Works by Linda Mealey ( view other items matching `Linda Mealey`, view all matches )

7 found
Sort by:
  1. Linda Mealey & Stuart Kinner (2001). The Perception-Action Model of Empathy and Psychopathic “Cold-Heartedness”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):42-43.
    The Perception-Action Model of empathy (PAM) is both sufficiently broad and sufficiently detailed to be able to describe and accommodate a wide range of phenomena – including the apparent “cold-heartedness” or lack of empathy of psychopaths. We show how the physiological, cognitive, and emotional elements of the PAM map onto known and hypothesized attributes of the psychopathic personality.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Linda Mealey (2000). Mating Strategies as Game Theory: Changing Rules? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):613-613.
    Human behavior can be analyzed using game theory models. Complex games may involve different rules for different players and may allow players to change identity (and therefore, rules) according to complex contingencies. From this perspective, mating behaviors can be viewed as strategic “plays” in a complex “mating game,” with players varying tactics in response to changes in the game's payoff matrix.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Linda Mealey (2000). The Illusory Function of Dreams: Another Example of Cognitive Bias. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (6):971-972.
    Patterns of dream content indicating a predominance of themes relating to threat are likely to reflect biases in dream recall and dream scoring techniques. Even if this pattern is not artifactual, it is yet reflective of threat-related biases in our conscious and nonconscious waking cognition, and is not special to dreams. [Revonsuo].
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Linda Mealey (1999). Evolutionary Models of Female Intrasexual Competition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):234-234.
    Female competition generally takes nonviolent form, but includes intense verbal and nonverbal harassment that has profound social and physiological consequences. The evolutionary ecological model of competitive reproductive suppression in human females, might profitably be applied to explain a range of contemporary phenomena, including anorexia.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Linda Mealey (1998). Testosterone-Aggression Relationship: An Exemplar of Interactionism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):380-381.
    Mazur & Booth provide life scientists with an example of the multilevel biopsychosocial approach. Research paradigms have to become more flexible and multidisciplinary if we are to free ourselves from the nature–nurture dichotomy that we have long agreed was simplistic and shortsighted. I point out a variety of kinds of interactions that may be the next frontier for behavioral scientists.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Virginia Slaughter & Linda Mealey (1998). Seeing is Not (Necessarily) Believing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):130-130.
    We doubt that theory of mind can be sufficiently demonstrated without reliance on verbal tests. Where language is the major tool of social manipulation, an effective theory of mind must use language as an input. We suspect, therefore, that in this context, prelinguistic human and nonhuman minds are more alike than are human pre- and postlinguistic minds.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Linda Mealey (1997). Heritability, Theory of Mind, and the Nature of Normality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (3):527-531.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation