Search results for 'Luke Taylor' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Wilson Carey McWilliams, Bob Pepperman Taylor, Bryan G. Norton, Robyn Eckersley, Joe Bowersox, J. Baird Callicott, Catriona Sandilands, John Barry, Andrew Light, Peter S. Wenz, Luis A. Vivanco, Tim Hayward, John O'Neill, Robert Paehlke, Timothy W. Luke, Robert Gottlieb & Charles T. Rubin (2002). Democracy and the Claims of Nature: Critical Perspectives for a New Century. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.score: 2400.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Justine Nolan & Luke Taylor (2009). Corporate Responsibility for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Rights in Search of a Remedy? Journal of Business Ethics 87 (2):433 - 451.score: 240.0
    It is no longer a revelation that companies have some responsibility to uphold human rights. However, delineating the boundaries of the relationship between business and human rights is more vexed. What is it that we are asking corporations to assume responsibility for and how far does that responsibility extend? This article focuses on the extent to which economic, social and cultural rights fall within a corporation's sphere of responsibility. It then analyses how corporations may be held accountable for violations of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. David McPherson & Charles Taylor (2012). Re-Enchanting the World: An Interview with Charles Taylor. Philosophy and Theology 24 (2):275-294.score: 210.0
    This interview with Charles Taylor explores a central concern throughout his work, viz., his concern to confront the challenges presented by the process of ‘disenchantment’ in the modern world. It focuses especially on what is involved in seeking a kind of ‘re-enchantment.' A key issue that is discussed is the relationship of Taylor’s theism to his effort of seeking re-enchantment. Some other related issues that are explored pertain to questions surrounding Taylor’s argument against the standard secularization thesis (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Charles Taylor (2004). Charles Taylor. Ethics 112 (1).score: 210.0
    Charles Taylor is one of the most distinctive figures in the landscape of contemporary philosophy. His ability to contribute to philosophical conversations across a wide spectrum of ideas is especially impressive in a time of increasing specialization. These areas include moral theory, theories of subjectivity, political theory, epistemology, hermeneutics, philosophy of mind, philosophy of language and aesthetics. Most recently, Taylor has branched into the study of religion. Written by a team of international authorities, this collection will be read (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Charles Taylor, James Tully & Daniel M. Weinstock (eds.) (1994). Philosophy in an Age of Pluralism: The Philosophy of Charles Taylor in Question. Cambridge University Press.score: 210.0
    This is the first comprehensive evaluation of Charles Taylor's work and a major contribution to leading questions in philosophy and the human sciences as they face an increasingly pluralistic age. Charles Taylor is one of the most influential contemporary moral and political philosophers: in an era of specialisation he is one of the few thinkers who has developed a comprehensive philosophy which speaks to the conditions of the modern world in a way that is compelling to specialists in (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Thomas Taylor (1969). Thomas Taylor the Platonist: Selected Writings. London, Routledge & K. Paul.score: 210.0
    Thomas Taylor in England, by K. Raine.--Thomas Taylor in America, by G. M. Harper.--Biographical accounts of Thomas Taylor.--Concerning the beautiful.--The hymns of Orpheus.--Concerning the cave of the nymphs.--A dissertation on the Eleusinian and Bacchic mysteries.--Introduction to The fable of Cupid and Psyche.--The Platonic philosopher's creed.--An apology for the fables of Homer.--Bibliography (p. [521]-538).
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Alex Klaushofer & Charles Taylor (2000). Taylor-Made Selves. The Philosophers' Magazine 12 (12):37-40.score: 180.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. C. Taylor, F. A. Carnevale & D. M. Weinstock (2011). Toward a Hermeneutical Conception of Medicine: A Conversation with Charles Taylor. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (4):436-445.score: 180.0
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. A. E. Taylor (1929). Professor Taylor's Reply. Philosophy 4 (15):433-.score: 180.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. C. S. Taylor (1980). Reviews : Charles S. Taylor -- Paulo Freire's Pedagogu in Guinea-Bissau. Philosophy and Social Criticism 7 (2):216-225.score: 180.0
  11. L. J. Taylor & S. Lev Ari (2009). Action in Cognition: The Case of Language. Language and Cognition, 1, 45-58. Taylor, LJ & Zwaan, RA (2008). Motor Resonance and Linguistic. [REVIEW] Cognition 115:39-45.score: 180.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Gwen Taylor, Ismay Barwell & R. G. Durrant (eds.) (1982). Essays in Honour of Gwen Taylor ; [Contributors, Ismay Barwell ... Et Al.]. Philosophy Dept., University of Otago.score: 180.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Richard Taylor (1989). Reflective Wisdom: Richard Taylor on Issues That Matter. Prometheus Books.score: 180.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Charles Taylor (1985). Self-Interpreting Animals. 45-76 In: TAYLOR, Charles: Human Agency and Language. Philosophical Papers 1.score: 180.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Charles Taylor (1980). Taylor's Comments. Rorty, Taylor, and Dreyfus: A Discussion. Review of Metaphysics 34 (1):47-55.score: 180.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. L. R. Taylor (1971). The Doomsday Book. By Gordon Rattray Taylor. Pp. 335. (Thames & Hudson, 1970.) Price £2·10. [REVIEW] Journal of Biosocial Science 3 (2):239-241.score: 180.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Matthew Walhout (2010). Looking to Charles Taylor and Joseph Rouse for Best Practices in Science and Religion. Zygon 45 (3):558-574.score: 24.0
    People discussing science and religion usually frame their conversations in terms of essentialist assumptions about science, assumptions requiring the existence (but not the specification) of criteria according to which science can be distinguished from other forms of inquiry. However, criteria functioning at a level of generality appropriate to such discussions may not exist at all. Essentialist assumptions may be avoided if science is understood within a broader context of human practices. In a philosophy of practices, to label a practice as (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Ruth Abbey (2002). Pluralism in Practice: The Political Thought of Charles Taylor. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 5 (3):98-123.score: 24.0
    This review article outlines some of the major contributions made to political theory by Charles Taylor. It focuses on his relationship to liberalism, his contribution to the understanding of democracy and his analysis of the politics of recognition. Several lines of critique of Taylor's thought on these issues are also explored. Some reflections on Taylor's style of theorising about politics are offered, and the question of whether he is a conservative or critical theorist is examined.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Jukka Varelius (2010). On Taylor's Justification of Medical Informed Consent. Bioethics 26 (4):207-214.score: 24.0
    In contemporary Western biomedical ethics, informed consent practices are commonly justified in terms of the intrinsic value of patient autonomy. James Stacey Taylor maintains that this conception of the moral grounding of medical informed consent is mistaken. On the basis of his reasoning to that effect, Taylor argues that medical informed consent is justified by the instrumental value of personal autonomy. In this article, I examine whether Taylor's justification of medical informed consent is plausible.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Peter Woodford (2012). Specters of the Nineteenth Century: Charles Taylor and the Problem of Historicism. [REVIEW] Journal of Religious Ethics 40 (1):171-192.score: 24.0
    This paper identifies and analyzes the problem of historicism in Charles Taylor's work overall, but with particular emphasis on his most recent publication, A Secular Age. I circumscribe the problem of historicism through reference to the nineteenth-century German philosophical tradition in which it developed, in particular in the thought of Wilhelm Dilthey. I then trace the structural similarities between the notions of history to be found in the thought of Taylor and Dilthey and how these structural similarities raise (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Alexander C. Karolis (2013). Sense in Competing Narratives of Secularization: Charles Taylor and Jean-Luc Nancy. Sophia 52 (4):673-694.score: 24.0
