Search results for 'Lucas Haley Commons-Miller' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Michael Lamport Commons & Patrice Marie Miller (2002). A Complete Theory of Human Evolution of Intelligence Must Consider Stage Changes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):404-405.score: 240.0
    We show 13 stages of the development of tool-use and tool making during different eras in the evolution of Homo sapiens. We used the NeoPiagetian Model of Hierarchical Complexity rather than Piaget's. We distinguished the use of existing methods imitated or learned from others, from doing such a task on one's own.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Chester Wolfsont, Sara Nora Ross, Patrice Marie Miller, Michael Lamport Commons & Miriam Chernoff (2008). Domain-Specific Increases in Stage of Performance in a Complete Theory of the Evolution of Human Intelligence. World Futures 64 (5 - 7):416 – 429.score: 240.0
    The evolution of humans required performing increasingly hierarchically complex tasks within multiple domains. Hierarchical complexity increases task by task. Tasks occur within, and differ by, determinable domains, their stages of performance measurable using the Model of Hierarchical Complexity. How well one performs within single and multiple domains is considered to indicate intelligence. Original task-initiation is more difficult than imitational learning and can create new domains. Levels of support reduce task difficulty, increasing performance. Task-performance may be generalized to other domains. Stages (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Richard W. Miller, George R. Lucas Jr, Jeff McMahan, Darrel Moellendorf, Enabling Monsters, Fernando R. Tesón, Ending War, David Rodin, Global Democratization & John S. Dryzek (2011). Carnegie Council. Ethics and International Affairs 25.score: 240.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Paul J. Schafer, Nicholas V. Costantino, Walter P. Krolikowski, Clyde E. Crum, R. Williams, Christopher J. Lucas, George M. Bellack, Val D. Rust, Miller Jr & Richard R. Renner (1975). Book Review Section 3. [REVIEW] Ethics and Behavior 6 (1):75-83.score: 240.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Lucas Haley Commons-Miller, Michael Lamport Commons & Geoffrey David Commons (2008). Genetic Engineering and the Speciation of Superions From Humans. World Futures 64 (5):436-443.score: 201.0
    (2008). Genetic Engineering and the Speciation of Superions from Humans. World Futures: Vol. 64, Postformal Thought and Hierarchical Complexity, pp. 436-443.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Brian Lucas (2013). Religious Confession Privilege and the Common Law [Book Review]. Australasian Catholic Record, The 90 (1):113.score: 200.0
    Lucas, Brian Review(s) of: Religious confession privilege and the common law, by Keith Thompson (Leiden: Matinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2011), pp.395, E135.00.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Lucas Alexander Haley Commons-Miller, Michael Lamport Commons & Geoffrey David Commons (2008). Genetic Engineering and the Speciation of Superions From Humans. World Futures 64 (5 - 7):436 – 443.score: 198.0
    Using ideas from evolution and postformal stages of hierarchical complexity, a hypothetical scenario, premised on genetic engineering advances, portrays the development of a new humanoid species, Superions. How would Superions impact and treat current humans? If the Superion scenario came to pass, it would be the ultimate genocidal terrorism of eliminating an entire species, Homo Sapiens. We speculate about defenses Homo Sapiens might mount. The tasks to relate two species (systems) constitutes a postformal, Metasystematic task. Developing a system of discourse (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. George A. Miller & Gilbert Harman (eds.) (1993). Conceptions of the Human Mind: Essays in Honor of George A. Miller. L. Erlbaum Associates.score: 150.0
    This volume is a direct result of a conference held at Princeton University to honor George A. Miller, an extraordinary psychologist. A distinguished panel of speakers from various disciplines -- psychology, philosophy, neuroscience and artificial intelligence -- were challenged to respond to Dr. Miller's query: "What has happened to cognition? In other words, what has the past 30 years contributed to our understanding of the mind? Do we really know anything that wasn't already clear to William James?" Each participant tried (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Christian Miller (2005). Review of Alexander Miller, An Introduction to Contemporary Metaethics. [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83:279-281.score: 150.0
    My initial hope when I first saw Miller’s book was that here at least would be a work which satisfies the long standing need for a comprehensive introduction to contemporary metaethics which is accessible enough to be employed in advanced undergraduate courses and introductory graduate seminars. This hope was only partially realized, however, as Miller ends up oscillating between clear presentations of extant debates in the recent literature and his own extended attempts to determine where the truth of the matter (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Charles Weijer & Paul B. Miller (2007). Refuting the Net Risks Test: A Response to Wendler and Miller's "Assessing Research Risks Systematically". Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (8):487-490.score: 150.0
