22 found
Order:
See also:
Profile: Lilian Alweiss (Trinity College Dublin)
  1. Lena Halldenius, Maeve Cooke, Lilian Alweiss, John Erik Fossum, Bruce Haddock & Julia Stapleton (2003). Contributors. European Journal of Political Theory 2 (3):259-260.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Lilian Alweiss (2009). Between Internalism and Externalism: Husserl's Account of Intentionality. Inquiry 52 (1):53 – 78.
    There is a strong consensus among analytic philosophers that Husserl is an internalist and that his internalism must be understood in conjunction with his methodological solipsism. This paper focuses on Husserl's early work the, Logical Investigations , and explores whether such a reading is justified. It shows that Husserl is not a methodological solipsist: He neither believes that meaning can be reduced to the individual, nor does he assign an explanatory role for meaning to the subject. Explanatory priority is assigned (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  3.  28
    Lilian Alweiss (2013). Beyond Existence and Non-Existence. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 21 (3):448-469.
    When Husserl speaks of the so-called ?transcendental reduction? or ?phenomenological epoch?? many believe that he is eschewing the question of truth or existence. Two reasons are given for this: First, Husserl explicitly states that when we perform the reduction, we should no longer naively ?accept [the world] as it presents itself to me as factually existing? (Id I ?30, p. 53) and should suspend our judgement with regard to ?the positing of its actual being? (Id I ?88, p. 182). Second, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  4.  5
    Lilian Alweiss (2003). The World Unclaimed: A Challenge to Heidegger's Critique of Husserl. Ohio University Press.
    The World Unclaimed argues that Heidegger's critique of modern epistemology in Being and Time is seriously flawed.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  5.  82
    Lilian Alweiss (2003). On Moral Dilemmas: Winch, Kant and Billy Budd. Philosophy 78 (2):205-218.
    This article queries Winch's view that moral issues are particular, subjective, context-dependent and not open to generalizations. Drawing on examples from film and literature, Winch believes he can prove first, that the universalisability principle is idle and second, that morality is wrongly conceived as a guide to moral conduct. Yet, neither example proves his point. Quite the contrary, they show that we face moral dilemmas only when moral theory fails to provide an answer to moral problems. Therfore, it is not (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  6.  92
    Lilian Alweiss (2008). Søren Overgaard, Husserl and Heidegger on Being in the World. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 24 (1):65-71.
    It is a study of the phenomenological philosophies of Husserl and Heidegger. Through a critical discussion including practically all previously published English and German literature on the subject, the aim is to present a thorough and evenhanded account of the relation between the two. The book provides a detailed presentation of their respective projects and methods, and examines several of their key phenomenological analyses, centering on the phenomenon of being-in-the-world. It offers new perspectives on Husserlian and Heideggerian phenomenology, e.g. concerning (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  49
    Lilian Alweiss (2005). Is There an ‘End’ to Philosophical Scepticism? Philosophy 80 (3):395-411.
    P F Strawson advocates a descriptive metaphysics. Contrary to Kant, he believes that metaphysics should be ‘content to describe the actual structure of thought about the world’, there is no need of postulating a world that lies beyond our grasp. We neither need to refute nor accept scepticism since we can ignore it with good reasons. Yet this paper argues that Strawson fails to provide us with good reasons. He fails to realise that one cannot do metaphysics by construing its (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  8.  37
    Lilian Alweiss (2007). Leaving Metaphysics to Itself. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 (3):349 – 365.
    In 'Time and Being' Heidegger claims that the task is to 'cease all overcoming and to leave metaphysics to itself'. This paper asks what it actually means to leave metaphysics to itself, and how we are meant to understand the difference between "leaving metaphysics to itself" and "overcoming metaphysics". To understand this distinction, the paper compares Heidegger's later position with those of Husserl and Wittgenstein and with his own earlier position expressed in Being and Time. While we find different interpretations (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  9.  4
    Lilian Alweiss (2015). Heidegger's Black Notebooks. Philosophy 90 (2):305-316.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  40
    Lilian Alweiss (2010). Against Cartesian Mistrust: Cavell, Husserl and the Other Mind Sceptic. Ratio 23 (3):241-259.
    This paper asks whether we should still be haunted by scepticism about other minds. It draws on the writings of Cavell and Husserl to show that there is some truth in the Cartesian premise that has given rise to scepticism about other minds, namely, that our self-awareness is of a fundamentally different type from our awareness of objects and other subjects. While this leads Cavell to argue that there is a truth to scepticism, it proves the opposite to Husserl, viz. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  13
    John Abromeit, Mark W. Cobb, Lilian Alweiss, Susan J. Armstrong, Richard G. Botzler, Ronald Aronson, Robin Attfield, Gordon Baker, Katherine Morris & Etienne Balibar (unknown). The Following Books Have Been Received and Are Available for Review. Please Contact the Reviews Editor: Jim. Oshea@ Ucd. Ie. [REVIEW] International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12 (4):517 - 523.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  13
    Lilian Alweiss (2003). Collective Guilt and Responsibility Some Reflections. European Journal of Political Theory 2 (3):307-318.
    Does our responsibility extend to deeds that have been performed in our name? Is our modern understanding of responsibility in need of revision? Arendt holds that it is not necessary to revise our conception of responsibility since there are two forms of responsibility: a moral and a political one. Margalit, in turn, argues that our conception of responsibility is too narrow. We are not only morally responsible for the deeds we have performed or neglected to perform but also for the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  23
    Lilian Alweiss (2009). Introduction: The Work of Michel Henry. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (3):359-360.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  17
    Lilian Alweiss (2009). The Bifurcated Subject. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (3):415 - 434.
    Michel Henry wishes to salvage Descartes?s first principle ?I think, I am? by claiming that there is no need to appeal to the world or others to make sense of the self. One of his main targets is Edmund Husserl, who claims that thought is necessarily intentional and thus necessarily about something that is other to thought. To show that this is not so, Henry draws on passages from Descartes?s texts which emphasize that we should not equate the cogito with (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  8
    Lilian Alweiss (2002). Heidegger and `the Concept of Time'. History of the Human Sciences 15 (3):117-132.
    This article explores the extent to which Heidegger promises a novel understanding of the concept of time. Heidegger believes that the tradition of philosophy was mistaken in interpreting time as a moveable image of eternity. We are told that this definition of time is intelligible only if we have eternity as a point of departure to understand the meaning of time. Yet, Heidegger believes that we are barred from such a viewpoint. We can only understand the phenomenon of time from (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  11
    Lilian Alweiss (2005). Philosophy in a Time of Terror. Review of Metaphysics 59 (2):406-409.
  17. Lilian Alweiss (1999). Jean François Lyotard, Postmodern Fables Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 19 (2):118-119.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  11
    Lilian Alweiss (2009). Review of Robert Sokolowski, Phenomenology of the Human Person. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (3).
  19.  3
    Lilian Alweiss (2010). Review of J. N. Mohanty, Lectures on Consciousness and Interpretation. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (7).
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Lilian Alweiss (1999). Jean François Lyotard, Postmodern Fables. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 19:118-119.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Lilian Alweiss (2014). Kant’s Not so “Logical” Subject. The Harvard Review of Philosophy 21:87-105.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Lilian Alweiss (2000). On Perceptual Experience. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 31 (3):264-276.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography