36 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Loren E. Lomasky [36]Loren Eric Lomasky [1]
  1.  18
    Loren E. Lomasky (1990). Persons, Rights, and the Moral Community. OUP Usa.
    This book presents the foundations of a liberal individualistic theory of rights, and explains what rights we have and do not have, why we have them, who is and who is not a holder of rights, and the place of rights within the overall structure of morality. The author argues for the moral importance of individual commitments to 'projects', and demonstrates the implications of this for a variety of problems and issues.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   31 citations  
  2. Loren E. Lomasky & Geoffrey Brennan (2000). Is There a Duty to Vote? Social Philosophy and Policy 17 (1):62.
    The genre of public service advertisements that appear with two- and four-year cyclical regularity is familiar. Cameras pan across scenes of marines hoisting the flag on Iwo Jima, a bald eagle soaring in splendid flight, rows of grave markers at Arlington. The somber-voiced announcer remonstrates: “ They did their part; now you do yours.” Once again it is the season to fulfill one's civic duty, to vote.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  3.  79
    Loren E. Lomasky (2007). Liberalism Beyond Borders. Social Philosophy and Policy 24 (1):206-233.
    While citizens of developed countries enjoy lives of unmatched affluence, over a billion people struggle to subsist on incomes of less than $1/day. Can't we conclude that their poverty constitutes a glaring injustice? The answer almost certainly is yes—but not because some countries are rich, nor because of inadequate levels of redistribution. Liberal political theory traditionally maintains that persons are rights-holders, and the primary duty owed them is noninterference. Corrupt and tyrannical governments flagrantly violate the liberty rights of their captive (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  4. Loren E. Lomasky (2005). Libertarianism at Twin Harvard. Social Philosophy and Policy 22 (1):178-199.
    In this essay Loren Lomasky wryly proposes that the views of Rawls and Nozick might not be as radically divergent as is conventionally supposed. To demonstrate this proposition, Lomasky invents “Twin Harvard” counterparts of Rawls and Nozick. The twist is that Twin Rawls turns out to be a leading libertarian theorist while Twin Nozick endorses a regime of sweeping redistribution. In each case the position follows from familiar elements in the theories of their respective, real-world counterparts. Lomasky concludes that Twin (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5.  65
    Loren E. Lomasky (1969). Nominalism, Replication and Nelson Goodman. Analysis 29 (5):156 - 161.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  35
    Gerald F. Gaus & Loren E. Lomasky (1990). Are Property Rights Problematic? The Monist 73 (4):483-503.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  7.  41
    Loren E. Lomasky (2011). Liberty After Lehman Brothers. Social Philosophy and Policy 28 (2):135-165.
    The financial Crunch of 2008 was easily explained by both the left and right–too easily. Each insisted that events thoroughly confirmed its own long-held views and utterly refuted those of the opposed camp. This essay argues that there are indeed new lessons to be drawn from the Crunch, lessons that involve balancing the bounty of the Invisible Hand against perils of the Prisoner's Dilemma. Liberal moral imperatives are traced to variables of Personal Choice and External Cost that are typically in (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  58
    Loren E. Lomasky (1998). Libertarianism as If People Mattered. Social Philosophy and Policy 15 (2):350.
    In this essay I wish to consider the implications for theory and practice of the following two propositions, either or both of which may be controversial, but which will here be assumed for the sake of argument: Libertarianism is the correct framework for political morality. The vast majority of our fellow citizens disbelieve. 1.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  32
    Loren E. Lomasky (1981). Medical Progress and National Health Care. Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 (1):65-88.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  10.  33
    Loren E. Lomasky (1983). Gift Relations, Sexual Relations and Freedom. Philosophical Quarterly 33 (132):250-258.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  11.  44
    Loren E. Lomasky (2008). The Paradox of Association. Social Philosophy and Policy 25 (2):182-200.
    Individuals care deeply about with whom they associate and on what terms. A liberty to avoid entanglement in the disfavored designs of others is counterposed by an entitlement not to be excluded from valued modes of activity. These interests generate not one but two freedoms of association, the former negative and the latter positive. Often they conflict. This essay begins by setting out several respects in which negative free association is crucial to a liberal order and then examines several pleas (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  22
    Loren E. Lomasky (1990). Liberal Autonomy. Philosophy and Theology 4 (3):297-309.
    Theorists increasingly tum to autonomy (rather than liberty per se) as a grounding value for liberalism. This is, I argue, an iII-advised strategy. If autonomy is understood to differ from (negative) liberty insofar as it demands from agents significantly greater feats of self-determination, then it is not clear that autonomy is worth having. And, irrespective of whether autonomy is judged to be valuable, autonomy-based liberalisms eilher prescribe essentially the same constraints as classical liberalism - and thus are poIitically innocuous - (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  17
    Loren E. Lomasky (1970). Leibniz and the Modal Argument for God's Existence. The Monist 54 (2):250-269.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  13
    Loren E. Lomasky (1981). Being a Person - Does It Matter? Philosophical Topics 12 (3):139-152.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  15.  24
    James M. Buchanan & Loren E. Lomasky (1984). The Matrix of Contractarian Justice. Social Philosophy and Policy 2 (1):12.
    There are no first principles etched in stone from which all moral philosophers must take their bearings. We must deliberately choose our point of departure in any attempt to respond to the question: “Must any defensible theory of justice incorporate both a commitment to personal liberty and to economic equality?” Basic to our own approach is a suspicion of seers and visionaries who espy an external source of values independent from human choices. We presuppose, instead, that political philosophy commences with (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Loren E. Lomasky (1995). Justice to Charity: LOREN E. LOMASKY. Social Philosophy and Policy 12 (2):32-53.
    Despite what one may be led to believe by breathless reports in the media, the acme of misery in America is not the woes, financial and otherwise, of Donald Trump and Michael Jackson. People lose their jobs, have their assets drained by reversals of fortune, suffer from illiteracy, malnutrition, lack of shelter, and other mishaps. The circumstances in which they find themselves are genuinely distressing. It would be an odd understanding indeed that failed to find these circumstances directly relevant to (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  4
    Loren E. Lomasky (1981). The Small but Crucial Role of Health Care Vouchers. Hastings Center Report 11 (4):40-42.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  6
    Loren E. Lomasky (1995). Justice to Charity. Social Philosophy and Policy 12 (2):32-53.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  10
    Loren E. Lomasky (2011). Contract, Covenant, Constitution. Social Philosophy and Policy 28 (1):50-71.
    Contract is the dominant model for political philosophy's understanding of government grounded on the consent of the governed. However, there are at least five disabilities attached to classical social contract theory: the grounding contract never actually occurred; its provisions are vague and contestable; the stringency of the obligation thereby established is dubious; trans-generational consent is questionable; interpretive methods for giving effect to the contract are ill-specified. By contrast, the biblical story of the covenant Israel embraces at Sinai is shown to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  18
    Loren E. Lomasky (1981). Gewirth's Generation of Rights. Philosophical Quarterly 31 (124):248-253.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  14
    Loren E. Lomasky (1978). Is Actual Consequence Utilitarianism Incoherent? Southern Journal of Philosophy 16 (2):71-78.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  3
    Loren E. Lomasky (1991). Liberal Obituary?:Liberalisms: Essays in Political Philosophy. John Gray. Ethics 102 (1):140-.
  23.  11
    Loren E. Lomasky (1990). But is It Liberalism? Critical Review 4 (1-2):86-105.
    THE LIBERTARIAN IDEA by Joseph Raz Oxford: Clarendon, 1986. 435 pp., $59.00 Joseph Raz's The Morality of Freedom offers a subtle and arrestingly original reconstruction of liberal theory. Raz argues that standard liberal linchpins such as neutrality, rights, equality, anti?perfectionism, subjective preference, and individualism fail adequately to ground a liberal order. Rather, he enshrines autonomy as the core value of a justifiable liberalism. Many of Raz's subsidiary arguments are insightful, yet his liberal structure ultimately founders. In large measure that is (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  4
    Loren E. Lomasky (1990). Are Property Rights Problematic? GERALD F. GAUS And. The Monist 73 (4).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  10
    Loren E. Lomasky (1989). Socialism as Classical Political Philosophy. Social Philosophy and Policy 6 (2):112.
    A small puzzle: the terms ‘capitalism’ and ‘socialism’ initially present themselves as contraries, the one affirming what the other rejects. However, once removed from the dictionary, they function otherwise. The theory of capitalism is very much contained within the science of economics. The positive theory of capitalistic institutions, but also its normative superstructure, rest most easily within the language and methodology of the economist. What distinguishes the free market? It is efficient ; allocation of factors of production are optimized ; (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  3
    Loren E. Lomasky (1988). Agreeable Morality? Critical Review 2 (2-3):36-49.
    MORALS BY AGREEMENT by David Gauthier New York: Oxford University Press, 1986. 367 pp., $39.95.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  6
    Geoffrey Brennan & Loren E. Lomasky (1987). The Logic of Electoral Preference: Response to Saraydar and Hudelson. Economics and Philosophy 3 (1):131.
    How may we best understand the motivational structure that stands behind individuals' acts of voting? In “The Impartial Spectator Goes to Washington” we suggested that expressive concerns swamp narrowly consequential motivations, in contradistinction to normal market transactions in which the priority is reversed. A striking consequence of this fact is that individuals will be led to vote for outcomes that they would reject were they in a position to act decisively. In this regard we found the moral psychology Adam Smith (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  6
    Loren E. Lomasky (1988). Book Review:Making Sense of Human Rights: Philosophical Reflections on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. James W. Nickel. [REVIEW] Ethics 98 (3):585-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  1
    Richard P. Cunningham, Robert F. Nagel & Loren E. Lomasky (1989). Commentaries on the Issue. Criminal Justice Ethics 8 (1):27-34.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  1
    Loren E. Lomasky (1991). Review: Liberal Obituary? [REVIEW] Ethics 102 (1):140 - 154.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Loren E. Lomasky (1975). Are Compatibilism and the Free Will Defense Compatible? Personalist 56 (4):385-388.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Loren E. Lomasky (1982). Earl E. Shelp, Ed., Justice and Health Care Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 2 (2/3):142-146.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Loren E. Lomasky (1986). Edward Regis, Jr., Gewirth's Ethical Rationalism Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 6 (2):81-84.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Loren E. Lomasky (1987). Public Money, Private Gain, Profit for All. Hastings Center Report 17 (3):5-7.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Loren E. Lomasky (2016). Rights Angles. Oxford University Press Usa.
    Loren Lomasky is a leading advocate of a rights-based libertarian approach to political and social issues. This volume collects fifteen of his articles that have appeared since his influential volume Persons, Rights, and the Moral Community alongside one new essay. The volume represents Lomasky's more recent efforts at constructing the underpinnings of liberal rights theory, in which he formulates a series of questions about the nature and scope of rights and rights holders.Among the questions Lomasky addresses: In what way is (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Loren E. Lomasky (1994). Ventilating Issues of Life and Death: The Case of Helga Wanglie. Public Affairs Quarterly 8 (2):153-168.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography