Search results for 'Lucas Bietti' (try it on Scholar)

995 found
Sort by:
  1. Lucas Bietti (2011). Cognitive Pragmatics: The Mental Processes of Communication. Philosophical Psychology 25 (4):1-5.score: 240.0
    Philosophical Psychology, Volume 25, Issue 4, Page 623-627, August 2012.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Lucas M. Bietti (2011). Lambros Malafouris and Colin Renfrew (Eds.), The Cognitive Life of Things. Recasting the Boundaries of the Mind.. Pragmatics and Cognition 19 (1):141-149.score: 240.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Lucas M. Bietti (2012). Towards a Cognitive Pragmatics of Collective Remembering. Pragmatics and Cognition 20 (1):32-61.score: 240.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Charles B. Stone & Lucas Bietti (eds.) (forthcoming). Contextualizing Human Memory: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Understanding How Individuals and Groups Remember the Past. Psychology Press.score: 240.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Billy Joe Lucas (2002). Logical Constructivism, Modal Logic, and Metaphysics: A Reply to Professor Pruss' ``Professor Lucas' Second Epistemic Way''. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 52 (3):143-157.score: 180.0
  6. J. R. Lucas (1998). Transcendental Tense: J.R. Lucas. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 72 (1):45–56.score: 180.0
  7. J. R. Lucas (1984). Lucas, Godel and Astaire: A Rejoinder. Philosophical Quarterly 34 (137):507-508.score: 180.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Billy Joe Lucas (1997). The Second Epistemic Way Revisited: Reply to Professor Beard's, 'Professor Lucas on Omniscience'. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 42 (3):143-162.score: 180.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. John R. Lucas (1984). Lucas Against Mechanism II: A Rejoinder. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14 (June):189-91.score: 180.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. J. R. Lucas, The Huxley-Wilberforce Debate Revisited.score: 60.0
    According to the legend, Bishop Wilberforce (``Soapy Sam'') at a meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science in Oxford on Saturday, June 30th, 1860, turned to Thomas Huxley, and asked him ``Is it on your grandfather's or your grandmother's side that you claim descent from a monkey''; whereupon Huxley delivered a devastating rebuke, thereby establishing the primacy of scientific truth over ecclesiastical obscurantism. Although the legend is historically untrue in almost every detail, its persistence suggests that (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Brian Lucas (2013). Religious Confession Privilege and the Common Law [Book Review]. Australasian Catholic Record, The 90 (1):113.score: 60.0
    Lucas, Brian Review(s) of: Religious confession privilege and the common law, by Keith Thompson (Leiden: Matinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2011), pp.395, E135.00.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. J. R. Lucas (2000). The Conceptual Roots of Mathematics: An Essay on the Philosophy of Mathematics. Routledge.score: 60.0
    The Conceptual Roots of Mathematics is a comprehensive study of the foundation of mathematics. Lucas, one of the most distinguished Oxford scholars, covers a vast amount of ground in the philosophy of mathematics, showing us that it is actually at the heart of the study of epistemology and metaphysics.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. J. R. Lucas, I Have Recently Had an E-Mail From Mr Evin Harris of Trinity College Dublin:.score: 60.0
    Dear Mr. Lucas, I was wondering if you had come across Query 44 of George Berkeley's ``Analyst: A discourse addressed to an infidel mathematician"?. It reads: ``Whether the difference between a mere computer and a man of science be not that one computes on principles clearly conceived and by rules evidently demonstrated, whereas the other [i.e a man] doth not?" Not bad for 1734!