    Earlier in the pages of this journal (p 481), Wendler and Miller offered the "net risks test" as an alternative approach to the ethical analysis of benefits and harms in research. They have been vocal critics of the dominant view of benefit-harm analysis in research ethics, which encompasses core concepts of duty of care, clinical equipoise and component analysis. They had been challenged to come up with a viable alternative to component analysis which meets five criteria. The alternative must (1) (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Andrew Alexandra & Seumas Miller (2009). Ethical Theory, “Common Morality,” and Professional Obligations. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (1):69-80.score: 140.0
    We have two aims in this paper. The first is negative: to demonstrate the problems in Bernard Gert’s account of common morality, in particular as it applies to professional morality. The second is positive: to suggest a more satisfactory explanation of the moral basis of professional role morality, albeit one that is broadly consistent with Gert’s notion of common morality, but corrects and supplements Gert’s theory. The paper is in three sections. In the first, we sketch the main features of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. J. R. Lucas, The Open Society €“ and ..score: 140.0
    There was once a leak from Hebdomadal Council. The Assessor told her husband, who told my wife, who told me that Monday afternoon had been spent discussing what Lucas would say if various courses of action were adopted, leading to the conclusion that it would be best to do nothing. I was flattered, but a bit surprised. The tide of philosophical scepticism had ebbed, and it was generally allowed that a reasonable way of discovering what someone would say (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Peter N. Miller (1994). Defining the Common Good: Empire, Religion, and Philosophy in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Cambridge University Press.score: 140.0
    The theme of this book is the crisis of the early modern state in eighteenth-century Britain. The revolt of the North American colonies and the simultaneous demand for wider religious toleration at home challenged the principles of sovereignty and obligation that underpinned arguments about the character of the state. These were expressed in terms of the 'common good', 'necessity', and 'community' - concepts that came to the fore in early modern European political thought and which gave expression to the problem (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Billy Joe Lucas (2002). Logical Constructivism, Modal Logic, and Metaphysics: A Reply to Professor Pruss' ``Professor Lucas' Second Epistemic Way''. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 52 (3):143-157.score: 120.0
  15. J. R. Lucas (1984). Lucas, Godel and Astaire: A Rejoinder. Philosophical Quarterly 34 (137):507-508.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. J. R. Lucas (1998). Transcendental Tense: J.R. Lucas. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 72 (1):45–56.score: 120.0
  17. Billy Joe Lucas (1997). The Second Epistemic Way Revisited: Reply to Professor Beard's, 'Professor Lucas on Omniscience'. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 42 (3):143-162.score: 120.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. John R. Lucas (1984). Lucas Against Mechanism II: A Rejoinder. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14 (June):189-91.score: 120.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Steven Joffe & Franklin G. Miller (2008). Steven Joffe and Franklin G. Miller Reply. Hastings Center Report 38 (5):7-7.score: 120.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Paul Litton & Franklin G. Miller (2005). Paul Litton and Franklin G. Miller Reply to Madeline M. Motta. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (4):635-635.score: 120.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. N. Miller, G. Valdés Gutiérrez & R. Salazar (2007). Reseña de "Paradigmas emancipatorios y movimientos sociales en América Latina teoría y praxis" de Gilberto Nchamah Miller y Robinson Salazar (coords.). Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana 12 (36):129-131.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Peter Miller (1998). Richard M. Miller, Casuistry and Modern Ethics: A Poetics of Practical Reasoning Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 18 (2):132-134.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Steven Miller (1992). Steven Miller. Social Epistemology 6 (1):23-33.score: 120.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. F. G. Miller & H. Brody (2003). Clinical Equipoise and the Therapeutic Misconception-Miller and Brody Reply. Hastings Center Report 33 (5):7-7.score: 120.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Franklin Miller & Robert Truog (2009). Franklin Miller and Robert Truog Reply. Hastings Center Report 39 (3):6-6.score: 120.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Alexander Miller (2003). LANGUAGE* Alexander Miller. In John Shand (ed.), Fundamentals of Philosophy. Routledge. 262.score: 120.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. C. Miller (2005). Miller, Alexander, An Introduction to Contemporary Metaethics. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (2):279.score: 120.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. M. Miller (2001). Phase I Cancer Trials: Therapeutic Research?-Matthew Miller Replies. Hastings Center Report 31 (1):5-5.score: 120.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Nchamah Miller & Gilberto Valdés Gutiérrez (2007). Reseña de “paradigmas emancipatorios Y movimientos sociales en américa latina teoría Y praxis” de Gilberto nchamah Miller Y Robinson Salazar (coords.) Utopía Y praxis latinoamericana, enero-marzo, año/vol. 12, número 036 universidad Del zulia. [REVIEW] Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana 12 (36):125-131.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Matthew C. Keller & Geoffrey Miller (2006). Resolving the Paradox of Common, Harmful, Heritable Mental Disorders: Which Evolutionary Genetic Models Work Best? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (4):385-404.score: 100.0
    Given that natural selection is so powerful at optimizing complex adaptations, why does it seem unable to eliminate genes (susceptibility alleles) that predispose to common, harmful, heritable mental disorders, such as schizophrenia or bipolar disorder? We assess three leading explanations for this apparent paradox from evolutionary genetic theory: (1) ancestral neutrality (susceptibility alleles were not harmful among ancestors), (2) balancing selection (susceptibility alleles sometimes increased fitness), and (3) polygenic mutation-selection balance (mental disorders reflect the inevitable mutational load on the thousands (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Bradley W. Miller (2007). Review Essay: A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review by WJ Waluchow. American Journal of Jurisprudence 52.score: 80.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Harold L. Miller & Steven Faux (1979). On the Commonalities Among Religious and Moral Codes: Proximate Analysis From a Sociobiological-Behavioristic Integration. Zygon 14 (1):83-93.score: 80.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. B. W. Miller (2007). A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review, W.J. Waluchow. Cambridge University Press (2007). American Journal of Jurisprudence 52 (1):297-312.score: 80.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Steven A. Miller (2011). Review of An Ethics for Today: Finding Common Ground Between Philosophy and Religion. [REVIEW] Contemporary Pragmatism 8 (1):222-225.score: 80.0
  35. Matt Keller & Geoffrey F. Miller (2006). Which Evolutionary Genetic Models Best Explain the Persistence of Common, Harmful, Heritable Mental Disorders. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (4).score: 80.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Russell Hardin (1984). Book Review:Philosophy and Ideology in Hume's Political Thought. David Miller; David Hume: Common-Sense Moralist, Sceptical Metaphysician. David Hume, David Fate Norton. [REVIEW] Ethics 94 (3):534-.score: 30.0
  37. B. Waters (2000). Book Reviews : From Culture Wars to Common Ground: Religion and the American Family Debate, by Don S. Browning, Bonnie J. Miller-McLemore, Pamela D. Couture, F. Brynolf Lyon and Robert M. Franklin. Louisville, Kentucky: Westminster/John Knox Press, 1997. 399 Pp. Pb. No Price. ISBN 0-664-25651-. [REVIEW] Studies in Christian Ethics 13 (1):128-132.score: 30.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. J. W. Bailey (2007). Miller and McCann (Eds.), In Search of the Common Good. Studies in Christian Ethics 20 (1):137.score: 30.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. J. Dougherty (1995). Defining the Common Good: Empire, Religion and Philosophy in Eighteenth Century Britain. By Peter N. Miller (Cambridge University Press, 1994). Pp. Xii + 472. [REVIEW] American Journal of Jurisprudence 40 (1):421-425.score: 30.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Robert G. Cook, Muhammad Aj Qadri, Art Kieres & Nicholas Commons-Miller (2012). Shape From Shading in Pigeons. Cognition 124 (3):284-303.score: 27.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Eileen A. Joy (2013). Disturbing the Wednesday-Ish Business-as-Usual of the University Studium: A Wayzgoose Manifest. Continent 2 (4):260-268.score: 24.0
    In this issue we include contributions from the individuals presiding at the panel All in a Jurnal's Work: A BABEL Wayzgoose, convened at the second Biennial Meeting of the BABEL Working Group. Sadly, the contributions of Daniel Remein, chief rogue at the Organism for Poetic Research as well as editor at Whiskey & Fox , were not able to appear in this version of the proceedings. From the program : 2ND BIENNUAL MEETING OF THE BABEL WORKING GROUP CONFERENCE “CRUISING IN (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Lucas Kaelin (2007). Around Manila on Foot: Hardt and Negri on the Commons. Budhi: A Journal of Ideas and Culture 11 (1):215-226.score: 24.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Paul B. de Laat (2006). Internet-Based Commons of Intellectual Resources: An Exploration of Their Variety. In Jacques Berleur, Markku I. Nurminen & John Impagliazzo (eds.), IFIP; Social Informatics: An Information Society for All? In Remembrance of Rob Kling Vol 223. Springer.score: 18.0
