20 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Lisa H. Schwartzman [20]Lisa Helene Schwartzman [1]
See also:
Profile: Lisa H. Schwartzman Schwartzman (Michigan State University)
  1. Lisa H. Schwartzman (2007). Challenging Liberalism: Feminism as Political Critique. Penn State University Press.
    Questions about the relevance and value of various liberal concepts are at the heart of important debates among feminist philosophers and social theorists. Although many feminists invoke concepts such as rights, equality, autonomy, and freedom in arguments for liberation, some attempt to avoid them, noting that they can also reinforce and perpetuate oppressive social structures. In _Challenging Liberalism _Schwartzman explores the reasons why concepts such as rights and equality can sometimes reinforce oppression. She argues that certain forms of abstraction and (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  2.  26
    Lisa H. Schwartzman (2006). Abstraction, Idealization, and Oppression. Metaphilosophy 37 (5):565-588.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  3.  33
    Lisa H. Schwartzman (2002). Hate Speech, Illocution, and Social Context: A Critique of Judith Butler. Journal of Social Philosophy 33 (3):421–441.
  4.  10
    Lisa H. Schwartzman (2009). Non-Ideal Theorizing, Social Groups, and Knowledge of Oppression: A Response. Hypatia 24 (4):177 - 188.
    In responding to Anderson, Tobin, and Mills, I focus on questions about non-ideal theory, normative individualism, and standpoint theory. In particular, I ask whether feminist theorizing can be "liberal" and yet not embody the problematic forms of abstraction and individualism described in "Challenging Liberalism". Ultimately, I call for methods of theorizing that illuminate and challenge oppressive social hierarchies.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5.  42
    Lisa H. Schwartzman (2012). Intuition, Thought Experiments, and Philosophical Method: Feminism and Experimental Philosophy. Journal of Social Philosophy 43 (3):307-316.
  6.  34
    Lisa H. Schwartzman (2007). Can Liberalism Account for Women's “Adaptive Preferences”? Social Philosophy Today 23:175-186.
    Feminist philosophers have questioned whether liberal theory can account for the phenomenon of adaptive preferences, specifically women’s preferences that are formed under conditions of sexist oppression. In this paper, I examine the argument of one feminist who addresses the problem of women’s “deformed desires” by relying on a liberal framework. Assessing her argument, I conclude that liberalism provides inadequate resources for responding to this issue since it errs in understanding adaptive preferences as exceptional, provides little explanation of how changes in (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  12
    Lisa H. Schwartzman (2005). A Feminist Critique of Nussbaum's Liberalism : Towards an Alternative Feminist Methodology. In Barbara S. Andrew, Jean Clare Keller & Lisa H. Schwartzman (eds.), Feminist Interventions in Ethics and Politics: Feminist Ethics and Social Theory. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 151.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  1
    Lisa H. Schwartzman (2015). Appetites, Disorder, and Desire. Ijfab: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 8 (2):86-102.
    Popular interest in the topic of food has exploded in the past decade. Due in part to books by Michael Pollan, Barbara Kingsolver, and Eric Schlosser and films such as Food, Inc., Super Size Me, and Forks over Knives, people are starting to think critically about where their food originates, how it is processed, and how their consumption choices affect the environment, nonhuman animals, and other people. At the same time, there is rising concern about the dangers of obesity. Although (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  10
    Margaret A. Crouch & Lisa H. Schwartzman (2012). Introduction. Journal of Social Philosophy 43 (3):205-211.
  10.  8
    Lisa H. Schwartzman (2002). Relational Autonomy. Teaching Philosophy 25 (2):183-186.
  11.  5
    Barbara S. Andrew, Jean Keller & Lisa H. Schwartzman (2005). Feminist Interventions in Ethics and Politics : An Introduction. In Barbara S. Andrew, Jean Clare Keller & Lisa H. Schwartzman (eds.), Feminist Interventions in Ethics and Politics: Feminist Ethics and Social Theory. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 1.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  9
    Lisa H. Schwartzman (2002). Feminist Analyses of Oppression and the Discourse of “Rights”. Social Theory and Practice 28 (3):465-480.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  8
    Lisa H. Schwartzman (2000). Liberal Abstraction and Social Inequality. Social Philosophy Today 15:229-243.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  6
    Lisa H. Schwartzman (2004). Groups and Group Rights. Teaching Philosophy 27 (2):184-187.
  15.  5
    Lisa H. Schwartzman (2005). Neutrality, Choice, and Contexts of Oppression. Social Philosophy Today 21:193-206.
    In her recent book, Perfectionism and Contemporary Feminist Values, Kimberly Yuracko argues that perfectionism is a promising theory for feminists, and she suggests that “what really motivates and drives feminists’ arguments is not a neutral commitment to freedom or equality but a perfectionist commitment to a particular, albeit inchoate, vision of human flourishing.” In my paper, I explore the connections between feminism, perfectionism, and critiques of liberal neutrality by focusing critical attention on Yuracko’s arguments. After summarizing Yuracko’s position, I contend (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Barbara S. Andrew, Jean Clare Keller & Lisa H. Schwartzman (eds.) (2005). Feminist Interventions in Ethics and Politics: Feminist Ethics and Social Theory. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    This collection breaks new ground in four key areas of feminist social thought: the sex/gender debates; challenges to liberalism/equality; feminist ethics; and feminist perspectives on global ethics and politics in the 21st century. Altogether, the essays provide an innovative look at feminist philosophy while making substantive contributions to current debates in gender theory, ethics, and political thought.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Barbara S. Andrew, Jean Keller & Lisa H. Schwartzman (eds.) (2005). Feminist Interventions in Ethics and Politics: Feminist Ethics and Social Theory. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    This collection breaks new ground in four key areas of feminist social thought: the sex/gender debates; challenges to liberalism/equality; feminist ethics; and feminist perspectives on global ethics and politics in the 21st century. Altogether, the essays provide an innovative look at feminist philosophy while making substantive contributions to current debates in gender theory, ethics, and political thought.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Lisa H. Schwartzman (2005). A Feminist Critique Of. In Barbara S. Andrew, Jean Clare Keller & Lisa H. Schwartzman (eds.), Feminist Interventions in Ethics and Politics: Feminist Ethics and Social Theory. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 151.
  19. Lisa H. Schwartzman (2007). Can Liberalism Account for Women’s “Adaptive Preferences”? Social Philosophy Today 23:175-186.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Lisa H. Schwartzman (2006). Challenging Liberalism: Feminism as Political Critique. Penn State University Press.
    Questions about the relevance and value of various liberal concepts are at the heart of important debates among feminist philosophers and social theorists. Although many feminists invoke concepts such as rights, equality, autonomy, and freedom in arguments for liberation, some attempt to avoid them, noting that they can also reinforce and perpetuate oppressive social structures. In _Challenging Liberalism _Schwartzman explores the reasons why concepts such as rights and equality can sometimes reinforce oppression. She argues that certain forms of abstraction and (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography