Search results for 'Louise Whiteley' (try it on Scholar)

992 found
Sort by:
  1. Nina di Pietro, Louise Whiteley & Judy Illes (2012). Treatments and Services for Neurodevelopmental Disorders on Advocacy Websites: Information or Evaluation? [REVIEW] Neuroethics 5 (2):197-209.score: 240.0
    The Internet has quickly gained popularity as a major source of health-related information, but its impact is unclear. Here, we investigate the extent to which advocacy websites for three neurodevelopmental disorders—cerebral palsy (CP), autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD)—inform stakeholders about treatment options, and discuss the ethical challenges inherent in providing such information online. We identified major advocacy websites for each disorder and assessed website accountability, the number, attributes, and accessibility of treatments described, and the valence (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Oliver J. Hulme & Louise Whiteley (2007). The “Mesh” as Evidence–Model Comparison and Alternative Interpretations of Feedback. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (5-6):505-506.score: 240.0
    We agree that the relationship between phenomenology and accessibility can be fruitfully investigated via meshing, but we want to emphasise the importance of proper comparison between meshes, as well as considerations that make comparison especially difficult in this domain. We also argue that Block's interpretation of the neural data in his exemplar mesh is incorrect, and propose an alternative.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. A. J. Ayer, C. H. Whiteley & M. Black (1936). Truth by Convention: A Symposium by A. J. Ayer, C. H. Whiteley, M. Black. Analysis 4 (2/3):17 - 32.score: 180.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. C. Sampford, J. Louise, S. Blencowe & T. Round, Retrospectivity and the Rule of Law / C. Sampford ; with the Assistance of J. Louise, S. Blencowe, and T. Round.score: 180.0
    Retrospective rule-making has few supporters and many opponents. Defenders of retrospective laws generally do so on the basis that they are a necessary evil in specific or limited circumstances, for example to close tax loopholes, to deal with terrorists or to prosecute fallen tyrants. Yet the reality of retrospective rule making is far more widespread than this, and ranges from ’corrective’ legislation to ’interpretive regulations’ to judicial decision making. The search for a rational justification for retrospective rule-making necessitates a reconsideration (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. J. Louise, Brute Rationality.score: 60.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. C. H. Whiteley (1979). Love, Hate and Emotion. Philosophy 54 (208):235.score: 30.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Jennie Louise (2004). Relativity of Value and the Consequentialist Umbrella. Philosophical Quarterly 54 (217):518–536.score: 30.0
    Does the real difference between non-consequentialist and consequentialist theories lie in their approach to value? Non-consequentialist theories are thought either to allow a different kind of value (namely, agent-relative value) or to advocate a different response to value ('honouring' rather than 'promoting'). One objection to this idea implies that all normative theories are describable as consequentialist. But then the distinction between honouring and promoting collapses into the distinction between relative and neutral value. A proper description of non-consequentialist theories can only (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Jennie Louise (2009). I Won't Do It! Self-Prediction, Moral Obligation and Moral Deliberation. Philosophical Studies 146 (3):327 - 348.score: 30.0
    This paper considers the question of whether predictions of wrongdoing are relevant to our moral obligations. After giving an analysis of ‘won’t’ claims (i.e., claims that an agent won’t Φ), the question is separated into two different issues: firstly, whether predictions of wrongdoing affect our objective moral obligations, and secondly, whether self-prediction of wrongdoing can be legitimately used in moral deliberation. I argue for an affirmative answer to both questions, although there are conditions that must be met for self-prediction to (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Jennie Louise (2009). Correct Responses and the Priority of the Normative. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (4):345 - 364.score: 30.0
    The ‘Wrong Kind of Reason’ problem for buck-passing theories (theories which hold that the normative is explanatorily or conceptually prior to the evaluative) is to explain why the existence of pragmatic or strategic reasons for some response to an object does not suffice to ground evaluative claims about that object. The only workable reply seems to be to deny that there are reasons of the ‘wrong kind’ for responses, and to argue that these are really reasons for wanting, trying, or (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Jennie Louise (2006). Right Motive, Wrong Action: Direct Consequentialism and Evaluative Conflict. [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (1):65 - 85.score: 30.0