    During the two last decades, speeded up by the development of the Internet, several types of commons have been opened up for intellectual resources. In this article their variety is being explored as to the kind of resources and the type of regulation involved. The open source software movement initiated the phenomenon, by creating a copyright-based commons of source code that can be labelled `dynamic': allowing both use and modification of resources. Additionally, such a commons may be either protected from (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Herman T. Tavani (2005). Locke, Intellectual Property Rights, and the Information Commons. Ethics and Information Technology 7 (2):87-97.score: 18.0
    This paper examines the question whether, and to what extent, John Locke’s classic theory of property can be applied to the current debate involving intellectual property rights (IPRs) and the information commons. Organized into four main sections, Section 1 includes a brief exposition of Locke’s arguments for the just appropriation of physical objects and tangible property. In Section 2, I consider some challenges involved in extending Locke’s labor theory of property to the debate about IPRs and digital information. In Section (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen (2009). Responsible Nations: Miller on National Responsibility. Ethics and Global Politics 2 (2).score: 18.0
    In National Responsibility and Global Justice, David Miller defends the view that a member of a nation can be collectively responsible for an outcome despite the fact that: (i) she did not control it; (ii) she actively opposed those of her nation’s policies that produced the outcome; and (iii) actively opposing the relevant policy was costly for her. I argue that Miller’s arguments in favor of this strong externalist view about responsibility and control are insufficient. Specifically, I show that Miller’s (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Nils Holtug (2011). The Cosmopolitan Strikes Back: A Critical Discussion of Miller on Nationality and Global Equality. Ethics and Global Politics 4 (3).score: 18.0
    According to David Miller, we have stronger obligations towards our co-nationals than we have towards non-nationals. While a principle of equality governs our obligations of justice within the nation-state, our obligations towards non-nationals are governed by a weaker principle of sufficiency. In this paper, I critically assess Miller’s objection to a traditional argument for global egalitarianism, according to which nationalist and other deviations from equality rely on factors that are arbitrary from a moral point of view. Then I critically discuss (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Rowan Cruft (2010). Kamm and Miller on Rights' Compatibility. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (4):393 - 401.score: 18.0
    In their recent books, National Responsibility and Global Justice (2007) and Intricate Ethics (2007), David Miller and Frances Kamm give two similar arguments aimed at preventing their favoured accounts of the moral justification of rights from justifying an excess of demanding assistance rights. Both arguments appeal to the fact that a proliferation of assistance rights would conflict with other rights. In this paper, I show that these arguments fail. As Miller recognises in a footnote, the failure of such arguments appears (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Gian Maria Greco & Luciano Floridi (2004). The Tragedy of the Digital Commons. Ethics and Information Technology 6 (2):73-81.score: 18.0
    In the paper it is argued that bridging the digital divide may cause a new ethical and social dilemma. Using Hardin's Tragedy of the Commons, we show that an improper opening and enlargement of the digital environment (Infosphere) is likely to produce a Tragedy of the Digital Commons (TDC). In the course of the analysis, we explain why Adar and Huberman's previous use of Hardin's Tragedy to interpret certain recent phenomena in the Infosphere (especially peer-to-peer communication) may not be entirely (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Andreas Føllesdal (2009). Universal Human Rights as a Shared Political Identity Impossible? Necessary? Sufficient? Metaphilosophy 40 (1):77-91.score: 18.0
    Abstract: Would a global commitment to international human rights norms provide enough of a sense of community to sustain a legitimate and sufficiently democratic global order? Sceptics worry that human rights cannot help maintain the mutual trust among citizens required for a legitimate political order, since such rights are now too broadly shared. Thus prominent contributors to democratic theory insist that the members of the citizenry must share some features unique to them, to the exclusion of others—be it a European (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Kim Angell (2013). Do Insecure Property Rights Ground Rights of Jurisdiction? Miller on Territorial Justice. Res Publica 19 (2):183-192.score: 18.0
    A prominent approach in the debate on territorial rights claims that a group may have jurisdictional rights over a particular land if that land has become a repository of value for the group. This justification relies on a premise which has remained largely unsubstantiated, namely that having jurisdictional rights should be our preferred means for ensuring the group’s retaining of the land’s embedded value. This article discusses a recent attempt to fill this gap. David Miller acknowledges that the value could (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000