations helped the United States to prosecute twenty German doctors and three administrators for war crimes and crimes against humanity. The legacy of Nuremberg was profound. In the Nuremberg code--a landmark in the history of modern medical ethics--the judges laid down, for the first time, international guidelines for permissible experiments on humans. One (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  36.  40
    Ryszard Mordarski (2006). Ostatni ezoterysta. Uwagi Leo Straussa o ezoterycznym charakterze twórczości Gottholda Ephraima Lessinga. Filo-Sofija 6 (1(6)):135-152.
    Author: Mordarski Ryszard Title: THE LAST ESOTERIC THINKER. LEO STRAUSS’S REMARKS ON THE ESOTERIC CHARACTER OF GOTTHOLD EPHRAIM LESSING’S WORKS (Ostatni ezoterysta. Uwagi Lea Straussa o ezoterycznym charakterze twórczości Gottholda Ephraima Lessinga) Source: Filo-Sofija year: 2006, vol:.6, number: 2006/1, pages: 135-152 Keywords: LEO STRAUSS, LESSING, ESOTERIC CHARACTER, MAIMONIDES Discipline: PHILOSOPHY Language: POLISH Document type: ARTICLE Publication order reference (Primary author’s office address): E-mail: www:According to Leo Strauss, the great thinkers of the political philosophy from Plato, through al-Farabi and Maimonides, to (...)
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  6
    Matthew Sharpe (2014). Publicizing the Essentially Private: Leo Strauss’s Platonic Aristophanes. Symposium: The Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy 18 (2):3-32.
    Political philosopher Leo Strauss’s extensive engagements with Aristophanes’s comedies represent a remarkable perspective in debates concerning the political and wider meaning of Aristophanes’s plays. Yet they have attracted nearly no critical response. This paper argues that for Strauss, Aristophanes was a very serious, philosophically-minded author who wrote esoterically, using the comic form to convey his conception of man, and his answer to the Socraticquestion of the best form of life. Part I addresses Strauss’s central reading of the Clouds, which positions (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  15
    Thomas L. Pangle (2006). Leo Strauss: An Introduction to His Thought and Intellectual Legacy. Johns Hopkins University Press.
    Leo Strauss's controversial writings have long exercised a profound subterranean cultural influence. Now their impact is emerging into broad daylight, where they have been met with a flurry of poorly informed, often wildly speculative, and sometimes rather paranoid pronouncements. This book, written as a corrective, is the first accurate, non-polemical, comprehensive guide to Strauss's mature political philosophy and its intellectual influence. Thomas L. Pangle opens a pathway into Strauss's major works with one question: How does Strauss's philosophic thinking contribute to (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  39.  48
    William Altman (2007). Exotericism After Lessing: The Enduring Influence of F. H. Jacobi on Leo Strauss. Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 15 (1):59-83.
    This study shows that despite the fact that Leo Strauss published little about Jacobi, the misunderstood thinker about whom he wrote his doctoral dissertation exercised a crucial influence on what is often thought to be Strauss's most enduring achievement: his rediscovery of exotericism. A consideration of several of Strauss's writings that do mention Jacobi but remained unpublished at the time of his death—in particular his studies on Moses Mendelssohn, who was Jacobi's principal target in the Pantheismusstreit —reveal that Strauss considered (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  42
    William Altman (2009). The Alpine Limits of Jewish Thought: Leo Strauss, National Socialism, and Judentum Ohne Gott. Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 17 (1):1-46.
    Writing in 1935 as "Hugo Fiala," Karl Löwith not only connected Martin Heidegger and Carl Schmitt to an apparently contentless "decisionism" but drew attention to the fact that his correspondent Leo Strauss had attacked Schmitt—like Heidegger an open Nazi since 1933— from the Right in 1932. In opposition to the views of Peter Eli Gordon, Heidegger's bellicose stance at the Davos Hochschule of 1929 is presented as "political" in Schmitt's sense of the term while Strauss's embrace of Heidegger, never regretted, (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  55
    William H. F. Altman (2007). Exotericism After Lessing: The Enduring Influence of F. H. Jacobi on Leo Strauss. Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 15 (1):59-83.
    This study shows that despite the fact that Leo Strauss published little about Jacobi, the misunderstood thinker about whom he wrote his doctoral dissertation exercised a crucial influence on what is often thought to be Strauss's most enduring achievement: his rediscovery of exotericism. A consideration of several of Strauss's writings that do mention Jacobi but remained unpublished at the time of his death—in particular his studies on Moses Mendelssohn, who was Jacobi's principal target in the Pantheismusstreit—reveal that Strauss considered Jacobi (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  14
    Douglas Kries (2013). Leo Strauss on Why Aristotle Is the Founder of Political Science but Not of Political Philosophy. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 87:261-270.