    In this article, using the recent work by Charles Taylor in A Secular Age as my point of departure, I will argue that Jean-Luc Nancy enables us to think past the competing binary of atheistic and religious experience and allows us to surpass the present narratives of secularism. In A Secular Age, Taylor himself seeks a middle ground between atheism and religion, arguing that it is possible to open ourselves to the cross-pressures of modern existence that find us (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Lucie White (2013). Understanding the Relationship Between Autonomy and Informed Consent: A Response to Taylor. Journal of Value Inquiry 47 (4):483-491.score: 24.0
    Medical ethicists conventionally assume that the requirement to employ informed consent procedures is grounded in autonomy. It seems intuitively plausible that providing information to an agent promotes his autonomy by better allowing him to steer his life. However, James Taylor questions this view, arguing that any notion of autonomy that grounds a requirement to inform agents turns out to be unrealistic and self-defeating. Taylor thus contends that we are mistaken about the real theoretical grounds for informed consent procedures. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Charles Blattberg (2006). Modern Social Imaginaries Charles Taylor Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2004, 215 Pp., $18.95 Paper. [REVIEW] Dialogue 45 (01):183-.score: 24.0
    Review of Charles Taylor's book, Modern Social Imaginaries.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Richard Double (1979). Taylor's Refutation of Epiphenomenalism. Journal of Critical Analysis 8 (1):23-28.score: 24.0
    In "metaphysics" richard taylor argues that epiphenomenalism is implausible because it leaves open the possibility that human behavior occurs without the presence of mental events. in my paper i examine the sort of possibility involved and conclude that the logical possibility of "mind-less behavior" which epiphenomenalism must allow is an equal possibility for all competing theories of mind. thus, epiphenomenalism is seen to be no worse off in this respect than other theories and taylor's objection fails.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Y. Michael Barilan (2007). The Doctor by Luke Fildes: An Icon in Context. [REVIEW] Journal of Medical Humanities 28 (2):59-80.score: 24.0
    This paper discusses one of the most famous paintings on medical themes: The Doctor by Sir Luke Fildes (Fig. 1), which exemplifies how an ideal type of doctoring is construed from reality and from the views and expectations of both the public and doctors themselves. A close reading of The Doctor elucidates three fundamental conflicts in medicine: the first is between statistical efficiency in accordance with scales of morbidity and mortality and the personal devotion that every sick child or (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Heike Mildenberger (2010). On Milliken-Taylor Ultrafilters. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 52 (4):381-394.score: 24.0
    We show that there may be a Milliken-Taylor ultrafilter with infinitely many near coherence classes of ultrafilters in its projection to ω, answering a question by López-Abad. We show that k -colored Milliken-Taylor ultrafilters have at least k +1 near coherence classes of ultrafilters in its projection to ω. We show that the Mathias forcing with a Milliken-Taylor ultrafilter destroys all Milliken-Taylor ultrafilters from the ground model.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Anna Wojciechowska (2005). Współpracownicy, współautorzy czy niezależni myśliciele? John Stuart Mill i Harriet Taylor Mill. Filo-Sofija 5 (1(5)):139-158.score: 24.0
    Author: Wojciechowska Anna Title: COLLABORATORS, CO-AUTHORS OR INDEPENDENT THINKERS? JOHN STUART MILL AND HARRIET TAYLOR MILL (Współpracownicy, współmyśliciele czy niezależni myśliciele? John Stuart Mill i Harriet Taylor Mill) Source: Filo-Sofija year: 2005, vol:.5, number: 2005/1, pages: 139-158 Keywords: J.S. MILL, HARRIET TAYLOR (MILL), SOCRATIC DIALOG, COLLABORATORS Discipline: PHILOSOPHY Language: POLISH Document type: ARTICLE Publication order reference (Primary author’s office address): E-mail: www:This article raise almost unnoticed in the literature problem of a creative relation between J.S. Mill and (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Ruth Abbey (2011). Another Philosopher-Citizen : The Political Philosophy of Charles Taylor. In Catherine H. Zuckert (ed.), Political Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: Authors and Arguments. Cambridge University Press.score: 24.0
    This chapter briefly reviews the link between Charles Taylor's life and work. It then discusses his position on the role of science in understanding human behavior. It concludes by considering the relationship between theory and practice in Taylor's thought.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Javier Gracia Calandin (2009). Legado filosófico en Charles Taylor: ¿Aristóteles, Hegel o Nietzsche? Daimon 46:171-187.score: 24.0
