Search results for 'Lucas Haley Commons-Miller' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1. Richard Miller (2011). Choosing What to Do in Afghanistan: A Reply by Richard W. Miller. Ethics & International Affairs 25 (2).
    In this online exclusive, Miller responds to the comments by Lucas, McMahan, Moellendorf, Teson, and Rodin on his essay, "The Ethics of America's Afghan War.".
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  15
    Michael Lamport Commons & Patrice Marie Miller (2002). A Complete Theory of Human Evolution of Intelligence Must Consider Stage Changes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):404-405.
    We show 13 stages of the development of tool-use and tool making during different eras in the evolution of Homo sapiens. We used the NeoPiagetian Model of Hierarchical Complexity rather than Piaget's. We distinguished the use of existing methods imitated or learned from others, from doing such a task on one's own.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  3.  25
    Chester Wolfsont, Sara Nora Ross, Patrice Marie Miller, Michael Lamport Commons & Miriam Chernoff (2008). Domain-Specific Increases in Stage of Performance in a Complete Theory of the Evolution of Human Intelligence. World Futures 64 (5 - 7):416 – 429.
    The evolution of humans required performing increasingly hierarchically complex tasks within multiple domains. Hierarchical complexity increases task by task. Tasks occur within, and differ by, determinable domains, their stages of performance measurable using the Model of Hierarchical Complexity. How well one performs within single and multiple domains is considered to indicate intelligence. Original task-initiation is more difficult than imitational learning and can create new domains. Levels of support reduce task difficulty, increasing performance. Task-performance may be generalized to other domains. Stages (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Iris V. Cully & Randolph Crump Miller (1978). Process and Relationship Issues in Theory, Philosophy, and Religious Education : A Festschrift for Randolph Crump Miller. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Richard W. Miller, George R. Lucas Jr, Jeff McMahan, Darrel Moellendorf, Enabling Monsters, Fernando R. Tesón, Ending War, David Rodin, Global Democratization & John S. Dryzek (2011). Carnegie Council. Ethics and International Affairs 25.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Arthur Miller & Robert A. Martin (1978). The Theater Essays of Arthur Miller. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Paul J. Schafer, Nicholas V. Costantino, Walter P. Krolikowski, Clyde E. Crum, R. Williams, Christopher J. Lucas, George M. Bellack, Val D. Rust, Miller Jr & Richard R. Renner (1975). Book Review Section 3. [REVIEW] Ethics and Behavior 6 (1):75-83.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  23
    George A. Miller & Gilbert Harman (eds.) (1993). Conceptions of the Human Mind: Essays in Honor of George A. Miller. L. Erlbaum Associates.
    This volume is a direct result of a conference held at Princeton University to honor George A. Miller, an extraordinary psychologist. A distinguished panel of speakers from various disciplines -- psychology, philosophy, neuroscience and artificial intelligence -- were challenged to respond to Dr. Miller's query: "What has happened to cognition? In other words, what has the past 30 years contributed to our understanding of the mind? Do we really know anything that wasn't already clear to William James?" Each participant tried (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   31 citations  
  9.  13
    Charles Weijer & Paul B. Miller (2007). Refuting the Net Risks Test: A Response to Wendler and Miller's "Assessing Research Risks Systematically". Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (8):487-490.
    Earlier in the pages of this journal (p 481), Wendler and Miller offered the "net risks test" as an alternative approach to the ethical analysis of benefits and harms in research. They have been vocal critics of the dominant view of benefit-harm analysis in research ethics, which encompasses core concepts of duty of care, clinical equipoise and component analysis. They had been challenged to come up with a viable alternative to component analysis which meets five criteria. The alternative must (1) (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  10.  21
    Christian Miller (2005). Review of Alexander Miller, An Introduction to Contemporary Metaethics. [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83:279-281.
    My initial hope when I first saw Miller’s book was that here at least would be a work which satisfies the long standing need for a comprehensive introduction to contemporary metaethics which is accessible enough to be employed in advanced undergraduate courses and introductory graduate seminars. This hope was only partially realized, however, as Miller ends up oscillating between clear presentations of extant debates in the recent literature and his own extended attempts to determine where the truth of the matter (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. John Lucas (2003). Lucas Against Mechanism: A Rejoinder. Etica E Politica 5 (1):1.
    Coder’s argument is very similar to Lewis’ one: he maintains that some human beings are not able to follow Gödel’s theorem, so Lucas’ argument cannot show that their minds are not machines. The answer of Lucas is that one proposed against Lewis’ criticism, that is that Mechanism makes a universal claim and so a single counter-example – a single mind producing a singe truth not recognizable by any machine – is a disproof for it.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  19
    Lucas Haley Commons-Miller, Michael Lamport Commons & Geoffrey David Commons (2008). Genetic Engineering and the Speciation of Superions From Humans. World Futures 64 (5):436-443.
    (2008). Genetic Engineering and the Speciation of Superions from Humans. World Futures: Vol. 64, Postformal Thought and Hierarchical Complexity, pp. 436-443.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  32
    Lucas Alexander Haley Commons-Miller, Michael Lamport Commons & Geoffrey David Commons (2008). Genetic Engineering and the Speciation of Superions From Humans. World Futures 64 (5 - 7):436 – 443.
    Using ideas from evolution and postformal stages of hierarchical complexity, a hypothetical scenario, premised on genetic engineering advances, portrays the development of a new humanoid species, Superions. How would Superions impact and treat current humans? If the Superion scenario came to pass, it would be the ultimate genocidal terrorism of eliminating an entire species, Homo Sapiens. We speculate about defenses Homo Sapiens might mount. The tasks to relate two species (systems) constitutes a postformal, Metasystematic task. Developing a system of discourse (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Steven Miller (1992). Steven Miller. Social Epistemology 6 (1):23-33.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  15. Mitchell Miller (2007). « Review Essay: Miller On Sayre On Metaphysics And Method In Plato’s Statesman ». [REVIEW] Plato: The Internet Journal of the International Plato Society 7.
  16.  27
    Billy Joe Lucas (2002). Logical Constructivism, Modal Logic, and Metaphysics: A Reply to Professor Pruss' ``Professor Lucas' Second Epistemic Way''. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 52 (3):143-157.
  17.  10
    N. Miller, G. Valdés Gutiérrez & R. Salazar (2007). Reseña de "Paradigmas emancipatorios y movimientos sociales en América Latina teoría y praxis" de Gilberto Nchamah Miller y Robinson Salazar (coords.). Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana 12 (36):129-131.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  14
    John R. Lucas (1984). Lucas Against Mechanism II: A Rejoinder. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14 (June):189-91.
  19.  13
    J. R. Lucas (1984). Lucas, Godel and Astaire: A Rejoinder. Philosophical Quarterly 34 (137):507-508.
  20. Peter Miller (1998). Richard M. Miller, Casuistry and Modern Ethics: A Poetics of Practical Reasoning Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 18 (2):132-134.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  14
    J. R. Lucas (1998). Transcendental Tense: J.R. Lucas. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 72 (1):45–56.
  22.  15
    Billy Joe Lucas (1997). The Second Epistemic Way Revisited: Reply to Professor Beard's, 'Professor Lucas on Omniscience'. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 42 (3):143-162.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  7
    Steven Joffe & Franklin G. Miller (2008). Steven Joffe and Franklin G. Miller Reply. Hastings Center Report 38 (5):7-7.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  1
    Barry Miller (1972). IN MEMORIAM: Robert D. Miller. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (2):65.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  1
    J. G. Miller (1915). Miller Anna Bertha: Roman Etiquette of the Late Republic. Classical World: A Quarterly Journal on Antiquity 9:61-62.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  2
    Paul Litton & Franklin G. Miller (2005). Paul Litton and Franklin G. Miller Reply to Madeline M. Motta. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 33 (4):635-635.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. J. R. Lucas (1973). ‘Because You Are a Woman’: J. R. Lucas. Philosophy 48 (184):161-171.
    Plato was the first feminist. In the Republic he puts forward the view that women are just the same as men, only not quite so good. It is a view which has often been expressed in recent years, and generates strong passions. Some of these have deep biological origins, which a philosopher can only hope to recognize and not to assuage. But much of the heat engendered is due to unnecessary friction between views which are certainly compatible and probably correct. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  28. George Goe, B. van der Waerden & Arthur Miller (1974). Comments on Miller's "The Myth of Gauss' Experiment on the Euclidean Nature of Physical Space". Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 65:83-87.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. George Goe, B. L. van der Waerden & Arthur I. Miller (1974). Comments on Miller's "The Myth of Gauss' Experiment on the Euclidean Nature of Physical Space". Isis 65 (1):83-87.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Adolf Grunbaum & Arthur Miller (1977). Remarks on Miller's Review of Philosophical Problems of Space and Time. Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 68:447-450.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Adolf Grunbaum & Arthur I. Miller (1977). Remarks on Miller's Review of Philosophical Problems of Space and Time. Isis 68 (3):447-450.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, William Wallace & Arnold V. Miller (1971). Philosophy of Mind. Being Part Three of the Encyclopaedia of the Philosophical Sciences, 1830, Translated by William Wallace, Together with the Zusätze in Boumann's Text, 1845, Translated by A.V. Miller. With a Foreword by J.N. Findlay. --. [REVIEW] Clarendon Press.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Stanley Romaine Hopper & David L. Miller (1967). Interpretation the Poetry of Meaning; [Essays] Edited by Stanley Romaine Hopper and David L. Miller. Harcourt, Brace & World.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Richard C. Jeffrey, David Miller, Karl R. Popper, Jeffrey Bub, Michael Radner & William W. Rozeboom (1970). A Paradox of Information.A Comment on Miller's New Paradox of Information.A Paradox of Zero Information.Miller's So-Called Paradox: A Reply to Professor J. L. Mackie.Miller's Paradox of Information.The Straight and Narrow Rule of Induction: A Reply to Dr Bub and Mr Radner.New Mysteries for Old: The Transfiguration of Miller's Paradox. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (1):124.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Paul Litton & Franklin G. Miller (2005). Paul Litton and Franklin G. Miller Reply to Madeline M. Motta. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (4):635-635.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. J. R. Lucas (1977). Against Equality Again: J. R. Lucas. Philosophy 52 (201):255-280.
    Equality in the present age has become an idol, in much the same way as property was in the age of Locke. Many people worship it, and think that it provides the key to the proper understanding of politics, and that on it alone can a genuinely just society be reconstructed. This is a mistake. Although, like property, it is a useful concept, and although, like property, there are occasions when we want to have it in practice, it is not (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Richard Lucas (1717). An Enquiry After Happiness, by the Author of Practical Christianity. By R. Lucas.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. J. R. Lucas (1993). A Mind of One's Own: J. R. Lucas. Philosophy 68 (266):457-471.
    Whatever good or ill it did to Guy Fawkes, his resuscitation at the hands of Bernard Williams has, by any utilitarian reckoning, been a Good Thing. A casual glance at the literature that has accumulated over the past thirty-five years leaves no doubt that the topic has been reduplicated many times over, to the great enjoyment of undergraduates, who have been able to write science fiction under the guise of essays in the Philosophy of Mind, and of dons, who in (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Richard Lucas (1717). Humane Life: Or, a Second Part of the Enquiry After Happiness, by the Author of Practical Christianity. By R. Lucas.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. J. R. Lucas (1998). II–J.R. Lucas. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 72 (1):45-56.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Richard Lucas (1717). Religious Perfection: Or, a 3rd Part of the Enquiry After Happiness, by the Author of Practical Christianity. By R. Lucas.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. George Herbert Mead, John Monroe Brewster, Albert Millard Dunham, David L. Miller & Charles William Morris (1967). The Philosophy of the Act. Edited, with Introd. By Charles W. Morris in Collaboration with John M. Brewster, Albert M. Dunham [and] David L. Miller. [REVIEW] The University of Chicago Press.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. F. G. Miller & H. Brody (2003). Clinical Equipoise and the Therapeutic Misconception-Miller and Brody Reply. Hastings Center Report 33 (5):7-7.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Franklin Miller & Robert Truog (2009). Franklin Miller and Robert Truog Reply. Hastings Center Report 39 (3):6-6.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Alexander Miller (2003). II—Alexander Miller: Does 'Belief-Holism' Show That Reductive Dispositionalism About Content Could Not Be True? Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77 (1):73-90.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Alexander Miller (2003). LANGUAGE* Alexander Miller. In John Shand (ed.), Fundamentals of Philosophy. Routledge 262.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. C. Miller (2005). Miller, Alexander, An Introduction to Contemporary Metaethics. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (2):279.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Miller Miller (1915). Miller Anna Bertha: Roman Etiquette of the Late Republic. [REVIEW] Classical World: A Quarterly Journal on Antiquity 9:61-62.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. J. Miller & D. Miller (1996). Miller contro Miller: una polemica. Studi di Estetica 13:191-236.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. M. Miller (2001). Phase I Cancer Trials: Therapeutic Research?-Matthew Miller Replies. Hastings Center Report 31 (1):5-5.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000