    In this paper I look at attempts to develop forms of consequentialism which do not have a feature considered problematic in Direct Consequentialist theories (that is, those consequentialist theories that apply the criterion of rightness directly in the evaluation of any set of options). The problematic feature in question (which I refer to as ‘evaluative conflict’) is the possibility that, for example, a right motive might lead an agent to perform a wrong act. Theories aiming to avoid this phenomenon must (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Jennie Louise (forthcoming). Moral Demands and Not Doing the Best One Can. Ethics.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Jennie Louise (2012). Collective Rationality: Equilibrium in Cooperative Games. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (1):205 - 205.score: 30.0
    Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Volume 90, Issue 1, Page 205, March 2012.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. C. H. Whiteley (1956). Meaning and Ostensive Definition. Mind 65 (July):332-335.score: 30.0
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. C. H. Whiteley (1975). Ignorance: A Case for Scepticism By Peter Unger Clarendon Press: Oxford University Press, 1975, Vii + 319 Pp. £6.50. [REVIEW] Philosophy 50 (194):489-.score: 30.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. C. H. Whiteley (1951). The Idea of Logical Form. Mind 60 (240):539-541.score: 30.0
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. J. Louise (2011). Ethics and Humanity: Themes From the Philosophy of Jonathan Glover * Edited by Nancy Ann Davis, Richard Keshen and Jeff McMahan. Analysis 71 (4):788-790.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Diane Whiteley (1998). The Victim and the Justification of Punishment. Criminal Justice Ethics 17 (2):42-54.score: 30.0
  18. A. Braunack-Mayer & J. Louise, The Ethics of Community Empowerment: Tensions in Health Promotion Theory and Practice.score: 30.0
    The concepts of community participation, empowerment and capacity building are central tenets of contemporary health promotion theory. They reflect the view that health and well-being are shaped by a wide range of social, economic, political and organisational forces that are outside the control of individuals. Despite its theoretical appeal, the practice of Community Empowerment is ethically contentious and can produce ethical dilemmas for health promotion practitioners. In this paper we relate these dilemmas to theoretical considerations, and argue that the empowerment (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. W. H. Walsh, James Griffin, J. W. N. Watkins, R. G. Swinburne, Bernard Mayo, J. A. Faris, C. H. Whiteley, P. F. Strawson, G. J. Warnock & Christopher Kirwan (1965). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 74 (295):434-458.score: 30.0
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. C. H. Whiteley (1969). Sense-Data. Philosophy 44 (September):187-192.score: 30.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. C. H. Whiteley (1950). Knowledge and Perception. By H. A. Prichard. (Oxford University Press. Pp. 214. Price 15s.). Philosophy 25 (95):358-.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. C. H. Whiteley (1959). Physical Objects. Philosophy 34 (129):142 - 149.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. J. Ettema Eric, D. Derksen Louise & Evert van Leeuwen (2010). Existential Loneliness and End-of-Life Care: A Systematic Review. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 31 (2).score: 30.0
    Patients with a life-threatening illness can be confronted with various types of loneliness, one of which is existential loneliness (EL). Since the experience of EL is extremely disruptive, the issue of EL is relevant for the practice of end-of-life care. Still, the literature on EL has generated little discussion and empirical substantiation and has never been systematically reviewed. In order to systematically review the literature, we (1) identified the existential loneliness literature; (2) established an organising framework for the review; (3) (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. C. H. Whiteley (1976). Morality and Egoism. Mind 85 (337):90-96.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. C. H. Whiteley (1956). On Retribution. Philosophy 31 (117):154 - 157.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Norwood R. Hanson, G. B. Keene, J. L. Ackrill, J. R. Lucas, Thomas McPherson, E. J. Lemmon, W. von Leyden, C. H. Whiteley, Renford Bambrough, A. C. MacIntyre, W. Gerber & M. Kneale (1958). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 67 (266):272-288.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. A. M. Quinton, J. L. Ackrill, C. H. Whiteley, Richard Wollheim, R. J. Hirst, Karl Britton, E. J. Furlong, Leslie J. Walker, K. V. Gajendragadkar, T. R. Miles & G. J. Warnock (1953). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 62 (245):107-124.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Jenny Teichmann, R. M. Hare, Anthony Palmer, D. R. Cousin, Jonathan Harrison & C. H. Whiteley (1969). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 78 (311):461-478.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. C. H. Whiteley (1982). The Justification of Morality. Philosophy 57 (222):435 - 451.score: 30.0
    The adoption by a community of a system of moral rules and ideals, and its imposition by training and compulsion, can be justified on non-moral grounds in so far as adherence to the system promotes cooperation and forbearance and thereby favours the welfare of all members. since an effective morality depends on the convinced support of people in general, the values to be upheld, which define "welfare", cannot be laid down a priori, but must be settled by negotiation, a continuous (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. H. Mounce, C. H. Whiteley, L. Jonathan Cohen, Don Locke, Antony Flew, Richard Robinson & S. A. Grave (1972). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 81 (324):618-639.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. C. H. Whiteley (1945). Hempel's Paradoxes of Confirmation. Mind 54 (214):156-158.score: 30.0
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. C. H. Whiteley (1960). On Defining "Moral". Analysis 20 (6):141 - 144.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. C. H. Whiteley (1958). An Introduction to Philosophical Analysis. By John Hospers. (Routledge and Kegan Paul. 1956. Pp. X + 525. Price 25s.). Philosophy 33 (124):70-.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. A. R. Lacey, William Kneale, Alan R. White, C. H. Whiteley & R. Kirk (1973). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 82 (325):143-160.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. H. H. Price, William Kneale, Antony Flew, R. G. Swinburne, D. Taylor & C. H. Whiteley (1967). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 76 (302):287-307.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. C. H. Whiteley (1949). On Understanding. Mind 58 (231):339-351.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. C. H. Whiteley, C. K. Grant, Alan Montefiore, Ronald W. Hepburn, H. J. Paton, P. H. Nowell-Smith, A. D. Woozley & J. A. Faris (1959). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 68 (272):556-574.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. C. H. Whiteley (1952). On Duties. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 53:95 - 104.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. C. H. Whiteley (1940). The Causal Theory of Perception. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 40:89-102.score: 30.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. C. H. Whiteley (1960). A History of Philosophy. Vol. V: Hobbes to Hume. By Frederick Copleston S.J. (London: Burns Oates and Washbourne. Pp. 413. Price 30s.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 35 (133):172-.score: 30.0
  41. C. H. Whiteley (1971). Empirical, Analytic, Evaluative. Analysis 31 (4):118 - 121.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. C. H. Whiteley (1958). Language and the Pursuit of Truth. By John Wilson. (Cambridge University Press. 1956. Pp. 105. Price 8s. 6d.). Philosophy 33 (126):282-.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. C. H. Whiteley (1959). Perceiving: A Philosophical Study. By Roderick M. Chisholm.(Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y. 1958. Pp. Ix + 197. Price 22s.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 34 (131):366-.score: 30.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. C. H. Whiteley (1959). The Idealist Tradition. Edited, with an Introduction and Commentary, by A. C. Ewing. (Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press. Pp. 362. Price $5.50.)Existentialism From Dostoevsky to Sartre. Edited, Selected and Introduced by Walter Kaufmann. (London: Thames and Hudson. Pp. 319. Price 12s. 6d.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 34 (130):269-.score: 30.0
  45. R. X. Ware, C. V. Borst & C. H. Whiteley (1972). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 81 (323):469-479.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. C. H. Whiteley (1969). Epistemological Strategies. Mind 78 (309):25-34.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. C. H. Whiteley (1958). Let Epimenides Lie! Analysis 19 (1):23 - 24.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. C. H. Whiteley (1959). Metaphysics and Science. Philosophical Quarterly 9 (36):244-249.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Vinit Haksar & C. H. Whiteley (1966). Symposium: Responsibility. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 40:187 - 234.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Richard Robinson, F. W. Thomas, W. J. H. Sprott, D. J. McCracken, Martha Kneale, C. Lewy, H. B. Acton, William Kneale, R. J. Spilsbury, John Arthur Passmore, P. H. Nowell-Smith, C. H. Whiteley, S. Hampshire, Margaret Macdonald & Richard Peters (1949). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 58 (212):246-275.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 992