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Brian Lucas (2012). The Price of Freedom: Edmund Rice Educational Leader [Book Review]. Australasian Catholic Record, The 89 (1):121.score: 60.0
    Lucas, Brian Review(s) of: The price of freedom: Edmund Rice educational leader, by Denis McLaughlin, East Kew: David Lovell Publishing, 2007, pp.397, $45.00.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. J. R. Lucas (1997). Comments: Reality and Time. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 11 (1):97 – 108.score: 60.0
    (1997). Comments: Reality and time. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science: Vol. 11, Festschrift for J. R. Lucas, pp. 97-108. doi: 10.1080/02698599708573553.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Brian Lucas (2012). The Episcopal Conference in the Communications Marketplace: Issues and Challenges for Catholic Identity and Ecclesiology. Australasian Catholic Record, The 89 (4):408.score: 60.0
    Lucas, Brian This article deals with the role of the Episcopal Conference in the area of social communications and the tensions that arise with respect to the respective roles of the diocesan bishop and the Episcopal Conference, including lay heads of ecclesial agencies, in presenting 'the face of the Church' in the public forum. The article is divided into two sections: i)The Church as 'visible institution' and the ecclesiological and juridical foundations for identifying those who represent it in the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. J. R. Lucas, The Open Society €“ and ..score: 60.0
    There was once a leak from Hebdomadal Council. The Assessor told her husband, who told my wife, who told me that Monday afternoon had been spent discussing what Lucas would say if various courses of action were adopted, leading to the conclusion that it would be best to do nothing. I was flattered, but a bit surprised. The tide of philosophical scepticism had ebbed, and it was generally allowed that a reasonable way of discovering what someone would say (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Hello John Lucas, About Me.score: 60.0
    Hello Mr John Lucas, I go to school in Perth in Western Australia. In the subject mathematics at my school, we were given a project to research a given mathematician and write a report on them. I was given you. I have to incorporate some information about the mathematical times in which you live and to attempt to include details of the contribution that you made to the field of mathematics. I also have to include a short biography (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Brian Lucas (2011). Pope Benedict XVI and the Sexual Abuse Crisis - Working for Reform and Renewal [Book Review]. Australasian Catholic Record, The 88 (3):381.score: 60.0
    Lucas, Brian Review(s) of: Pope benedict XVI and the sexual abuse crisis - working for reform and renewal, Gregory Erlandson and Matthew Bunson, (Huntington, Indiana: Our Sunday Visitor Publishing Division, 2010), pb, pp.207.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. J. R. Lucas (2011). Conceptual Roots of Mathematics. Routledge.score: 60.0
    The Conceptual Roots of Mathematics is a comprehensive study of the foundation of mathematics. J.R. Lucas, one of the most distinguished Oxford scholars, covers a vast amount of ground in the philosophy of mathematics, showing us that it is actually at the heart of the study of epistemology and metaphysics.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. J. R. Lucas (2003). Knowing the Unknowable God: How Faith Thrives on Divine Mystery. Waterbrook Press.score: 60.0
    Meet the God Who Is Greater Than Your Biggest Questions. The Bible never shies away from seeming contradictions. We are told both to resist our enemies and to love them, and that our all-knowing God can sometimes forget. Unable to reconcile such biblical paradoxes, some people abandon Christianity, while others pretend that the seeming contradictions don’t exist–preferring to believe in an uncomplicated, easy-to-comprehend God. Yet countless others are hungry for new insight into the God behind the Bible’s mysterious paradoxes. Responding (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. J. R. Lucas (1995). Responsibility. Clarendon Press.score: 60.0
    Responsibility is a key concept in our moral, social and political thinking, but is not itself properly understood. In this book J R Lucas elucidates it in terms of answerability - the obligation to answer the question 'Why did you do it?' He develops this account to include negative responsiblity - 'Why did you not do something about it?' - and share responsibility, which together yield the rationale of political responsibility. In disentangling these two strands of argument, he points (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. John R. Lucas (1961). Minds, Machines and Godel. Philosophy 36 (April-July):112-127.score: 30.0
    Goedel's theorem states that in any consistent system which is strong enough to produce simple arithmetic there are formulae which cannot be proved-in-the-system, but which we can see to be true. Essentially, we consider the formula which says, in effect, "This formula is unprovable-in-the-system". If this formula were provable-in-the-system, we should have a contradiction: for if it were provablein-the-system, then it would not be unprovable-in-the-system, so that "This formula is unprovable-in-the-system" would be false: equally, if it were provable-in-the-system, then it (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. J. R. Lucas, The Unity of Science Without Reductionism.score: 30.0
    The Unity of Science is often thought to be reductionist, but this is because we fail to distinguish questions from answers. The questions asked by different sciences are different---the biologist is interested in different topics from the physicist, and seeks different explanations---but the answers are not peculiar to each particular science, and can range over the whole of scientific knowledge. The biologist is interested in organisms--- concept unknown to physics---but explains physiological processes in terms of chemistry, not a mysterious vital (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. John R. Lucas, The Implications of Godel's Theorem.score: 30.0
    In 1931 Kurt Gödel proved two theorems about the completeness and consistency of first-order arithmetic. Their implications for philosophy are profound. Many fashionable tenets are shown to be untenable: many traditional intuitions are vindicated by incontrovertible arguments.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. John R. Lucas, The Godelian Argument: Turn Over the Page.score: 30.0
    I have no quarrel with the first two sentences: but the third, though charitable and courteous, is quite untrue. Although there are criticisms which can be levelled against the Gödelian argument, most of the critics have not read either of my, or either of Penrose's, expositions carefully, and seek to refute arguments we never put forward, or else propose as a fatal objection one that had already been considered and countered in our expositions of the argument. Hence my title. The (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. John R. Lucas & Michael Redhead (2007). Truth and Provability. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (2):331-2.score: 30.0
    The views of Redhead ([2004]) are defended against the argument by Panu Raatikainen ([2005]). The importance of informal rigour is canvassed, and the argument for the a priori nature of induction is explained. The significance of Gödel's theorem is again rehearsed.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. John R. Lucas (1968). Satan Stultified: A Rejoinder to Paul Benacerraf. The Monist 52 (1):145-58.score: 30.0
    The argument is a dialectical one. It is not a direct proof that the mind is something more than a machine, but a schema of disproof for any particular version of mechanism that may be put forward. If the mechanist maintains any specific thesis, I show that [146] a contradiction ensues. But only if. It depends on the mechanist making the first move and putting forward his claim for inspection. I do not think Benacerraf has quite taken the point. He (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. J. R. Lucas, An Engagement with Plato's Republic.score: 30.0
    Plato was politically incorrect---gloriously incorrect: hard to ignore and difficult to refute. Read An Engagement with Plato's Republic to argue with him or against him, for contemporary orthodoxies or against them. ``Plato was the first feminist. Women were the same as men, only not so good.''.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. J. R. Lucas, Chapter 9a What is Logic?score: 30.0
    Thus far the logic out of which mathematics has developed has been First-order Predicate Calculus with Identity, that is the logic of the sentential functors, ¬, →, ∧, ∨, etc., together with identity and the existential and universal quotifiers restricted to quotify- ing only over individuals, and not anything else, such as qualities or quotities themselves. Some philosophers—among them Quine— have held that this, First-order Logic, as it is often called, con- stitutes the whole of logic. But that is a (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. John R. Lucas (1970). The Freedom of the Will. Oxford University Press.score: 30.0
    It might be the case that absence of constraint is the relevant sense of ' freedom' when we are discussing the freedom of the will, but it needs arguing for. ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. J. R. Lucas (1965). Against Equality. Philosophy 40 (154):296 - 307.score: 30.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. John R. Lucas (1970). Mechanism: A Rejoinder. Philosophy 45 (April):149-51.score: 30.0
    PROFESSOR LEWIS 1 and Professor Coder 2 criticize my use of Gödel's theorem to refute Mechanism. 3 Their criticisms are valuable. In order to meet them I need to show more clearly both what the tactic of my argument is at one crucial point and the general aim of the whole manoeuvre.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. John R. Lucas (1967). Human and Machine Logic: A Rejoinder. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19 (August):155-6.score: 30.0
    We can imagine a human operator playing a game of one-upmanship against a programmed computer. If the program is Fn, the human operator can print the theorem Gn, which the programmed computer, or, if you prefer, the program, would never print, if it is consistent. This is true for each whole number n, but the victory is a hollow one since a second computer, loaded with program C, could put the human operator out of a job.... It is useless for (...)
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. J. R. Lucas, The Ontological Argument.score: 30.0
    The ontological argument has run for a long time, regularly refuted, regularly re-appearing in a new form. Something can be learnt from its longevity. Its proponents must be on to something, or it would not have survived its many refutations. But equally, it must have been much misformulated, or it would not have seemed evidently fallacious to its many critics. Perhaps it does express a deep philosophical intimation. Certainly it has been taken to prove more than it really can establish. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. J. R. Lucas, The Responsibilities of a Businessman.score: 30.0
    MANY thinkers deny the possibility of businessmen having responsibilities or ethical obligations. A businessman has no alternative, in view of the competition of the market-place, to do anything other than buy at the cheapest and sell at the dearest price he can. In any case, it would be irrational-if, indeed, it were possible-not to do so. Admittedly, there is a framework of law within which he has to operate, but that is all, and so long as he keeps the law (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Basil Mitchell & J. R. Lucas (2003). An Engagement with Plato's Republic. Ashgate.score: 30.0
    Introductions should introduce, but sometimes lead to engagements. That is our aim. We want to make Plato’s Republic more easily read by modern readers, but do not want to do only that. For philosophy is like poetry, and cannot be learned second-hand. I can learn all sorts of facts about a poem, but unless I have entered into the poet’s experience, if only in my imagination, it remains dead. Similarly, I shall not see the point of text-book analyses of philosophical (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. D. W. Lucas (1968). Aristotle Poetics. The Classical Review 18 (02):168-.score: 30.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. J. R. Lucas (1958). On Not Worshipping Facts. Philosophical Quarterly 8 (31):144-156.score: 30.0
    My sights in this paper are trained on facts. Most people think that they know what facts are; that while their friends often, and themselves occasionally, are ignorant of the facts, at least they know what sort of things facts are---they can recognise a fact when they see it. Facts, in the popular philosophy of today, are good, simple souls; there is no guile in them, nor any room for subjective bias, and once we have made ourselves acquainted with them, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Billy Joe Lucas (1997). Graham Oppy, Ontological Arguments and Belief in God. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 41 (3):181-183.score: 30.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Sheri Lucas (2005). A Defense of the Feminist-Vegetarian Connection. Hypatia 20 (1):150-177.score: 30.0
    : Kathryn Paxton George's recent publication, Animal, Vegetable, or Woman? (2000), is the culmination of more than a decade's work and encompasses standard and original arguments against the feminist-vegetarian connection. This paper demonstrates that George's key arguments are deeply flawed, antithetical to basic feminist commitments, and beg the question against fundamental aspects of the debate. Those who do not accept the feminist-vegetarian connection should rethink their position or offer a non-question-begging defense of it.
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Peter Lucas (2002). Mind-Forged Manacles and Habits of the Soul: Foucault's Debt to Heidegger. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (3):310-328.score: 30.0
  43. J. R. Lucas, Jesus Barabbas.score: 30.0
    But still, I had heard it. It must have been in the New English Bible and the New English E 'o)# f&# Bible is sound on scholarship, so there must be good manuscript authority for s..
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Thierry Lucas (2005). Later Mohist Logic, Lei, Classes, and Sorts. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 32 (3):349–365.score: 30.0
  45. Billy Joe Lucas (2012). The Right to Believe Truth Paradoxes of Moral Regret for No Belief and the Role(s) of Logic in Philosophy of Religion. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 72 (2):115-138.score: 30.0
    I offer you some theories of intellectual obligations and rights (virtue Ethics): initially, RBT (a Right to Believe Truth, if something is true it follows one has a right to believe it), and, NDSM (one has no right to believe a contradiction, i.e., No right to commit Doxastic Self-Mutilation). Evidence for both below. Anthropology, Psychology, computer software, Sociology, and the neurosciences prove things about human beliefs, and History, Economics, and comparative law can provide evidence of value about theories of rights. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Thierry Lucas (1993). Hui Shih and Kung Sun Lung an Approach From Contemporary Logic. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 20 (2):211-255.score: 30.0
  47. George R. Lucas (2003). The Role of the 'International Community' in Just War Tradition--Confronting the Challenges of Humanitarian Intervention and Preemptive War. Journal of Military Ethics 2 (2):122-144.score: 30.0
    Although the use of military force for humanitarian ends seems utterly divorced from the use of such force to combat terrorism, both uses answer to similar descriptions. Both appear to encourage nations that are not necessarily themselves under attack to set aside the reigning conventions of national sovereignty and territorial integrity for the overriding purposes of international law enforcement and protection of vulnerable noncombatants. Both involve offensive rather than purely defensive uses of military force. Both answer to criteria of justification (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. J. R. Lucas, Criticisms and Discussions of the Gödelian Argument.score: 30.0
    based on a list which I distributed at the Turing Conference in Brighton some years ago, with some further additions. In the Proceedings, Machines and Thought, ed. Peter Millican and Andy Clark, Oxford, 1996, Robin Gandy gives a much earlier reference: Emil L. Post, `Absolutely Unsolvable Problems and Relatively Undecidable Propositions—Account of an Anticipation’, in Martin Davis, (ed.), The Undecidable (New York: Raven Press, 1965), pp.340-435, esp. pp.417-24. Chalmers gives a more up-to-date list in his bibliography—which used to be (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. John R. Lucas, Can the Theory of Games Save Mill's Utilitarianism?score: 30.0
    John Stuart Mill’s Utilitarianism engages our interest and sympathy because it is flawed. It reflects the crisis in Mill’s life, when he lost his faith. He had been brought up by his father in the straitest tenets of utilitarianism, but had had nervous breakdown in early adult life from emotional ill-nourishment. Utilitarianism might work as a guide for the well-governing of India by James Mill and his colleagues, but gave little sustenance to the aspiring spirit of the Romantic Movement. It (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Peter Lucas (2011). Decision-Making Capacity and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (2):117-122.score: 30.0
    Principle 2 of the 2005 Mental Capacity Act (MCA) requires that decision-making capacity should be assumed, unless there is conclusive evidence, on a balance of probabilities, to the contrary (Department of Constitutional Affairs 2005). In his article “The Paradox of the Assessment of Capacity Under the Mental Capacity Act 2005,” Ajit Shah (2011) raises the concern that the new Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DOLS), introduced through the Mental Health Act (Department of Health 2007), conflict with this principle (henceforth, the principle (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 995