    En este ensayo voy a explorar el legado de Aristóteles, Hegel y Nietzsche en Taylor en relación con su enfoque moderno. Creo que rastrear las huellas de los planteamientos de aquellos filósofos ayuda a entender mejor el enfoque de Taylor y la apropiación moderna que hace de ellos. Una pregunta surge de la búsqueda tras las fuentes filosóficas del enfoque de Taylor: ¿Aristóteles, Hegel o Nietzsche? ¿O quizá ninguno? ¿O tal vez todos un poco? Vamos a ver (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Ildo Perondi, Fabrizio Zandonadi Catenassi & Gisele Soares Silva (2013). A centralidade da Palavra de Deus em Lucas 5,1-11 (The centrality of the Word od God in Luke 5,1-11) - DOI: 10.5752/P.2175-5841.2013v11n30p682. [REVIEW] Horizonte 11 (30):682-708.score: 24.0
    Pouca atenção foi dada pelos estudiosos para a função da Palavra de Deus no relato da pesca milagrosa em Lucas, tanto em nível literário, quanto teológico. Diante disso, o objetivo deste trabalho foi analisar a perícope de Lc 5,1-11, com enfoque na Palavra de Deus, proclamada em Jesus e por ele. A metodologia utilizada foi a análise e interpretação de textos, privilegiando o método histórico-crítico e os seus elementos essenciais, além do uso de outros métodos, baseados na ciência da linguagem. (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. L. C. Holborow (1966). Taylor on Pain Location. Philosophical Quarterly 16 (April):151-158.score: 21.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Bernard Yack (2005). Charles Taylor, Modern Social Imaginaries:Modern Social Imaginaries. Ethics 115 (3):629-633.score: 21.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Jason Blakely (2013). How Charles Taylor Philosophizes with History: A Review of Dilemmas and Connections. [REVIEW] Journal of the Philosophy of History 7 (2):231-243.score: 21.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Annabelle Lever (2004). Jo Ellen Jacobs, The Voice of Harriet Taylor Mill Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 24 (2):118-119.score: 21.0
  35. Franco A. Carnevale (2013). Charles Taylor, Hermeneutics and Social Imaginaries: A Framework for Ethics Research. Nursing Philosophy 14 (2):86-95.score: 21.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Leo Catana (2013). Thomas Taylor's Dissent From Some 18th-Century Views on Platonic Philosophy: The Ethical and Theological Context. International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 7 (2):180-220.score: 21.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Arto Laitinen, Charles Taylor and Paul Ricoeur on Self-Interpretations and Narrative Identity.score: 18.0
    In this chapter I discuss Charles Taylor's and Paul Ricoeur's theories of narrative identity and narratives as a central form of self-interpretation.1 Both Taylor and Ricoeur think that self-identity is a matter of culturally and socially mediated self-definitions, which are practically relevant for one's orientation in life.2 First, I will go through various characterisations that Ricoeur gives of his theory, and try to show to what extent they also apply to Taylor's theory. Then, I will analyse more (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Allison Weir (2009). Who Are We?: Modern Identities Between Taylor and Foucault. Philosophy and Social Criticism 35 (5):533-553.score: 18.0
    Charles Taylor and Michel Foucault offer two very different descriptions and analyses of modern identities. While it can be argued that Taylor and Foucault are thematizing two very different aspects of identity — Taylor is focusing on first-person, subjective, affirmed identity, and Foucault is focusing on third-person, or ascribed, category identity — in practice, these two are very much intertwined. I argue that attention to identities of race, gender, class and sexual orientation demands that we combine a (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Yong Huang (1998). Charles Taylor's Transcendental Arguments for Liberal Communitarianism. Philosophy and Social Criticism 24 (4):79-106.score: 18.0
    This paper sees Charles Taylor's moral discourse as a version of liberal communitarianism, an attempt to reconcile liberalism and communitarianism, by examining his three transcendental arguments: the liberal transcendence from the parochial to the universal; the communi tarian transcendence from the instinctual to the ontological; and the theistic transcendence from the good to God. While this liberal communi tarianism absorbs some great insights from both liberalism and communi tarianism and overcomes some of their respective weaknesses, it fails to avoid (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. John Rundell (2010). Charles Taylor and the Secularization Thesis. Critical Horizons 11 (1):119-132.score: 18.0
    Charles Taylor, A Secular Age (Cambridge, MA, and London, UK: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2007), ISBN-13:978-0674- 02676-6; 874pp. This review essay concentrates on Charles Taylor's image of modernity.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Arto Laitinen, A Critique of Charles Taylor's Notions of “Moral Sources” and “Constitutive Goods”.score: 18.0
    In this paper I argue that moral realism does not, pace Charles Taylor, need “moral sources” or “constitutive goods”, and adding these concepts distorts the basic insights of what can be called “cultural” moral realism.1 Yet the ideas of “moral topography” or “moral space” as well as the idea of “ontological background pictures” are valid, if separated from those notions. What does Taylor mean by these notions?
