14 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Lois Frankel [11]Lois Elaine Frankel [3]
  1. Therese Boos Dykeman, Eve Browning, Judith Chelius Stark, Jane Duran, Marilyn Fischer, Lois Frankel, Edward Fullbrook, Jo Ellen Jacobs, Vicki Harper, Joy Laine, Kate Lindemann, Elizabeth Minnich, Andrea Nye, Margaret Simons, Audun Solli, Catherine Villanueva Gardner, Mary Ellen Waithe, Karen J. Warren & Henry West (2008). An Unconventional History of Western Philosophy: Conversations Between Men and Women Philosophers. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    This is a unique, groundbreaking study in the history of philosophy, combining leading men and women philosophers across 2600 years of Western philosophy, covering key foundational topics, including epistemology, metaphysics, and ethics. Introductory essays, primary source readings, and commentaries comprise each chapter to offer a rich and accessible introduction to and evaluation of these vital philosophical contributions. A helpful appendix canvasses an extraordinary number of women philosophers throughout history for further discovery and study.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Lois Elaine Frankel (1997). The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 35 (4):627-629.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Lois Frankel (1990). How's and Why's: Causation Un-Locked. History of Philosophy Quarterly 7 (4):409 - 429.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Lois Frankel (1989). Damaris Cudworth Masham: A Seventeenth Century Feminist Philosopher. Hypatia 4 (1):80 - 90.
    The daughter of Ralph Cudworth, and friend of John Locke, Damaris Masham was also a philosopher in her own right. She published two, philosophical books, A Discourse Concerning the Love of God and Occasional Thoughts In Reference to a Virtuous and Christian Life. Her primary purpose was to refute John Norris' Malebranchian doctrine that we ought to love only God because only God can give us pleasure, and his criticism of Locke. In addition, she argues for greater educational opportunities for (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Lois Frankel (1987). Causation and the Self. International Philosophical Quarterly 27 (3):325-327.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Lois Frankel (1986). From a Metaphysical Point of View: Leibniz and the Principle of Sufficient Reason. Southern Journal of Philosophy 24 (3):321-334.
    The relation between leibniz's logical and his metaphysical views is the subject of much modern scholarship. Some commentators have argued that his metaphysics is based on his logic; others have taken the opposite position. However, Both sides pose the question in terms of 'priority'. On the contrary, I argue that it is likely that leibniz means the psr to play "both" a logical and a metaphysical role. The ambiguity of leibniz's psr indicates that he equates the metaphysical notion of causation (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Lois Frankel (1986). Mutual Causation, Simultaneity and Event Description. Philosophical Studies 49 (3):361 - 372.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Lois Elaine Frankel (1986). Justifying Descartes' Causal Principle. Journal of the History of Philosophy 24 (3):323-341.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Lois Frankel (1985). Leibniz's Metaphysics of Nature. International Studies in Philosophy 17 (1):88-89.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Lois Frankel (1984). Being Able to Do Otherwise. Leibniz on Freedom and Contingency. Studia Leibnitiana 16:45.
    Dieser Aufsatz möchte zeigen, daß Leibniz Freiheit nur in dem Sinne Kontingenz voraussetzt, daß andere Handlungsweisen als absolut möglich denkbar sein müssen. Freiheit besteht nicht in der bloßen Illusion, daß unsere Handlungen nicht durch unseren vollständigen Begriff verursacht und bestimmt sind, sondern in der epistemischen Möglichkeit des Handelnden, anders zu handeln. Für endliche Wesen impliziert diese epistemische Möglichkeit die Unkenntnis des göttlichen Plans. Für Gott ist sie begründet in dem intellektuellen Bewußtsein, daß die Handlungen von seinem Willen, der aufgrund der (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Lois Frankel (1984). Reason and Antecedent Doubt. Southern Journal of Philosophy 22 (3):331-346.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Lois Frankel (1983). The Skeptical Feminist. International Studies in Philosophy 15 (3):109-111.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Lois Frankel (1981). Leibniz's Principle of Identity of Indiscernibles. Studia Leibnitiana 13:192.
    La plupart des commentateurs interprète le principe de l'identité des indiscernables comme principe purement logique, mais avec des implications métaphysiques, et donc, selon l'interprétation commune, comme fausseté ou vérité contingente ou triviale. Je soutiens, au contraire, que le principe, selon Leibniz, est vrai, mais que cette vérité n'est triviale ni contingente, mais nécessaire dans un sens métaphysique. Leibniz tent à démontrer la nécessité du principe dans deux manières : une manière logique et une manière métaphysique . Je soutiens que seule (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Lois Elaine Frankel (1980). Identity and Metaphysics in the Philosophy of Leibniz. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
    I conclude that it is more accurate to say that, rather than trying to make logic metaphysical, Leibniz tries, in the context of a theistic system, to make metaphysics logical. ;I begin with a study of the principle of identity of indiscernibles, and show how it is best thought of as a principle which follows from a metaphysical interpretation of the principle of sufficient reason. It has been traditional to interpret the principle of identity of indiscernibles as primarily a merely (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation