Search results for 'Leo Kuper' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Leo Kuper (1964). The Problem of Violence in South Africa. Inquiry 7 (1-4):295 – 303.score: 240.0
    In an actual conflict situation many different factors can contribute to the view that a recourse to violence is inescapable and even desirable. Among them are natural responses to repression, encouragement from interested parties outside, and the oversimplification of the situation as it is described in the militant ideologies of the organizers of the conflict and in the moral evaluations of those who take sides in it. The reality is far more complex and the situation far less determined than it (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Quentin Skinner, Partha Dasgupta, Raymond Geuss, Melissa Lane, Peter Laslett, Onora O'Neill, W. G. Runciman & Andrew Kuper (2002). Political Philosophy: The View From Cambridge. Journal of Political Philosophy 10 (1):1–19.score: 30.0
    This article reports on a conversation convened by Quentin Skinner at the invitation of the Editors of The Journal of Political Philosophy and held in Cambridge on 13 February 2001.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Andrew Kuper (2002). More Than Charity: Cosmopolitan Alternatives to the "Singer Solution". Ethics and International Affairs 16 (1):107–128.score: 30.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Andrew Kuper (2000). Rawlsian Global Justice: Beyond the Law of Peoples to a Cosmopolitan Law of Persons. Political Theory 28 (5):640-674.score: 30.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Joop Leo (2008). Modeling Relations. Journal of Philosophical Logic 37 (4):353 - 385.score: 30.0
    In the ordinary way of representing relations, the order of the relata plays a structural role, but in the states themselves such an order often does not seem to be intrinsically present. An alternative way to represent relations makes use of positions for the arguments. This is no problem for the love relation, but for relations like the adjacency relation and cyclic relations, different assignments of objects to the positions can give exactly the same states. This is a puzzling situation. (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Andrew Kuper (2002). Facts, Theories, and Hard Choices: Reply to Peter Singer. Ethics and International Affairs 16 (1):125–126.score: 30.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Troy Leo & Kellene Eagen (2008). Professionalism Education: The Medical Student Response. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 51 (4):508-516.score: 30.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Jerome H. Skolnick & Richard A. Leo (1992). The Ethics of Deceptive Interrogation. Criminal Justice Ethics 11 (1):3-12.score: 30.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. A. Kuper (2007). The Intersubjective and the Intrasubjective in the Patient Physician Dyad: Implications for Medical Humanities Education. Medical Humanities 33 (2):75-80.score: 30.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. L. E. Fleischhacker & J. Kuper (1982). Deontic Logic and the Axoim of Necessity: The Consequences of a Misinterpretation. [REVIEW] Journal of Value Inquiry 16 (1):67-74.score: 30.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Andrew Kuper, D E B at E.score: 30.0
    The main thrust of my argument was that ad hoc su gge s ti ons of ch a ri ty cannot replace a systematic and theoreti c a lly inform ed approach to poverty rel i ef . Ch a ri t a ble don a ti on som eti m e s h elps—and som etimes harm s — but is no general solution to global poverty, and can be po s i tively dangerous wh en pre s en (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Charles Goethe Kuper & Asher Peres (eds.) (1971). Relativity and Gravitation. New York,Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.score: 30.0
  13. Andrew Kuper (2002). Global Poverty Relief--More Than Charity: Cosmopolitan Alternatives to the Singer Solution. Ethics and International Affairs 16 (1):107-120.score: 30.0
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. John R. Leo & D. Cohen (2003). Broken Brains or Flawed Studies? A Critical Review of ADHD Neuroimaging Research. Journal of Mind and Behavior 24 (1):29-55.score: 30.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Richard A. Leo (1998). Responses to Emery. Criminal Justice Ethics 17 (1):44-49.score: 30.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Nikolay Milkov (2004). Leo Tolstois Darlegung des Evangelium Und Seine Theologisch-Philosophische Ethik. Perspektiven der Philosophie 30:311-333.score: 18.0
    The paper discusses Leo Tolstoy's philosophy as developed in his works 'A Synoptic Presentation of the Four Gospels' and 'The Gospel in Brief'. Tolstoy considered Christian religion not as a belief but as an ethical doctrine about how to live, so that our life does not lose its meaning when confronted with the death. Jesus' doctrine teaches that we must lead our life following our spirit, not our flesh. This means that we must strive to understand other persons and to (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Matthew Sharpe (2011). 'In the Court of a Great King': Some Remarks on Leo Strauss' Introduction to the Guide for the Perplexed. Sophia 50 (1):141-158.score: 18.0
    This essay, which will be divided between two SOPHIA editions, proposes to test the consensus in Maimonidean scholarship on the alleged intellectualism of Leo Strauss’ Maimonides by making a close interpretive study of Strauss’ 1963 essay ‘How to Begin to Study the Guide for the Perplexed’. While the importance of this essay, which is Strauss’ last extended piece on the Guide, is established in Maimonidean scholarship, its recognised esotericism has been matched by a dearth of detailed studies of the piece. (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. José Daniel Parra Quintero (2010). Between Carl Schmitt and Thomas Hobbes: A Study of Modern Liberalism From Leo Strauss' Thought. [Spanish]. Eidos 12:48-86.score: 18.0
    Normal 0 21 false false false ES-CO X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Tabla normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;} This essay presents a reading of modern liberalism from Leo Strauss´thought. Starting with his analysis of Carl Schmitt’s Concept of the Political and its critique of liberal “neutralization and depolitization”, Strauss posits an affirmation of the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Mark Bevir (2007). Esotericism and Modernity: An Encounter with Leo Strauss. Journal of the Philosophy of History 1 (2):201-218.score: 15.0
    Strauss championed a philosophy of history according to which philosophers characteristically hide their actual beliefs when writing about ethics and politics. This paper begins by suggesting that an esoteric philosophy of history encourages a set of specific biases when writing histories of philosophy. Proponents of esotericism are liable to be far too ready to conclude that philosophers intended to hide their beliefs; they are likely to be insufficiently attuned to the varied contexts in which philosophers write; and they are likely (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Leo Strauss (2012). Leo Strauss on Moses Mendelssohn. The University of Chicago Press.score: 15.0
    Leo Strauss's introductions to ten writings of Moses Mendelssohn -- Preliminary remark by Alexander Altmann -- Introduction to Pope a metaphysician! -- Introduction to "Epistle to Mr. Lessing in Leipzig" -- Introduction to Commentary on Moses Maimonides' "Logical terms" -- Introduction to Treatise on evidence in metaphysical sciences -- Introduction to Phädon -- Introduction to Treatise on the incorporeality of the human soul -- Introduction to "On a handwritten essay of Mr. de Luc's" -- Introduction to The soul -- Introduction (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Leo Strauss (2013). Leo Strauss on Maimonides: The Complete Writings. The University of Chicago Press.score: 15.0
    Leo Strauss's essays and lectures on Maimonides -- Point of departure: why study medieval thinkers? -- How to study medieval philosophy (1944) -- On Maimonides -- Spinoza's critique of Maimonides (1930) -- Cohen and Maimonides (1931) -- The philosophic foundation of the law: Maimonides' doctrine of prophecy and its sources.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Leo Strauss (2001). Leo Strauss on Plato's Symposium. University of Chicago Press.score: 15.0
    The first major piece of unpublished work by Leo Strauss to appear in more than thirty years, "Leo Strauss On Plato's "Symposium"" offers the public the unprecedented experience of encountering this renowned scholar as his students did.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. R. Beiner (1990). Arendt, Hannah and Strauss, Leo the Uncommenced Dialog. Political Theory 18 (2):238-254.score: 15.0
  24. Cropsey, Joseph & [From Old Catalog] (1964). Ancients and Moderns; Essays on the Tradition of Political Philosophy in Honor of Leo Strauss. New York, Basic Books.score: 15.0
  25. Leo Strauss (2002). Leo Strauss: The Early Writings (1921-1932). State University of New York Press.score: 15.0
    Presents the early published writings of the distinguished political philosopher Leo Strauss, available here for the first time in English. “Zank places at the reader’s disposal the young Strauss’s passionate advocacy of political Zionism and his early confrontations with Spinoza, consideration of whom helped lead Strauss to formulate his teaching on ‘the quarrel between the ancients and the moderns.’” — National Review.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. John P. McCormick (1994). Fear, Technology, and the State: Carl Schmitt, Leo Strauss, and the Revival of Hobbes in Weimar and National Socialist Germany. Political Theory 22 (4):619-652.score: 12.0
    It is striking that one of the most consequential representatives of [the] abstract scientific orientation of the seventeenth century [Thomas Hobbes] became so personalistic. This is because as a juristic thinker he wanted to grasp the reality of societal life just as much as he, as a philosopher and a natural scientist, wanted to grasp the reality of nature.... [J]uristic thought in those days had not yet become so overpowered by the natural sciences that he, in the intensity of his (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. William H. F. Altman (2007). Exotericism After Lessing: The Enduring Influence of F. H. Jacobi on Leo Strauss. Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 15 (1):59-83.score: 12.0
    This study shows that despite the fact that Leo Strauss published little about Jacobi, the misunderstood thinker about whom he wrote his doctoral dissertation exercised a crucial influence on what is often thought to be Strauss's most enduring achievement: his rediscovery of exotericism. A consideration of several of Strauss's writings that do mention Jacobi but remained unpublished at the time of his death—in particular his studies on Moses Mendelssohn, who was Jacobi's principal target in the Pantheismusstreit—reveal (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Jacob Schiff (2010). From Anti-Liberal to Untimely Liberal: Leo Strauss' Two Critiques of Liberalism. Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (2):157-181.score: 12.0
    Leo Strauss’ ubiquitous presence in recent US foreign policy debates demands a thorough analysis of his critique of liberalism. I identify and explain a previously unnoticed transformation in that critique. Strauss’ Weimar critique of liberalism was philosophical and political; like Carl Schmitt, he sought philosophical grounds to replace liberalism with an authoritarian political system. However, post-emigration Strauss abandoned this political agenda, exclusively pursuing a philosophical critique that exposed modern liberalism’s purported weaknesses in order to strengthen its core. I accentuate this (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Ryszard Mordarski (2006). Ostatni ezoterysta. Uwagi Leo Straussa o ezoterycznym charakterze twórczości Gottholda Ephraima Lessinga. Filo-Sofija 6 (1(6)):135-152.score: 12.0
    Author: Mordarski Ryszard Title: THE LAST ESOTERIC THINKER. LEO STRAUSS’S REMARKS ON THE ESOTERIC CHARACTER OF GOTTHOLD EPHRAIM LESSING’S WORKS (Ostatni ezoterysta. Uwagi Lea Straussa o ezoterycznym charakterze twórczości Gottholda Ephraima Lessinga) Source: Filo-Sofija year: 2006, vol:.6, number: 2006/1, pages: 135-152 Keywords: LEO STRAUSS, LESSING, ESOTERIC CHARACTER, MAIMONIDES Discipline: PHILOSOPHY Language: POLISH Document type: ARTICLE Publication order reference (Primary author’s office address): E-mail: www:According to Leo Strauss, the great thinkers of the political philosophy from Plato, through al-Farabi and Maimonides, to (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Heinrich Meier (2006). Leo Strauss and the Theological-Political Problem. Cambridge University Press.score: 12.0
    By one of the most prominent interpreters of Leo Strauss's thought, this book is the first to examine the theme that Strauss considered to be key to his entire intellectual enterprise. The theologico-political problem refers to the confrontation between the theological and political alternative to philosophy as a way of life. Heinrich Meier clarifies the distinction between political theology and political philosophy and sheds new light on the unifying center of Strauss' philosophical work. The culmination of his work on the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Laurence Lampert (1996). Leo Strauss and Nietzsche. University of Chicago Press.score: 12.0
    The influential political philosopher Leo Strauss has been credited by conservatives with the recovery of the great tradition of political philosophy stretching back to Plato. Among Strauss's most enduring legacies is a strongly negative assessment of Nietzsche as the modern philosopher most at odds with that tradition and most responsible for the sins of twentieth-century culture--relativism, godlessness, nihilism, and the breakdown of family values. In fact, this apparent denunciation has become so closely associated with Strauss that it is often seen (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Catherine H. Zuckert (2006). The Truth About Leo Strauss: Political Philosophy and American Democracy. University of Chicago Press.score: 12.0
    Is Leo Strauss truly an intellectual forebear of neoconservatism and a powerful force in shaping Bush administration foreign policy? The Truth about Leo Strauss puts this question to rest, revealing for the first time how the popular media came to perpetuate such an oversimplified view of such a complex and wide-ranging philosopher. More important, it corrects our perception of Strauss, providing the best general introduction available to the political thought of this misunderstood figure. Catherine and Michael Zuckert—both former students of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Nasser Behnegar (2003). Leo Strauss, Max Weber, and the Scientific Study of Politics. University of Chicago Press.score: 12.0
    Can politics be studied scientifically, and if so, how? Assuming it is impossible to justify values by human reason alone, social science has come to consider an unreflective relativism the only viable basis, not only for its own operations, but for liberal societies more generally. Although the experience of the sixties has made social scientists more sensitive to the importance of values, it has not led to a fundamental reexamination of value relativism, which remains the basis of contemporary social science. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Leora Faye Batnitzky (2006). Leo Strauss and Emmanuel Levinas: Philosophy and the Politics of Revelation. Cambridge University Press.score: 12.0
    Leo Strauss and Emmanuel Levinas, two twentieth-century Jewish philosophers and two extremely provocative thinkers whose reputations have grown considerably over the last twenty years, are rarely studied together. This is due to the disparate interests of many of their intellectual heirs. Strauss has influenced political theorists and policy makers on the right while Levinas has been championed in the humanities by different cadres associated with postmodernist thought. In Leo Strauss and Emmanuel Levinas: Philosophy and the Politics of Revelation, Leora Batnitzky (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Thomas L. Pangle (2006). Leo Strauss: An Introduction to His Thought and Intellectual Legacy. Johns Hopkins University Press.score: 12.0
    Leo Strauss's controversial writings have long exercised a profound subterranean cultural influence. Now their impact is emerging into broad daylight, where they have been met with a flurry of poorly informed, often wildly speculative, and sometimes rather paranoid pronouncements. This book, written as a corrective, is the first accurate, non-polemical, comprehensive guide to Strauss's mature political philosophy and its intellectual influence. Thomas L. Pangle opens a pathway into Strauss's major works with one question: How does Strauss's philosophic thinking contribute to (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Paul O'Mahoney (2011). Jerusalem in Athens: On the Biblical Epigraphs to Leo Strauss's Natural Right and History. Heythrop Journal 53 (3):418-431.score: 12.0
    The Old Testament epigraphs used by Leo Strauss for his study Natural Right and History tend invariably to vex his readers. In the book itself and in other of his writings, Strauss explicitly states that the Old Testament tradition does not know ‘nature’ in the philosophical sense, and hence the concept of ‘natural right’ is unknown or alien to that tradition. Another, more obvious problem they present has been seemingly universally passed over by commentators: neither epigraph tells the reader anything (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. S. B. Smith (2013). Leo Strauss's Discovery of the Theologico-Political Problem. European Journal of Political Theory 12 (4):388-408.score: 12.0
    Leo Strauss once called the theologico-political problem ‘the theme of my investigations’ from the 1920s on. What justified this remark is by no means obvious. This article examines the origins of Strauss’s concern with political theology in his earliest writings on Zionism and Jewish thought during the Weimar period. Here we see Strauss, at the outset of his career as a young Zionist committed to a programme of political atheism, slowly begin to develop the idea that the conflict between unbelief (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Leo Sweeney (1975). "Aristotle's Theology: A Commentary of Book Lambda of the Metaphysics," by Leo Elders, S.V.D. The Modern Schoolman 52 (2):211-214.score: 12.0
  39. Daniel Chernilo (2010). On the Relationships Between Social Theory and Natural Law: Lessons From Karl Löwith and Leo Strauss. History of the Human Sciences 23 (5):91-112.score: 12.0
    This article offers a combined reading of Karl Löwith’s and Leo Strauss’s critique of social theory from the point of view of the natural law tradition broadly understood. Within the context of a growing interest in revisiting social theory’s debt to natural law, the piece seeks to unfold the connections between the two traditions without searching to restore any kind of natural law. Rather, it looks at their relationships as one of Aufhebung — the suspension and carrying forward — of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. David Leech & Aku Visala (2013). The Cognitive Science of Religion and Theism Again: A Reply to Leo Näreaho. Religious Studies 50 (1):1-10.score: 12.0
    In this article we respond to Leo Nreaho construes what he takes to be our commitment to a thesis regarding the of the new bio-psychological theories of religion (in the case at hand, CSR). We suggest that Näreaho has misconstrued us on what the neutrality thesis actually is and what follows from it. We conclude that his own proposal for compatibility is not an alternative to ours but rather one permissible metaphysical reading of CSR among others.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Robert C. Miner (2012). Nietzsche, Schmitt, and Heidegger in the Anti-Liberalism of Leo Strauss. Telos 2012 (160):9-27.score: 12.0
    ExcerptAfter emigrating to the United States, Leo Strauss taught political philosophy for thirty years, first at the New School for Social Research in New York and then at the University of Chicago, before retiring at St. John's College. Richard Wolin observes that he “seems to have deeply mistrusted day-to-day politics—a very strange stance, to be sure, for someone who made his living teaching political philosophy.”1 But is it really so strange? What in his German Gymnasium education, or his participation in (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Aryeh Leo Motzkin (2012). Philosophy and the Jewish Tradition: Lectures and Essays by Aryeh Leo Motzkin. Brill.score: 12.0
    Plato and Aristotle on the vocation of the philosopher -- Halevi's Kuzari as a platonic dialogue -- Maimonides and the imagination -- Elia del Medigo, Averroes and Averroism -- Paduan Averroism reconsidered -- Philosophy and mysticism -- Maimonides and Spinoza on good and evil -- A note on natural right, nature and reason in Spinoza -- Spinoza and Luzzatto : philosophy and religion -- On the interpretation of Maimonides: the cases of Samuel David Luzzatto and Ahad Haxam -- Harry a. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. David B. Resnik (1992). Discussion: Leo Buss's the Evolution of Individuality. Biology and Philosophy 7 (4):453-460.score: 12.0
    In his book The Evolution of Individuality, Leo Buss attacks a central dogma of the neo-Darwinian (or synthetic) theory of evolution, the idea that the individual is the sole unit of selection, by arguing that individuals themselves emerged as the result of selective forces that regulated the replication of cell lineages for the benefit of the whole organism. Buss also argues that metazoan developmental patterns and life cycles are the products of selection operating on different units of selection, and that (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. John Gunnell (2004). Reading Max Weber Leo Strauss and Eric Voegelin. European Journal of Political Theory 3 (2):151-166.score: 12.0
    Leo Strauss»s Natural Right and History and Eric Voegelin»s New Science of Politics represented both a continuation of the Weimar conversation and a projection into the American context of the issues that defined that conversation. They each chose Max Weber as the pivotal figure in their animadversions regarding historicism, relativism, and the condition of social science, but, as in the case of Weber himself, the underlying issue, which animated the emigres across the ideological spectrum, was the relationship between theory and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Leo Strauss (forthcoming). Bibliografía de Leo Strauss. Res Publica.score: 12.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Ömür Birler (2008). Political (or) Philosophy? A Critical Account of Leo Strauss's Response to the Crisis of Modernity. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:37-43.score: 12.0
    Leo Strauss has generally been regarded as an historian of ideas, albeit a very unusual one. He wrote many very momentous commentaries on the major figures in the history of political thought; yet Strauss’ main intellectual quest was to take himself back in the history, to classical antiquity and to the fountainhead of political philosophy, Plato. In this paper, however, I am mostly interested in the philosophical nature of Strauss’s basic dissatisfaction with modernity and with the adequacy of his criticisms. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Jonathan Boyd (2008). The Lion and the Ox: Oakeshott's Engagement with Leo Strauss on Hobbes. History of Political Thought 29 (4):692-716.score: 12.0
    Recent studies of Michael Oakeshott have stressed the mutually constitutive importance of Hobbes to Oakeshott, arguing in part that Oakeshott's Hobbes largely reflected his own concerns and broader philosophical project. This article does not dispute this, but proposes a complementary account: Oakeshott's interpretation of Hobbes was also formed in large measure by both his sympathy for Leo Strauss's account and by his perception of it as the principal rival to his own. To demonstrate the existence of such a formative engagement, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Leonardo Rodríguez Duplá (2006). El camino de Leo Strauss hacia la filosofía política. Diálogo Filosófico 66:437-452.score: 12.0
    Leo Strauss es considerado por muchos el gran reivindicador de la filosofía política en el siglo XX. Pero esta caracterización resulta insuficiente en tanto no se precise qué entendía él por filosofía política. Para hacer esto último es necesario reconstruir el largo y complejo itinerario intelectual de Strauss. Su punto de partida es la pregunta por la vida buena para el hombre, la cual tiene desde el principio implicaciones teológicas y políticas. La exploración sistemática de esas implicaciones llevará a Strauss (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Richard H. King (2008). Rights and Slavery, Race and Racism: Leo Strauss, the Straussians, and the American Dilemma. Modern Intellectual History 5 (1):55-82.score: 12.0
    My interest here is in the way Leo Strauss (1899regime,or did not—with the Straussian account of the political foundations of the new nation and how latter-day followers of Strauss have dealt with the persisting topic of race and racism in America. Overall, I want to make two large points. First, the Straussian commitment to superhistorical standards provides the Straussians with a moral perspective on slavery, race, and racism. Second, though race and slavery have been less than central among the concerns (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Eberhard Lämmert (1986). Laudatio for Leo Lowenthal. Telos 1986 (70):167-174.score: 12.0
    In the 1920s, Leo Lowenthal mustered the courage and the nonchalance to point literary studies in a direction which, had die discipline in Germany at diat time taken heed, would have spared it a great deal of repetition forty years later. In looking at his career, we must consider how diese early efforts were subject to a consolidation and historical elaboration dirough Lowendial's involvement with the Institute of Social Research in Frankfurt and dien in New York. We ought to consider (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000