    This paper explores Leo Strauss’s puzzling claim, published in an essay on Aristotle’s Politics, that Aristotle was the founder of political science even though Socrates was the founder of political philosophy. In order to explain Strauss’s claim, the paper analyzes the distinction between political science and political philosophy as Strauss understood the matter. This analysis shows that Strauss offers us a very “Socratic” view of Aristotle’s Politics; that is, Aristotle’s political science shares the concern of Socrates for initiating the philosophical (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  14
    Ömür Birler (2008). Political (or) Philosophy? A Critical Account of Leo Strauss's Response to the Crisis of Modernity. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:37-43.
    Leo Strauss has generally been regarded as an historian of ideas, albeit a very unusual one. He wrote many very momentous commentaries on the major figures in the history of political thought; yet Strauss’ main intellectual quest was to take himself back in the history, to classical antiquity and to the fountainhead of political philosophy, Plato. In this paper, however, I am mostly interested in the philosophical nature of Strauss’s basic dissatisfaction with modernity and with the adequacy of his criticisms. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  40
    Jacob Schiff (2010). From Anti-Liberal to Untimely Liberal: Leo Strauss' Two Critiques of Liberalism. Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (2):157-181.
    Leo Strauss’ ubiquitous presence in recent US foreign policy debates demands a thorough analysis of his critique of liberalism. I identify and explain a previously unnoticed transformation in that critique. Strauss’ Weimar critique of liberalism was philosophical and political; like Carl Schmitt, he sought philosophical grounds to replace liberalism with an authoritarian political system. However, post-emigration Strauss abandoned this political agenda, exclusively pursuing a philosophical critique that exposed modern liberalism’s purported weaknesses in order to strengthen its core. I accentuate this (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  16
    Leo Sweeney (1975). "Aristotle's Theology: A Commentary of Book Lambda of the Metaphysics," by Leo Elders, S.V.D. Modern Schoolman 52 (2):211-214.
  46.  9
    John Gunnell (2004). Reading Max Weber Leo Strauss and Eric Voegelin. European Journal of Political Theory 3 (2):151-166.
    Leo Strauss»s Natural Right and History and Eric Voegelin»s New Science of Politics represented both a continuation of the Weimar conversation and a projection into the American context of the issues that defined that conversation. They each chose Max Weber as the pivotal figure in their animadversions regarding historicism, relativism, and the condition of social science, but, as in the case of Weber himself, the underlying issue, which animated the emigres across the ideological spectrum, was the relationship between theory and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  8
    N. Robertson (1998). The Closing Of The Early Modern Mind: Leo Strauss And Early Modern Political Thought. Animus 3:211-226.
    This paper argues that underlying Leo Strauss's interpretation of Early Modern political thought as premised on a break with nature as a moral standard is a contemporary moral and political phenomenology which inhibits the understanding of that period in its own terms.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  8
    Stanley Hauerwas (1995). Remembering Martin Luther King Jr. Remembering: A Response to Christopher Beem. Journal of Religious Ethics 23 (1):135-148.
    The question of the relation of my work to that of Martin Luther King Jr. cannot be resolved with the theoretical tools Christopher Beem brings to the task. Stanley Fish has written that "those who detach King's words from the history that produced them erase the fact of that history from the slate, and they do so, paradoxically, in order to prevent that history from being truly and deeply altered." The vice of liberalism is not selfishness so much as (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  49.  5
    Carlos Marzán Trujillo & Chaxiraxi María Escuela Cruz (2013). Leo Lowenthal y la destrucción del individuo. Notas sobre una traducción. Laguna 32:103-118.
    La obra de Leo Löwental, destacado representante de la Teoría crítica, se ha ocupado de la destrucción del individuo en el mundo contemporáneo. La «herencia de Calibán» que aquí traducimos es un ejemplo de ese análisis.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  7
    Grant Havers (2005). Politycal Philosophy Nad the Love of Wisdom: Leo Strauss and the \"New\" Conservatism. Dialogue and Universalism 15 (1-2):121-132.
    The “new” conservatism which dominates American politics is fundamentally different from both liberalism and traditional conservatism. For the neoconservatives, who are influenced by the political philosopher Leo Strauss, fault liberalism for undermining the authority of absolute morality and natural inequality in favor of relativism and openness. Yet they also repudiate the old European conservatism for failing to defy the currents of modernity with anything more than an appeal to tradition. In fine, neoconservatism rejects, despite its own modern origins, modernity itself.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000