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Louise Racine (2009). Examining the Conflation of Multiculturalism, Sexism, and Religious Fundamentalism Through Taylor and Bakhtin: Expanding Post-Colonial Feminist Epistemology. Nursing Philosophy 10 (1):14-25.score: 18.0
    In this post-9/11 era marked by religious and ethnic conflicts and the rise of cultural intolerance, ambiguities arising from the conflation of multiculturalism, sexism, and religious fundamentalism jeopardize the delivery of culturally safe nursing care to non-Western populations. This new social reality requires nurses to develop a heightened awareness of health issues pertaining to racism and ethnocentrism to provide culturally safe care to non-Western immigrants or refugees. Through the lens of post-colonial feminism, this paper explores the challenge of providing culturally (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Adam Kovach (2009). The Return of Taylor's Putnam. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (1):119 – 125.score: 18.0
    It is argued that the version of Hilary Putnam's model-theoretic argument developed by Barry Taylor in Models, Truth and Realism poses no threat to the realist claim that an ideal theory may be false.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. J. R. Kuntz (2009). A Litmus Test for Exploitation: James Stacey Taylor's Stakes and Kidneys. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (6):552-572.score: 18.0
    James Stacy Taylor advances a thorough argument for the legalization of markets in current (live) human kidneys. The market is seemly the most abhorrent type of market, a market where the least well-off sell part of their body to the most well off. Though rigorously defended overall, his arguments concerning exploitation are thin. I examine a number of prominent bioethicists’ account of exploitation: most importantly, Ruth Sample’s exploitation as degradation. I do so in the context of Taylor’s argument, (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Paul James Crittenden (2009). A Secular Age: Reflections on Charles Taylor′s Recent Book. Sophia 48 (4):469-478.score: 18.0
    Charles Taylor in A Secular Age describes the modern secular age as one in which ‘the eclipse of all goals beyond human flourishing … falls within the range of an imaginable life for masses of people’. This article reflects on his historico-analytic investigation of the emergence of modern secularity and his account of how it shapes the current conditions of belief. Taylor challenges the widespread presumption against belief mainly on ethical considerations, especially what counts as human fulfilment. The (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Neil Levy (2000). Charles Taylor on Overcoming Incommensurability. Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (5):47-61.score: 18.0
    As he recognizes, Taylor's view of practical reasoning commits him to the existence of incommensurable world-views. However, he holds that it is in principle possible to overcome these incommensurabilities. He has two major arguments for this conclusion, which I label the argument from the human condition, and the transition argument. I show that the first argument, though perhaps successful in the case Taylor takes as an example, cannot be generalized. The second argument is even less successful, since all (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Michael Brownstein (2010). Conceptuality and Practical Action: A Critique of Charles Taylor's Verstehen Social Theory. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (1):59-83.score: 18.0
    In their recent debate, Hubert Dreyfus rejects John McDowell’s claim that perception is permeated with "mindedness" and argues instead that ordinary embodied coping is largely "nonconceptual." This argument has important, yet largely unacknowledged consequences for normative social theory, which this article demonstrates through a critique of Charles Taylor’s Verstehen thesis. If Dreyfus is right that "the enemy of expertise is thought," then Taylor is denied his defense against charges of relativism, which is that maximizing the interpretive clarity of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Sebastian Gurciullo (2001). Making Modern Identity: Charles Taylor's Retrieval of Moral Sources. Critical Horizons 2 (1):93-125.score: 18.0
    Charles Taylor's attempt to map the complexity and fullness of the modern identity has led him to recuperate its moral sources. This paper explores the zone of ontological contestation Taylor has engaged by defending a notion of the self that does not succumb to a narrowing or partiality of vision. Taylor's criticisms of Michel Foucault and Jürgen Habermas are examined to draw out the features of his project and its own limitations.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Iain Thomson (2011). Transcendence and the Problem of Otherworldly Nihilism: Taylor, Heidegger, Nietzsche. Inquiry 54 (2):140-159.score: 18.0
    This paper examines Charles Taylor's case against complete secularization in A Secular Age in the light of Nietzsche's and Heidegger's critiques of the potential for nihilism inherent in different kinds of philosophical appeals to ?transcendence?. The Heideggerian critique of metaphysics as ontotheology suggests that the theoretical pluralism Taylor rightly embraces is more consistently thought of as following from a robust ontological pluralism, and that Taylor's own commitment to ontological monism seems to follow from his own desire to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Penelope Deutscher (2006). When Feminism is "High" and Ignorance is "Low": Harriet Taylor Mill on the Progress of the Species. Hypatia 21 (3):136-150.score: 18.0
    : This essay considers the important role attributed to education in the writings of nineteenth-century feminist Harriet Taylor Mill. Taylor Mill connected ignorance to inequality between the sexes. She called up the specter of regression into lowness and ignorance when she associated feminism with progress. As she stressed the importance of education, she constructed an 'other' to feminism, variously associated with lowness, poverty, and the primitive. She made a case for the advantages of civilization (education, enfranchisement, equality) to (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000